Transportation and Physical Distribution OperationsIntroduction and contextTransportation is the physical movement of goods between points in a supply network. Physical distribution is broader: it coordinates transportation, order processing, inventory positioning, warehousing, packaging, documentation, delivery and customer service from the point of dispatch to the consignee. Transportation is therefore not merely a cost centre. It determines market reach, delivery reliability, inventory exposure, product condition and the customer’s experience of the supply chain. A distribution manager must balance three frequently competing outcomes: - Cost: freight, handling, fuel, accessorial charges, inventory-in-transit and administration.
- Speed: transit time, order-to-delivery time and responsiveness to demand.
- Reliability: consistency of promised delivery, shipment visibility, damage prevention and recovery from disruption.
The lowest freight rate is not necessarily the lowest logistics cost. A slower service may require more safety stock, while an unreliable service may create stockouts, emergency shipments and lost sales. Effective distribution operations therefore use total-cost and service analysis rather than isolated rate comparison. Learning objectivesAfter studying this chapter, the learner should be able to: - Compare transportation modes and select an appropriate mode or multimodal combination.
- Evaluate carriers using cost, service, capability, compliance and risk criteria.
- Explain freight consolidation, vehicle loading and load planning.
- Design practical routing and scheduling decisions.
- Identify essential transport documents and control points.
- Measure delivery performance using operational and customer-focused indicators.
- Apply total-cost reasoning to distribution decisions.
- Recognise ethical, regulatory, technological and resilience issues in physical distribution.
1. The architecture of physical distributionA typical outbound process is: Customer order → allocation and picking → packing and labelling → staging → carrier handover → line-haul movement → local delivery → proof of delivery → settlement and performance review. Each interface can create delay or loss. For example, a correctly picked order can still fail if it is staged in the wrong lane, loaded without regard to delivery sequence, accompanied by inaccurate documentation, or delivered without usable proof of delivery. Distribution design operates at three levels: | Level | Main decisions | Typical horizon |
|---|
| Strategic | Network locations, modal mix, fleet ownership, contracts | Years | | Tactical | Carrier portfolio, lane allocation, consolidation rules, delivery calendars | Months to a year | | Operational | Daily routing, loading, dispatch, tracking and exception handling | Hours to weeks |
A useful principle is postponement of transport commitment: retain flexibility until demand, destination and service requirements are sufficiently known. Conversely, where demand is stable and volumes are high, planned line-haul movements may be consolidated in advance. 2. Transportation modes and service designRoadRoad transport offers high geographic coverage, frequent departures, door-to-door service and relatively flexible shipment sizes. It is particularly valuable for regional distribution and final-mile delivery. Its disadvantages include congestion, driver availability, accident exposure, fuel-price volatility, emissions and limited payload or dimensional capacity on particular vehicles. RailRail is suitable for heavy, bulky or containerised freight over longer distances, especially where terminals and sidings are available. It generally offers lower energy use per tonne-kilometre than road, but requires terminal handling and is less flexible for door-to-door movements. Reliability depends on network capacity, timetables and interchange arrangements. WaterOcean and inland water transport provide very low unit cost for large, heavy or non-urgent consignments. Transit time is longer and exposed to port congestion, weather, vessel schedules and additional inland legs. Containerisation has improved standardisation, security and intermodal transfer. AirAir provides the shortest transit time and high geographic reach. It is appropriate for high-value, time-critical, perishable or production-disrupting items. Freight rates, airport handling, security requirements and emissions are significant disadvantages. PipelinePipelines are specialised fixed infrastructure for liquids, gases and some slurries. They provide continuous flow and low variable operating cost after construction, but have high fixed investment and limited product flexibility. Intermodal and multimodal transportIntermodal transport uses two or more modes, commonly a container moving by ship, rail and truck without unloading the cargo itself. It can combine the efficiency of rail or water with road flexibility. The design challenge is managing handoffs, schedules, documentation, liability and end-to-end visibility. Mode selection frameworkMode selection should begin with shipment requirements rather than carrier preference. Relevant variables include: - product value, density, fragility, perishability and hazard classification;
- shipment size, frequency, origin and destination;
- required delivery window and tolerance for delay;
- infrastructure, border and terminal constraints;
- security, temperature and regulatory requirements;
- carbon, noise and social-impact objectives; and
- total logistics cost and disruption exposure.
The speed–cost–reliability triangle is a useful managerial model, but it is not a universal law: premium air service may be both costly and reliable, whereas a low-cost service may be unreliable. The appropriate choice depends on the value of service to the customer and the consequences of failure. Total landed or delivered costA general decision expression is: Ctotal = Cfreight + Chandling + Cinventory + Cdamage + Cadmin + Crisk + Cexternality Here, Ctotal is total distribution cost for the decision period; Cfreight is the carrier charge; Chandling includes terminal, loading and unloading costs; Cinventory is the cost of inventory tied up during transit; Cdamage covers expected loss and claims; Cadmin includes planning and documentation; Crisk represents expected disruption or failure cost; and Cexternality represents monetised environmental or social impacts when the organisation includes them. All terms must use the same currency and time basis. The expression is a decision framework, not a claim that every term can be estimated precisely. For goods with value V, annual carrying-rate i, and transit time t days, a simple in-transit inventory estimate is: Cinventory = V × i × t ÷ 365 This assumes a simple annual carrying rate, a 365-day year and constant value during transit. It excludes pipeline stock needed for order-cycle variability unless that stock is separately modelled. Worked example. A shipment has product value $80,000, a carrying rate of 18% per year and transit time of 6 days. The estimated in-transit inventory cost is: 80,000 × 0.18 × 6 ÷ 365 = $236.71 approximately. If a faster mode costs $1,000 more in freight but saves 4 days, its inventory saving is only about $157.81. On these assumptions, the faster mode is not justified by inventory cost alone; its value may instead arise from avoiding a stockout or meeting a customer service commitment. 3. Carrier selection and procurementA carrier is selected for a lane or service requirement, not simply for its published rate. A professional carrier evaluation normally includes the following stages: - Define the lane, shipment profile, service promise and compliance requirements.
- Prequalify carriers for authority, insurance, financial stability, equipment, safety and relevant licences.
- Request comparable quotations using standard shipment data and accessorial assumptions.
- Evaluate cost and non-price performance using a documented scorecard.
- Conduct due diligence, negotiate terms and establish operating procedures.
- Pilot the award, review performance and retain contingency capacity.
A weighted score can support, but should not replace, managerial judgement: S = ∑(wj × rj), where ∑wj = 1 S is the total carrier score; wj is the weight assigned to criterion j; and rj is the normalised rating for that criterion, commonly on a 0–100 scale. Weights should reflect business priorities. A carrier failing a mandatory safety or legal requirement should be excluded regardless of its score; mandatory gates precede weighted scoring. Illustrative criteria include freight cost, on-time performance, claims ratio, tender acceptance, capacity, tracking quality, sustainability, financial resilience and responsiveness. The organisation should define measurement rules in advance. “On time,” for example, may mean arrival within a promised window, not merely arrival on the scheduled date. Contracts should clarify rates, fuel mechanisms, accessorial charges, detention, demurrage, claims, liability, service levels, data exchange, audit rights, subcontracting, confidentiality, termination and business-continuity obligations. Procurement should avoid unrealistic rates that encourage unsafe practices, hidden surcharges or service deterioration. 4. Freight consolidation and shipment planningConsolidation combines shipments to improve vehicle utilisation or obtain a more economical service. Common forms are: - Origin consolidation: shipments from several suppliers are combined before dispatch.
- Destination consolidation: orders for nearby customers are grouped into a delivery route.
- Temporal consolidation: orders are held briefly to meet a planned dispatch frequency.
- Cross-docking: inbound goods are sorted and transferred to outbound vehicles with little or no storage.
- Pool distribution: freight moves to a regional break-bulk point and is divided for local delivery.
Consolidation reduces cost per unit and handling frequency, but may increase order waiting time, handling risk and planning complexity. The decision should compare the cost of waiting and additional handling with the transport saving. A simple consolidation rule is to consolidate only when: Transport saving − extra handling cost − waiting cost − risk cost > 0. The rule is conceptual; each term should be estimated for the relevant shipment and time horizon. Consolidation is inappropriate for urgent, highly fragile, temperature-sensitive or incompatible goods unless controls are strong. Vehicle loading and load planningLoad planning must respect weight, cube, axle limits, centre of gravity, product compatibility, delivery sequence, accessibility and restraint requirements. A truck that is full by volume may be underweight, while a truck that reaches its legal weight may have unused cubic capacity. For shipment items i = 1, 2, …, n, a basic utilisation indicator is: Uvolume = (∑vi ÷ Vvehicle) × 100% where vi is the volume of item i and Vvehicle is usable vehicle volume. A weight utilisation measure is: Uweight = (∑mi ÷ Mvehicle) × 100% where mi is item mass and Mvehicle is the legally permitted or operational payload. These measures are valid only when all volumes and masses use consistent units and the items are physically compatible. High utilisation does not prove that the load is safe or efficient. A practical loading sequence is: - verify vehicle type, payload, internal dimensions and equipment;
- inspect the vehicle and confirm cleanliness and temperature condition;
- place dense and heavy freight low and within permitted axle limits;
- distribute mass laterally and longitudinally;
- load delivery stops in reverse sequence where safe and appropriate;
- protect fragile goods and separate incompatible materials;
- apply approved blocking, bracing and restraint;
- check seals, labels, counts, temperature and documents; and
- record exceptions before departure.
The familiar “last in, first out” loading logic is not absolute. Safe load distribution and restraint take priority over unloading convenience. 5. Routing and schedulingRouting assigns stops and paths; scheduling assigns times, resources and sequence. They are related but distinct. A route can be geographically efficient yet operationally infeasible if it violates delivery windows, driver hours, vehicle capacity or loading constraints. Route planning principlesEffective routing considers: - customer locations and time windows;
- vehicle capacity and product compatibility;
- service priorities and stop duration;
- road restrictions, tolls, congestion and seasonal conditions;
- driver work and rest rules;
- depot cut-off and return times;
- collection as well as delivery demand; and
- contingency routes and escalation rules.
A route may be evaluated using distance, duration, cost, emissions, number of vehicles, missed-window risk or a weighted combination. The shortest-distance route is not necessarily best when congestion, tolls or service windows are considered. A common operational measure is vehicle kilometres per delivery, but interpretation must account for delivery density. One route serving many nearby stops may have more stops and lower kilometres per stop than a direct route serving one remote customer. The vehicle routing problem with time windows is a constrained optimisation problem. A simplified objective can be written as: Minimise Z = ∑(cij × xij) + ∑(pk × lk) where xij equals 1 if a vehicle travels from location i to j, otherwise 0; cij is the associated travel cost; lk represents lateness or another service violation for customer k; and pk is its penalty. This objective must be supplemented by constraints for vehicle capacity, route continuity, time windows, depot start and return, driver regulations and product restrictions. It is a model of a decision problem, not a complete routing algorithm. Exact optimisation can become computationally difficult as the number of stops increases. Practical systems therefore use heuristics, such as savings methods, insertion, local search and adaptive re-optimisation. Human dispatchers remain important because maps may not reflect temporary restrictions, customer access conditions or local knowledge. Scheduling and dispatch controlA robust daily schedule includes order cut-off, wave release, pick completion, staging, loading, dispatch, estimated arrival, delivery window, return and close-out times. Time buffers should reflect historical variability rather than arbitrary optimism. Dispatch control should distinguish: - planned events: scheduled departure and arrival;
- actual events: scan, GPS or signed receipt time; and
- exceptions: late loading, missed appointment, breakdown, refusal, damage or temperature excursion.
Re-planning should follow defined thresholds. For example, a high-priority shipment may trigger escalation when its estimated arrival is outside the customer window, while a low-priority route may be monitored without immediate intervention. 6. Documentation, custody and complianceDocumentation transfers information, establishes instructions and supports legal, financial and evidential control. Depending on the shipment and jurisdiction, documents may include: - purchase order and sales order;
- commercial invoice and packing list;
- transport order or consignment note;
- bill of lading or sea waybill;
- air waybill;
- customs declaration and certificates of origin;
- dangerous-goods declaration and safety data information;
- temperature record or chain-of-custody record;
- delivery appointment and proof of delivery; and
- freight invoice, claim record and accessorial approval.
Document names and legal effects differ by country and mode. A bill of lading, for example, may function as a receipt, evidence of a contract of carriage and, in some contexts, a document of title. A waybill commonly provides evidence of carriage but may not be negotiable. Organisations must obtain jurisdiction-specific legal advice rather than assuming that documents are interchangeable. Core controls include consistent shipment identifiers, barcode or RFID scanning, master-data validation, document version control, segregation of duties, electronic access controls and retention schedules. The proof of delivery should identify the consignee, date and time, shipment or order reference, quantity received, visible exceptions and authorised acceptance. A signature alone may not prove that the correct quantity or condition was accepted. For hazardous, pharmaceutical, food or temperature-sensitive products, compliance includes classification, packaging, labelling, training, segregation, monitoring and documented corrective action. Regulatory requirements may include transport safety, customs, labour, vehicle weights, environmental standards, data protection and competition law. Compliance is a managerial responsibility shared across shipper, carrier, broker and consignee. 7. Delivery performance and controlPerformance measurement should connect operational activity with customer outcomes. Useful indicators include: | Indicator | Typical definition | Management use |
|---|
| On-time delivery | Deliveries within the agreed window ÷ due deliveries | Measures promise reliability | | On-time in-full (OTIF) | Orders both on time and complete ÷ due orders | Integrates timing and quantity | | Tender acceptance | Accepted tenders ÷ tenders offered | Tests carrier capacity commitment | | Transit-time variability | Dispersion of actual transit times around the average | Supports safety time and promise setting | | Damage rate | Damaged units or shipments ÷ shipped units or shipments | Controls packaging and handling | | Claims ratio | Valid claims value ÷ freight or shipment value | Tracks loss and damage exposure | | Cost per shipment | Total attributable distribution cost ÷ shipments | Supports cost control | | Empty kilometres | Non-revenue kilometres ÷ total kilometres | Indicates network and backhaul opportunity |
Definitions must specify denominator, time window, exclusions and data source. If a carrier excludes refused deliveries from its denominator while the customer includes them, the two reported service rates are not comparable. For Non-time on-time deliveries and Ndue due deliveries: OTD = (Non-time ÷ Ndue) × 100% For OTIF, the numerator counts orders satisfying both conditions. It is incorrect to average separate on-time and in-full percentages unless a defined analytical purpose supports that method. Worked example. During a week, 480 orders were due. Of these, 468 arrived within the agreed window, 474 were complete, and 458 were both on time and complete. Therefore: - OTD = 468 ÷ 480 × 100 = 97.5%
- In-full = 474 ÷ 480 × 100 = 98.75%
- OTIF = 458 ÷ 480 × 100 ≈ 95.42%
The lower OTIF result shows why an integrated customer measure can reveal failures hidden by separate indicators. Performance management should use trend analysis, lane-level segmentation, root-cause analysis and corrective action. A single monthly average can conceal a failing route, customer or product class. Control charts and percentile transit times may be useful where data quality and sample size are adequate, but managers should distinguish random variation from assignable causes. 8. Technology and contemporary practiceTransportation management systems support rating, tendering, consolidation, routing, appointment management, tracking, freight audit and performance reporting. Telematics can provide location, engine, driving and temperature data. Electronic proof of delivery reduces paperwork and accelerates exception handling. APIs and electronic data interchange connect shippers, carriers, marketplaces and customers. Artificial intelligence can assist with demand-aware routing, estimated-time-of-arrival prediction, anomaly detection, carrier selection and document classification. Its value depends on reliable historical data, appropriate objectives and human oversight. A model trained on past routes may reproduce inequitable driver workloads or fail during unusual weather and network disruption. Automated decisions require explainability, access controls, cybersecurity and a clear override process. Digital visibility is not the same as physical control. A GPS signal may show location but not load condition, legal compliance or accurate quantity. Data governance should address ownership, consent where relevant, retention, cybersecurity, interoperability and the risk of sharing commercially sensitive information. Contemporary distribution practice also emphasises: - electrification and alternative fuels for suitable routes;
- urban consolidation centres and low-emission delivery zones;
- reusable packaging and reverse logistics;
- dynamic appointment systems;
- carrier diversification and scenario planning;
- collaborative transport and shared capacity; and
- carbon accounting using transparent boundaries and emission factors.
Sustainability decisions should assess the full system. A larger vehicle may reduce emissions per unit delivered if it improves utilisation, while an apparently short route may create more emissions through congestion and repeated failed deliveries. 9. Illustrative case: regional distribution redesignBackgroundA fictional consumer-appliance distributor serves 180 retailers from one central warehouse. It uses several carriers and dispatches small consignments daily. Freight cost is rising, OTIF has fallen to 91%, and vehicles often leave with high volume utilisation but unused payload capacity. Problem analysisAn eight-week review identifies four causes: - orders for the same regional clusters are released independently rather than consolidated;
- the cheapest carrier has poor performance on two remote lanes;
- loads are sequenced by pick completion rather than delivery sequence;
- appointment changes are communicated by telephone and are not visible to the warehouse.
The distributor calculates total cost rather than comparing base rates only. It also separates urban, regional and remote lanes and analyses damage, waiting time and failed deliveries. Approach and solutionThe organisation introduces a three-tier carrier portfolio: a primary regional carrier, a qualified secondary carrier and a contingency provider. It establishes a two-day consolidation window for non-urgent regional orders while preserving same-day dispatch for critical replenishment. A route-planning process groups nearby deliveries, validates vehicle payload and inserts time-window constraints. Loading instructions place remote-stop freight appropriately while preserving safe axle distribution. A transport management system sends electronic tenders and appointment updates. The scorecard weights OTIF at 35%, total cost at 25%, capacity and acceptance at 15%, claims and damage at 10%, visibility at 10% and sustainability at 5%. Safety, legal authority and insurance remain pass/fail gates rather than tradeable score items. OutcomeAfter a three-month pilot, the distributor records OTIF of 96%, a 12% reduction in freight cost per delivered unit, a 19% reduction in empty kilometres and fewer failed deliveries. The improvement is not attributed to one technology: it results from lane segmentation, appropriate consolidation, carrier governance, better load sequencing and closed-loop measurement. Learning pointsThe case demonstrates that mode and carrier selection must be linked to service requirements. Consolidation should be selective, not universal. Load utilisation must consider both volume and weight. Finally, performance data is useful only when definitions, accountability and corrective actions are clear. 10. Challenges, ethics and managerial judgementDistribution decisions can create safety, labour and community consequences. Excessive delivery pressure may encourage speeding, fatigue or unsafe loading. Ethical management therefore requires realistic schedules, lawful working conditions, fair subcontracting, maintenance standards and non-retaliatory incident reporting. Other governance risks include bribery at borders, discriminatory service allocation, falsified delivery records, improper handling of customer data, undeclared subcontracting and misleading carbon claims. Procurement teams should evaluate carriers beyond price, audit high-risk activities proportionately and maintain escalation channels. Operational resilience requires more than holding extra inventory. It may involve alternative carriers, dual routes, substitute modes, emergency contacts, critical-item prioritisation, mutual-aid agreements and tested continuity plans. Resilience has a cost; the appropriate level depends on consequence, likelihood, recovery time and customer criticality. Best-practice checklistBefore dispatch, confirm that: - the mode and carrier match product and service requirements;
- shipment data, labels and documents agree;
- the vehicle is suitable, legal, clean and safe;
- mass, volume, axle and restraint requirements are satisfied;
- delivery sequence and customer appointments are visible;
- tracking and escalation contacts are active;
- exceptions have an owner and response time; and
- actual delivery, condition and quantity will be captured for performance analysis.
Chapter SummaryTransportation and physical distribution coordinate the movement, information and control activities that connect inventory to customers. Professional decisions balance freight cost, speed, reliability, risk, inventory and externalities. Road, rail, water, air, pipeline and intermodal services each have distinct capabilities and constraints; mode choice should be based on shipment requirements and total delivered cost. Carrier selection uses mandatory compliance gates followed by transparent evaluation of cost, capacity, reliability, claims, visibility and sustainability. Consolidation can reduce unit cost but may increase waiting and handling risk. Vehicle loading requires simultaneous attention to volume, weight, axle distribution, compatibility, delivery sequence and restraint. Routing and scheduling must incorporate capacity, time windows, driver rules, congestion and exceptions rather than distance alone. Accurate transport documents support custody, payment, compliance and claims. Indicators such as on-time delivery, OTIF, claims ratio, cost per shipment and empty kilometres become meaningful only when definitions and data sources are consistent. Technology improves visibility and decision support, but AI and automation require governance, human oversight and cybersecurity. Ethical distribution protects workers, customers, communities and the integrity of commercial information. Key TermsTransportation: Physical movement of goods between locations. Physical distribution: Coordination of outbound movement, storage, handling, information and delivery. Intermodal transport: Use of multiple transport modes with the cargo remaining in the same loading unit. Carrier: Organisation that transports freight for a shipper or consignee. Consolidation: Combining shipments to improve transport or handling efficiency. Cross-docking: Transferring inbound goods to outbound movements with minimal storage. Pool distribution: Consolidating freight at a regional facility before local delivery. Accessorial charge: Additional charge for services beyond the basic freight movement. Payload: Permitted mass of cargo carried by a vehicle. Load utilisation: Degree to which available vehicle volume or payload is used. Route: Sequence and path used to serve delivery or collection points. Time window: Agreed interval in which a delivery or collection must occur. Proof of delivery: Evidence that a shipment was delivered and accepted. On-time delivery: Delivery completed within the agreed service window. OTIF: Order delivered both on time and in full. Tender acceptance: Proportion of offered shipments accepted by a carrier. Freight audit: Review of freight invoices, rates, accessorials and shipment records. Exception management: Identification and resolution of deviations from plan. Total delivered cost: Combined cost of freight, handling, inventory, risk and related factors. Physical distribution network: Facilities, transport links, processes and information connecting supply to customers. Review QuestionsShort Answer Questions- Distinguish transportation from physical distribution.
- State two advantages and two limitations of road transport.
- Why should compliance requirements be treated as carrier-selection gates?
- What is the difference between on-time delivery and OTIF?
- Identify four controls required during vehicle loading.
Long Answer Questions- Explain how cost, speed and reliability interact in mode selection. Use total delivered cost in your answer.
- Describe a systematic carrier-selection process from prequalification to performance review.
- Discuss the benefits and risks of freight consolidation, cross-docking and pool distribution.
- Explain how routing and scheduling constraints affect practical distribution decisions.
- Evaluate the role of transport documentation in custody, compliance, payment and claims.
Analytical / Application Questions- A shipment has a product value of $120,000, an annual carrying rate of 15% and a transit time of 8 days. Calculate its simple in-transit inventory cost using a 365-day year. State the assumptions and explain whether this calculation alone is sufficient to choose a mode.
- A carrier reports 98% on-time delivery but only 93% OTIF. Explain operational reasons for the difference and propose three corrective actions.
- Design a carrier scorecard for a temperature-sensitive pharmaceutical lane. Identify mandatory pass/fail requirements, weighted criteria and the data needed to verify performance.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which consideration most directly distinguishes physical distribution from transportation alone? A. The colour of the vehicle B. Coordination of inventory, documentation, handling and delivery C. The number of tyres on the vehicle D. The carrier’s advertising budget Correct Answer: B. Coordination of inventory, documentation, handling and delivery Question 2Which mode is generally most appropriate for a high-value, urgent and lightweight shipment? A. Air B. Pipeline C. Inland water D. Bulk rail Correct Answer: A. Air Question 3A shipment has a product value of $80,000, an annual carrying rate of 18% and six transit days. Using a 365-day year, what is the approximate in-transit inventory cost? A. $157.81 B. $236.71 C. $864.00 D. $14,400.00 Correct Answer: B. $236.71 Question 4What should normally occur before weighted carrier scoring? A. Ignoring legal requirements B. Selecting the carrier with the lowest advertised rate C. Applying mandatory safety, authority and insurance gates D. Removing all contingency capacity Correct Answer: C. Applying mandatory safety, authority and insurance gates Question 5Which statement about consolidation is most accurate? A. It always reduces total cost B. It combines shipments but may increase waiting and handling risk C. It is suitable for every urgent shipment D. It eliminates the need for routing Correct Answer: B. It combines shipments but may increase waiting and handling risk Question 6Which vehicle-loading principle is correct? A. Maximise volume without checking mass B. Place all heavy freight at the rear door C. Respect payload, axle distribution, compatibility and restraint requirements D. Load in picking order regardless of safety Correct Answer: C. Respect payload, axle distribution, compatibility and restraint requirements Question 7A route that is shortest by distance may still be inferior because it fails to consider which factor? A. Vehicle paint colour B. Customer time windows and congestion C. Invoice font D. Warehouse ownership structure Correct Answer: B. Customer time windows and congestion Question 8Which measure requires an order to be both on time and complete? A. Tender acceptance B. OTIF C. Empty kilometres D. Claims ratio Correct Answer: B. OTIF Question 9A week has 480 due orders, of which 458 are both on time and complete. What is the OTIF percentage? A. 91.00% B. 95.42% C. 97.50% D. 98.75% Correct Answer: B. 95.42% Question 10Which is an appropriate governance principle for AI-supported transport planning? A. Allow the system to override safety rules B. Use historical data without checking bias or disruption conditions C. Maintain human oversight, explainability and an override process D. Remove cybersecurity controls to improve speed Correct Answer: C. Maintain human oversight, explainability and an override process
|