Inventory Management Systems

Chapter 2
Inventory Economics, Costs and Financial Performance

Post Graduate Program in Logistics
Inventory Management Systems   •   Post Graduate

Inventory Economics, Costs and Financial Performance

Introduction

Inventory is both an operating resource and a financial investment. It enables a firm to decouple supply from demand, protect customer service against uncertainty, consolidate purchases, and exploit economies of scale. At the same time, inventory absorbs cash, occupies space, creates handling and control requirements, and may lose value through deterioration, obsolescence, theft, or technological change. Effective inventory management therefore requires more than selecting reorder points: it requires an integrated understanding of cost, working capital, accounting measurement, operational performance, and financial return.

The central managerial problem is economic trade-off. A policy that minimizes purchase price may increase carrying costs or obsolete stock. A policy that eliminates excess inventory may increase shortages and expedite costs. Financially attractive inventory performance is achieved when the service benefits generated by inventory exceed its full economic cost and the capital committed produces an acceptable return.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, the reader should be able to:

  1. Classify and analyse ordering, acquisition, holding, shortage, and obsolescence costs.
  2. Explain the economic logic of balancing service and inventory investment.
  3. Calculate economic order quantity, total relevant cost, reorder implications, and inventory performance measures.
  4. Relate inventory to working capital and the cash-to-cash cycle.
  5. Distinguish accounting inventory valuation from managerial economic valuation.
  6. Interpret turnover, days of supply, gross margin return, and return on inventory investment.
  7. Evaluate an inventory policy using operational, financial, governance, and risk perspectives.

1. Inventory as an Economic Decision

Inventory exists because timing, quantity, location, and uncertainty are not perfectly synchronized. Common forms include cycle stock created by replenishment batches, safety stock held against uncertainty, anticipation stock held for predictable peaks, pipeline stock in transit, and decoupling stock between stages of a process.

The economic value of inventory is not identical to its purchase price. Its value depends on the benefits it provides, such as avoiding a lost sale, preventing production stoppage, or reducing transport frequency. Its cost includes direct expenditure and opportunity costs that may not appear on the purchase invoice.

A useful decision principle is:

Increase inventory when the incremental service or operating benefit exceeds the incremental total cost; reduce it when the reverse is true.

This principle is superior to an absolute objective such as “minimize inventory,” because zero inventory can be economically irrational where demand and supply are variable.

Relevant and sunk costs

A cost is relevant to a decision if it changes as a consequence of that decision. The purchase cost of a unit is relevant when comparing suppliers or order quantities, but it may be irrelevant to a short-term decision about already purchased stock. Historical expenditure that cannot be recovered is a sunk cost. Nevertheless, accounting records must still report inventory appropriately, and managers must consider disposal, replacement, and opportunity costs.

2. The Structure of Inventory Cost

2.1 Acquisition and purchase cost

Acquisition cost includes the supplier price and costs necessary to bring inventory to its present location and condition. Depending on the accounting framework and the nature of the transaction, this may include freight, import duties, insurance in transit, receiving, inspection, and directly attributable conversion costs. Trade discounts and rebates normally reduce cost.

For managerial analysis, acquisition cost may also include quality failures, supplier administration, payment-term effects, and the expected cost of disruption. A low quoted price is not necessarily a low total acquisition cost.

A purchase-price variance compares actual purchase price with a standard or budgeted price:

Purchase-price variance = (Actual price − Standard price) × Actual quantity purchased

The result is expressed in currency. A positive result conventionally indicates an unfavourable variance when actual price exceeds standard price; organizations should state their sign convention explicitly.

2.2 Ordering and setup cost

Ordering cost is incurred per replenishment event rather than per unit. It may include requisition processing, supplier communication, approval, transport planning, receiving, inspection, invoice matching, and payment administration. In manufacturing, the analogous setup cost includes cleaning, tooling, calibration, and lost production time.

If annual demand is D, order quantity is Q, and the cost per order is S, the annual ordering cost is:

Ordering cost = (D ÷ Q) × S

The formula assumes relatively stable annual demand, a constant order cost, and replenishment events that are counted as D ÷ Q. It is not appropriate without modification where order costs vary materially by supplier, transport mode, or order size.

2.3 Holding or carrying cost

Holding cost is the cost of possessing inventory over time. It commonly includes:

  • capital or financing cost;
  • warehouse space, utilities, equipment, and labour;
  • insurance and property-related charges;
  • shrinkage, damage, deterioration, and handling;
  • systems, counting, and control costs;
  • expected obsolescence and disposal costs.

If average inventory is measured in units, unit cost is C, and the annual carrying-rate fraction is i, annual holding cost is:

Holding cost = Average inventory × C × i

The carrying rate should be defined carefully. It may include only financing cost, or it may be a comprehensive rate including storage, risk, and service costs. Double counting must be avoided: for example, expected obsolescence should not be included both in the carrying rate and as a separate loss unless the policy explicitly separates them.

For a basic order-cycle model with instantaneous replenishment and no safety stock, average cycle inventory is Q ÷ 2. Thus:

Annual holding cost = (Q ÷ 2) × C × i

This is a special case. If safety stock is SS, average inventory is approximately Q ÷ 2 + SS, subject to the treatment of pipeline, anticipation, and excess stock.

2.4 Shortage and stockout cost

Shortage cost occurs when inventory cannot satisfy demand at the required time or location. It can include lost contribution margin, backorders, production interruption, emergency freight, substitution, customer compensation, loss of goodwill, contractual penalties, and future demand loss.

Shortage cost is difficult to estimate because some effects are immediate and observable while others are probabilistic and long term. A lost sale should not automatically be valued at lost revenue: the relevant economic loss is usually the lost contribution margin plus consequential effects. Conversely, a backorder may create a delay cost rather than a lost sale.

A simple expected shortage-cost expression is:

Expected shortage cost = Probability of shortage × Cost per shortage event

This is valid only when the event cost is reasonably homogeneous. With different shortage quantities or consequences, the expected cost should be calculated across scenarios:

Expected shortage cost = ∑ (Probability of scenario j × Cost in scenario j)

2.5 Obsolescence and depreciation of inventory

Obsolescence is the loss of economic usefulness or recoverable value caused by technological change, regulation, fashion, product substitution, expiry, or a change in customer requirements. It differs from physical deterioration: an item may be physically perfect but commercially obsolete.

Expected obsolescence cost can be represented as:

Expected obsolescence cost = Probability of obsolescence × Exposure at risk

“Exposure at risk” may be the purchase cost, replacement cost, or expected unrecoverable value, depending on the decision. For items with a salvage value, the expected loss should reflect the difference between recorded or economic cost and recoverable value.

Obsolescence risk is strongly influenced by product life cycle, engineering changes, minimum order quantities, forecast bias, and delayed disposition decisions. Governance therefore requires clear ownership of slow-moving and non-moving inventory.

3. The Economic Order Quantity Model

The classical Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model identifies the order quantity that minimizes annual ordering and cycle-stock holding costs. With annual demand D, order quantity Q, ordering cost S, unit cost C, and annual holding rate i, the relevant annual cost is:

TC(Q) = (D ÷ Q)S + (Q ÷ 2)Ci

Purchase expenditure DC is excluded when unit price is constant and independent of order quantity. If quantity discounts exist, purchase cost must be included in the comparison.

Differentiating with respect to Q gives:

dTC ÷ dQ = −DS ÷ Q² + Ci ÷ 2

Setting the derivative equal to zero produces:

Q* = √(2DS ÷ Ci)

The model assumes constant and known demand, constant replenishment lead time, instantaneous replenishment, no shortages, fixed ordering cost, constant unit price, and a holding cost proportional to inventory. Real systems rarely satisfy all assumptions; EOQ is therefore a benchmark, not an automatic order instruction.

At the optimum, annual ordering cost equals annual cycle-stock holding cost. This equality is a property of the basic model and should not be generalized to systems containing safety stock, quantity discounts, capacity constraints, or shortage penalties.

Worked example: basic EOQ

A distributor has annual demand of 24,000 units. Each order costs $75 to process and transport. Unit acquisition cost is $20, and the annual carrying rate is 25 percent. Therefore C × i = 20 × 0.25 = $5 per unit-year.

Q* = √(2 × 24,000 × 75 ÷ 5) = √720,000 ≈ 848.5 units

The recommended theoretical quantity is approximately 849 units. Annual ordering cost is:

(24,000 ÷ 848.5) × 75 ≈ $2,121.32

Annual cycle-stock holding cost is:

(848.5 ÷ 2) × 5 ≈ $2,121.25

The small difference is rounding. Total relevant cost is approximately $4,242.57 per year, excluding purchase expenditure because price is constant.

4. Replenishment, Safety Stock and Service

EOQ addresses replenishment quantity, not timing. Reorder timing depends on demand during lead time and the desired service level. With average demand per time unit d and lead time L, expected lead-time demand is:

Lead-time demand = d × L

If demand and lead time are deterministic, the reorder point is simply lead-time demand. With uncertainty, a common representation is:

Reorder point = Expected lead-time demand + Safety stock

For normally distributed independent demand during a fixed lead time:

Safety stock = z × σLT

where z is the standard-normal service-factor quantile and σLT is the standard deviation of demand during lead time. If period demand has standard deviation σd and lead time is L periods, then, under independence:

σLT = σd × √L

If both demand and lead time vary, a more general variance expression is required. One commonly used approximation, assuming independence, is:

σLT² = E(L)σd² + E(d)²σL²

where E(L) is expected lead time, E(d) is mean demand per period, and σL is lead-time standard deviation. This approximation should not be used when demand and lead time are correlated without incorporating covariance.

Cycle service level is the probability of not experiencing a stockout during a replenishment cycle. Fill rate is the proportion of demand quantity supplied immediately from stock. They are different measures: a high cycle service level does not necessarily imply a high fill rate when shortage quantities vary.

5. Working Capital and the Cash-to-Cash Cycle

Inventory is a current asset, but it is not cash. Cash is committed when materials are purchased and released when inventory is sold and collected. The cash-to-cash, or cash conversion, cycle links operating decisions to liquidity:

Cash-to-cash cycle = Days inventory outstanding + Days sales outstanding − Days payables outstanding

Days inventory outstanding (DIO) measures the average time inventory remains invested:

DIO = Average inventory ÷ Cost of goods sold × 365

Days sales outstanding (DSO) is:

DSO = Average accounts receivable ÷ Net credit sales × 365

Days payables outstanding (DPO) is:

DPO = Average accounts payable ÷ Cost of goods sold or relevant purchases × 365

The denominator for DPO should be selected consistently with the organization’s accounting practice. These measures are averages, not exact transaction-level cash dates. A shorter cash-to-cash cycle can improve liquidity, but aggressive reduction of inventory or extension of supplier payment may damage service, supplier viability, or resilience.

Worked example: cash-to-cash cycle

Suppose average inventory is $3.0 million, annual cost of goods sold is $18.0 million, average receivables are $4.5 million, annual credit sales are $30.0 million, and average payables are $2.0 million. Using 365 days:

DIO = 3.0 ÷ 18.0 × 365 = 60.83 days
DSO = 4.5 ÷ 30.0 × 365 = 54.75 days
DPO = 2.0 ÷ 18.0 × 365 = 40.56 days

Therefore:

Cash-to-cash cycle = 60.83 + 54.75 − 40.56 = 75.02 days

Approximately 75 days of operating cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting customer cash.

6. Inventory Valuation and Managerial Measurement

Financial reporting and managerial decision-making use related but distinct concepts. Financial accounting seeks consistent measurement of assets, profit, and cost of sales under applicable standards. Managerial analysis asks whether a future decision creates value and may use replacement cost, opportunity cost, expected disposal value, or risk-adjusted cost.

Common cost-flow methods include:

MethodInterpretationTypical analytical implication
FIFOEarliest costs are assigned to cost of sales firstIn rising prices, reported closing inventory tends to be higher
Weighted averageCosts are averaged over available unitsReduces cost-layer volatility
Specific identificationActual cost is assigned to identifiable unitsSuitable for unique or high-value items

The permitted methods and required write-down rules depend on the applicable reporting framework and jurisdiction. Inventory is generally not reported above its recoverable or realizable amount where accounting standards require a write-down. Managers must also distinguish accounting write-downs from physical disposal: an item can be written down before it is physically removed.

Inventory records should reconcile quantities and values through receiving, transfers, issues, returns, adjustments, cycle counts, and disposals. Weak master data, incorrect units of measure, duplicate stock-keeping units, and unauthorized adjustments can distort both operational and financial metrics.

7. Performance Metrics and Return on Inventory Investment

Inventory turnover

Inventory turnover indicates how many times average inventory is consumed or sold during a period:

Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Average inventory

Cost of goods sold is preferable to sales revenue because both numerator and denominator are cost-based. A high turnover may indicate efficient use of inventory, but it may also indicate understocking, frequent shortages, or excessive replenishment risk. A low turnover may reflect excess stock, seasonal build-up, long supply pipelines, or deliberate resilience.

Days of supply and days inventory outstanding

If turnover is measured on a 365-day basis:

Days of supply = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover

Equivalently, when using cost-based inventory:

Days of supply = Average inventory ÷ Annual demand or usage at cost × 365

Days of supply is often operationally expressed using forecast demand, while DIO is a financial ratio using cost of goods sold. They may differ when forecast demand, sales volume, and accounting cost are not aligned.

Gross margin return on inventory investment

A widely used retail measure is gross margin return on inventory investment (GMROII):

GMROII = Gross margin ÷ Average inventory at cost

Gross margin equals sales revenue less cost of goods sold. GMROII estimates gross-margin dollars generated per dollar of average inventory cost. It does not include all operating expenses, taxes, capital charges, or service-risk costs, so it is not identical to economic profit.

Return on inventory investment

A broader managerial measure can be expressed as:

ROII = Incremental operating benefit attributable to inventory policy ÷ Average inventory investment

The numerator must be defined. It may be gross margin, contribution margin, avoided disruption cost, or operating profit after relevant inventory costs. A rigorous analysis should state whether the measure is before or after holding, obsolescence, shortage, and financing costs. Comparing ROII across businesses is unreliable unless definitions, time periods, valuation bases, and service requirements are consistent.

8. Integrated Policy Analysis

Inventory decisions should be evaluated through a balanced scorecard rather than a single ratio. A useful policy review considers:

  1. Service: fill rate, stockout frequency, promised-date performance, and critical-item availability.
  2. Cost: purchase, ordering, holding, shortage, obsolescence, handling, and disposal cost.
  3. Capital: inventory value, DIO, cash-to-cash cycle, and working-capital release.
  4. Risk: supplier concentration, disruption exposure, regulatory requirements, and resilience.
  5. Data quality: forecast accuracy, inventory record accuracy, lead-time reliability, and master-data completeness.
  6. Sustainability: waste, energy use, reverse logistics, and disposal impacts.

Pareto analysis and ABC classification can focus managerial attention on high-value or high-impact items, but value alone is insufficient. A low-value spare part may be operationally critical, while a high-value item may be readily available. ABC analysis should therefore be combined with criticality, demand variability, lead-time risk, and obsolescence exposure.

9. Illustrative Case: Northstar Medical Devices

This is a fictional illustrative case.

Background

Northstar Medical Devices distributes sterile diagnostic cartridges to hospitals. Its annual demand is 120,000 cartridges, with a unit acquisition cost of $8. The company’s ordering and receiving cost averages $140 per order. Its finance department uses a 24 percent annual carrying rate. Demand is relatively stable, but hospital service agreements impose severe penalties for shortages.

Problem

Northstar orders 5,000 cartridges at a time. Average cycle stock is therefore approximately 2,500 units, before safety stock. A review found that the firm also held 4,000 units of safety stock, giving average inventory of about 6,500 units. The product has a 12-month shelf life, and engineering changes have made 3 percent of annual stock vulnerable to obsolescence.

Analysis

The EOQ benchmark is:

Q* = √(2 × 120,000 × 140 ÷ (8 × 0.24))
= √(33,600,000 ÷ 1.92)
= √17,500,000 ≈ 4,183 units

The current order quantity is higher than the benchmark, increasing cycle stock. However, reducing the order quantity without reviewing safety stock and service requirements would be incomplete. The holding cost per unit-year is $1.92. Current cycle-stock holding cost is approximately:

2,500 × 1.92 = $4,800 per year

At the EOQ benchmark, cycle stock would be approximately 2,091.5 units and annual cycle-stock holding cost approximately $4,016. The direct saving is modest relative to the risk of stockouts, so the main opportunity may be safety-stock calibration and expiry management rather than EOQ alone.

Northstar segments cartridges by hospital criticality, measures demand and lead-time variability, and calculates safety stock by service segment. It introduces FEFO—first expired, first out—picks, monthly shelf-life reviews, supplier expiry guarantees, and controlled engineering-change notices. Finance separately reports working-capital release, write-offs, and service penalties.

Outcome

After a pilot, average safety stock for non-critical hospitals falls while critical-hospital protection is retained. Expiry-related write-offs decline, inventory records become more accurate, and the company reports service by segment rather than using one aggregate target. The case demonstrates that the economically best policy is not simply the policy with the lowest average inventory. It is the policy that allocates inventory where its service value is highest and removes stock where it generates little benefit.

Learning points

  • EOQ is a benchmark within a broader policy.
  • Safety stock should reflect differentiated service consequences.
  • Shelf life converts excess inventory into a time-sensitive financial risk.
  • Financial and operational metrics must be reconciled rather than optimized separately.

10. Technology, Governance and Contemporary Practice

Enterprise resource planning systems, warehouse-management systems, barcode scanning, RFID, and IoT sensors can improve visibility, transaction accuracy, location control, and condition monitoring. Predictive analytics can estimate demand distributions, lead-time variability, expiry risk, and likely stockout consequences. AI may support anomaly detection, parameter recommendations, and scenario analysis, but it does not eliminate the need for managerial judgment.

AI-based inventory recommendations should be governed through documented data lineage, explainable parameters, human approval thresholds, monitoring for forecast bias, and controls against automated over-ordering. A model trained on historical sales may reproduce past stockouts and understate latent demand. It may also ignore contractual service requirements or a newly introduced product. Decision rights must remain clear.

Important governance practices include segregation of purchasing and receiving duties, approval limits, cycle-count policies, audit trails, controlled master-data changes, documented write-off authority, and periodic review of carrying-rate assumptions. Regulatory and ethical requirements may be especially important for pharmaceuticals, food, medical devices, hazardous materials, and products subject to traceability or recall obligations.

Sustainability adds another dimension. Excess inventory can produce waste and disposal emissions, while insufficient inventory can cause emergency transport, repeated production setups, and customer disruption. Life-cycle analysis should therefore consider the consequences of both surplus and shortage rather than assuming that lower stock is automatically greener.

Challenges and Limitations

Inventory economics contains unavoidable measurement difficulties. Holding rates are partly conventional; shortage costs may be latent; average inventory can conceal large peaks and stockouts; accounting values may differ from replacement economics; and aggregate turnover can hide poor performance in critical categories. Seasonal businesses require time-matched averages, and inflation can distort comparisons across periods.

Models also depend on assumptions. EOQ does not model capacity, quantity discounts, multiple items sharing transport, supplier minimums, correlated demand, or service differentiation. Normal-distribution safety stock can be inappropriate for intermittent, lumpy, or highly skewed demand. Financial ratios are descriptive and should not be treated as causal evidence. Good practice is to conduct sensitivity analysis, use scenario ranges, validate assumptions with operational data, and evaluate service and risk alongside cost.

Best-Practice Checklist

  • Define every cost component and avoid double counting.
  • Separate purchase, ordering, holding, shortage, and obsolescence costs.
  • Use EOQ as a benchmark, not as an unquestioned policy.
  • Segment inventory by value, criticality, variability, lead time, and life cycle.
  • Reconcile operational quantities with financial values.
  • Use cost-based denominators consistently in financial ratios.
  • Track service, working capital, risk, and sustainability together.
  • Review slow-moving and obsolete stock with named accountability.
  • Govern analytics and AI through transparent assumptions and human oversight.
  • Test policy changes through pilots and sensitivity analysis.

Chapter Summary

Inventory is an economic investment that creates service and operating benefits while consuming cash and generating holding, risk, and control costs. The principal cost categories are acquisition, ordering or setup, holding, shortage, and obsolescence. The classical EOQ model balances ordering and cycle-stock holding cost under restrictive assumptions; it must be supplemented by safety stock, service-level analysis, lead-time variability, and practical constraints.

Inventory affects liquidity through working capital and the cash-to-cash cycle. Financial measures such as turnover, days of supply, DIO, GMROII, and ROII are useful only when their definitions and valuation bases are explicit. Accounting valuation supports reliable reporting, whereas managerial valuation may require opportunity cost, replacement cost, recoverable value, and risk-adjusted analysis. Effective practice integrates financial performance with service, resilience, data quality, governance, and sustainability.

Key Terms

Inventory: Stock held to support future demand, production, distribution, or service.

Acquisition cost: Cost necessary to purchase and bring inventory to its present location and condition.

Ordering cost: Cost incurred each time replenishment is initiated and processed.

Setup cost: Cost of preparing equipment or processes for a production run.

Holding cost: Cost of possessing inventory over time.

Shortage cost: Economic consequence of unavailable inventory when required.

Obsolescence: Loss of economic usefulness or value due to change, expiry, or substitution.

Cycle stock: Inventory created by ordering or producing in batches.

Safety stock: Inventory held to protect against uncertainty.

Economic Order Quantity: Order quantity minimizing basic ordering plus cycle-stock holding cost.

Reorder point: Inventory position at which replenishment should be initiated.

Service level: Probability or proportion measure of satisfying demand, defined according to a stated convention.

Working capital: Current operating investment, including inventory and receivables net of operating payables.

Cash-to-cash cycle: Time between cash payment to suppliers and cash collection from customers.

Inventory turnover: Cost of goods sold divided by average inventory.

Days of supply: Number of demand or usage days represented by available inventory.

GMROII: Gross margin generated per dollar of average inventory at cost.

ROII: Return attributable to inventory investment under a stated benefit definition.

FEFO: First-expired, first-out inventory issuing method.

Carrying rate: Annual percentage or rate used to estimate inventory holding cost.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. Why can minimizing inventory be an economically inappropriate objective?
  2. Distinguish ordering cost from holding cost.
  3. What is the difference between cycle service level and fill rate?
  4. Why is cost of goods sold normally preferred to sales revenue in inventory turnover?
  5. Identify two limitations of the classical EOQ model.

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain the principal components of total inventory cost and discuss the difficulty of estimating shortage and obsolescence costs.
  2. Derive the basic EOQ expression and state its assumptions and practical limitations.
  3. Explain how inventory affects the cash-to-cash cycle and working-capital management.
  4. Compare FIFO, weighted-average, and specific-identification inventory valuation from managerial and financial perspectives.
  5. Discuss how an organization can balance service, cost, capital, resilience, and sustainability in inventory policy.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. Annual demand is 36,000 units, ordering cost is $90 per order, unit cost is $15, and the annual carrying rate is 20 percent. Calculate the basic EOQ and annual relevant cost at that quantity. State the assumptions used.
  2. A firm has average inventory of $2.4 million, annual cost of goods sold of $14.4 million, average receivables of $3.6 million, annual credit sales of $24 million, and average payables of $1.6 million. Calculate DIO, DSO, DPO, and the cash-to-cash cycle using 365 days.
  3. A product has high turnover but frequent emergency shipments and customer backorders. Analyse why turnover alone gives a misleading performance assessment and recommend a balanced set of measures.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which cost is incurred primarily because inventory is held over time?

A. Ordering cost

B. Holding cost

C. Purchase-price variance

D. Requisition cost

Correct Answer: B. Holding cost

Question 2

In the basic EOQ model, which two annual costs are balanced at the optimum?

A. Purchase cost and shortage cost

B. Ordering cost and cycle-stock holding cost

C. Obsolescence cost and sales revenue

D. Freight cost and tax cost

Correct Answer: B. Ordering cost and cycle-stock holding cost

Question 3

Annual demand is 10,000 units, ordering cost is $50, unit cost is $10, and the annual carrying rate is 20%. What is the basic EOQ?

A. 500 units

B. 707 units

C. 1,000 units

D. 1,414 units

Correct Answer: B. 707 units

Question 4

Which expression correctly represents the cash-to-cash cycle?

A. DIO + DSO − DPO

B. DIO − DSO + DPO

C. DSO + DPO − DIO

D. DIO × DSO ÷ DPO

Correct Answer: A. DIO + DSO − DPO

Question 5

Why is cost of goods sold generally used in the numerator of inventory turnover?

A. It is always larger than sales revenue

B. It provides a cost-based comparison with inventory

C. It excludes all inventory costs

D. It measures customer satisfaction

Correct Answer: B. It provides a cost-based comparison with inventory

Question 6

A firm has average inventory of $1 million and annual cost of goods sold of $5 million. What is its inventory turnover?

A. 0.2 times

B. 2 times

C. 5 times

D. 6 times

Correct Answer: C. 5 times

Question 7

What does safety stock primarily protect against?

A. Constant unit prices

B. Uncertainty in demand or replenishment

C. Accounting depreciation only

D. Trade discounts

Correct Answer: B. Uncertainty in demand or replenishment

Question 8

Which statement about GMROII is correct?

A. It equals gross margin divided by average inventory at cost

B. It equals sales divided by accounts payable

C. It measures only supplier lead time

D. It is identical to net profit margin

Correct Answer: A. It equals gross margin divided by average inventory at cost

Question 9

Which inventory method issues items with the earliest expiry first?

A. FIFO by receipt date only

B. LIFO

C. FEFO

D. Specific identification only

Correct Answer: C. FEFO

Question 10

A high inventory turnover can coexist with poor customer service when the firm:

A. Has excessive safety stock

B. Experiences frequent stockouts and emergency replenishment

C. Uses weighted-average costing

D. Has long payment terms

Correct Answer: B. Experiences frequent stockouts and emergency replenishment

Inventory Management Systems
Chapter 2 of 15