Fixed-Income and Credit AnalysisIntroduction and ContextFixed-income analysis concerns the valuation and risk assessment of contractual cash flows. Unlike an equity investor, who generally participates in the residual profits of a company, a bond investor lends capital in exchange for promised interest and principal payments. The central questions are therefore: What are the cash flows? What discount rate is appropriate? How sensitive is value to changes in interest rates? How likely is payment default? If default occurs, how much might be recovered? These questions are interconnected. A bond with a high coupon may still be unattractive if its price embeds excessive credit risk. A highly rated issuer may experience substantial market-value losses when interest rates rise. A secured subsidiary bond may be safer than a structurally senior holding-company bond even when both have the same issuer group. Professional analysis therefore combines valuation, market-risk analysis, legal-document review, and fundamental credit assessment. Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this chapter, the reader should be able to: - value fixed-rate, zero-coupon, and floating-rate bonds;
- distinguish coupon rate, current yield, yield to maturity, spot rates, and forward rates;
- explain duration, modified duration, and convexity and use them to estimate price sensitivity;
- interpret the term structure of interest rates and credit spreads;
- assess covenants, security, seniority, guarantees, and structural subordination;
- analyze ratings, probability of default, loss given default, and recovery value;
- evaluate an issuer’s operating performance, leverage, liquidity, and refinancing capacity; and
- integrate quantitative and qualitative evidence into an investment or underwriting decision.
1. Bond Cash Flows and ValuationA bond’s value is the present value of its expected contractual cash flows. For a plain-vanilla fixed-rate bond with face value F, annual coupon rate c, n periods to maturity, and periodic discount rate y, the coupon per period is C = cF/m when coupons are paid m times per year. The price is: P = ∑t=1N C ÷ (1 + y)ᵗ + F ÷ (1 + y)ᴺ Here P is the clean or dirty price depending on whether accrued interest is included, N = mn is the number of coupon periods, and y is the yield per coupon period. The formula assumes deterministic cash flows, a consistent compounding frequency, and no default or embedded-option effects. For an annual-pay bond, this becomes: P = C[1 − (1 + y)^(−n)] ÷ y + F(1 + y)^(−n) A zero-coupon bond makes no interim coupon payment: P = F ÷ (1 + y)n A bond trades at par when its coupon rate equals the required yield under the same compounding convention. It trades at a premium when the coupon rate exceeds the required yield and at a discount when the coupon rate is lower. Clean Price, Dirty Price, and Accrued InterestBetween coupon dates, the seller has earned part of the next coupon. Accrued interest is commonly calculated under the applicable day-count convention: Accrued interest = Coupon payment × (Days elapsed ÷ Days in coupon period) The dirty price, or invoice price, is: Dirty price = Clean price + Accrued interest Actual conventions vary. Government and corporate markets may use actual/actual, 30/360, or other conventions. A valuation must use the convention specified in the bond documentation and market practice. Worked Example 1: Plain-Vanilla BondConsider a five-year bond with face value ₹1,000, annual coupon rate 8%, annual payments, and yield to maturity of 10%. The annual coupon is ₹80. Its value is: P = 80[1 − (1.10)^(−5)] ÷ 0.10 + 1,000(1.10)^(−5) Since (1.10)^(−5) ≈ 0.6209, the coupon annuity is approximately ₹303.26 and the discounted principal is approximately ₹620.92. Thus P ≈ ₹924.18. The discount reflects the fact that the bond’s 8% coupon is below the market-required 10% yield. 2. Yield MeasuresA yield is meaningful only when its definition, cash-flow assumptions, and compounding convention are clear. Coupon Rate and Current YieldThe coupon rate is contractual annual coupon divided by face value. Current yield is: Current yield = Annual coupon ÷ Market price For the preceding bond, current yield is ₹80 ÷ ₹924.18 ≈ 8.66%. It is not a total-return measure because it ignores capital gain or loss, reinvestment, and timing of cash flows. Yield to MaturityYield to maturity (YTM) is the single discount rate that equates the market price with the present value of all promised cash flows, assuming the bond is held to maturity, payments occur as promised, coupons can be reinvested at the YTM, and the compounding convention is specified. It is an internal rate of return, not a guaranteed realized return. For a premium or discount bond, YTM incorporates the pull toward par. A discount bond may have a YTM above its current yield because the investor also expects a contractual price accretion toward face value, assuming no default. Yield to Call and Yield to WorstA callable bond may be redeemed before maturity. Yield to call calculates the internal rate of return using the call date and call price. Yield to worst is generally the lowest yield among relevant contractual redemption scenarios, subject to market conventions. Investors should not rely on maturity yield when early redemption is economically likely. Spot Rates and Forward RatesA spot rate is the yield applicable to a single cash flow at a particular maturity. If sₜ is the annual effective spot rate for year t, a cash flow CFₜ has present value: PV(CFₜ) = CFₜ ÷ (1 + sₜ)ᵗ A coupon bond should ideally be valued using the full spot-rate curve: P = ∑t=1N CFₜ ÷ (1 + sₜ)ᵗ A one-year forward rate beginning at the end of year t, using annual effective rates, satisfies: (1 + st+1)^(t+1) = (1 + st)t(1 + ft,t+1) Therefore: ft,t+1 = [(1 + st+1)^(t+1) ÷ (1 + st)t] − 1 Forward rates are rates implied by current spot rates; they are not necessarily unbiased forecasts of future short-term rates. 3. Interest-Rate Risk: Duration and ConvexityBond prices generally move inversely to yields. The sensitivity is greater for longer maturities, lower coupons, and lower yields. Macaulay DurationMacaulay duration is the weighted average time to receive a bond’s promised cash flows: DM = [∑t=1N t × PV(CFₜ)] ÷ P For periodic payments, t is measured in coupon periods. If periods are semiannual, duration in years is obtained by dividing the periodic duration by 2. Duration is expressed in time units. Modified DurationFor annual compounding, modified duration is: Dmod = DM ÷ (1 + y) For m compounding periods per year: Dmod = DM ÷ [1 + (ynominal ÷ m)] For a small change in yield Δy, the first-order price approximation is: ∆P ÷ P ≈ −Dmod × ∆y Yield changes must be expressed as decimals. A 50-basis-point increase is Δy = 0.005. Duration assumes a parallel yield shift and a locally linear price-yield relationship. ConvexityBecause the price-yield relationship is curved, duration alone becomes less accurate for larger yield changes. Convexity is approximately: Convexity = [1 ÷ P] × [∂²P ÷ ∂y²] Using duration and convexity: ∆P ÷ P ≈ −Dmod∆y + ½ × Convexity × (∆y)² For a conventional option-free bond, convexity is normally positive. Positive convexity means the price rises more when yields fall than it falls when yields rise by the same amount. Callable bonds may exhibit negative effective convexity over certain ranges because the issuer’s call option becomes more valuable as rates decline. Worked Example 2: Duration ApproximationSuppose a bond has price ₹980, modified duration 4.8, and convexity 32. If yield rises by 0.75% (Δy = 0.0075), the duration-only estimate is: ∆P ÷ P ≈ −4.8 × 0.0075 = −0.036 The estimated price decline is 3.60%, or approximately ₹35.28, giving an estimated price of ₹944.72. Including convexity: ∆P ÷ P ≈ −0.036 + ½ × 32 × (0.0075)² ≈ −0.036 + 0.0009 = −0.0351 The estimated price is approximately ₹945.60. The difference illustrates why convexity matters for larger changes. Key-Rate and Spread DurationA parallel-shift duration can conceal important curve risk. Key-rate duration measures sensitivity to a change at a specific maturity point, such as two, five, or ten years. Spread duration measures sensitivity to a change in the credit spread while the benchmark government curve is held constant. A corporate bond can therefore lose value because of either rising risk-free rates, widening credit spreads, or both. 4. Term Structure and Fixed-Income Risk FactorsThe term structure describes interest rates across maturities. Common shapes include upward-sloping, downward-sloping, flat, and humped curves. Explanations include: - Expectations theory: long-term rates reflect expected future short-term rates, although the strict version implies no maturity-related risk premium.
- Liquidity-preference theory: investors demand compensation for holding longer maturities, producing a term premium.
- Market-segmentation theory: supply and demand conditions differ across maturity sectors.
- Preferred-habitat theory: investors prefer certain maturities but may move when compensation is sufficient.
A curve inversion may signal expectations of weaker future growth or monetary easing, but it is not a mechanical recession forecast. Analysts should examine real rates, inflation expectations, term premia, liquidity, and central-bank policy. Other fixed-income risks include reinvestment risk, inflation risk, liquidity risk, currency risk, event risk, and optionality risk. A bond’s total return over a holding period consists broadly of coupon income, reinvestment income, and price change. YTM does not guarantee that realized holding-period return will equal the quoted yield. 5. Credit Spreads and Default RiskA credit spread is the yield difference between a risky bond and a benchmark of similar maturity and currency. In simplified form: Credit spread = Yield of risky bond − Yield of benchmark bond The spread compensates for expected default loss, uncertainty about loss, liquidity risk, risk aversion, tax effects, embedded options, and other factors. It is not identical to expected default loss. A useful approximation for annual expected loss is: Expected loss ≈ Probability of default × Loss given default Loss given default (LGD) is: LGD = 1 − Recovery rate Thus, if one-year probability of default is 2% and expected recovery is 40% of par, LGD is 60% and expected loss is approximately 1.2% of exposure. This approximation ignores timing, changing exposures, risk-neutral pricing, liquidity, taxes, and migration risk. Market spreads can be much wider or narrower than expected loss. Cumulative and Conditional Default ProbabilitiesA cumulative default probability through year t is the probability that default has occurred by that date. If qₜ is the conditional probability of default during year t given survival to its beginning, the survival probability through year n is: Sn = ∏t=1n(1 − qt) The cumulative default probability is 1 − Sₙ. This distinction is essential: conditional probabilities are not simply added across years. Ratings and Credit MigrationCredit ratings summarize an agency’s opinion about relative credit risk, not a guarantee of repayment or a recommendation to buy. Investment-grade and speculative-grade categories are commonly used, although exact definitions and symbols differ by agency. Analysts should distinguish issuer ratings from issue ratings: collateral, guarantees, seniority, and structural position can cause different instruments of the same corporate group to receive different ratings. Credit migration—the movement between rating categories—can affect price before any default. A downgrade may force regulated or benchmark-sensitive investors to sell, increasing spreads. Ratings are therefore lagging and can change abruptly; independent analysis remains necessary. 6. Recovery, Security, and Structural SubordinationRecovery is determined by the value available to creditors and the legal priority of their claims. Important forms of protection include: - Secured debt: backed by specified collateral, subject to valuation, control, and enforcement risk.
- Senior unsecured debt: ranks ahead of subordinated claims but lacks specific collateral.
- Subordinated debt: contractually ranks behind senior obligations.
- Guaranteed debt: benefits from a guarantor, provided the guarantee is valid, enforceable, and supported by the guarantor’s assets.
- Structural subordination: holding-company creditors depend on upstreaming value after creditors of operating subsidiaries are paid.
Priority is not merely a label. Analysts should construct an enterprise liability waterfall: identify asset location, operating-subsidiary debt, secured claims, administrative claims, priority obligations, senior unsecured debt, subordinated debt, and equity. Recovery analysis should use conservative asset valuations and account for bankruptcy costs, timing, currency, and legal uncertainty. A simplified recovery estimate is: Recovery rate = Value available to a class ÷ Claim amount of that class The estimate is class-specific. Total enterprise value divided by total debt is not a valid recovery estimate when claims have different priorities. 7. Covenants and Bondholder ProtectionCovenants are contractual restrictions designed to limit actions that could transfer value from creditors to shareholders or other creditors. Maintenance and Incurrence CovenantsA maintenance covenant requires a ratio or condition to be satisfied periodically, such as minimum interest coverage. An incurrence covenant is tested when the issuer takes a specified action, such as issuing additional debt or paying a dividend. Maintenance covenants generally provide earlier warning and intervention rights; incurrence covenants may provide greater operating flexibility. Common covenants include limits on: - additional secured or total debt;
- liens and negative pledges;
- asset sales and use of proceeds;
- restricted payments and dividends;
- mergers, acquisitions, and change of control;
- transactions with affiliates; and
- disposal or transfer of material assets.
Covenant analysis must examine definitions, baskets, exceptions, builder provisions, EBITDA add-backs, permitted liens, ratio calculations, cure rights, and amendment thresholds. A covenant package can appear strong while being weakened by broad exceptions. Covenant erosion, or “covenant-lite” documentation, increases reliance on collateral, liquidity, and enterprise-value resilience. 8. Fundamental Issuer Credit AnalysisA disciplined credit assessment moves from business risk to financial risk, liquidity, legal structure, and downside recovery. Business and Industry RiskAssess demand cyclicality, competition, pricing power, customer concentration, regulation, technological disruption, input costs, and management quality. A stable regulated utility and a commodity producer should not be evaluated with identical leverage thresholds. Financial AnalysisImportant measures include: Debt-to-EBITDA = Total debt ÷ EBITDA Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Cash interest expense Fixed-charge coverage = (EBIT + Fixed charges before tax) ÷ (Interest + Fixed charges) Free cash flow = Operating cash flow − Capital expenditure − Cash taxes − Other required cash uses Definitions must be consistent. Reported EBITDA may include adjustments that are non-recurring, optimistic, or not cash-generating. Analysts should reconcile adjusted EBITDA to reported earnings and test whether add-backs recur. Examine leverage, profitability, working-capital needs, capital expenditure, pension obligations, leases, guarantees, receivables financing, contingent liabilities, and off-balance-sheet commitments. Cash flow quality often matters more than accounting earnings. Liquidity and RefinancingLiquidity analysis should identify unrestricted cash, committed undrawn facilities, minimum cash requirements, seasonal working-capital needs, covenant headroom, maturities, commercial paper dependence, and access to capital markets. A solvent issuer can default because it cannot refinance a near-term maturity. A maturity wall is a concentration of debt repayments in a limited period. Stress TestingStress cases should vary revenue, margins, interest rates, foreign exchange, working capital, capital expenditure, and refinancing spreads. The analyst should ask whether the issuer can remain compliant, maintain liquidity, and refinance under a plausible adverse scenario. Sensitivity analysis is more informative when it identifies management actions and their feasibility rather than presenting only mechanical ratio changes. 9. Integrated Valuation and Credit Decision FrameworkA professional process can follow these steps: - Map all contractual cash flows, currencies, maturities, options, and payment priorities.
- Select an appropriate benchmark curve and discount framework.
- Calculate price, yield measures, duration, convexity, and spread measures.
- Analyze the issuer’s industry, strategy, financial statements, liquidity, and governance.
- Read the complete offering memorandum, trust deed, loan agreement, security documents, and guarantees.
- Estimate default probability, recovery, and downside value under multiple scenarios.
- Compare the instrument’s spread and expected return with alternatives of similar risk.
- Identify monitoring triggers, including covenant breaches, rating actions, spread widening, cash-burn acceleration, and refinancing events.
The investment decision should distinguish three returns: contractual carry, expected credit loss, and mark-to-market risk. A high coupon is not necessarily high value. The relevant question is whether compensation is adequate for all material risks. 10. Illustrative Case: Meridian Components FinanceThis is a fictional case designed for educational purposes. BackgroundMeridian Components, an automotive-parts manufacturer, proposes a five-year ₹500 crore senior unsecured bond with an 8.75% annual coupon. A government benchmark of similar maturity yields 6.25%, so the initial spread is 2.50 percentage points. Meridian operates in a cyclical industry and has significant exposure to two large customers. ProblemAn investor must decide whether the spread compensates for credit and interest-rate risk. The company reports EBITDA of ₹150 crore, total debt of ₹600 crore, cash of ₹70 crore, and annual cash interest expense of ₹48 crore. A ₹180 crore term loan is secured by substantially all assets of a principal operating subsidiary. The proposed bonds are issued by the holding company and have no direct security. AnalysisGross debt-to-EBITDA is: ₹600 crore ÷ ₹150 crore = 4.0× Interest coverage using EBITDA as a rough screening measure is: ₹150 crore ÷ ₹48 crore ≈ 3.1× These ratios are not conclusive. Depreciation is high, maintenance capital expenditure is ₹65 crore, and working capital absorbs ₹25 crore annually. Approximate pre-financing cash generation after interest, capital expenditure, and working capital is therefore only: ₹150 − ₹48 − ₹65 − ₹25 = ₹12 crore The holding-company bonds are structurally subordinated to the secured debt at the operating subsidiary. If the operating subsidiary owns most assets, bondholders may have limited direct access to them. The 2.50% spread should therefore be compared with similarly subordinated, cyclical issuers rather than with senior secured industrial debt. A downside scenario assumes EBITDA falls 25% to ₹112.5 crore. Interest coverage on the existing interest burden becomes approximately 2.34×, before considering additional interest on the proposed bonds. If the new bonds add ₹43.75 crore of annual coupon, consolidated cash interest becomes approximately ₹91.75 crore and EBITDA-based coverage falls to about 1.23×. After capital expenditure and working capital, liquidity could become negative unless management cuts investment, sells assets, draws facilities, or refinances. Approach and DecisionThe investor should request a detailed debt-capacity model, subsidiary guarantees, limitations on additional secured debt, minimum liquidity, restrictions on asset transfers, and a clear change-of-control provision. The investor should also analyze customer concentration and the value of collateral after the secured lender’s claim. A cautious decision could be to reject the issue at 250 basis points unless the bonds receive stronger structural protection or a materially wider spread. Alternatively, the investor may accept a smaller position if liquidity is strong, maturities are well staggered, and covenant protections are improved. Learning PointsThe case demonstrates that reported leverage alone is insufficient. Cash-flow conversion, debt location, collateral priority, covenant quality, refinancing risk, and downside recovery all influence the appropriate spread. It also illustrates why issuer-level analysis must be separated from instrument-level analysis. 11. Limitations, Governance, and Contemporary PracticeModels can create false precision. Default probabilities depend on historical samples, economic regimes, and definitions of default. Recovery values depend on uncertain future enterprise value and legal outcomes. Duration assumes specified cash flows and a simplified yield shift. Spread comparisons may be distorted by liquidity and embedded options. Governance risks include aggressive accounting, undisclosed related-party transactions, weak board oversight, conflicts between shareholders and creditors, and incentive structures that encourage excessive leverage. Analysts must document assumptions, challenge management adjustments, preserve an audit trail, and avoid relying mechanically on ratings. Technology supports bond screening, covenant extraction, cash-flow forecasting, scenario analysis, and anomaly detection. Artificial intelligence can help identify changes in filings and legal documents, but it may misread definitions, miss exceptions, or reproduce biased historical judgments. Human review is essential for material contractual interpretation, issuer communication, and investment approval. Confidential information must be handled under applicable securities laws and information-barrier policies. Contemporary fixed-income practice increasingly incorporates climate-transition risk, supply-chain resilience, cyber risk, private-credit opacity, sustainability-linked terms, and rapid changes in refinancing conditions. These factors matter financially when they affect cash flows, asset values, access to capital, or legal obligations. They should be translated into explicit scenarios rather than treated as unexamined labels. Best-Practice Checklist- Match cash-flow frequency, day-count, and compounding conventions.
- Separate benchmark-rate risk from credit-spread risk.
- Use duration for small changes and convexity for improved approximation.
- Examine key-rate and spread duration where curve or credit movements are non-parallel.
- Reconcile reported and adjusted EBITDA.
- Map debt by legal entity, security, maturity, currency, and priority.
- Read definitions and exceptions in covenant documents.
- Model liquidity under adverse but plausible assumptions.
- Estimate recovery by creditor class, not only at enterprise level.
- Treat ratings as inputs rather than substitutes for independent analysis.
- Record assumptions, sensitivities, data sources, and monitoring triggers.
Chapter SummaryFixed-income valuation discounts contractual cash flows using market-consistent rates. Price, coupon, current yield, YTM, spot rates, and forward rates answer different questions and must not be conflated. Duration measures first-order price sensitivity to yield changes, while convexity improves estimates by capturing curvature. Term-structure analysis separates maturity-related rate movements from credit-spread movements and other risks. Credit analysis extends beyond ratios. Probability of default, loss given default, recovery, security, seniority, guarantees, covenants, and structural subordination determine the risk of a particular instrument. Issuer assessment requires analysis of business quality, leverage, cash-flow generation, liquidity, refinancing, governance, and stress resilience. Professional decisions integrate valuation with legal-document review and downside analysis, while recognizing the limitations of models, ratings, and automated tools. Key TermsBond valuation: Present-value assessment of promised or expected bond cash flows. Coupon rate: Annual contractual coupon divided by face value. Current yield: Annual coupon divided by market price. Yield to maturity: Discount rate equating price with promised cash flows to maturity. Spot rate: Rate applicable to a single cash flow at a specified maturity. Forward rate: Rate implied for a future period by current spot rates. Duration: Measure of a bond’s timing-weighted cash-flow exposure to yield changes. Modified duration: Approximate percentage price sensitivity to a unit change in yield. Convexity: Curvature of the price-yield relationship. Credit spread: Yield difference between a risky instrument and a comparable benchmark. Probability of default: Likelihood that an obligor fails to meet contractual obligations. Loss given default: Proportion of exposure expected to be lost after default. Recovery rate: Proportion of a claim recovered after default. Covenant: Contractual restriction or requirement protecting lenders. Maintenance covenant: Covenant tested periodically regardless of a new transaction. Structural subordination: Lower effective priority caused by debt being issued above operating subsidiaries. Maturity wall: Concentration of debt maturities within a limited period. Key-rate duration: Sensitivity to movements at particular points on the yield curve. Yield to worst: Lowest relevant yield among contractual redemption scenarios. Debt waterfall: Priority sequence determining distribution of value among creditors. Review QuestionsShort Answer Questions- Why does a bond trade at a discount when its coupon rate is below the required market yield?
- Distinguish current yield from yield to maturity.
- What does modified duration estimate?
- Why is a holding-company bond potentially structurally subordinated?
- Why is credit spread not equal to expected default loss?
Long Answer Questions- Explain the valuation of a fixed-rate bond using spot rates and discuss the assumptions behind YTM.
- Derive the duration-convexity approximation and explain when it may be unreliable.
- Compare expectations, liquidity-preference, market-segmentation, and preferred-habitat explanations of the term structure.
- Discuss how covenants, collateral, guarantees, and seniority affect credit risk and recovery.
- Develop a comprehensive framework for evaluating an issuer’s creditworthiness and refinancing risk.
Analytical / Application Questions- A bond has modified duration 6.2 and convexity 48. Estimate its percentage price change if yield rises by 100 basis points, using both duration alone and duration plus convexity. Explain the difference.
- An issuer has conditional default probabilities of 1%, 2%, and 4% in years one, two, and three. Calculate three-year survival and cumulative default probability, assuming annual periods and no recovery adjustment.
- Construct a creditor waterfall for a holding company whose operating subsidiary has secured debt, trade claims, senior unsecured debt, and subordinated notes. Explain how asset location affects expected recovery for each class.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1A five-year bond has an 8% annual coupon and a required yield of 10%, with annual payments and face value ₹1,000. Which statement is most accurate? A. It should trade above ₹1,000 because it pays coupons. B. It should trade below ₹1,000 because its coupon is below the required yield. C. It must trade exactly at ₹1,000 because maturity is five years. D. Its price cannot be determined without the issuer’s rating. Correct Answer: B. It should trade below ₹1,000 because its coupon is below the required yield. Question 2Which measure is defined as annual coupon divided by market price? A. Current yield B. Yield to maturity C. Spot rate D. Forward rate Correct Answer: A. Current yield Question 3If a bond’s modified duration is 5 and its yield rises by 0.50%, the duration-only estimated percentage price change is: A. +2.50% B. +0.50% C. −0.50% D. −2.50% Correct Answer: D. −2.50% Question 4For an option-free conventional bond, positive convexity generally means that: A. Price rises more for a given yield increase than for an equal yield decrease. B. Price rises more for a given yield decrease than it falls for an equal yield increase. C. Price is unaffected by yield changes. D. The bond must be callable. Correct Answer: B. Price rises more for a given yield decrease than it falls for an equal yield increase. Question 5If the probability of default is 3% and the recovery rate is 40%, the approximate expected loss is: A. 1.2% B. 2.4% C. 3.0% D. 40.0% Correct Answer: B. 2.4% Question 6Which statement best describes a maintenance covenant? A. It is tested only when the issuer issues new debt. B. It is tested periodically regardless of whether a new transaction occurs. C. It eliminates all default risk. D. It applies only to government securities. Correct Answer: B. It is tested periodically regardless of whether a new transaction occurs. Question 7Structural subordination most directly arises when: A. A bond has a floating coupon. B. A holding-company creditor ranks behind creditors of an operating subsidiary in access to subsidiary assets. C. A bond is issued at a premium. D. A government yield curve is upward sloping. Correct Answer: B. A holding-company creditor ranks behind creditors of an operating subsidiary in access to subsidiary assets. Question 8Which ratio is calculated as EBIT divided by cash interest expense? A. Debt-to-equity B. Interest coverage C. Current ratio D. Recovery rate Correct Answer: B. Interest coverage Question 9If annual conditional default probabilities are 1% and 2% in years one and two, the two-year survival probability is: A. 97.00% B. 97.02% C. 98.00% D. 99.98% Correct Answer: B. 97.02% Question 10Which statement about credit ratings is most appropriate? A. A rating guarantees repayment. B. An issue rating must always equal the issuer rating. C. Ratings summarize credit risk but do not replace independent analysis. D. Ratings measure only interest-rate duration. Correct Answer: C. Ratings summarize credit risk but do not replace independent analysis.
|