Security Analysis & Financial Analysis

Chapter 6
Business, Industry and Competitive Analysis

Post Graduate Program in Investment Banking
Security Analysis & Financial Analysis   •   Post Graduate Diploma

Business, Industry and Competitive Analysis

Introduction

Security analysis begins with a deceptively simple question: what economic activities generate the cash flows that support a security’s value? Financial statements describe historical performance, but valuation requires an informed view of the business’s future earning power, risks and strategic position. Business, industry and competitive analysis provides that bridge.

A professional analyst therefore studies the firm at three connected levels. First, the business model explains how the company creates, delivers and captures value. Second, industry analysis examines the economic environment in which that model operates, including demand, supply, competition, regulation and technological change. Third, competitive analysis evaluates whether the firm possesses advantages that can sustain superior returns.

These analyses are essential in investment banking. They inform equity research, initial public offerings, mergers and acquisitions, fairness opinions, credit assessments, restructuring advice and strategic reviews. They also prevent a common error: treating reported growth as evidence of durable value creation without asking whether growth is profitable, financeable and defensible.

Learning Objectives

After completing this chapter, the reader should be able to:

  1. Explain business models and identify their principal revenue and cost drivers.
  2. Analyse unit economics, operating leverage and scalability.
  3. Assess industry structure using demand, supply and competitive-force frameworks.
  4. Evaluate competitive advantage, barriers to entry and the sustainability of returns.
  5. Identify cyclicality, regulation and macroeconomic exposure.
  6. Integrate ESG-related strategic risks into security analysis.
  7. Apply structured analysis to an investment-banking case.
  8. Recognise the limitations and governance risks of business and competitive analysis.

1. Understanding the Business Model

A business model is the logic by which an organisation serves customers and converts resources into economic returns. It is broader than a product description and more useful than a slogan. A complete business-model analysis answers six questions:

  • Who is the customer and what problem is being solved?
  • What is the value proposition?
  • How are customers acquired, served and retained?
  • How does the firm generate revenue?
  • What resources, activities and partners are required?
  • How do revenues, costs, capital investment and working capital translate into cash flow?

Common models include transaction-based businesses, subscription businesses, advertising-supported platforms, licensing models, franchising, marketplaces, asset-heavy manufacturing, professional services and regulated utilities. These categories are not mutually exclusive. A software company, for example, may combine subscriptions, usage charges, implementation fees and advertising.

Revenue architecture

Revenue analysis should proceed beyond total sales. The analyst should identify:

  • Price: the amount charged per unit, customer or period;
  • Volume: units, transactions, users or customers sold;
  • Mix: the relative contribution of products, geographies and customer groups;
  • Retention: repeat purchase, renewal or churn behaviour;
  • Timing: when revenue is recognised and when cash is collected;
  • Concentration: dependence on major customers, channels or markets.

For a simple one-product business:

Revenue = Price × Quantity

Price and quantity must be measured over the same period and in consistent units. For a multi-product firm:

Revenue = ∑(Pᵢ × Qᵢ)

where Pᵢ is the price of product or service i and Qᵢ is its quantity. The summation is meaningful only when products are not double-counted and revenue recognition is consistent.

Growth may be decomposed conceptually into price, volume, mix, currency and acquisition effects. A firm reporting 15% sales growth may actually have declining unit demand offset by price increases, or strong organic growth obscured by a divestiture. Each interpretation has different implications for sustainability.

Cost architecture and operating leverage

Costs should be classified economically rather than solely by financial-statement labels. Variable costs change broadly with activity; fixed costs remain relatively stable over a relevant range; semi-variable costs contain both components. The relevant range matters because a factory, call centre or data network may require additional capacity once utilisation exceeds a threshold.

For a simplified firm:

Operating profit = (Price − Variable cost per unit) × Quantity − Fixed costs

The formula assumes one product, constant unit price and variable cost, and fixed costs that do not change within the relevant activity range. It excludes financing costs and taxes; therefore it describes operating profit rather than net income.

A business with high fixed costs has high operating leverage. When demand rises, profit may increase faster than revenue after fixed costs are covered. When demand falls, the same structure magnifies the decline. High operating leverage is not inherently good or bad: it is valuable when demand is resilient and dangerous when demand is volatile.

Cash conversion

Accounting profit does not equal cash generation. Analysts examine receivables, inventory, payables, deferred revenue, capital expenditure and lease obligations. A useful simplified relationship is:

Free cash flow to the firm = EBIT × (1 − Tax rate) + Depreciation and amortisation − Capital expenditure − Increase in net working capital

Here EBIT is earnings before interest and tax. The expression assumes that tax is approximated as a proportion of EBIT, depreciation and amortisation are non-cash expenses, and capital expenditure and working-capital investment are measured consistently. It is a simplified unlevered cash-flow measure and may require adjustments for restructuring costs, provisions, leases, pensions and other non-recurring items.

A business with impressive EBITDA but persistent cash deficits may be investing heavily for growth, suffering from poor working-capital control, or capitalising costs that should be expensed. The analyst must distinguish a deliberate investment phase from an uneconomic business model.

2. Unit Economics and Growth Quality

Unit economics studies profitability at the level of a customer, transaction, location, loan, policy or product. It is particularly important for start-ups, platforms, consumer businesses and businesses expanding through repeated units.

For a basic product:

Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit − Variable cost per unit
Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin per unit ÷ Selling price per unit

Contribution margin excludes fixed costs. It indicates how much each incremental unit contributes toward fixed costs and profit, but it is not equivalent to operating margin.

For a subscription or customer-acquisition business, analysts often compare customer acquisition cost (CAC) with customer lifetime value (LTV). A simplified LTV estimate is:

LTV ≈ Average revenue per customer per period × Gross margin × Expected customer lifetime

If the expected lifetime is estimated as 1 ÷ churn rate, then:

LTV ≈ Average revenue per customer per period × Gross margin ÷ Periodic churn rate

The second expression assumes a stable churn rate, stable revenue and margin, and a simple expected-lifetime approximation. It is unreliable when churn varies materially by cohort, customer age or contract type. CAC should include relevant sales and marketing costs and should be compared with LTV on a consistent gross-margin and time basis.

Illustrative example. Suppose a software customer pays $100 per month, the gross margin is 80%, monthly churn is 2%, and fully loaded acquisition cost is $2,400.

Monthly contribution is $100 × 0.80 = $80. The simplified expected lifetime is 1 ÷ 0.02 = 50 months. Thus LTV is approximately $80 × 50 = $4,000. The LTV/CAC ratio is $4,000 ÷ $2,400 ≈ 1.67. This may support growth, but it is not automatically attractive: payback takes $2,400 ÷ $80 = 30 months, and the calculation ignores discounting, expansion revenue, support costs beyond the stated margin and cohort deterioration.

Important unit-economic indicators include churn, retention, average order value, utilisation, take rate, repeat purchase rate, contribution per location, payback period and cohort profitability. Analysts should test whether economics improve with scale or deteriorate because new customers are less attractive, service costs rise, or promotional pricing becomes necessary.

3. Industry Analysis

Industry analysis places the firm within its competitive and institutional context. The relevant industry is not always the one used by a stock-exchange classification. A bank may compete with payment platforms; a hotel may compete with short-term rental platforms; a newspaper may compete with digital advertising and social media.

Industry boundaries and value chains

Define the industry by customer need, substitutability and economic function. Then map the value chain: inputs, production, distribution, complementors, customers and after-sales services. Value-chain mapping reveals where bargaining power and profits accumulate. A manufacturer may have low margins while a branded distributor captures more value; a platform may control customer access even when suppliers perform the underlying service.

Porter’s five forces

The five-forces framework evaluates the structural potential for industry profitability:

  1. Rivalry among existing competitors: affected by concentration, growth, differentiation, switching costs, excess capacity and exit barriers.
  2. Threat of new entrants: affected by capital requirements, scale economies, regulation, access to distribution, intellectual property and network effects.
  3. Bargaining power of suppliers: increased when inputs are concentrated, specialised or difficult to replace.
  4. Bargaining power of buyers: increased when buyers are concentrated, price-sensitive or able to switch easily.
  5. Threat of substitutes: arises from alternative ways of satisfying the same customer need, including technological substitutes.

The framework is structural rather than mechanical. A concentrated industry may still be unprofitable if competitors engage in aggressive price competition. Conversely, a fragmented industry can generate attractive returns if differentiation and local advantages are strong.

Industry life cycle

Industries commonly pass through introduction, growth, maturity and decline, although stages may overlap and industries can be revitalised. Growth industries may provide expanding demand but attract capital and competitors. Mature industries may grow slowly yet generate dependable cash flows. Declining industries can still create value for low-cost operators, consolidators or firms serving defensible niches.

Useful indicators include market growth, capacity additions, utilisation, pricing, inventory levels, customer penetration, research intensity, consolidation and bankruptcy rates. Analysts should separate market growth from share gains: a company can grow in a shrinking market by taking competitors’ customers, but such growth may provoke retaliation.

Cyclicality and operating sensitivity

Cyclicality refers to systematic variation in demand, prices or margins with economic conditions. Industries exposed to construction, advertising, discretionary consumption, commodities and capital expenditure are often cyclical. Defensive industries may still face cycles through input costs, regulation or credit conditions.

A practical analysis considers:

  • historical revenue and margin ranges;
  • correlation with GDP, employment, interest rates, housing and commodity prices;
  • order books and lead indicators;
  • fixed-cost intensity and capacity utilisation;
  • inventory and credit cycles;
  • management behaviour during prior downturns.

Scenario analysis is preferable to a single point forecast. A downside case might combine lower volume, weaker price, adverse mix, higher input costs and delayed customer payments. The analyst should examine liquidity and covenant headroom, not merely earnings sensitivity.

4. Competitive Advantage and Economic Profit

Competitive advantage exists when a firm can earn returns above the cost of capital for a sustained period. The central question is not whether a company is large or popular, but whether rivals can replicate its economics.

Potential sources include:

  • Cost advantage: lower input, production, distribution or financing cost;
  • Differentiation: valued product attributes that support price or retention;
  • Scale economies: lower unit cost as volume expands;
  • Network effects: a service becomes more valuable as participation increases;
  • Switching costs: financial, operational or psychological costs of changing provider;
  • Intangible assets: brands, patents, data, licences and organisational know-how;
  • Efficient scale: a market is too small to support many competitors profitably;
  • Distribution and relationships: privileged access to customers or channels.

A resource is strategically valuable only if it is difficult to imitate or substitute and if the firm is organised to exploit it. A patent that expires soon, a brand unsupported by customer preference, or a network with low user engagement may offer less protection than management claims.

ROIC and value creation

A standard measure of operating value creation is return on invested capital:

ROIC = NOPAT ÷ Invested capital

NOPAT is net operating profit after tax, commonly approximated as EBIT × (1 − tax rate). Invested capital represents operating assets financed by debt and equity, commonly measured as interest-bearing debt plus equity minus non-operating cash, with adjustments for leases and other relevant items. Definitions must be consistent across firms and periods.

Economic profit can be expressed as:

Economic profit = (ROIC − WACC) × Invested capital

WACC is the weighted average cost of capital. This relationship assumes ROIC and WACC are measured on comparable after-tax, nominal or real bases and that invested capital represents the capital supporting operations. Growth creates value when incremental returns exceed the cost of capital; growth below that threshold can destroy value even when revenue rises.

Competitive advantage should be evaluated dynamically. A firm may have a current advantage but face erosion from open-source technology, regulation, customer insourcing, changing tastes or platform disintermediation. The duration of excess returns is often more important to valuation than the current margin alone.

5. Regulation, Macroeconomics and ESG Risk

Regulation

Regulation can affect revenues, costs, capital requirements, market access, product design and liability. Analysts should distinguish:

  • economic regulation, such as price controls or access rules;
  • prudential regulation, such as capital and liquidity requirements;
  • conduct regulation, including consumer protection and disclosure;
  • environmental regulation, including emissions and waste standards;
  • competition regulation, including merger control and abuse-of-dominance rules.

Regulatory analysis should identify the rule, affected business line, implementation timetable, compliance cost, potential penalties and strategic response. Regulation may be a burden, but it can also create barriers to entry and protect incumbents.

Macroeconomic exposure

Map the firm’s sensitivity to interest rates, inflation, currencies, employment, commodity prices, trade policy and credit availability. Exposure may be direct or indirect. A retailer may be affected by employment and real wages; a technology company may be affected by discount rates and corporate IT budgets; an exporter may face currency translation and transaction risk.

Use sensitivity and scenario analysis rather than unsupported claims. For example, an interest-rate increase can reduce demand for financed products, increase the firm’s borrowing cost and lower the present value of future cash flows. The effects may occur at different speeds and may be partly hedged.

ESG-related strategic risk

ESG analysis is most useful when connected to enterprise value rather than treated as a checklist. Relevant channels include:

  • environmental transition costs, carbon pricing and physical climate damage;
  • labour availability, safety, turnover and productivity;
  • data privacy, cybersecurity and customer trust;
  • supply-chain labour practices and resilience;
  • board independence, incentives, controls and shareholder rights;
  • litigation, licence-to-operate risk and reputational damage.

The analyst should ask whether an ESG issue changes revenue, costs, capital expenditure, asset life, insurance, financing terms, terminal value or probability of severe loss. Materiality is industry-specific. Water scarcity may be central to agriculture, while data governance may dominate analysis of a digital platform.

ESG claims require evidence. Greenwashing risk arises when marketing language exceeds measurable performance. Analysts should reconcile sustainability reports with operating data, regulatory filings, third-party information and capital-allocation decisions.

6. A Structured Analytical Process

A disciplined workflow reduces confirmation bias:

  1. Define the investment question. Is the task valuation, credit assessment, acquisition screening or strategic advice?
  2. Describe the business model. Identify customers, products, pricing, channels and cash conversion.
  3. Build operating drivers. Link volume, price, mix, retention, costs, capital expenditure and working capital.
  4. Define the industry. Map substitutes, value chains, regulation and life-cycle position.
  5. Assess competition. Compare market share, margins, returns, customer metrics, capabilities and reinvestment.
  6. Test durability. Identify barriers, threats, disruption and management responses.
  7. Model scenarios. Include base, upside and downside cases with explicit assumptions.
  8. Connect analysis to valuation and risk. Translate strategic conclusions into cash flows, discount rates, multiples, covenants and transaction terms.
  9. Challenge the thesis. Search for disconfirming evidence and alternative explanations.
  10. Document sources and judgement. Separate reported facts, estimates and analyst interpretation.

A useful output is a driver tree: customers → transactions → revenue → contribution margin → operating profit → reinvestment → free cash flow. Every major forecast line should have an operational explanation.

7. Illustrative Case: Northstar Cold Chain Services

Background

Northstar Cold Chain Services is a fictional regional provider of temperature-controlled warehousing and transport for food and pharmaceutical customers. An investment bank is considering advising a larger logistics group on a potential acquisition.

Problem

Northstar has grown revenue by 18% annually for three years, but its EBITDA margin has remained near 12%. The acquirer wants to know whether growth is durable and whether Northstar’s assets and customer relationships create a defensible advantage.

Analysis

Business model. Northstar earns storage fees per pallet-day, transport fees per shipment and additional charges for specialised handling. Revenue therefore depends on occupied capacity, price per pallet-day, shipment volume and service mix. Electricity, labour, maintenance and fuel are major costs. Warehouses and refrigeration systems create substantial fixed costs.

Unit economics. A new facility requires high upfront capital expenditure. Attractive economics depend on reaching sufficient utilisation. At 85% utilisation, the facility produces a strong contribution after variable labour and energy costs; at 60%, fixed costs materially depress returns. Customer retention is high because pharmaceutical customers face validation and compliance costs when changing providers.

Industry structure. Entry requires land, refrigeration expertise, permits, compliance systems and customer trust. However, large food retailers possess buyer power, and regional competitors can compete aggressively for standard storage. Pharmaceutical logistics is more differentiated and regulated than general food storage.

Competitive advantage. Northstar’s strongest assets are validated pharmaceutical processes, a dense network near airports and a record of low temperature excursions. Its advantage is weaker in ordinary food storage, where switching costs and differentiation are limited. The analyst should not apply the pharmaceutical margin to the entire business.

Cyclicality and macroeconomics. Food demand is relatively defensive, but transport volumes and customer inventory policies fluctuate. Energy inflation threatens margins, although contracts permit partial pass-through with a lag. Higher interest rates increase the cost of funding new facilities and reduce acquisition capacity.

ESG and regulation. Refrigerants may face stricter environmental rules. Electricity consumption creates both cost and emissions exposure. Worker safety and product integrity are material governance and operational issues. A serious temperature excursion could cause product loss, regulatory action and reputational damage.

Approach and outcome

The advisory team recommends a segment-based valuation rather than applying one multiple to total EBITDA. It builds three scenarios:

  • Base: utilisation rises gradually, energy costs are partly passed through and pharmaceutical growth remains strong.
  • Upside: network density improves route economics and new pharmaceutical contracts fill existing capacity.
  • Downside: food-storage pricing declines, energy pass-through is delayed and a new facility opens below break-even utilisation.

The proposed transaction includes representations concerning compliance, environmental liabilities and customer concentration, plus an earn-out tied to pharmaceutical contract renewals. Due diligence priorities include facility-level contribution, maintenance capex, lease commitments, customer churn, temperature-excursion history, regulatory permits and energy procurement.

Learning points

The case demonstrates that revenue growth alone does not establish value. Analysis must identify the operating unit, distinguish attractive and unattractive segments, test utilisation and fixed-cost risk, and translate regulatory and ESG issues into financial consequences. It also shows why transaction structure can allocate uncertainty when forecasts are difficult to verify.

8. Limitations, Ethics and Technology

Frameworks simplify reality. Porter’s forces may understate cooperation, complementors and platform dynamics. Unit economics can be distorted by allocation choices, cohort selection or promotional acquisition. ROIC is affected by accounting treatment, goodwill, inflation and asset age. Historical margins may not represent replacement economics.

Analysts must avoid conflicts of interest, selective disclosure and investment recommendations based on material non-public information. They should distinguish fact from assumption, disclose uncertainty, maintain an audit trail and challenge management representations. In investment banking, independence may be difficult when advisory fees depend on completing a transaction.

Artificial intelligence can assist with document extraction, competitor monitoring, customer-review analysis, scenario generation and anomaly detection. It should not replace source verification or professional judgement. Models may reproduce biased data, confuse correlation with causation, omit confidential context or generate fabricated citations. Sensitive information must be handled under applicable confidentiality and data-governance controls.

Best Practices

Effective business and competitive analysis should:

  • begin with customer economics rather than company slogans;
  • reconcile operational metrics with reported financial statements;
  • use segment and cohort analysis where averages conceal differences;
  • compare returns with the cost of capital;
  • distinguish temporary performance from structural advantage;
  • stress-test volume, price, costs, utilisation and financing;
  • integrate regulation and ESG through cash-flow and risk channels;
  • document assumptions, sources and confidence levels;
  • seek evidence that could falsify the investment thesis; and
  • update conclusions when industry conditions or competitive behaviour changes.

Chapter Summary

Business, industry and competitive analysis explains the economic foundations of security value. Business-model analysis identifies customers, pricing, volume, mix, costs, capital intensity and cash conversion. Unit economics tests whether growth creates contribution and whether customer or transaction-level returns improve with scale.

Industry analysis examines boundaries, value chains, life-cycle position, cyclicality, substitutes, suppliers, buyers, entrants and rivalry. Competitive analysis asks whether cost, differentiation, scale, networks, switching costs, intangible assets or distribution create a durable advantage. ROIC exceeds value-creation thresholds only when it is greater than the cost of capital, and growth is valuable only when incremental returns justify reinvestment.

Regulation, macroeconomic exposure and ESG issues should be translated into effects on revenue, margins, capital expenditure, financing, liability and strategic flexibility. A rigorous analyst uses driver-based forecasts, scenarios, segment analysis, source verification and ethical judgement. Frameworks guide inquiry, but they do not substitute for evidence or critical thinking.

Key Terms

Business model: The logic by which a firm creates, delivers and captures value.

Revenue driver: An operating factor that determines sales, such as price, volume or retention.

Unit economics: Profitability analysis at the level of a customer, transaction, product or operating unit.

Contribution margin: Revenue less variable costs attributable to the relevant unit or activity.

Operating leverage: Sensitivity of operating profit to changes in revenue caused by fixed costs.

Customer acquisition cost (CAC): Cost of acquiring a customer, measured on a defined and consistent basis.

Customer lifetime value (LTV): Estimated present or undiscounted contribution generated by a customer over its relationship.

Industry life cycle: The progression of an industry through introduction, growth, maturity and decline.

Value chain: The sequence of activities and participants that create and deliver a product or service.

Competitive rivalry: The intensity of competition among existing firms.

Barrier to entry: A condition that makes entry by new competitors difficult or uneconomic.

Switching cost: Cost incurred by a customer when changing suppliers or systems.

Network effect: A condition in which service value changes with the number or quality of participants.

Cyclicality: Variation in business performance associated with economic or industry cycles.

NOPAT: Net operating profit after tax.

ROIC: Return on invested capital, commonly NOPAT divided by invested capital.

WACC: Weighted average cost of capital.

Economic profit: Profit remaining after charging the business for the capital it employs.

ESG risk: Environmental, social or governance exposure that may affect enterprise value or risk.

Greenwashing: Misleading presentation of environmental or sustainability performance.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. What six questions should a complete business-model analysis address?
  2. Distinguish variable costs from fixed costs and explain why the distinction matters.
  3. What are the five forces in Porter’s industry framework?
  4. Define competitive advantage and identify two possible sources.
  5. Why should ESG issues be connected to enterprise-value drivers?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain how revenue growth can be decomposed into price, volume, mix, retention and acquisition effects. Why is this decomposition important for valuation?
  2. Discuss unit economics, including contribution margin, CAC, LTV and payback period. State the principal limitations of simplified LTV calculations.
  3. Evaluate the usefulness and limitations of Porter’s five-forces framework in analysing a technology platform.
  4. Explain how operating leverage and cyclicality interact to affect downside risk.
  5. Discuss how ROIC, WACC and economic profit can be used to assess whether growth creates value.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A subscription business charges $60 per month, has a gross margin of 75%, monthly churn of 3% and CAC of $900. Using the simplified stable-churn LTV method, calculate LTV, LTV/CAC and the simple CAC payback period. Identify two reasons why the result may overstate economic value.
  2. A manufacturer has rising revenue but falling cash flow. Construct a diagnostic analysis using price, volume, mix, operating leverage, working capital, capital expenditure and customer concentration.
  3. An acquisition target operates in a regulated, energy-intensive industry with a specialised customer segment and a commoditised segment. Design a due-diligence and valuation approach that incorporates competition, regulation, ESG risk, scenarios and transaction protections.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which measure best represents the amount available from each additional unit to cover fixed costs and profit?

A. Contribution margin

B. Net income

C. WACC

D. Accounts payable

Correct Answer: A. Contribution margin

Question 2

A firm has monthly revenue per customer of $100, gross margin of 80%, and monthly churn of 2%. Using the simplified stable-churn method, approximate LTV is:

A. $400

B. $2,000

C. $4,000

D. $5,000

Correct Answer: C. $4,000

Question 3

Which of the following is not one of Porter’s five forces?

A. Bargaining power of suppliers

B. Threat of substitutes

C. Government budget surplus

D. Rivalry among existing competitors

Correct Answer: C. Government budget surplus

Question 4

If ROIC is 14% and WACC is 10%, the firm is creating economic profit when invested capital is positive because:

A. Revenue growth must be negative

B. ROIC exceeds WACC

C. Debt is zero

D. Operating leverage is absent

Correct Answer: B. ROIC exceeds WACC

Question 5

Which characteristic most directly indicates a high fixed-cost business?

A. Profit changes little when volume changes

B. Unit costs always rise with volume

C. Profit is highly sensitive to utilisation after capacity is installed

D. All costs are paid in cash immediately

Correct Answer: C. Profit is highly sensitive to utilisation after capacity is installed

Question 6

A major reason to analyse customer cohorts is to determine whether:

A. Reported depreciation is tax deductible

B. New and older customers have different retention and profitability

C. Industry regulation can be ignored

D. WACC equals the risk-free rate

Correct Answer: B. New and older customers have different retention and profitability

Question 7

Which is an example of a barrier to entry?

A. A temporary promotional discount

B. A mandatory licence combined with scarce technical capability

C. A decline in customer retention

D. A firm’s quarterly reporting date

Correct Answer: B. A mandatory licence combined with scarce technical capability

Question 8

In the simplified FCFF relationship presented in the chapter, an increase in net working capital generally:

A. Increases free cash flow

B. Has no cash-flow effect

C. Reduces free cash flow

D. Raises ROIC automatically

Correct Answer: C. Reduces free cash flow

Question 9

Which ESG issue is most directly connected to a digital platform’s licence to operate?

A. Data privacy and cybersecurity

B. Warehouse pallet density

C. Commodity inventory turnover only

D. Factory depreciation method only

Correct Answer: A. Data privacy and cybersecurity

Question 10

Why is segment-based valuation often preferable for a company with pharmaceutical and ordinary food-storage operations?

A. All segments necessarily have identical risks

B. Different segments may have different margins, barriers and growth prospects

C. Segment reporting eliminates the need for scenarios

D. It guarantees a higher acquisition price

Correct Answer: B. Different segments may have different margins, barriers and growth prospects

Security Analysis & Financial Analysis
Chapter 6 of 14