International Trade Management

Chapter 12
International Trade Risk and Performance Management

Advance Diploma in Foreign Trade
International Trade Management   •   Advance Diploma

International Trade Risk and Performance Management

Introduction and Context

International trade creates value through access to wider markets, specialised suppliers, economies of scale and international finance. It also exposes firms to uncertainties that may not exist, or may be less severe, in domestic transactions. A shipment may be commercially unsuccessful because demand was misjudged; payment may be delayed because the buyer becomes insolvent; a currency may depreciate between quotation and settlement; political action may interrupt a route; or goods may be detained because documentation or product requirements were not satisfied.

International trade risk management is the systematic identification, assessment, treatment and monitoring of uncertainties that can affect trade objectives. Performance management complements risk management by determining whether the organisation is achieving its targets for revenue, margin, cash flow, service, compliance and resilience. The two disciplines are interdependent: aggressive growth may increase exposure, while excessive risk avoidance may reduce competitiveness.

A professional trade manager therefore asks four questions:

  1. What can prevent the transaction or supply chain from achieving its objectives?
  2. How likely and how damaging is each event?
  3. Which responses provide an acceptable balance between cost, control and opportunity?
  4. How will performance and emerging exposure be monitored?

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, the learner should be able to:

  • classify major commercial, country, political, currency, credit, transport, compliance and supply risks;
  • assess probability, impact, exposure and risk interdependence;
  • select appropriate treatments, including insurance, contractual allocation, hedging, diversification and contingency planning;
  • distinguish financial hedging from operational and commercial risk reduction;
  • design trade KPIs and a management dashboard;
  • analyse a practical international trade risk scenario; and
  • evaluate governance, ethical, regulatory and technological issues in trade risk management.

1. The Architecture of International Trade Risk

Risk is not simply the possibility of loss. In contemporary risk management, it is the effect of uncertainty on objectives. The effect may be negative, such as a loss, or positive, such as an unexpectedly favourable market movement. In operational trade practice, attention is usually concentrated on downside exposure, but opportunity risk should not be ignored.

A useful distinction is between hazard, exposure, vulnerability and consequence. A hazard is a potential source of harm, such as political unrest. Exposure is the amount of trade value, time or capacity subject to the hazard. Vulnerability describes how susceptible the transaction is, for example because it depends on one port. Consequence is the resulting financial, operational, legal or reputational effect.

Risk is also classified by where it originates:

Risk categoryTypical sourcePossible consequence
CommercialDemand, price, competition, product acceptanceUnsold inventory or margin erosion
CountryMacroeconomic, legal or infrastructure conditionsDelayed payment or market disruption
PoliticalSanctions, expropriation, conflict, policy changeBlocked transaction or asset loss
CurrencyExchange-rate movement and convertibilityReduced home-currency margin
CreditBuyer or bank inability to payReceivable loss
TransportDamage, theft, delay or route failureClaims, penalties and lost sales
ComplianceCustoms, sanctions, tax, product or documentation failureFines, seizure or exclusion
SupplySupplier failure, shortages, quality or capacity constraintsProduction interruption

These categories overlap. A war may create transport delays, currency depreciation, sanctions exposure and buyer insolvency simultaneously. Risk registers should therefore record both individual risks and connected risk scenarios.

Risk Appetite and Tolerance

Risk appetite is the level and type of risk an organisation is willing to pursue in support of its strategy. Risk tolerance is the acceptable variation around a specific target. For example, a firm may have a moderate appetite for new-market sales but zero tolerance for prohibited sanctions transactions. Limits should be expressed in operational terms: maximum unsecured receivables, maximum exposure to one country, minimum supplier fill rate, or maximum acceptable customs error rate.

Risk Governance

The board or senior management establishes appetite and approves major limits. The trade, finance, logistics, procurement, legal and compliance functions identify and manage exposures. Internal audit independently evaluates the design and operation of controls. Effective governance requires clear ownership: every material risk should have a named risk owner, treatment plan, trigger and review date.

2. Risk Identification and Assessment

Risk identification uses several complementary methods:

  • transaction and process mapping from quotation to final payment;
  • country and counterparty due diligence;
  • supplier and logistics performance reviews;
  • historical loss and near-miss analysis;
  • scenario workshops and “what-if” analysis;
  • contract, regulatory and documentary reviews; and
  • consultation with insurers, banks, customs specialists and freight providers.

A risk register normally records the risk event, cause, affected objective, owner, existing controls, inherent rating, residual rating, treatment, trigger and review date.

Probability–Impact Assessment

A simple qualitative matrix may classify probability and impact as low, medium or high. A more disciplined approach uses numerical scores. If probability is represented by p and financial impact by I, a basic expected loss estimate is:

EL = p × I

Here, EL is expected loss in monetary units, p is a probability between 0 and 1, and I is the loss if the event occurs. This model assumes that the probability and consequence estimate are meaningful and that the event can be represented separately. It is not a prediction of the actual loss in a particular year; it is a decision-support estimate.

For several mutually exclusive events:

ELtotal = ∑(pi × Ii)

where pi and Ii are the probability and impact of event i. If events are correlated, simply adding expected losses may understate concentration and extreme-event risk. Scenario analysis and stress testing are then necessary.

Illustrative calculation. A firm estimates a 4% probability of a customs seizure producing a loss of $120,000. The expected loss is 0.04 × $120,000 = $4,800. This does not mean that the firm will lose $4,800; it means that, under the stated assumptions, the probability-weighted loss is $4,800.

Inherent and Residual Risk

Inherent risk is exposure before controls. Residual risk is exposure after controls. For example, documentary errors may have high inherent risk, but automated document validation, staff training and a broker review may reduce residual risk. Controls should be tested rather than assumed to work.

Risk Interdependence and Stress Testing

A risk assessment should include adverse but plausible scenarios. Examples include a 15% currency movement, closure of a major port for 30 days, a 20% reduction in demand, or simultaneous failure of a principal supplier and its backup. Stress tests are particularly important where the normal expected-loss calculation hides a low-probability, high-impact event.

3. Commercial, Country and Political Risk

Commercial Risk

Commercial risk concerns the viability of the transaction and market proposition. It includes uncertain demand, inaccurate pricing, aggressive competition, product obsolescence, unsuitable distribution channels and failure to understand local customer preferences. Exporters should conduct market research, test demand, assess total landed cost and define clear pricing authority. Importers should evaluate supplier quality, substitution possibilities and the reliability of the business case.

A contribution-margin perspective is useful. If selling price per unit is P, variable cost per unit is V, and fixed costs are F, the break-even quantity is:

QBE = F ÷ (P − V)

The formula assumes constant unit price and variable cost, a relevant range of activity, and that all units produced are sold. In international trade, variable cost should include relevant freight, duties, insurance, commissions and handling costs. Currency changes may alter both P and V.

Country Risk

Country risk combines economic, financial, legal, infrastructural and social conditions in a foreign market. Indicators include inflation, foreign-exchange reserves, debt sustainability, banking-system health, contract enforcement, customs efficiency and political stability. Country ratings are useful screening tools but should not replace transaction-specific analysis.

Mitigation may include shorter payment terms, confirmed letters of credit, political-risk insurance, local partnerships, staged investment, arbitration clauses, alternative routes and limits on outstanding exposure.

Political Risk

Political risk arises from government action or political events. It includes sanctions, import restrictions, expropriation, nationalisation, licensing changes, civil disorder, war and restrictions on capital transfers. Political-risk analysis must be current because legal permissions can change rapidly. A transaction that was lawful when quoted may become prohibited before shipment or payment.

Contracts should allocate responsibilities carefully, using appropriate force-majeure, sanctions, change-in-law, termination and dispute-resolution clauses. Such clauses do not make a prohibited transaction lawful and should not be treated as a substitute for compliance advice.

4. Currency and Financial Risk

Transaction Exposure

Transaction exposure occurs when a foreign-currency receivable or payable changes in home-currency value before settlement. If a foreign-currency amount is A and the home-currency value per foreign-currency unit is S, then:

H = A × S

where H is the home-currency value. The quotation convention must be stated clearly. If S rises under this convention, the home-currency value rises; whether that is favourable depends on whether the firm will receive or pay the currency.

Example. An exporter will receive €100,000. The current quotation is $1.08 per euro, so the expected dollar value is $108,000. If the euro falls to $1.03, the receipt becomes $103,000, a $5,000 reduction before fees and taxes. A forward contract could lock an agreed rate, subject to bank approval, credit support and the obligation to transact at maturity.

Hedging Choices

  • Natural hedge: Match foreign-currency revenues with costs or borrowings in the same currency.
  • Forward contract: Fix an exchange rate for a future purchase or sale.
  • Currency option: Purchase the right, but not the obligation, to exchange at a specified rate; the premium is the cost of flexibility.
  • Currency clause: Adjust the price if the exchange rate moves beyond an agreed band.
  • Leading and lagging: Accelerate or delay settlement where commercially and legally appropriate.

A hedge reduces uncertainty; it does not guarantee a higher profit. The firm must document the exposure, hedge objective, maturity, notional amount, counterparty and accounting treatment. Speculative derivatives that exceed the underlying exposure can create additional risk.

Interest and Liquidity Risk

Trade finance may expose firms to changing interest rates, refinancing risk and cash-flow gaps. Liquidity planning should include payment timing, borrowing capacity, margin calls, insurance premiums, duties and inventory funding. A profitable sale can still cause financial distress if cash is collected long after suppliers and carriers must be paid.

5. Credit Risk and Payment Security

Credit risk is the possibility that a buyer, bank or other obligor will not perform. Assessment should consider financial statements, payment history, ownership, beneficial ownership, litigation, credit reports, country conditions and the proposed credit limit.

Common payment methods differ in risk allocation:

MethodExporter’s payment protectionImporter’s control before payment
Advance paymentHighLow
Open accountLowHigh
Documentary collectionModerate, depending on documentsModerate
Letter of creditHigher if compliant and bank is reliablePayment depends on compliant documents, not necessarily goods quality
Credit insurance or guaranteeCan reduce loss severityDoes not remove commercial obligations

A letter of credit is documentary: banks generally examine stipulated documents rather than physically verifying the goods. Documentary compliance is therefore essential. Credit insurance may cover specified commercial or political causes of non-payment, but exclusions, waiting periods, deductibles, notification duties and limits must be understood.

Credit limits should be dynamic. They may be reduced when overdue balances increase, financial information deteriorates, country controls tighten or the buyer requests unusually large orders.

6. Transport, Supply-Chain and Operational Risk

Transport risks include physical damage, theft, temperature excursion, delay, misrouting, port congestion, carrier insolvency and inaccurate transport documents. The selected Incoterm allocates certain costs, tasks and risk points, but it does not by itself determine ownership, payment or insurance coverage. Contract, Incoterm, insurance policy and transport document must be read together.

Controls include suitable packaging, container and seal controls, approved carriers, cargo tracking, route alternatives, inspection, photographic evidence, claims procedures and accurate packing lists. Insurance should reflect the nature of the goods, route, hazards, valuation basis, deductible and exclusions. A policy with a low premium may be unsuitable if it excludes delay, poor packing or a critical temperature risk.

Supply risk concerns the continuity and quality of inputs. Mitigation includes dual sourcing, supplier qualification, safety stock, capacity reservations, substitute specifications, supplier development and business-continuity plans. Diversification is not automatically safer: multiple suppliers may share the same region, raw-material source, transport corridor or financial vulnerability. Effective diversification addresses common-cause failure.

Inventory and Service Measures

The reorder point under a simple deterministic model is:

ROP = d × L + SS

where d is demand per time unit, L is lead time in the same time unit, and SS is safety stock in units. This formula assumes relatively stable demand and lead time. When both are variable, safety stock should be based on service objectives and demand/lead-time variability rather than an arbitrary percentage.

7. Compliance and Ethical Risk

Trade compliance includes customs classification, valuation, origin, licensing, sanctions, export controls, anti-bribery, tax, product safety, labelling, data protection and record retention. Errors may result in penalties, seizure, loss of licences, customer harm and reputational damage.

A compliance programme should contain:

  • written policies and accountable leadership;
  • customer, supplier and beneficial-owner screening;
  • product and destination classification;
  • controlled approval for restricted transactions;
  • accurate commercial invoices and origin evidence;
  • training appropriate to job responsibilities;
  • system controls that prevent shipment where required data are missing;
  • escalation and investigation procedures; and
  • periodic testing, corrective action and documented records.

Ethical risk extends beyond legal compliance. A firm should consider forced labour, unsafe production, environmental harm, deceptive origin claims, bribery and exploitative contracting. Due diligence should be proportionate to risk, but commercial pressure is not a justification for ignoring warning signs. Artificial intelligence can assist screening and anomaly detection, yet human review remains necessary because models may produce false positives, miss newly designated entities or reproduce biased data.

8. Risk Treatment and Contingency Planning

The principal treatment strategies are:

  1. Avoid: Do not enter a prohibited or unjustifiable transaction.
  2. Reduce: Change process, supplier, route, specification or payment terms.
  3. Transfer or share: Use insurance, guarantees, contractual allocation or outsourcing.
  4. Accept: Retain risk within approved appetite, with monitoring and resources.
  5. Exploit or enhance: Where uncertainty creates a valuable opportunity, invest in capturing it within controls.

A contingency plan converts a general intention into an executable response. It should specify trigger indicators, decision authority, contact lists, alternative suppliers and routes, customer communications, funding, inventory priorities, data backups and recovery time objectives. Plans must be exercised. A document that has never been tested may fail under pressure.

Business continuity and disaster recovery should distinguish between immediate response, continuity of critical operations and eventual recovery. Scenario plans should identify dependencies such as one cloud provider, one customs broker, one port or one key employee.

9. Performance Management and Trade KPIs

Risk controls must be linked to measurable outcomes. A dashboard should combine lagging indicators, which show what has happened, with leading indicators, which signal what may happen.

DimensionKPIInterpretation
FinancialGross margin by market; cash conversion cycleProfitability and funding pressure
SalesExport order growth; forecast accuracyDemand and planning quality
CreditDays sales outstanding; overdue receivablesCollection performance and exposure
LogisticsOn-time-in-full delivery; transit-time varianceService reliability
SupplySupplier fill rate; defect rate; lead-time adherenceContinuity and quality
ComplianceDocumentation error rate; screening exceptionsControl effectiveness
RiskOpen high risks; overdue mitigation actionsGovernance discipline
CustomerClaims rate; complaint closure timeExperience and product performance

The cash conversion cycle is commonly expressed as:

CCC = DIO + DSO − DPO

where DIO is days inventory outstanding, DSO is days sales outstanding, and DPO is days payable outstanding. All terms are measured in days. A lower value generally indicates less cash tied up, but an excessively low inventory level or extended supplier payment may damage service or supplier relationships.

A generic KPI rate is:

Rate = (Actual outcome ÷ Relevant denominator) × 100

The denominator must be defined. For example, an on-time delivery rate may use shipments delivered by the promised date divided by total completed shipments. Excluding late or cancelled orders without a documented rule makes the KPI misleading.

Dashboard Design

A useful dashboard has a clear audience, refresh frequency, data owner, target, tolerance, trend, commentary and action. It should show exceptions rather than overwhelm managers with disconnected numbers. Drill-down should permit analysis by country, customer, product, supplier, Incoterm, carrier and shipment.

Data quality is a governance issue. KPI definitions should be standardised in a data dictionary. Changes in ERP systems, exchange rates, shipment status codes or product classification can create artificial trends. Managers should investigate causation rather than reward teams for optimising a single KPI at the expense of service, compliance or total risk.

10. Applied Case: Meridian Components Ltd.

This is an illustrative case. Meridian Components Ltd., a manufacturer in Country A, exports electrical components to a distributor in Country B. The buyer requests 90-day open-account terms and orders worth €500,000 per quarter. Meridian purchases specialised inputs from one supplier in Country C and ships through a congested port. Its costs are mainly in dollars, while sales are in euros.

Background and Problem

Meridian’s sales team forecasts strong growth, but the buyer has limited audited financial information. Country B is experiencing foreign-exchange shortages, and the port has recently reported delays. The euro has weakened against the dollar. Meridian’s management is concerned that revenue growth could conceal deteriorating cash flow and margin.

Analysis

The principal risks are buyer credit risk, currency exposure, country transfer risk, transport delay, single-supplier dependence and documentary compliance. A preliminary register rates the open receivable as high impact because one quarter’s order equals 18% of Meridian’s annual working-capital capacity. The currency exposure is also material: a 5% adverse movement on €500,000 reduces dollar proceeds by approximately $27,000 if the initial rate is $1.08 per euro and the adverse movement changes the rate to $1.026. The calculation is €500,000 × ($1.08 − $1.026) = $27,000.

Approach and Solution

Meridian adopts a staged response:

  • reduce the initial credit limit and require 30% advance payment;
  • obtain a bank-confirmed letter of credit for the balance until payment history is established;
  • purchase credit insurance subject to a documented buyer limit;
  • hedge 70% of the forecast euro receipt with rolling forwards, retaining some flexibility for forecast uncertainty;
  • qualify a second input supplier in a different region;
  • reserve alternative port capacity and define a customer communication protocol;
  • use a documentary checklist and independent pre-shipment review; and
  • install a dashboard showing receivables ageing, hedge coverage, margin, port dwell time, supplier fill rate and documentary exceptions.

The finance department reviews the hedge monthly, while the credit committee reviews the buyer limit quarterly or immediately upon a trigger such as overdue payment, a downgrade or new capital controls.

Outcome

After two quarters, Meridian’s sales growth is lower than the original forecast, but cash-flow volatility declines. No payment default occurs, and the second supplier passes qualification. One shipment is delayed, but the alternative-port arrangement prevents a production stoppage. The company discovers that its original on-time KPI excluded orders delayed by customer-requested date changes; it revises the definition and produces a more credible service measure.

Learning Points

The case demonstrates that no single instrument eliminates risk. Financial hedging addressed exchange-rate volatility but not buyer default. Insurance reduced loss severity but did not replace credit discipline. Diversification required a supplier in a different risk environment, not merely a second supplier using the same upstream source. Finally, performance measures had to be defined transparently before management could interpret them.

11. Contemporary Developments and Limitations

Digital trade platforms, electronic bills of lading, real-time vessel data, automated sanctions screening and predictive analytics can improve visibility and response speed. Distributed-ledger applications may strengthen document integrity, although interoperability, legal recognition, cybersecurity and data governance remain important constraints. AI can identify unusual pricing, routing or payment patterns, but models require validated data, explainability, human oversight and controls against manipulation.

Risk models have limits. Probabilities may be subjective; historical data may not represent structural change; correlations may increase during crises; and model outputs can create false confidence. Insurance may contain exclusions and capacity limits. Hedging can create settlement obligations and opportunity cost. Diversification can increase coordination complexity. Contingency inventory ties up capital. Compliance systems can generate excessive false positives and delay legitimate trade.

Sound management therefore combines quantitative analysis with expert judgement, scenario thinking, independent challenge and continuous review. The objective is not to eliminate uncertainty—an impossible and potentially value-destroying goal—but to make exposure visible, keep it within approved boundaries and preserve the organisation’s ability to act.

Best-Practice Framework

A mature international trade risk system should:

  1. connect risk appetite to commercial strategy;
  2. maintain a current, owned and prioritised risk register;
  3. assess both expected loss and severe scenarios;
  4. integrate trade, finance, logistics, procurement, legal and compliance data;
  5. use insurance and hedging only for clearly defined exposures;
  6. diversify genuine concentrations and test common-cause dependencies;
  7. document controls, decision rights and escalation triggers;
  8. measure leading and lagging KPIs with consistent definitions;
  9. test continuity plans and learn from incidents and near misses; and
  10. review assumptions as markets, regulations, technology and counterparties change.

Chapter Summary

International trade risk management protects strategic objectives by identifying uncertainty across commercial, country, political, currency, credit, transport, supply and compliance dimensions. Effective assessment distinguishes probability, impact, exposure and vulnerability, while recognising that risks may be correlated. Treatment options include avoidance, reduction, insurance, guarantees, contractual allocation, hedging, diversification and contingency planning. Currency formulas and expected-loss estimates support decisions but depend on explicit assumptions and do not replace judgement.

Performance management translates strategy and controls into measurable outcomes. A balanced dashboard combines financial, customer, logistics, supply, compliance and risk indicators. KPI definitions, denominators, ownership and data quality are as important as the numbers themselves. The central managerial principle is integration: risk controls should support profitable, compliant and resilient trade rather than operate as an isolated administrative function.

Key Terms

Risk: The effect of uncertainty on objectives.

Risk appetite: The level and type of risk an organisation is willing to pursue.

Risk tolerance: The acceptable variation around a defined target or limit.

Exposure: The value, activity or capacity subject to a risk event.

Vulnerability: The susceptibility of an exposed transaction or system to harm.

Expected loss: Probability-weighted financial loss from a risk event.

Residual risk: Risk remaining after controls are applied.

Commercial risk: Risk arising from demand, pricing, competition or market acceptance.

Country risk: Risk associated with economic, legal, financial and social conditions in a country.

Political risk: Risk arising from government action or political events.

Transaction exposure: Foreign-currency exposure created by a committed receivable or payable.

Natural hedge: Matching foreign-currency inflows with outflows or liabilities.

Credit risk: The possibility that an obligor will not perform its payment or contractual obligation.

Incoterm: A recognised trade term allocating specified costs, tasks and risk points between parties.

Compliance risk: Risk of violating laws, regulations, licences or internal standards.

Diversification: Spreading dependence across sufficiently independent suppliers, markets or routes.

Contingency plan: A documented response to a specified disruption or trigger.

Leading indicator: A measure that signals developing conditions or future performance.

Lagging indicator: A measure of results that have already occurred.

Cash conversion cycle: Inventory days plus receivable days minus payable days.

Review Questions

5 Short Answer Questions

  1. Distinguish risk appetite from risk tolerance.
  2. Identify four major categories of international trade risk.
  3. What is the purpose of a forward currency contract?
  4. Why should a risk register assign a named risk owner?
  5. Distinguish a leading KPI from a lagging KPI.

5 Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain how commercial, country and political risks may interact in an export transaction.
  2. Compare open-account sales, documentary collections and letters of credit from the perspectives of exporter and importer.
  3. Discuss the benefits and limitations of insurance, hedging and diversification as risk treatments.
  4. Explain the elements of an effective international trade compliance programme.
  5. Design a balanced dashboard for an importing and exporting enterprise and justify your selected KPIs.

3 Analytical / Application Questions

  1. An exporter expects to receive €250,000 in 90 days. Analyse the risks created by a weakening euro and recommend a suitable combination of natural and financial hedges.
  2. A firm depends on one supplier and one port. Construct a risk-treatment and contingency plan that addresses common-cause disruption, cost and service trade-offs.
  3. A company reports a 98% on-time delivery rate, but it excludes customer complaints, cancelled orders and shipments with revised promised dates. Critically evaluate the KPI and propose a more reliable measurement design.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which statement best describes residual risk?

A. Risk before any controls are applied

B. Risk remaining after controls are applied

C. Risk transferred entirely to an insurer

D. Risk that has no measurable consequence

Correct Answer: B. Risk remaining after controls are applied

Question 2

A transaction has a 5% probability of a $80,000 loss. What is its expected loss?

A. $400

B. $4,000

C. $16,000

D. $80,000

Correct Answer: B. $4,000

Question 3

Which instrument gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to exchange currency at an agreed rate?

A. Forward contract

B. Currency option

C. Open-account agreement

D. Bill of lading

Correct Answer: B. Currency option

Question 4

Which payment method generally gives the exporter the least payment protection before shipment?

A. Advance payment

B. Confirmed letter of credit

C. Open account

D. Bank guarantee

Correct Answer: C. Open account

Question 5

A firm receives €100,000 when the exchange rate is $1.10 per euro. What is the dollar value of the receipt?

A. $90,909

B. $100,000

C. $110,000

D. $210,000

Correct Answer: C. $110,000

Question 6

Which is an example of a natural currency hedge?

A. Entering a derivative larger than the underlying exposure

B. Matching euro revenues with euro-denominated costs

C. Ignoring exchange-rate movements

D. Increasing receivable days

Correct Answer: B. Matching euro revenues with euro-denominated costs

Question 7

In the formula CCC = DIO + DSO − DPO, what does DSO represent?

A. Days supplier orders

B. Days sales outstanding

C. Domestic shipment output

D. Daily stock obligation

Correct Answer: B. Days sales outstanding

Question 8

Which action best addresses single-supplier risk?

A. Increase dependence on the same supplier

B. Qualify an appropriately independent alternative supplier

C. Remove supplier performance monitoring

D. Extend all supplier payment terms

Correct Answer: B. Qualify an appropriately independent alternative supplier

Question 9

Why is a letter of credit described as documentary?

A. Banks normally inspect the physical goods themselves

B. Payment depends on stipulated compliant documents

C. It eliminates all country risk

D. It guarantees that the buyer will accept defective goods

Correct Answer: B. Payment depends on stipulated compliant documents

Question 10

Which dashboard measure is primarily a leading indicator?

A. Last year’s realised gross margin

B. Historical annual sales

C. Overdue mitigation actions and emerging screening exceptions

D. Completed claims from the previous year

Correct Answer: C. Overdue mitigation actions and emerging screening exceptions

International Trade Management
Chapter 12 of 14