Global and International LogisticsIntroduction and ContextGlobal logistics is the planning, coordination, execution, and control of the movement and storage of goods, information, documents, and financial flows across national borders. It extends domestic logistics by adding distance, multiple jurisdictions, foreign currencies, cultural differences, international transport interfaces, customs controls, political exposure, and greater uncertainty. A shipment that is operationally simple within one country may become strategically complex when it crosses several borders and involves manufacturers, freight forwarders, ports, customs brokers, carriers, banks, insurers, regulators, and distributors. International logistics is therefore not merely a transportation problem. It is a network-design and governance problem. Managers must balance landed cost, service reliability, inventory exposure, working capital, compliance, resilience, sustainability, and strategic access to markets. The lowest freight rate may produce the highest total cost if it creates border delays, demurrage, stockouts, quality losses, or regulatory penalties. The strategic importance of global logistics has increased because supply chains are geographically dispersed, customers expect shorter and more reliable delivery windows, and geopolitical events can rapidly alter trade lanes. Port congestion, sanctions, export controls, pandemics, armed conflict, extreme weather, cyberattacks, and changes in tariff policy may all affect network performance. Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this chapter, students should be able to: - Evaluate the structure and performance of global logistics networks and major trade lanes.
- Distinguish transport modes, port functions, intermodal interfaces, and international lead-time components.
- Apply Incoterms appropriately while recognizing their limits.
- Explain customs procedures, documentation, tariff classification, valuation, origin, duties, and trade compliance.
- Assess currency, infrastructure, partner, geopolitical, and regulatory risks.
- Recommend controls and network responses that improve resilience without ignoring cost and service trade-offs.
1. The Architecture of Global Logistics NetworksA global logistics network consists of nodes and links. Nodes include suppliers, factories, consolidation centers, ports, airports, bonded warehouses, distribution centers, customs offices, and customers. Links include ocean, air, rail, road, inland waterway, pipeline, and information connections. Ownership and control may be distributed across many firms, which makes visibility and accountability important design issues. A typical ocean import flow is: Supplier → origin pickup → export consolidation → origin port → ocean mainline → destination port → import customs → inland transport → distribution center → customer. Each interface can add time, cost, handling risk, and information requirements. Network design must therefore consider not only nominal transit time but also variability and failure consequences. Global network design decisionsManagers commonly decide: - where to source and manufacture;
- whether to centralize or regionalize inventory;
- which ports, airports, carriers, and routes to use;
- whether to use direct shipment, consolidation, postponement, or transshipment;
- where customs clearance should occur;
- how much capacity and inventory redundancy to maintain; and
- which activities should be outsourced to logistics service providers.
The central economic principle is total landed cost rather than purchase price or freight cost alone. A useful managerial representation is: Landed Cost = Purchase Price + Origin Costs + International Freight + Insurance + Duties and Taxes + Destination Costs + Compliance Costs + Expected Disruption Cost The expression is a decision framework rather than a universal accounting identity. Components must be defined consistently, and taxes may be recoverable or excluded depending on the analysis. Expected disruption cost can be estimated as the probability of an event multiplied by its financial consequence, but this estimate is uncertain and should be tested through scenarios. Trade lanes and gatewaysA trade lane is a recurring flow between geographic markets, usually characterized by origin and destination regions, transport mode, carriers, ports, cargo type, and regulatory conditions. A gateway is a major entry or exit point through which freight enters a region. Gateway selection should consider: - port or airport capacity and congestion;
- draft, berth, crane, storage, and handling capability;
- inland connectivity and distance to demand centers;
- customs efficiency and inspection practices;
- carrier frequency and schedule reliability;
- weather and disruption exposure;
- labor relations and operating hours; and
- security, digital connectivity, and geopolitical stability.
Port choice is not simply a comparison of ocean rates. A port with a lower terminal charge may be inferior if inland drayage is expensive, rail service is unreliable, or containers frequently incur storage charges. 2. Transport Modes, Ports, and Intermodal CoordinationOcean transportOcean freight is generally economical for large volumes and non-urgent cargo. Full-container load (FCL) provides exclusive use of a container, while less-than-container load (LCL) consolidates cargo from several shippers. Ocean service involves booking, cut-off dates, container release, documentation deadlines, vessel loading, transshipment, discharge, terminal availability, and inland delivery. Important distinctions include port-to-port transit time and end-to-end lead time. The former excludes many pre-carriage, clearance, and post-carriage activities. Schedule reliability may be more important than advertised sailing time because production and inventory decisions depend on the distribution of actual arrival times. Air transportAir freight is appropriate when cargo has high value-to-weight, high obsolescence risk, urgent replenishment requirements, or a severe cost of stockout. Its advantages include speed and frequent departures; disadvantages include high cost, capacity constraints, emissions intensity, and restrictions on dangerous goods or specialized cargo. Rail, road, and inland waterwaysRail can provide a balance between ocean cost and air speed over suitable corridors. Road transport is essential for first- and last-mile connectivity but is exposed to border queues, driver shortages, tolls, fuel prices, security risks, and road quality. Inland waterways may offer low-cost, lower-emission movement but depend on navigability, terminals, and seasonal conditions. Intermodal and multimodal transportIntermodal transport uses multiple modes while cargo remains in the same loading unit, such as a container. Multimodal transport refers to a movement involving multiple modes under a coordinated arrangement, often with a principal transport provider. The managerial objective is not merely mode substitution but smooth transfer between modes, consistent information, clear liability, and reliable handoffs. 3. International Lead Time and Inventory ImplicationsInternational lead time is the elapsed time from release of an order or production requirement until usable inventory is available at the destination. It may include supplier processing, origin pickup, export documentation, consolidation, port waiting, main carriage, transshipment, discharge, import clearance, inland delivery, receiving, inspection, and put-away. A planning model is: Ltotal = Lorder + Lorigin + Lexport + Lmain + Limport + Ldestination + Lreceiving where each L term is a lead-time component measured in consistent units, such as days. The model assumes that the components are sequential. If activities overlap, the total is governed by the critical path rather than a simple sum. For uncertain lead time, a common approximation for lead-time demand is: DLT = d̄ × L̄ where D_LT is expected demand during lead time, d̄ is average demand per period, and L̄ is average lead time in the same period. This is appropriate for basic planning when demand and lead-time variability are not explicitly modeled. If demand and lead-time variation are treated as independent, the variance of demand during lead time can be approximated by: σ²LT = L̄σ²d + d̄²σ²L where σ²_LT is variance of lead-time demand, σ²_d is demand variance per period, and σ²_L is lead-time variance in periods squared. The expression assumes independent observations and a sufficiently stable process; correlation, seasonality, intermittent demand, and non-normal distributions may require a more appropriate model. Safety stock may then be represented as: SS = z × σLT where SS is safety stock, z is the service-factor quantile associated with the desired cycle-service probability, and σ_LT is the standard deviation of demand during lead time. This formula assumes that the selected probability model is appropriate and that the service definition is understood. It does not automatically account for customs holds, minimum order quantities, container constraints, or extreme disruption events. Worked exampleA distributor has average daily demand of 200 units and standard deviation of daily demand of 40 units. Average international lead time is 15 days, with a lead-time standard deviation of 3 days. Assume independence and a target service factor of z = 1.65. Expected lead-time demand is: DLT = 200 × 15 = 3,000 units The variance of lead-time demand is: σ²LT = 15 × 40² + 200² × 3² = 24,000 + 360,000 = 384,000 Thus: σLT = √384,000 ≈ 619.7 units Safety stock is: SS = 1.65 × 619.7 ≈ 1,022.5 units The approximate reorder point is therefore: ROP = DLT + SS ≈ 3,000 + 1,023 = 4,023 units This result is a planning estimate, not a guarantee. A manager should test whether demand and lead-time observations are sufficiently stable and whether the target service level justifies the working-capital investment. 4. Incoterms and Allocation of ResponsibilitiesIncoterms are standardized commercial terms published by the International Chamber of Commerce. They define selected responsibilities, costs, and risk-transfer points between seller and buyer in a sale of goods. They do not determine ownership transfer, payment terms, product specifications, contract remedies, tariff classification, or all regulatory obligations. The major conceptual distinction is between allocation of cost and transfer of risk. These do not always occur at the same location. For example, under some “C” terms the seller pays for carriage to the named destination, but risk transfers earlier when goods are handed to the carrier or loaded on board, depending on the term. Main Incoterms categories| Category | Examples | General commercial logic |
|---|
| E term | EXW | Buyer assumes most transport responsibility from the seller’s premises. | | F terms | FCA, FAS, FOB | Seller delivers to a carrier or named point; main carriage is generally arranged by buyer. | | C terms | CPT, CIP, CFR, CIF | Seller arranges main carriage, but risk transfers at an earlier shipment point specified by the rule. | | D terms | DAP, DPU, DDP | Seller bears greater responsibility to a named destination; DDP includes import clearance and duties subject to legal feasibility. |
The named place must be precise. “FCA Shanghai” is less useful than a specific facility or terminal because the point affects loading, custody, and risk. Managers should also verify whether the chosen term is suitable for the mode. FOB, CFR, and CIF are maritime terms intended for port-to-port shipments, whereas FCA, CPT, and CIP are generally more suitable for containerized and multimodal movements. Managerial use of IncotermsA robust quotation or contract should identify the Incoterms version, named place, transport mode, documentation responsibilities, insurance expectations, customs obligations, and treatment of exceptional charges. Organizations should avoid selecting a term solely because it appears familiar. The correct term depends on bargaining power, operational capability, customs law, insurance requirements, and control objectives. 5. Customs, Documentation, Duties, and Trade ComplianceCustoms administration protects revenue, public safety, national security, and domestic policy. Importers and exporters must provide accurate information about the goods, parties, value, origin, classification, quantity, and intended procedure. Errors can cause delays, audits, seizure, fines, loss of privileges, or criminal exposure. Core customs conceptsTariff classification assigns goods to a standardized commodity code, commonly based on the Harmonized System. Classification affects duty rates, licensing, quotas, trade remedies, statistics, and eligibility for preferential treatment. Classification should be based on the product’s objective characteristics and the applicable interpretive rules, not on the desired duty rate. Customs valuation establishes the value used to calculate ad valorem duties and sometimes taxes. Transaction value is often central, but additions, related-party circumstances, assists, royalties, commissions, or alternative valuation methods may apply under the relevant jurisdiction’s law. Origin identifies where goods are considered to originate under the applicable rules. Country of shipment is not necessarily country of origin. Rules may be wholly obtained, substantially transformed, or agreement-specific. A product assembled in one country from components made in several countries may require a detailed origin analysis. Duties and taxes may include ad valorem duties, specific duties, compound duties, value-added tax, excise taxes, anti-dumping duties, countervailing duties, and other charges. A simplified ad valorem calculation is: Duty = Customs Value × Duty Rate The formula assumes the rate is purely ad valorem and that the customs value is correctly established. If a tariff is specific, the calculation may instead depend on quantity, weight, volume, or another measure. Essential documentsTypical documents include the commercial invoice, packing list, bill of lading or air waybill, export declaration, import declaration, certificate of origin, permits, licenses, insurance certificate, inspection certificate, dangerous-goods declaration, and product-specific conformity documents. Requirements vary by country, commodity, transport mode, and trade agreement. Documents are not administrative substitutes for physical compliance. A perfectly prepared invoice cannot cure an unauthorized export, incorrect labeling, prohibited product, sanctions violation, or unsafe packaging. Trade compliance governanceTrade compliance should be managed as an internal-control system. Core controls include: - product and party screening against applicable restrictions;
- classification and origin master-data governance;
- documented authority matrices;
- broker instructions and performance reviews;
- denied-party, sanctions, and export-control screening;
- license determination and record retention;
- valuation and transfer-pricing coordination;
- post-entry review and voluntary correction processes; and
- training, escalation, and audit procedures.
Compliance responsibility cannot be delegated completely to a customs broker. Brokers execute instructions, but the importer or exporter remains responsible for the accuracy and legality of its transactions under applicable law. 6. Risk in Global LogisticsInternational logistics risk is multidimensional. A useful assessment distinguishes probability, impact, detectability, exposure duration, and recovery capability. Risk registers should identify the event, cause, affected nodes, early-warning indicators, owner, preventive controls, response actions, and residual risk. Currency riskA buyer whose functional currency differs from the invoice currency faces transaction exposure. If an import invoice is denominated in foreign currency, a depreciation of the buyer’s currency increases the domestic-currency cost. Organizations may use pricing clauses, natural hedges, currency matching, forward contracts, options, or centralized treasury policies. Hedging decisions should consider forecast accuracy, accounting treatment, counterparty risk, and policy compliance. Infrastructure and partner riskRisks include weak roads, unreliable power, limited warehousing, port congestion, poor data quality, informal processes, labor disputes, financial distress of logistics providers, and inadequate security. Due diligence should assess licenses, insurance, safety records, cybersecurity, financial strength, subcontracting, business continuity, and compliance history. Geopolitical and regulatory riskSanctions, export controls, tariffs, trade wars, border closures, armed conflict, diplomatic tensions, and changing local-content rules can alter the feasibility or economics of a route. Scenario planning should examine alternative suppliers, ports, modes, inventory positions, and customer allocation rules. A route that is efficient in normal conditions may be unacceptable if it passes through a chokepoint with no practical substitute. Resilience and flexibilityResilience is not identical to redundancy. Redundancy adds alternative capacity or inventory; flexibility enables rapid switching among options. Examples include dual sourcing, multi-port strategies, regional postponement, modular product design, pre-approved alternate carriers, bonded inventory, and digital event monitoring. These options have a cost, so the appropriate level depends on the value at risk and the organization’s risk appetite. 7. Technology, Visibility, and Artificial IntelligenceTechnology supports international logistics when it improves the quality and timeliness of decisions. Transportation-management systems can compare routes, tender loads, monitor milestones, and calculate freight costs. Warehouse and port systems coordinate inventory and handling. Electronic data interchange, application programming interfaces, electronic bills of lading, and customs single windows can reduce manual re-entry and improve document consistency. Control towers and event-management platforms can combine carrier milestones, vessel positions, weather, port conditions, customs status, and inventory data. However, visibility is useful only when data are accurate, timely, interoperable, and connected to action thresholds. Artificial intelligence may support ETA prediction, anomaly detection, document classification, demand forecasting, risk sensing, and intelligent exception management. Its use requires human oversight, explainability appropriate to the decision, data-quality controls, cybersecurity, privacy protection, and clear accountability. An AI system trained on historical routes may reproduce past bias or fail during unprecedented disruptions. It should recommend or prioritize actions within a governed process rather than silently make legally consequential decisions. 8. Sustainability and Ethical GovernanceGlobal logistics decisions affect emissions, labor conditions, communities, and public health. Mode selection, route length, load factor, empty repositioning, packaging, energy source, and warehousing design influence environmental performance. Managers should avoid evaluating sustainability only through transport emissions; production location, inventory obsolescence, expedited recovery shipments, and product returns also matter. Ethical governance includes respect for labor rights, anti-bribery controls, responsible sourcing, modern-slavery due diligence, safe working conditions, truthful customs declarations, and protection of confidential commercial data. Expedient practices such as misclassification, under-valuation, unofficial payments, or falsified origin documents create legal and reputational exposure and undermine fair competition. 9. Illustrative Case: Northstar Medical DevicesBackgroundNorthstar Medical Devices, a fictional multinational company, sells diagnostic sensors in North America. The sensors are manufactured in Malaysia, consolidated through a regional logistics provider, shipped through two possible Asian gateways, and distributed from a United States warehouse. Demand is stable but highly service-sensitive because hospitals schedule procedures around product availability. ProblemNorthstar’s purchase price is competitive, but quarterly stockouts have increased. The company uses a single ocean route and relies on a broker to determine product classification. Managers observe that the quoted 28-day ocean transit does not match the 50-to-65-day end-to-end replenishment time. Finance also reports that the invoice currency has become more volatile against the company’s functional currency. AnalysisA cross-functional team maps the complete lead-time path. It identifies 5 days for supplier release and origin pickup, 7 days for consolidation and export processing, 28 days of nominal ocean movement, 8 days of port and customs activity, and 7 days for inland delivery and receiving. The total expected path is therefore 55 days, before exceptional holds. The team also discovers that the selected Incoterm places risk at an earlier shipment point than some managers assumed. The contract does not clearly identify the named place, insurance responsibility, or treatment of destination demurrage. Classification data are inconsistent across product families, and the broker has not received a formal technical ruling or documented classification rationale. Approach and solutionNorthstar adopts five measures: - It establishes a documented product-classification and origin process involving engineering, legal, procurement, and customs specialists.
- It compares gateways using total landed cost, reliability, inland connectivity, and disruption scenarios rather than ocean freight alone.
- It retains ocean freight for base demand but pre-approves airfreight escalation for critical shortages.
- It introduces a second qualified logistics provider and a contingency port, with quarterly performance reviews.
- It uses currency bands and a treasury-approved hedging policy for forecastable foreign-currency purchases.
The company also separates commercial negotiation from legal interpretation of Incoterms and rewrites purchase contracts with precise named places, document responsibilities, insurance provisions, and escalation rules. OutcomeAfter implementation, average replenishment time changes little, but its variability declines. Emergency air shipments become less frequent because inventory parameters are based on end-to-end lead time rather than ocean transit alone. Customs queries decline after classification records are standardized. The alternate gateway costs slightly more in normal conditions but provides a credible option during congestion. Learning pointsThe case demonstrates that international logistics performance is systemic. Better results came not from negotiating a lower freight rate but from integrating network design, customs governance, contract interpretation, inventory policy, currency management, and contingency planning. It also shows that resilience investments should be evaluated against service consequences and total exposure, not as isolated logistics expenses. 10. Best-Practice Management FrameworkA mature global logistics program should: - Map physical, financial, information, and legal flows.
- Define total landed cost and service metrics consistently.
- Measure end-to-end lead time and its variability.
- Select ports and trade lanes using reliability and disruption scenarios.
- Use Incoterms with precise named places and explicit contract supplements.
- Govern classification, valuation, origin, licensing, screening, and records.
- Qualify brokers, carriers, forwarders, and subcontractors.
- Maintain alternative modes, routes, suppliers, or inventory where justified.
- Integrate transportation, customs, finance, procurement, and sales data.
- Review sustainability, ethics, cybersecurity, and regulatory developments continuously.
Limitations and Critical EvaluationNo framework eliminates uncertainty. Global logistics data may be incomplete, lead-time distributions may be nonstationary, and geopolitical events may invalidate historical probabilities. Incoterms simplify certain contractual responsibilities but do not replace a complete sales contract. Customs rules differ across jurisdictions and change over time. Digital visibility may create an appearance of control without improving physical execution. Resilience may also conflict with efficiency: multiple suppliers, safety stock, and alternate routes raise cost and complexity. Graduate-level analysis therefore requires judgment. Managers should distinguish what is known from what is estimated, test assumptions, use sensitivity and scenario analysis, and involve legal, tax, trade, treasury, security, and sustainability specialists when decisions cross professional boundaries. Chapter SummaryGlobal and international logistics links suppliers, production sites, ports, carriers, customs systems, warehouses, and customers across jurisdictions. Its strategic challenge is to coordinate cost, service, compliance, risk, working capital, sustainability, and resilience simultaneously. Network decisions should be based on total landed cost and end-to-end performance rather than isolated freight rates. International lead time includes all sequential and critical-path activities, not merely vessel or aircraft transit. Incoterms allocate specified responsibilities, costs, and risk-transfer points but do not define every element of a sales contract. Customs performance depends on accurate classification, valuation, origin, documentation, licensing, and records. Compliance is an organizational responsibility that cannot be transferred entirely to brokers. Currency, infrastructure, partner, geopolitical, regulatory, and technology risks require formal governance and scenario planning. Finally, technology and AI can improve visibility and prediction only when supported by reliable data, human accountability, cybersecurity, and ethical controls. Key TermsGlobal logistics: Management of cross-border flows of goods, information, and financial resources. Trade lane: A recurring origin–destination flow characterized by routes, modes, carriers, and regulatory conditions. Gateway: A major port, airport, or border entry through which freight enters or leaves a region. Intermodal transport: Movement using multiple modes while cargo remains in the same loading unit. Lead time: Elapsed time between initiation of a requirement and availability of usable inventory. Landed cost: Total acquisition and delivery cost, including freight, duties, taxes, destination costs, and relevant risk costs. Incoterms: Standardized commercial rules allocating specified delivery responsibilities, costs, and risks. Named place: The precisely identified location specified in an Incoterm rule. Customs classification: Assignment of goods to a tariff or commodity code. Customs valuation: Determination of the value used for duty assessment. Origin: Country determined under applicable rules as the source of goods for trade purposes. Ad valorem duty: Duty calculated as a percentage of customs value. Preferential origin: Origin status that may qualify goods for reduced duty under a trade agreement. Trade compliance: Systems and controls ensuring lawful international transactions. Demurrage: Charges associated with containers or equipment remaining beyond an allowed period, subject to applicable terms. Resilience: Ability to prepare for, absorb, recover from, and adapt to disruption. Postponement: Delaying final configuration, localization, or deployment until demand information is clearer. Control tower: Coordinated capability for monitoring and managing supply-chain events and exceptions. Transaction exposure: Financial risk arising from foreign-currency-denominated commitments. Critical path: Sequence of dependent activities determining total elapsed process time. Review Questions5 Short Answer Questions- Why is total landed cost more useful than international freight cost alone?
- Distinguish port-to-port transit time from end-to-end international lead time.
- What do Incoterms define, and what do they not define?
- Why are classification, valuation, and origin important in customs administration?
- Identify three controls that should be included in a trade-compliance program.
5 Long Answer Questions- Explain how a firm should evaluate competing gateways and trade lanes.
- Analyze the relationship between international lead-time variability and inventory policy.
- Compare the commercial logic and managerial implications of E, F, C, and D Incoterms.
- Discuss how geopolitical and infrastructure risks can be incorporated into global network design.
- Evaluate the opportunities and governance risks associated with AI-enabled logistics visibility.
3 Analytical / Application Questions- A company is choosing between a low-cost congested port and a higher-cost reliable port. Design a decision framework using landed cost, lead-time variability, stockout exposure, and disruption scenarios.
- Develop a customs-compliance control plan for a product assembled from components sourced in four countries and sold under a preferential trade agreement.
- Recommend a resilience strategy for a medical-product supply chain that has one manufacturing country, two possible gateways, uncertain currency exposure, and strict service requirements. Justify the trade-offs among inventory, mode flexibility, alternate suppliers, and cost.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which statement best describes total landed cost? A. The supplier’s quoted purchase price only B. International freight plus port handling only C. The combined acquisition, transport, duty, destination, compliance, and relevant disruption costs D. The customs value multiplied by the tariff rate Correct Answer: C. The combined acquisition, transport, duty, destination, compliance, and relevant disruption costs Question 2Which factor is most directly associated with gateway selection? A. The color of the shipping container B. Port capacity and inland connectivity C. The buyer’s organizational chart D. The product’s retail packaging design Correct Answer: B. Port capacity and inland connectivity Question 3Under the lead-time demand approximation D_LT = d̄ × L̄, what does d̄ represent? A. Average demand per period B. Lead-time variance C. The service-factor quantile D. Average customs value Correct Answer: A. Average demand per period Question 4What is a key limitation of using nominal ocean transit time for inventory planning? A. It always includes customs clearance and receiving B. It excludes or may not reflect origin, port, customs, and destination variability C. It is measured only in monetary units D. It cannot be used for any international shipment Correct Answer: B. It excludes or may not reflect origin, port, customs, and destination variability Question 5Which statement about Incoterms is correct? A. They define all aspects of ownership transfer and payment B. They allocate specified delivery responsibilities, costs, and risks C. They replace customs law in the importing country D. They guarantee a particular transit time Correct Answer: B. They allocate specified delivery responsibilities, costs, and risks Question 6Why must the named place in an Incoterm be precise? A. It determines the product’s tariff classification automatically B. It identifies the relevant delivery, custody, and risk point C. It eliminates the need for a commercial invoice D. It fixes the foreign-exchange rate Correct Answer: B. It identifies the relevant delivery, custody, and risk point Question 7Which customs concept determines the commodity code used to assess many trade measures? A. Tariff classification B. Container utilization C. Carrier allocation D. Warehouse slotting Correct Answer: A. Tariff classification Question 8If customs value is 50,000 currency units and the applicable purely ad valorem duty rate is 8%, what is the duty? A. 400 currency units B. 4,000 currency units C. 6,250 currency units D. 58,000 currency units Correct Answer: B. 4,000 currency units Question 9Which is an example of transaction currency exposure? A. A foreign-currency invoice becoming more expensive in the buyer’s functional currency B. A container being unloaded at a port C. A product receiving a tariff classification D. A warehouse changing its picking layout Correct Answer: A. A foreign-currency invoice becoming more expensive in the buyer’s functional currency Question 10Why should customs responsibility not be delegated entirely to a broker? A. Brokers cannot communicate electronically B. The importer or exporter generally retains responsibility for transaction accuracy and legality C. Brokers are responsible only for ocean navigation D. Customs authorities do not review broker submissions Correct Answer: B. The importer or exporter generally retains responsibility for transaction accuracy and legality
|