Warehouse Design, Layout and Storage SystemsIntroductionA warehouse is not merely a building in which inventory is stored. It is a flow system that receives, identifies, protects, stores, retrieves, consolidates and dispatches materials in response to demand. Warehouse design therefore integrates operations strategy, inventory policy, facility engineering, information systems, human factors, safety and financial analysis. The central design challenge is to achieve the required service level with the least total cost and acceptable risk. A layout that minimises travel may require more automation; a layout that maximises storage density may reduce accessibility; and a layout designed for current demand may become a constraint when product variety or order volume increases. Effective design is consequently a process of balancing space, flow, labour, equipment, information and flexibility. Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter, the learner should be able to: - Design receiving, storage, picking, packing and dispatch zones.
- Compare storage media and material-handling equipment.
- Calculate and interpret capacity, space-utilisation and flow measures.
- Apply slotting principles to improve travel, productivity and ergonomics.
- Evaluate layout alternatives using operational, financial and strategic criteria.
- Incorporate scalability, safety, technology and sustainability into warehouse design.
1. Warehouse Design as an Integrated SystemWarehouse design has three interdependent dimensions: - Structural design: the building envelope, columns, floor, docks, ceiling height, fire protection, utilities and environmental controls.
- Operational design: receiving, put-away, replenishment, picking, packing, dispatch, returns, cycle counting and exception handling.
- Control design: warehouse-management systems, identification technologies, task allocation, performance measurement and governance.
A change in one dimension affects the others. For example, high-bay storage increases vertical capacity but demands suitable lift equipment, rack protection, floor flatness, fire engineering and trained operators. Similarly, batch picking may raise picker productivity but increases sorting requirements and the probability of consolidation errors. A useful design sequence is: - Define customer-service requirements and product characteristics.
- Analyse order, inventory and activity data.
- Establish process flows and zoning requirements.
- Estimate capacity and peak demand.
- Generate alternative layouts and storage systems.
- Test alternatives using simulation, pilot trials or sensitivity analysis.
- Select equipment, technology and controls.
- Implement, measure and continuously improve.
The design should be based on peak or design demand rather than average demand alone. However, designing for the absolute maximum can create excessive capital cost. A defensible approach identifies normal, seasonal and extreme scenarios and assigns an acceptable probability and duration to overflow operations. 2. From Material Flow to Layout2.1 Basic warehouse processThe principal physical flow is: Receiving → inspection and identification → put-away → storage → replenishment → picking → consolidation → packing → dispatch Returns, damaged goods, quarantine stock, value-added services and recycling may require separate flows. These should not be treated as afterthoughts because they can disrupt forward operations and create inventory inaccuracies. Two broad layout patterns are common: - U-flow: receiving and dispatch are located on the same side of the building. It supports shared docks, flexible labour deployment and cross-utilisation of equipment, but inbound and outbound traffic must be carefully controlled.
- Through-flow or I-flow: receiving is at one end and dispatch at the opposite end. It can provide a clear directional flow for high-volume operations, but may require more building frontage and can reduce flexibility.
Neither pattern is universally superior. The selection depends on site constraints, product flow, dock availability, traffic separation, expansion plans and the degree of process specialisation. 2.2 Functional zonesA robust layout generally distinguishes the following zones: | Zone | Primary purpose | Key design concern |
|---|
| Receiving | Unload, count and identify inbound goods | Dock capacity and inspection space | | Inbound staging | Temporarily hold goods awaiting decisions | Avoiding congestion and misidentification | | Quarantine/quality | Isolate non-released or suspect stock | Physical and system segregation | | Reserve storage | Hold replenishment inventory | Density, accessibility and safety | | Forward pick | Hold immediately accessible picking stock | Short travel and replenishment control | | Value-added services | Kitting, labelling or light assembly | Labour standards and traceability | | Packing | Verify, package and document orders | Ergonomics and carton flow | | Dispatch staging | Consolidate orders by route or carrier | Time windows and shipment accuracy | | Returns | Inspect, grade and disposition returned goods | Reverse-flow separation | | Support areas | Offices, maintenance, charging and welfare | Safety and operational visibility |
The area assigned to each zone should reflect activity, not simply inventory volume. Packing may require little inventory space but substantial labour and work-in-process space during the dispatch wave. 2.3 Flow and adjacency analysisLayouts can be analysed with a from-to chart, which records movements between departments. If departments are represented by i and j, the approximate handling burden can be represented as: H = ∑ᵢ∑ⱼ Fᵢⱼ dᵢⱼ cᵢⱼ Here, H is the total movement burden; Fᵢⱼ is the number of trips or load movements from area i to area j during the planning period; dᵢⱼ is the travel distance; and cᵢⱼ is the cost per unit distance or movement. The equation is useful for comparing layouts, provided that the same time period, load unit and cost basis are used. It does not by itself capture congestion, safety risk, vertical travel, waiting or differences in handling difficulty. High-volume, high-frequency relationships should generally be close together, subject to fire separation, security, contamination control and safe-traffic requirements. The shortest physical distance is not always the best arrangement if it creates crossing flows or unsafe pedestrian interaction. 3. Capacity and Space Planning3.1 Inventory capacityStorage capacity must be distinguished from building area. A warehouse may have substantial floor area but low usable capacity because of aisles, columns, docks, offices, fire clearances and inaccessible corners. For a storage module, nominal locations can be estimated as: N = R × L × V where N is the number of storage locations, R is the number of rack rows or bays, L is the number of usable positions per row, and V is the number of vertical levels. The calculation assumes that all positions are physically usable and does not include losses caused by damaged locations, clearance requirements or incompatible product dimensions. The effective capacity is: Cₑ = N × u × a where Cₑ is effective capacity, u is the physical usability factor, and a is the availability factor reflecting locations reserved for operational reasons. Both factors range from 0 to 1. For example, a facility with 2,400 nominal pallet positions, a usability factor of 0.96 and an availability factor of 0.90 has effective capacity of 2,073.6, normally reported as approximately 2,073 or 2,074 positions depending on the rounding policy. 3.2 Space utilisationSpace utilisation should be measured in three distinct ways: - Floor utilisation: occupied floor area divided by usable floor area.
- Cube utilisation: occupied volume divided by usable volume.
- Location utilisation: occupied storage positions divided by available storage positions.
Uc = Vo ÷ Vu × 100% U_c is cube utilisation, V_o is occupied inventory volume, and V_u is usable storage volume. The measure is meaningful only when both volumes use the same boundaries and when safety clearances are excluded consistently. High utilisation is not automatically desirable: very high occupancy can restrict access, increase congestion and make replenishment difficult. 3.3 Dock and staging capacityDock planning must consider arrival patterns, unloading rates, vehicle dwell time, appointment variability and inspection requirements. A simple first estimate of required dock positions is: D = ⌈λt ÷ m⌉ where D is the number of positions, λ is the average vehicle arrival rate during the design period, t is average dock occupancy time, m is the target utilisation allowance, and ⌈ ⌉ means round upward to the next whole position. This is a planning approximation, not a queueing model. If arrivals are highly variable or service-level requirements are strict, a queueing analysis or discrete-event simulation is more appropriate. 4. Storage Systems and MediaStorage media should be selected according to load characteristics, access frequency, selectivity, density, rotation policy, building height, fire requirements, budget and future flexibility. | Storage system | Strengths | Limitations | Typical application |
|---|
| Selective pallet rack | Direct access and flexible SKU allocation | Lower density than compact systems | High SKU variety and frequent access | | Drive-in rack | High density and fewer aisles | Limited selectivity; greater damage risk | Few SKUs, large quantities | | Double-deep rack | Improved density with reasonable access | Requires specialised reach equipment | Medium selectivity | | Pallet flow rack | Supports FIFO and high throughput | Higher capital and maintenance cost | Stable, fast-moving pallets | | Push-back rack | Good density and multiple pallet positions | Usually LIFO; complex loading | Moderate turnover and batch storage | | Carton flow rack | Fast piece picking and replenishment visibility | Requires suitable carton dimensions | Forward pick faces | | Shelving and bins | Low cost and flexible for small items | Labour-intensive; limited load capacity | Slow or medium-moving units | | Cantilever rack | Suitable for long or irregular loads | Limited to appropriate products | Timber, pipe, furniture and profiles | | Carousels or vertical lifts | Reduced walking and improved security | Dependence on controls and maintenance | Small parts and high-value items | | Automated storage and retrieval | High density, accuracy and controlled movement | High investment and integration risk | Predictable, high-volume operations |
The distinction between selectivity and density is fundamental. Selectivity is the proportion of inventory that can be accessed directly without moving other inventory. Density is the amount of inventory stored per unit of space. Compact storage increases density but often reduces selectivity. Storage policy must also reflect product rotation. FIFO supports age control and is essential for many food, pharmaceutical and regulated products. LIFO may be operationally acceptable for products without ageing or obsolescence concerns, but it can create hidden ageing and should not be used merely because a rack system makes it convenient. 5. Material-Handling EquipmentMaterial-handling equipment should be selected as part of a system rather than as isolated purchases. Important criteria include load unit, travel distance, lift height, aisle width, throughput, floor quality, operator skill, maintenance, energy use and safety. Common equipment includes pallet trucks, counterbalance forklifts, reach trucks, very-narrow-aisle trucks, order pickers, conveyors, sorters, cranes, automated guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots. The relevant comparison is not simply purchase price. Total cost includes acquisition, installation, energy, labour, maintenance, downtime, training, software integration and eventual disposal. A basic equipment-capacity check is: Tₑ = n × r × e where Tₑ is theoretical equipment capacity per hour, n is the number of operating units, r is rated cycles per hour, and e is an effective utilisation factor between 0 and 1. The factor e accounts for travel variability, waiting, charging, congestion, operator breaks and other losses. The result is an estimate, not a guarantee; design should include a peak requirement and a suitable safety margin. Equipment selection must protect people and product. Pedestrian walkways, rack guards, speed controls, visibility at intersections, charging ventilation, battery handling and operator training are design requirements, not optional additions. 6. Picking, Packing and Dispatch DesignPicking often represents the largest share of warehouse labour. The choice of method should reflect order profile, SKU variety, line count, order urgency and equipment. 6.1 Picking methods- Discrete picking: one picker completes one order. It is simple and provides clear accountability but may generate substantial travel.
- Batch picking: a picker collects the same SKU for several orders and later sorts the units. It reduces repeated travel but adds sorting and error-control requirements.
- Zone picking: each picker works within an assigned zone. Orders move between zones or are consolidated. It reduces travel per person but requires balancing and coordination.
- Wave picking: work is released in planned groups according to carrier departure, route, customer priority or labour availability. It improves synchronisation but may create peaks and idle periods.
- Goods-to-person picking: inventory is brought to a workstation by automated or semi-automated equipment. It can improve ergonomics and productivity but requires significant capital and reliable controls.
The most appropriate method may be hybrid. Fast-moving items can use goods-to-person or carton flow, while irregular or slow-moving items remain in shelving or selective rack. 6.2 SlottingSlotting assigns products to storage locations. A sound slotting decision considers: - demand frequency and quantity;
- cube, weight and dimensions;
- order affinity, meaning products frequently ordered together;
- replenishment frequency;
- expiry, lot and serial-control requirements;
- security and environmental needs;
- ergonomic reach limits;
- equipment compatibility; and
- future demand uncertainty.
A useful principle is to place high-activity items close to the point of use, but not to reduce the decision to velocity alone. A bulky, heavy product may have high demand but should be positioned at a safe, ergonomically suitable level. A small high-value item may require controlled access rather than the shortest travel path. One analytical measure is the cube-per-order index (COI): COIᵢ = sᵢ ÷ fᵢ where COIᵢ is the index for item i, sᵢ is the storage space required, and fᵢ is the number of order lines or picks over the selected period. Lower COI generally indicates greater activity per unit of storage space and may justify a more accessible location. COI should be supplemented by weight, handling risk, affinity and service constraints. 6.3 Packing and dispatchPacking design must control product protection, dimensional efficiency, verification and documentation. Workstations should position cartons, void fill, labels and tools within the operator’s normal reach. Scan verification at packing can detect wrong-item and wrong-quantity errors before dispatch. Dispatch staging should be organised by route, carrier, departure time, customer priority or temperature requirement. It must have clear status identification and a defined maximum dwell time. Staging areas that are too small cause congestion; those that are too large hide delays and consume valuable space. 7. Ergonomics, Safety and SustainabilityErgonomics seeks to fit the task to the worker. Design variables include lift frequency, load weight, reach distance, working height, twisting, visual demand and repetitive motion. Heavy or frequently picked items should generally be positioned between knee and shoulder height, subject to product and equipment constraints. Safety design should address: - vehicle–pedestrian separation;
- rack stability and impact protection;
- load ratings and inspection;
- emergency exits and fire access;
- safe dock edges and vehicle restraint;
- battery charging and hazardous materials;
- manual handling and work-at-height risks; and
- clear housekeeping and obstruction control.
Requirements vary by jurisdiction, so local occupational-safety, fire, building, accessibility and environmental regulations must be verified during design. Sustainable design can reduce both environmental impact and operating cost. Relevant measures include energy-efficient lighting, daylight control, electric equipment, regenerative charging, solar generation, reusable packaging, reduced empty travel, right-sized cartons and heat management. Sustainability analysis should consider the full life cycle rather than only the initial energy performance. 8. Technology, Data and Artificial IntelligenceA warehouse-management system (WMS) typically maintains item, location, lot, serial, status and task information. It can direct receiving, put-away, replenishment, picking, cycle counting and shipping. Barcode scanning remains widely useful because it is relatively inexpensive and robust. RFID can reduce line-of-sight requirements but involves tag, reader, interference and process-design considerations. Automation is most valuable where it solves a defined constraint. Conveyors can provide predictable transport; sorters can support high-volume order consolidation; automated storage can improve density and reduce travel; robots can support goods-to-person or collaborative movement. Automation does not eliminate the need for master-data quality, exception management, maintenance and human supervision. AI and analytics may support demand-based slotting, labour forecasting, anomaly detection, image-based damage inspection and dynamic task assignment. These applications require reliable historical data and governance. Managers should monitor model drift, false alarms, explainability, privacy and accountability. An algorithm should not make unreviewed decisions that create unsafe work, discriminatory task allocation or improper handling of regulated goods. 9. Performance Measurement and Continuous ImprovementWarehouse performance should be assessed through a balanced set of measures: | Dimension | Example measures |
|---|
| Service | On-time dispatch, order completeness, perfect-order rate | | Accuracy | Inventory accuracy, pick accuracy, shipping accuracy | | Productivity | Lines per labour hour, pallets per equipment hour | | Space | Cube utilisation, location utilisation, overflow frequency | | Flow | Dock-to-stock time, order cycle time, dwell time | | Cost | Cost per order line, labour cost, energy cost | | Safety | Incidents, near misses, ergonomic risk observations | | Sustainability | Energy per unit, packaging use, emissions and waste |
A single metric can produce dysfunctional behaviour. For example, maximising location utilisation may increase travel and reduce accessibility. Metrics should therefore be interpreted as a system and linked to service, cost and risk. Cycle counting is a control mechanism that detects discrepancies without requiring a complete annual shutdown. Counting frequency may be differentiated by value, velocity, risk and regulatory importance. Root-cause analysis should examine receiving errors, unit-of-measure problems, unrecorded movements, damages, picking mistakes and master-data weaknesses. 10. Worked Application: Designing a Regional E-Commerce WarehouseBackgroundThe following is an illustrative case. A regional distributor handles 18,000 order lines per day, with a seasonal peak of 27,000 lines. It stocks 6,000 active SKUs. Approximately 60% of lines are small items, 25% are medium cartons and 15% are bulky products. Customers expect same-day dispatch for orders released before 14:00. ProblemThe existing facility uses largely discrete picking. Pickers travel long distances, replenishment frequently interrupts picking, and dispatch staging becomes congested during the afternoon peak. Inventory accuracy is 96.5%, below the management target of 99.5%. AnalysisOrder-profile analysis shows that 15% of SKUs generate 70% of order lines. These fast movers are suitable for a forward-pick zone. Bulky items have low line frequency but require floor-level storage and dedicated handling. The operation also has strong order affinity among several product families, suggesting that some items should be positioned in neighbouring zones. The design team maps inbound and outbound flows, identifies pedestrian–forklift conflict points and measures travel by zone. It estimates that a 20% reduction in picker travel would release sufficient labour capacity to handle the seasonal peak without proportional recruitment. SolutionThe proposed layout uses a U-flow arrangement with separate receiving and dispatch lanes within a shared dock envelope. Selective pallet rack is retained for reserve stock. Carton-flow shelving is installed for fast-moving small items, while medium items use adjustable shelving and bulky items use floor locations and cantilever sections where appropriate. The picking system combines zone picking and batch release. Orders are consolidated at packing stations equipped with scan verification and right-sized carton selection. Replenishment is scheduled during lower picking intensity, with minimum and maximum quantities maintained for forward locations. High-risk and high-value items are placed in controlled-access areas. A WMS directs tasks and records location status. Cycle counting is risk-based: fast-moving and high-value locations are counted more frequently than stable, low-risk locations. Pedestrian routes are physically marked, and forklift crossings are reduced through one-way traffic rules and designated crossing points. OutcomeIn the illustrative implementation, average picker travel falls by 24%, inventory accuracy rises to 99.4% after master-data correction and disciplined scanning, and dispatch staging congestion is reduced by route-based lanes. The design retains expansion space for additional forward-pick modules and packing stations. The outcome depends not only on the physical layout but also on slotting discipline, replenishment control, training and management of exceptions. Learning points- Layout improvement begins with demand and activity data, not intuition.
- Fast movers should be analysed by lines, cube, weight and affinity.
- A forward-pick system requires reliable replenishment.
- Technology cannot compensate for inaccurate item and location data.
- Scalability should be designed into the building, systems and operating standards.
11. Design Challenges and Critical EvaluationWarehouse design involves uncertainty. Demand may change, product dimensions may be inaccurate, suppliers may alter packaging, labour availability may fluctuate and automation technology may become obsolete. Consequently, flexibility has economic value even when it reduces maximum theoretical density. Common design failures include: - sizing storage for average rather than peak demand;
- ignoring returns, quarantine and exception flows;
- locating fast movers without considering replenishment effort;
- selecting automation before defining the process;
- using utilisation as the only performance objective;
- failing to reserve space for maintenance and expansion;
- overlooking fire, accessibility and local regulatory requirements; and
- underestimating change-management and training needs.
Alternative designs should be tested using sensitivity analysis. Important scenarios include a change in order lines, SKU count, product cube, peak duration, labour cost, service promise and automation availability. A design that is optimal under one forecast may be inferior under a modest change in demand mix. Best-Practice Design Principles- Design the complete flow from receiving to dispatch, including exceptions.
- Separate people, vehicles and incompatible products through layout and controls.
- Match storage density to required selectivity and service speed.
- Use activity data and order affinity to guide slotting.
- Protect ergonomics and safety at the design stage.
- Measure effective capacity rather than nominal capacity.
- Provide modular expansion paths and flexible utilities.
- Integrate physical design with WMS rules and master data.
- Validate assumptions through pilots, simulation or controlled trials.
- Balance cost, service, resilience, sustainability and risk.
Chapter SummaryWarehouse design is the coordinated design of space, flow, storage, equipment, people and information. Effective layouts reduce unnecessary movement while preserving safety, selectivity and flexibility. Receiving, storage, picking, packing and dispatch zones must be designed as connected processes, with quarantine, returns and exception flows explicitly included. Storage systems involve a fundamental trade-off between density and selectivity. Selective rack, compact systems, flow rack, shelving, carousels and automation each suit different demand and product conditions. Capacity analysis must distinguish nominal from effective capacity and should consider peak requirements, utilisation, access and expansion. Picking design depends on order profile and may use discrete, batch, zone, wave or goods-to-person methods. Slotting should incorporate velocity, cube, weight, affinity, ergonomics, security and replenishment. Material-handling equipment should be evaluated using total cost, effective capacity, safety and integration requirements. Warehouse performance requires balanced metrics covering service, accuracy, productivity, space, flow, cost, safety and sustainability. Technology and AI can improve visibility and decision-making, but they depend on accurate data and responsible governance. The best warehouse designs are scalable, evidence-based and continuously improved. Key TermsWarehouse layout: Physical arrangement of areas, equipment, people and flows within a warehouse. U-flow: Layout in which receiving and dispatch are located on the same side of a facility. Through-flow: Layout in which inbound and outbound activities are positioned at opposite ends. Selectivity: Ability to access a stored unit directly without moving other units. Storage density: Inventory quantity or volume stored per unit of facility space. Forward-pick area: Accessible area holding stock for routine order picking. Reserve storage: Area holding replenishment inventory. Slotting: Assignment of products to storage and picking locations. Order affinity: Tendency of products to appear together in customer orders. Cube utilisation: Proportion of usable storage volume occupied by inventory. Effective capacity: Usable capacity after physical and operational allowances. Batch picking: Picking quantities for several orders in one travel cycle. Zone picking: Assignment of pickers or activities to defined warehouse zones. Wave picking: Release of picking work in planned groups or time windows. Cross-docking: Movement of inbound goods to outbound dispatch with little or no storage. Material-handling equipment: Equipment used to move, position or store materials. Warehouse-management system: Information system that directs and records warehouse operations. Quarantine stock: Inventory physically and systemically held pending a decision or release. Perfect-order rate: Proportion of orders delivered complete, accurate, undamaged and on time. Review QuestionsShort Answer Questions- What is the difference between storage density and selectivity?
- Why should a warehouse layout include returns and quarantine areas?
- Define forward-pick area and reserve storage.
- State two advantages and two limitations of batch picking.
- What is the purpose of cycle counting?
Long Answer Questions- Explain how receiving, storage, picking, packing and dispatch should be integrated in a warehouse layout.
- Compare selective pallet rack, drive-in rack, pallet flow rack and automated storage and retrieval systems.
- Discuss the factors that should be considered when slotting products.
- Explain how ergonomics, safety and sustainability influence warehouse design decisions.
- Evaluate the role of WMS, scanning, RFID and automation in improving warehouse performance.
Analytical / Application Questions- A warehouse has 3,000 nominal pallet positions, a usability factor of 0.95 and an availability factor of 0.90. Calculate effective capacity and explain why it differs from nominal capacity.
- A facility receives 18 vehicles per hour, with an average dock occupancy time of 20 minutes. If the target dock utilisation allowance is 0.75, estimate the minimum number of dock positions using the approximation given in this chapter. Discuss why a queueing analysis may produce a different result.
- An operation is considering either a dense LIFO storage system or a lower-density selective system for products with expiry dates and high SKU variety. Recommend an approach and justify it using selectivity, rotation, service and risk criteria.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which layout places receiving and dispatch activities on the same side of the warehouse? A. U-flow layout B. Through-flow layout C. Circular-flow layout D. Random-flow layout Correct Answer: A. U-flow layout Question 2A warehouse has 2,400 nominal locations, a usability factor of 0.96 and an availability factor of 0.90. What is its approximate effective capacity? A. 2,073.6 locations B. 2,304 locations C. 2,640 locations D. 2,880 locations Correct Answer: A. 2,073.6 locations Question 3Which storage system generally provides the highest direct access to individual pallets? A. Drive-in rack B. Selective pallet rack C. Push-back rack D. Block stacking Correct Answer: B. Selective pallet rack Question 4What is the principal purpose of a forward-pick area? A. To store damaged goods permanently B. To hold stock for routine order picking C. To receive supplier vehicles D. To store empty handling equipment Correct Answer: B. To hold stock for routine order picking Question 5In batch picking, the picker normally: A. Completes only one customer order per trip B. Picks quantities for several orders and later sorts them C. Works exclusively at the dispatch dock D. Moves reserve stock directly to suppliers Correct Answer: B. Picks quantities for several orders and later sorts them Question 6If an item requires 4 m² of storage space and generates 200 order lines, its COI is: A. 0.02 m² per order line B. 20 m² per order line C. 50 m² per order line D. 800 m² per order line Correct Answer: A. 0.02 m² per order line Question 7Which measure represents occupied inventory volume divided by usable storage volume? A. Location accuracy B. Cube utilisation C. Order completeness D. Dock productivity Correct Answer: B. Cube utilisation Question 8Why can maximising space utilisation reduce operational performance? A. It always reduces inventory accuracy B. It can restrict access and increase congestion C. It eliminates the need for replenishment D. It prevents the use of barcodes Correct Answer: B. It can restrict access and increase congestion Question 9Which factor is least appropriate as the sole basis for slotting? A. Demand frequency B. Product weight C. Ergonomic reach requirements D. Alphabetical order of the product description Correct Answer: D. Alphabetical order of the product description Question 10What is a major governance concern when AI is used for warehouse task allocation? A. The need to define rack colours B. Model drift, accountability and potentially unsafe decisions C. The elimination of all master data D. The requirement that every item be stored on the floor Correct Answer: B. Model drift, accountability and potentially unsafe decisions
|