Water Stewardship and Resource ManagementIntroductionWater stewardship is the planned, ethical and resilient management of water throughout the life cycle of a real-estate asset. It extends beyond reducing potable-water consumption inside a building. It includes catchment protection, source reliability, demand management, metering, leak control, rainwater capture, wastewater treatment and reuse, sustainable drainage, flood-risk reduction, and the relationship between a property and the wider urban water system. For real-estate managers, water is simultaneously an operating cost, a public-health concern, a regulatory obligation, a climate-risk issue and a community resource. A building may have efficient fixtures yet remain unsustainable if it depends on an insecure aquifer, discharges polluted runoff, or sends reusable wastewater to an overloaded sewer. Conversely, a well-designed property can reduce demand, retain rainfall, reuse water safely and contribute to watershed resilience. Water stewardship therefore requires systems thinking. Decisions about plumbing, landscape design, cooling systems, tenant behaviour, wastewater quality and emergency storage must be evaluated together rather than as isolated efficiency projects. Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this chapter, the learner should be able to: - Prepare and interpret a building water balance.
- Select appropriate efficiency, metering and leak-detection strategies.
- Evaluate rainwater harvesting and wastewater-reuse options.
- Explain resilient water supply, sustainable drainage and water-sensitive urban design.
- Assess technical, financial, health, regulatory and governance implications.
- Develop a practical water-stewardship plan for a real-estate asset or portfolio.
1. Water Stewardship as a Property-Management FunctionA conventional water strategy asks, “How can the building use less water?” A stewardship strategy asks broader questions: - Where does the water come from, and is the source sustainable?
- Which uses require potable quality and which do not?
- How much water is consumed, discharged, evaporated or incorporated into products?
- What pollutants enter stormwater or wastewater?
- How will drought, flooding, power failure, contamination or infrastructure interruption affect service?
- Who bears the costs and risks of the chosen strategy?
The water hierarchy is generally: - Avoid unnecessary demand.
- Reduce unavoidable demand through efficient equipment and behaviour.
- Substitute non-potable sources where health protection is maintained.
- Reuse water internally or locally.
- Harvest rainfall and manage runoff close to its source.
- Treat and discharge residual water responsibly.
The hierarchy is not absolute. A rainwater system may be inappropriate where rainfall is highly seasonal, storage is costly, or the energy and maintenance burden exceeds the benefit. Similarly, wastewater reuse is not automatically sustainable if treatment energy, chemicals and replacement equipment are ignored. 2. The Building Water BalanceA water balance accounts for inflows, internal uses, storage changes and outflows over a defined period. It is the foundation for design, diagnosis and performance verification. Win + Wrecovered = Wconsumed + Wdischarged + ΔS + Wlosses Here, Win is imported water; Wrecovered is water supplied from rainwater, treated wastewater or other approved sources; Wconsumed is water incorporated into products, evaporated or otherwise not returned during the period; Wdischarged is water sent to sewer, drainage or receiving water; ΔS is the change in stored water; and Wlosses includes leakage, overflow and measurement error. All terms must use the same period and unit, such as cubic metres per month. For a stable annual system in which storage begins and ends at the same level, ΔS = 0. A useful diagnostic is the unexplained residual: Wresidual = Win + Wrecovered − Wconsumed − Wdischarged − ΔS A large residual may indicate leakage, unmetered uses, inaccurate meters, incorrect assumptions or inconsistent reporting boundaries. The equation is an accounting identity, not a prediction model; it does not by itself explain why a discrepancy exists. 2.1 Demand estimationFor an end use based on users, frequency and volume: D = N × f × v × d ÷ 1,000 D is demand in cubic metres per period; N is the number of users or events; f is the number of uses per user per day; v is litres per use; and d is the number of days. The divisor 1,000 converts litres to cubic metres. The formula assumes the average values are representative and that all events have similar volume. For example, 500 occupants using a 6-litre flush toilet an average of four times daily for 30 days generate: D = 500 × 4 × 6 × 30 ÷ 1,000 = 360 m³/month If efficient fixtures reduce the average flush to 4.5 litres, demand becomes 270 m³/month, a saving of 90 m³/month before accounting for behavioural or operational changes. Other significant end uses include handwashing, showers, kitchens, cooling towers, irrigation, cleaning, process activities and make-up water. Estimates should be replaced by submeters wherever the end use is material or variable. 2.2 Water-performance indicatorsUseful indicators include: | Indicator | Interpretation |
|---|
| Total water use per floor area | Useful for comparing similar assets, but distorted by occupancy and function | | Water use per occupant | Useful in offices, hotels and residential buildings when occupancy is reliable | | Potable water use per occupant | Shows success in source substitution and demand reduction | | Irrigation use per landscaped area | Helps evaluate landscape design and irrigation control | | Non-revenue or unexplained water | Signals leakage, metering gaps or accounting problems | | Reuse ratio | Reused water divided by total water demand, subject to defined boundaries |
Comparisons should be normalized for climate, occupancy, operating hours, building type and services. A hotel, hospital and office cannot be ranked fairly using a single unadjusted intensity value. 3. Efficiency Through Design and OperationsWater efficiency begins with demand reduction rather than equipment substitution alone. Measures include low-flow taps and showers, dual-flush or pressure-assisted toilets, water-efficient appliances, dry or hybrid cooling systems, automatic irrigation controls, drought-tolerant planting and improved cleaning procedures. Fixture performance must be assessed in relation to user experience. Excessively low flow may increase time of use, encourage tampering or impair hygiene. Product selection should consider flow rate, pressure range, durability, spare parts, accessibility and local maintenance capability. Cooling towers require particular attention because evaporation is a necessary loss while blowdown removes concentrated dissolved solids. Cycles of concentration may be expressed as: C = TDSc ÷ TDSm C is cycles of concentration; TDSc is total dissolved solids in circulating water; and TDSm is total dissolved solids in make-up water. The relationship is useful only when the measured streams and operating conditions are comparable. Increasing cycles can reduce blowdown but may increase scaling, corrosion or biological risk. Water chemistry, manufacturer limits and public-health controls must govern the decision. Operational measures are often inexpensive: correcting continuously running toilets, setting irrigation schedules, calibrating sensors, shutting down redundant cooling equipment, training cleaning staff and incorporating water checks into preventive maintenance. 4. Metering, Submetering and Leak DetectionA reliable water-management programme requires a measurement architecture. The main meter establishes total imported water. Submeters should be considered for high-consumption or high-risk uses such as irrigation, cooling towers, kitchens, laundries, swimming pools, tenant zones and recycled-water systems. A practical hierarchy is: - Utility or site boundary meter.
- Building or block meters.
- Major end-use meters.
- Tenant or floor meters.
- Smart sensors for abnormal flow, pressure and equipment condition.
Meters must be correctly sized, accessible, protected from damage and calibrated according to applicable standards. Data intervals should match the management objective. Monthly billing data may identify long-term trends but cannot reliably detect a toilet leak; fifteen-minute or hourly data are more suitable for abnormal-flow detection. A simple minimum-flow test can be performed during a known unoccupied period. If flow remains above an expected baseline, the property team should investigate toilets, irrigation valves, storage tanks, pressure-reducing valves and underground services. Automated systems can flag continuous flow, night-time use, sudden step changes and deviations from weather-adjusted irrigation demand. Leak detection must not depend exclusively on algorithms. A false alarm may arise from legitimate cleaning, process demand or tank filling, while a small intermittent leak may be hidden by coarse data. The strongest programme combines meter data, physical inspection, tenant reporting and documented repair response times. 5. Rainwater HarvestingRainwater harvesting intercepts rainfall from roofs or other suitable surfaces, conveys it through gutters and filters, stores it, and supplies an approved end use. Typical non-potable applications include irrigation, toilet flushing, cooling-tower make-up and cleaning. A first-order annual yield estimate is: V = P × A × Cr × η V is harvested volume in cubic metres; P is rainfall depth in metres over the period; A is contributing area in square metres; Cr is the runoff coefficient; and η is system efficiency, accounting for conveyance, filtration, overflow and operational losses. Since metres multiplied by square metres gives cubic metres, units are consistent. The coefficient varies with roof material, slope, surface condition and rainfall intensity. For a 1,000 m² roof receiving 0.8 m annual rainfall, with Cr = 0.85 and η = 0.90: V = 0.8 × 1,000 × 0.85 × 0.90 = 612 m³/year This is potential supply, not guaranteed usable supply. A monthly or daily water balance is preferable because annual rainfall can conceal dry-season shortages. Storage sizing should compare time-varying inflow with demand and include dead storage, emergency overflow, sediment accumulation and available tank volume. Rainwater systems require separation from potable plumbing, backflow protection, clear labelling, access for inspection, mosquito and vermin control, safe overflow routing and water-quality management. Potable use demands rigorous treatment and regulatory approval; it should never be assumed merely because rainwater appears clear. 6. Wastewater ReuseWastewater streams differ in contamination and treatment difficulty. Greywater generally excludes toilet waste and may include showers, hand basins and laundry. Blackwater includes toilet waste and may include kitchen or industrial contaminants. The distinction is jurisdiction-specific and must be confirmed with regulators. Reuse systems normally include collection, screening, equalization, biological or physical treatment, disinfection, storage, distribution and monitoring. Common technologies include membrane bioreactors, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, constructed wetlands and ultraviolet or chemical disinfection. Technology selection depends on required quality, flow variability, land, energy, operator skill and discharge standards. A fit-for-purpose principle is central: water should be treated to the quality required for the intended use, not automatically to drinking-water quality. However, risk assessment must address pathogens, nutrients, chemicals, aerosols, cross-connections and public perception. Recycled water for toilet flushing is a different risk proposition from recycled water used in cooling towers or potable applications. A mass balance for a reuse plant can be represented as: Qfeed = Qreuse + Qdischarge + Qsludge + Qloss Qfeed is influent flow; Qreuse is treated water supplied for reuse; Qdischarge is liquid residual discharge; Qsludge is water associated with removed solids; and Qloss includes evaporation and measurement error. Each term must refer to the same time interval and compatible measurement points. The business case should include capital cost, energy, chemicals, laboratory testing, operator time, membrane or media replacement, residual disposal, regulatory compliance and contingency operation. A reuse system that fails frequently may create greater health and reputational risk than a simpler, well-managed potable supply. 7. Resilient Water SupplyWater resilience is the capacity of a property to maintain safe and acceptable service during disruption and recover quickly afterward. Threats include drought, floods, contamination, pipe failure, power outages, cyber incidents, wildfire, supply restrictions and rising demand. Resilience planning should identify critical uses rather than treating all water demand equally. Drinking, hygiene, fire protection, cooling, medical functions and sanitation may have different priorities. A property may require emergency storage, dual supply routes, portable treatment, backup power, manual operating procedures and agreements with neighbouring assets. A resilience assessment considers: - source diversity and dependence on one utility or aquifer;
- minimum service level and duration of autonomy;
- water-quality monitoring and isolation capability;
- energy dependence of pumps and treatment systems;
- flood protection of tanks, pumps and electrical equipment;
- drought operating rules and demand-reduction triggers; and
- communication with occupants, authorities and suppliers.
Resilience is not equivalent to maximum redundancy. Oversized infrastructure may increase embodied carbon, stagnation risk and cost. The appropriate level depends on hazard probability, consequence, recovery time and social vulnerability. 8. Sustainable Drainage and Water-Sensitive Urban DesignSustainable drainage systems seek to manage rainfall near its source, reduce peak runoff, improve water quality, support infiltration where appropriate and create ecological or social value. Measures include green roofs, rain gardens, swales, permeable paving, detention basins, wetlands, tree pits and infiltration trenches. Water-sensitive urban design integrates the whole urban water cycle into planning and place-making. It treats streets, open space and buildings as parts of a connected system rather than separating stormwater, water supply and wastewater into unrelated technical networks. The design sequence is commonly: - Avoid runoff through site layout and surface permeability.
- Infiltrate water where soil, groundwater and contamination conditions permit.
- Retain and reuse rainfall.
- Detain and slowly release excess runoff.
- Convey extreme events safely through defined overland routes.
- Protect receiving waters from sediment, nutrients, oils and litter.
Infiltration is not universally appropriate. Contaminated soils, high groundwater, expansive clays, unstable slopes or protection zones may require lined systems and controlled discharge. Drainage design must address ordinary rainfall and exceedance events, including safe flow paths when systems are overwhelmed. Green infrastructure also has maintenance requirements: sediment removal, plant replacement, inspection of inlets and outlets, weed control and protection from compaction. Without a clear owner and budget, attractive installations can become blocked or ineffective. 9. Governance, Health and RegulationWater projects cross organizational boundaries. Asset owners, facilities managers, tenants, utilities, public-health agencies, landscape contractors and emergency services may all have legitimate interests. Governance should define ownership of meters, data, treatment equipment, quality testing, alarms, repairs and regulatory reporting. Health protection is non-negotiable. Reclaimed-water and cooling systems can create exposure to pathogens or aerosols. Legionella control, backflow prevention, cross-connection control, disinfection and safe maintenance procedures must follow applicable law and recognized technical guidance. Workers need appropriate training and personal protective equipment. Ethical stewardship also concerns allocation. A commercial development should not reduce its operating cost by drawing down a scarce community water source or transferring polluted runoff to a lower-income neighbourhood. Procurement should consider local water stress, indigenous or customary water rights where relevant, and the cumulative effect of multiple developments. Water data are increasingly used for tenant benchmarking and automated control. Governance must address data quality, privacy where occupancy information is inferred, cybersecurity of connected valves and sensors, and human oversight of automated decisions. 10. Economic and Strategic EvaluationWater projects should be evaluated using whole-life analysis rather than simple payback alone. Relevant benefits include reduced water and sewer charges, avoided damage, improved resilience, lower regulatory risk, tenant value, reduced energy use and environmental benefits. Costs include capital, maintenance, monitoring, replacement, downtime and staff capability. A basic net-present-value framework is: NPV = −C0 + ∑[t=1 to n] (Bt − Ct) ÷ (1 + r)t C0 is initial capital cost; Bt and Ct are benefits and operating costs in year t; r is the discount rate; and n is the analysis period. The calculation assumes cash flows can be estimated and discounted consistently. It does not capture all social or ecological value, so non-financial criteria should accompany it. Sensitivity analysis should test water-price escalation, rainfall variation, occupancy, equipment life, maintenance cost, energy price and regulatory change. Scenario analysis is particularly important for drought and flood conditions, where historical averages may be poor indicators of future risk. 11. Illustrative Case: Harbour Exchange Mixed-Use PrecinctBackgroundHarbour Exchange is an illustrative 18,000 m² mixed-use precinct containing offices, retail food outlets, apartments, landscaped public space and a basement car park. Annual mains-water use is 24,000 m³. The site experiences seasonal drought, intense short-duration storms and rising water tariffs. ProblemThe owner observed unexplained night-time flow, high irrigation demand and stormwater surcharge during heavy rain. Tenants also reported periodic low pressure. The management team initially proposed replacing all fixtures but lacked a water balance and did not know whether the proposed rainwater tank would materially reduce mains demand. AnalysisSubmetering identified the following annual demand: | End use | Annual demand (m³) |
|---|
| Toilets and urinals | 7,200 | | Showers and basins | 4,800 | | Food and retail uses | 3,600 | | Cooling system | 4,200 | | Irrigation | 3,000 | | Cleaning and other | 1,200 | | Total | 24,000 |
A night-flow investigation found a leaking irrigation valve and two continuously running toilets, together accounting for an estimated 1,500 m³/year. Fixture replacement and pressure adjustment were expected to reduce toilet and basin demand by 20%, saving approximately 2,400 m³/year across those uses. Landscape redesign was expected to reduce irrigation demand by 900 m³/year. The roof area was 6,000 m². Annual rainfall was estimated at 0.65 m, with a runoff coefficient of 0.8 and system efficiency of 0.85. Potential harvested volume was: V = 0.65 × 6,000 × 0.8 × 0.85 = 2,652 m³/year However, monthly modelling showed that only 1,900 m³/year could reliably supply irrigation and toilet flushing because of dry-season storage limits. The team therefore avoided claiming the full theoretical yield. Approach and solutionThe owner adopted a staged programme: - repair leaks and install submeters before major capital works;
- replace high-use fixtures and commission pressure controls;
- install a 400 m³ rainwater tank with first-flush diversion and non-potable pipe identification;
- redesign planting and use weather-responsive irrigation;
- optimize cooling-tower cycles within water-quality limits;
- install smart meter alerts for continuous night flow;
- create an annual water-quality and backflow-prevention audit; and
- add stormwater raingardens, permeable paving and a controlled overflow route.
OutcomeThe combined measures reduced mains demand by approximately 6,700 m³/year, or about 28% of the baseline, subject to verification through post-implementation metering. More importantly, the precinct gained visibility of end uses, reduced nuisance flooding and established defined responsibilities for water quality and maintenance. Learning pointsThe case demonstrates that measurement should precede major investment, theoretical rainfall yield must be adjusted for time and storage, efficiency and source substitution should be combined, and drainage outcomes must be assessed alongside water-supply outcomes. It also shows that a portfolio-wide governance system is necessary when several contractors and tenant groups share infrastructure. 12. Implementation Framework for Real-Estate ManagersA practical water-stewardship plan can follow six phases: Phase 1: Establish the baseline. Define the site boundary, collect utility bills, map systems, identify users and inspect meters. Phase 2: Build the water balance. Quantify major inflows, uses, discharges, storage and residuals. Identify uncertainty rather than presenting estimates as facts. Phase 3: Prioritize interventions. Rank actions by water saving, health risk, resilience benefit, cost, disruption and regulatory complexity. Phase 4: Design and procure. Specify performance requirements, metering points, maintainability, commissioning, data ownership and quality controls. Phase 5: Commission and verify. Test flow rates, alarms, backflow protection, treatment performance, overflow routes and user instructions. Compare measured savings with the baseline using consistent boundaries. Phase 6: Operate and improve. Review data, inspect assets, update drought and flood procedures, train staff, engage occupants and revise targets as conditions change. Targets should be specific and measurable, but should not encourage unsafe behaviour or conceal increased demand elsewhere. A reduction in potable water may be achieved by importing energy-intensive treated water; therefore water, energy, carbon, health and financial indicators should be reviewed together. Challenges and LimitationsWater data are often incomplete because meters are poorly located, bills cover multiple assets, tenants control fixtures, or rainfall and occupancy vary substantially. Benchmarks may be misleading across building types. Reuse systems can fail because of inadequate operator skills, poor maintenance, changing wastewater quality or insufficient storage. Green infrastructure may lose performance through compaction and neglect. Climate projections contain uncertainty, yet waiting for perfect information can delay necessary adaptation. The appropriate response is adaptive management: document assumptions, monitor outcomes, use conservative safety margins where health is involved, review performance periodically and retain the ability to change operating rules. No single technology is a universal solution. Contemporary DevelopmentsDigital twins, connected meters, acoustic sensors, pressure analytics and machine-learning models can improve anomaly detection and forecasting. Their value depends on accurate data, suitable sensor placement, cybersecurity and human review. AI may identify unusual consumption patterns or optimize irrigation using weather forecasts, but it should not override safety controls or regulatory requirements without accountable professional authorization. Emerging practice also emphasizes water neutrality or water-positive claims, catchment-scale accounting, nature-based infrastructure, circular water systems and climate-adjusted design standards. Such claims require transparent boundaries. A building should not claim to be water positive by purchasing uncertain offsets while continuing to impose local water-quality or supply risks. Chapter SummaryWater stewardship integrates demand reduction, efficient equipment, measurement, leakage control, alternative supplies, wastewater reuse, resilience and sustainable drainage. A water balance provides the accounting foundation, but reliable decisions require appropriate boundaries, accurate meters and explicit assumptions. Rainwater harvesting and reuse can reduce potable demand when storage, quality, energy, maintenance and regulation are properly evaluated. Resilient systems diversify sources and protect critical functions without creating unnecessary complexity. Sustainable drainage and water-sensitive urban design manage runoff, improve water quality and connect buildings to their catchments. Effective implementation combines technical design with governance, health protection, financial analysis, ethical responsibility and continuous verification. Key TermsWater stewardship: Responsible management of water resources, uses, impacts and risks across a property’s life cycle. Water balance: Accounting of water inflows, uses, storage changes, discharges and losses. Potable water: Water treated to a quality suitable for human consumption under applicable standards. Non-potable water: Water suitable for specified uses but not intended for drinking. Submeter: A meter that measures a defined building, tenant or end-use portion of total consumption. Water intensity: Water use normalized by a relevant denominator such as area or occupancy. Runoff coefficient: The fraction of rainfall represented as runoff from a contributing surface. Rainwater harvesting: Collection, treatment, storage and use of rainfall. Greywater: Wastewater from specified domestic sources excluding, in many jurisdictions, toilet waste. Blackwater: Wastewater containing toilet waste and potentially other high-contamination streams. Fit-for-purpose treatment: Treatment that achieves the quality required for a defined use. Backflow: Unintended reverse flow that may contaminate a potable-water system. Water resilience: Capacity to maintain and recover safe water services during disruption. Sustainable drainage: Drainage designed to reduce runoff, pollution and peak flows while supporting infiltration, retention or reuse. Water-sensitive urban design: Integrated planning of urban water, land use, ecology and public space. Cycles of concentration: Ratio of dissolved-solids concentration in circulating water to that in make-up water. Non-revenue or unexplained water: Water not accounted for through legitimate measured uses or known losses. Catchment: Land area draining toward a common water body or outlet. Adaptive management: Iterative decision-making based on monitoring, learning and revised action. Review QuestionsShort Answer Questions- What purposes does a building water balance serve?
- Distinguish between a main meter and a submeter.
- State two conditions that may make infiltration inappropriate.
- What is meant by fit-for-purpose water treatment?
- Identify three factors that influence rainwater-harvesting yield.
Long Answer Questions- Explain how a real-estate manager can develop a water-stewardship strategy from baseline assessment through continuous improvement.
- Discuss the technical and governance requirements for safe wastewater reuse in a mixed-use building.
- Compare demand reduction, rainwater harvesting and wastewater reuse as strategies for reducing potable-water consumption.
- Explain how sustainable drainage and water-sensitive urban design contribute to both flood resilience and environmental quality.
- Critically evaluate the use of water-performance benchmarks across different building types.
Analytical / Application Questions- A building has 800 occupants, each generating three toilet uses per day. If the existing flush volume is 6 litres and the replacement volume is 4 litres, calculate the annual water saving using 365 days. State your assumptions.
- A 2,500 m² roof receives 0.7 m of annual rainfall. If the runoff coefficient is 0.82 and system efficiency is 0.88, estimate annual harvestable volume. Explain why the usable volume may be lower.
- Prepare a preliminary intervention plan for a property with high night-time flow, seasonal drought, limited roof area and recurring stormwater flooding. Justify the sequence of actions using technical, financial, health and governance criteria.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which expression represents a general building water balance? A. W_in + W_recovered = W_consumed + W_discharged + ΔS + W_losses B. W_in = W_consumed − W_discharged − W_losses C. W_recovered = W_in + W_discharged + ΔS D. W_consumed = W_in + W_discharged + W_losses Correct Answer: A. W_in + W_recovered = W_consumed + W_discharged + ΔS + W_losses Question 2A 500-person building has four toilet uses per person per day, a 6-litre flush, and operates for 30 days. What is monthly toilet demand? A. 30 m³ B. 180 m³ C. 360 m³ D. 720 m³ Correct Answer: C. 360 m³ Question 3Which measure most directly identifies continuous overnight water use? A. Annual rainfall analysis B. High-resolution meter data during unoccupied periods C. Increasing tank size D. Replacing all landscape plants Correct Answer: B. High-resolution meter data during unoccupied periods Question 4Using V = P × A × Cr × η, what is the potential harvest from a 1,000 m² roof with 0.8 m rainfall, Cr = 0.85 and η = 0.90? A. 612 m³ B. 680 m³ C. 850 m³ D. 900 m³ Correct Answer: A. 612 m³ Question 5Why can annual rainfall alone overestimate the useful contribution of a rainwater system? A. Rainfall never produces runoff B. Storage and seasonal timing may prevent matching supply with demand C. Roof areas cannot be measured D. Runoff coefficients are always zero Correct Answer: B. Storage and seasonal timing may prevent matching supply with demand Question 6What is the primary purpose of backflow prevention? A. To increase irrigation pressure B. To prevent contamination of potable-water systems C. To increase rainfall capture D. To reduce roof runoff Correct Answer: B. To prevent contamination of potable-water systems Question 7Which statement best describes fit-for-purpose treatment? A. All water must be treated to drinking-water quality B. Treatment quality is matched to the intended use and its risk requirements C. No treatment is required for non-potable uses D. Treatment is determined only by capital cost Correct Answer: B. Treatment quality is matched to the intended use and its risk requirements Question 8Which condition may make infiltration-based drainage unsuitable? A. Clean permeable soil B. Adequate separation from groundwater C. Contaminated soil or a high groundwater table D. A landscaped receiving area Correct Answer: C. Contaminated soil or a high groundwater table Question 9In cooling-tower management, increasing cycles of concentration may reduce blowdown but can increase the risk of: A. Scaling and corrosion B. Roof runoff C. Potable demand from handwashing D. Rainfall intensity Correct Answer: A. Scaling and corrosion Question 10Which is the most appropriate first step before a major water-efficiency investment? A. Remove all submeters B. Establish a measured baseline and water balance C. Assume all unexplained use is irrigation D. Maximize storage without assessing demand Correct Answer: B. Establish a measured baseline and water balance
|