Insurance Finance & Solvency Models

Chapter 1
Insurance Finance and the Insurer Business Model

Post Graduate Program in Insurance Management
Insurance Finance & Solvency Models   •   Post Graduate

Insurance Finance and the Insurer Business Model

Introduction

Insurance is often described as a promise to pay for uncertain future losses. Financially, however, an insurer is a highly leveraged risk-bearing institution that collects relatively small amounts from many policyholders, invests or holds those funds, pays claims and expenses over time, and retains capital against adverse outcomes. Its business model therefore combines financial intermediation, risk pooling, contractual performance, investment management and regulated capital allocation.

The central financial difficulty is temporal. Premiums are generally received before the insurer knows the final cost of claims. Some claims are reported and settled quickly; others emerge only after many years. The insurer must price uncertainty, establish provisions for future obligations, invest responsibly, manage liquidity and maintain sufficient capital to remain solvent under stress.

This chapter develops the foundations needed to analyse insurance finance and solvency models. It distinguishes the finances of life, health, general and reinsurance businesses and explains how underwriting leverage, risk pooling, investment income, expenses, capital and stakeholder objectives interact.

Learning objectives

By the end of this chapter, the reader should be able to:

  1. Explain the insurer’s cash-flow cycle and the difference between underwriting and investment activities.
  2. Analyse the economic logic and limitations of risk pooling.
  3. Interpret underwriting leverage, loss ratios, expense ratios and combined ratios.
  4. Identify the main drivers of insurance profitability and solvency.
  5. Compare the financial characteristics of life, health, general and reinsurance businesses.
  6. Evaluate the objectives of policyholders, shareholders, managers, regulators and other stakeholders.
  7. Apply basic financial relationships to an insurer case and identify governance implications.

1. The insurer as a financial institution

An insurer performs three connected functions.

Risk transformation. It converts uncertain individual losses into a more predictable aggregate loss by combining exposures. A policyholder exchanges an uncertain, potentially large loss for a certain premium and contractual protection.

Intertemporal finance. Premiums may be collected months or years before claims are paid. The insurer invests available funds, but it must ensure that assets are sufficiently liquid and appropriately matched to expected liabilities.

Capital allocation and risk bearing. Premiums and investment returns are not sufficient protection against every adverse event. Shareholder or mutual capital absorbs unexpected losses, supports growth and protects policyholders.

An insurer’s balance sheet can be simplified as:

Assets = Liabilities + Equity

Assets include cash, bonds, equities, loans, real estate and reinsurance recoverables. Liabilities include claims reserves, policyholder account balances, future benefit obligations, unearned premium provisions and other obligations. Equity, or available capital, is the residual claim and the principal financial buffer against adverse experience.

The accounting identity is not itself a solvency model. Solvency depends on whether the value of assets remains sufficient to meet liabilities under current and stressed conditions, including market, credit, insurance and operational risks.

2. The insurance cash-flow cycle

The basic cash-flow cycle begins when a policyholder pays a premium. The insurer may pay acquisition commissions, administration expenses and taxes immediately, while claims may be paid much later. During the intervening period, funds may generate investment income. At the end of the cycle, the insurer pays claims, settles expenses and retains any resulting surplus as profit or capital.

Insurance cash-flow cycle PolicyholdersPremiums InsurerUnderwriting and capital management InvestmentsInterest and market returns ClaimantsClaims and benefits Cash inflowAsset allocationCash outflow
Insurance cash-flow cycle showing premiums, investment, claims and capital
Figure: Insurance cash-flow cycle showing premiums, investment, claims and capital

Figure: The insurer’s operating cash-flow cycle.

A useful simplified underwriting result is:

Underwriting result = Earned premium − Incurred claims − Underwriting expenses

Earned premium is the portion of written premium relating to the coverage already provided. For a one-year policy written evenly throughout the year, written premium and earned premium may differ materially at the reporting date. Incurred claims include paid claims and the change in claims liabilities, subject to the accounting framework used.

Total pre-tax profit can be represented as:

Profit = Underwriting result + Net investment income + Other income − Other expenses

This is a managerial representation rather than a complete statutory or financial-reporting formula. It may need adjustment for reinsurance, discounting, fair-value movements, taxes, finance costs, policyholder participation and changes in insurance contract liabilities.

Insurance float and liquidity

The period between premium receipt and claim payment is sometimes called insurance float. Float is not free money: it belongs economically to policyholders and is associated with future obligations. Its value depends on the cost of obtaining funds through underwriting and on investment returns.

An insurer can be profitable while experiencing negative operating cash flow, for example when claims are paid before sufficient premiums are collected or when the business grows rapidly. Conversely, an insurer can report accounting profit while facing liquidity stress because assets are illiquid, claims accelerate or collateral requirements increase. Liquidity management therefore complements solvency management.

3. Risk pooling and the economics of insurance

Risk pooling works because individual losses are imperfectly correlated. Let Xi denote the loss of policyholder i, and let the aggregate loss for n similar policyholders be:

Sn = X1 + X2 + … + Xn

If losses are independent and identically distributed, with expected loss μ and variance σ2, then:

E[Sn] = nμ

and

Var(Sn) = nσ²

The standard deviation of aggregate loss is therefore σ√n, while expected loss increases as n. The coefficient of variation is:

CV(Sn) = σ/(μ√n)

Thus, relative uncertainty decreases as the pool becomes larger. This relationship assumes independence, comparable exposures and a stable probability distribution. It does not hold fully for catastrophes, pandemics, financial crises or other events that create strong correlation.

With pairwise correlation ρ between equal-risk exposures, a simplified aggregate variance is:

Var(Sn) = nσ²[1 + (n − 1)ρ]

When ρ = 0, diversification operates strongly. When ρ > 0, aggregate volatility is larger; as the pool grows, correlated risk can dominate idiosyncratic risk. This is why insurers use geographic diversification, underwriting limits, catastrophe models and reinsurance.

Adverse selection and moral hazard

Adverse selection occurs before contract formation when higher-risk individuals are more likely to seek, retain or purchase extensive cover. If the insurer cannot distinguish risks adequately, average premiums may become too high for low-risk customers and too low for high-risk customers.

Moral hazard occurs after insurance is purchased when protection changes behaviour. A policyholder may take less care, exaggerate a claim or consume more healthcare. Insurers respond through deductibles, co-payments, exclusions, monitoring, underwriting, claims investigation and experience rating. These mechanisms improve incentives but can reduce accessibility or create fairness concerns.

4. Underwriting leverage and profitability metrics

Underwriting leverage describes the scale of insurance obligations relative to capital. A simple premium-to-surplus measure is:

Premium leverage = Net written premium ÷ Available capital

A claims-reserve leverage measure is:

Reserve leverage = Net claims liabilities ÷ Available capital

“Net” generally means after applicable reinsurance, although definitions differ by jurisdiction and reporting basis. High leverage can increase return on equity when underwriting is profitable, but it also magnifies the effect of adverse claims development, reserve strengthening and catastrophe losses.

For property and casualty insurance, the loss ratio is commonly:

Loss ratio = Incurred claims ÷ Earned premium × 100

The expense ratio is:

Expense ratio = Underwriting expenses ÷ Earned premium × 100

The combined ratio is:

Combined ratio = Loss ratio + Expense ratio

A combined ratio below 100% indicates an underwriting profit before relevant investment income and other adjustments. A ratio above 100% indicates an underwriting loss. The ratio is meaningful only when numerator and denominator are measured consistently and when claims development, discounting and reinsurance treatment are understood.

Worked example: general insurer

Suppose an insurer reports earned premium of CU 120 million, incurred claims of CU 78 million and underwriting expenses of CU 36 million.

Loss ratio = 78 ÷ 120 × 100 = 65%.

Expense ratio = 36 ÷ 120 × 100 = 30%.

Combined ratio = 65% + 30% = 95%.

The underwriting result is CU 120 − CU 78 − CU 36 = CU 6 million. If net investment income is CU 4 million and tax and other charges are CU 2 million, simplified pre-tax operating profit before those charges is CU 10 million; after the stated CU 2 million charge, it is CU 8 million. The example excludes reserve discounting, reinsurance recoveries, investment gains and accounting-specific adjustments.

5. Main drivers of insurer profitability

Pricing and risk selection

Premium adequacy depends on expected claims, expenses, capital costs, profit margin and uncertainty. A technically adequate premium can be expressed conceptually as:

Premium = Expected loss cost + Expected expenses + Risk margin + Profit margin

This is a pricing framework, not a universal regulatory formula. Expected loss cost should reflect exposure, policy conditions, inflation, trends and claims handling. Risk margins compensate for uncertainty and capital usage.

Claims frequency and severity

Frequency is the number of claims relative to exposure units; severity is the cost per claim. Expected aggregate claims are often analysed conceptually as:

Expected aggregate claims = Expected frequency × Expected severity × Exposure units

The relationship assumes that frequency and severity estimates are defined consistently. Inflation, legal changes, medical costs, climate events and social inflation can alter both components.

Expenses and distribution

Acquisition commissions, employee costs, technology, claims handling, fraud management, regulatory levies and overheads affect the expense ratio. Digital distribution may reduce transaction costs but can increase cyber risk, platform dependence and conduct risks.

Investment income and asset-liability management

Investment return depends on asset allocation, interest rates, credit spreads, equity markets, liquidity and duration. Matching assets to liability cash flows reduces sensitivity to interest-rate movements, but perfect matching is rarely possible. Search for yield can expose the insurer to credit, market and liquidity risks.

Growth and reserve development

Rapid premium growth can increase future claims and operational demands before controls mature. Reported profitability may deteriorate when prior-year reserves are strengthened. Reserve releases can improve current results but may not indicate sustainable performance.

Capital cost and reinsurance

Capital supports risk-taking but has an opportunity cost. Reinsurance can reduce volatility and required capital, but premiums, counterparty default risk, collateral arrangements and basis risk must be considered. A ceded risk is not automatically an eliminated risk.

6. Distinctive financial models by insurance business

Life insurance

Life insurers typically have long-duration liabilities involving mortality, morbidity, longevity, lapse, expenses and investment guarantees. Premiums may be regular or single payments. Products can include term assurance, whole life, endowment, annuities, unit-linked contracts and participating policies.

The present value of a stream of future cash flows is generally:

PV = ∑[t=1 to T] CFt ÷ (1 + r)t

where CFt is the cash flow at time t, r is the effective discount rate per period and T is the final period. The formula assumes a consistent payment frequency and discount-rate convention. Liability valuation additionally requires assumptions about mortality, longevity, lapses, expenses, inflation, guarantees, options and policyholder behaviour.

Life insurance often generates significant contractual service obligations and may include policyholder participation in surplus. Asset-liability management is central because small changes in interest rates, longevity or guarantees can materially change liability values. Solvency analysis must consider duration mismatch, reinvestment risk, spread risk and embedded options.

Health insurance

Health insurers face medical inflation, utilisation, provider pricing, morbidity, disease trends, fraud and regulatory restrictions. Cash-flow timing may be shorter than in life insurance, but uncertainty in treatment patterns and claim development can be substantial.

Key financial issues include risk adjustment, provider networks, benefit design, deductibles, co-payments and the balance between affordability and adverse selection. In many systems, premiums may be constrained by regulation or social objectives, limiting the insurer’s ability to reprice risk.

General insurance

General, or property and casualty, insurance commonly covers motor, property, liability, marine, engineering and miscellaneous risks. Policies are often short-tail or long-tail.

Short-tail claims, such as many motor damage claims, are reported and settled relatively quickly. Long-tail claims, such as liability or workers’ compensation, may develop over many years. Long-tail business creates reserve uncertainty, inflation sensitivity, legal risk and discount-rate exposure.

General insurers commonly focus on earned premium, loss ratio, expense ratio, combined ratio, reserve adequacy, catastrophe exposure and reinsurance structure. Underwriting cycles may arise when capital availability, competition and pricing change over time.

Reinsurance

A reinsurer accepts risks ceded by primary insurers. It may provide proportional cover, where premiums and losses are shared according to a stated percentage, or non-proportional cover, where the reinsurer pays losses above an attachment point up to a limit.

Reinsurance improves capacity and can protect against severity or accumulation. However, it creates counterparty, concentration, wording and basis risks. A reinsurer must understand the underlying portfolio, aggregation across cedants and the possibility that many cedants are affected by one event.

Reinsurance financial analysis includes ceded premium, recoverables, collateral, reinstatement premiums, retrocession and catastrophe accumulation. Because information may be less granular than in direct insurance, underwriting governance and data quality are especially important.

FeatureLifeHealthGeneralReinsurance
Typical liability horizonLongShort to mediumShort to longDepends on ceded portfolio
Main risksMortality, longevity, lapse, guaranteesMorbidity, utilisation, medical inflationFrequency, severity, catastrophe, reserve developmentAggregation, catastrophe, cedant and counterparty risk
Important assets issueDuration and guaranteesLiquidity and credit qualityLiquidity and catastrophe liquidityCollateral and recoverables
Common performance focusNew business value, margins, solvencyMedical loss ratio, adequacy, serviceCombined ratio and reserve developmentTechnical result, cycle and accumulation

7. Stakeholder objectives and governance

Policyholders seek reliable claims payment, fair treatment, affordability, privacy and continuity of cover. Shareholders generally seek sustainable risk-adjusted returns, growth and capital efficiency. Managers seek operational viability, reputation, remuneration and strategic flexibility. Employees and intermediaries seek stable employment or income. Regulators prioritise policyholder protection, financial stability, market integrity and fair conduct. Credit-rating agencies and lenders focus on capital strength, liquidity, risk controls and debt-servicing capacity.

These objectives can conflict. Reducing claims costs may improve profitability but damage customer fairness if legitimate claims are delayed. Aggressive growth may increase shareholder returns while weakening solvency. High investment risk may improve short-term returns but expose policyholders to losses.

Good governance requires clearly assigned risk ownership, independent challenge, actuarial and risk functions, documented underwriting authority, claims controls, model validation, audit trails and escalation procedures. The board should understand not only expected profit but also downside scenarios, liquidity needs, risk appetite and recovery options.

8. Solvency perspective

Solvency asks whether an insurer can meet obligations as they fall due and remain financially viable under adverse conditions. A simplified solvency ratio is:

Solvency ratio = Available capital ÷ Required capital × 100

The definition of available and required capital is jurisdiction-specific. Required capital may reflect underwriting, market, credit, operational and catastrophe risks, together with diversification and concentration effects. Regulatory models may use standard formulas, internal models or hybrid approaches.

Capital adequacy should not be interpreted mechanically. Two insurers with the same ratio may have different liquidity, asset quality, reserve uncertainty, governance quality or exposure to model error. Stress testing should examine events such as a catastrophe, pandemic, rapid interest-rate movement, mass lapse, credit downgrade, inflation shock or reinsurer default.

9. Illustrative case: Meridian General Insurance

Background. Meridian is a fictional regional insurer writing motor and commercial property business. It has CU 200 million of net written premium, CU 150 million of available capital and CU 110 million of net claims liabilities. Its management reports strong growth and a combined ratio of 96%.

Problem. Growth has accelerated to 25% annually. A large share of new property business is concentrated in flood-prone areas, while reinsurance recoverables are concentrated with two counterparties. The board is concerned that the reported combined ratio understates emerging catastrophe and reserve risks.

Analysis. Premium leverage is:

CU 200 million ÷ CU 150 million = 1.33 times

Reserve leverage is:

CU 110 million ÷ CU 150 million ≈ 0.73 times

These ratios alone do not establish solvency. The underwriting result implied by a 96% combined ratio is approximately 4% of earned premium, assuming the ratio is calculated consistently. However, the ratio may deteriorate if flood claims are under-modelled, if claims inflation exceeds pricing assumptions or if reserves are inadequate.

The concentration of reinsurance recoverables creates counterparty and liquidity risk. A catastrophe may produce simultaneous gross claims and delayed recoveries. Rapid growth may also indicate inadequate underwriting review, insufficient claims staffing and reliance on immature data.

Approach. Management should conduct scenario analysis using at least: a severe flood event, a reinsurer downgrade, a 15% increase in claims severity, and a two-year period of high inflation. It should review exposure accumulations by geography, policy wording, deductibles and limits; validate catastrophe models; diversify or collateralise reinsurance; strengthen claims reserves where appropriate; and impose growth limits linked to capital and control capacity.

Outcome. In the illustrative resolution, Meridian slows growth in high-accumulation zones, raises deductibles, purchases a catastrophe layer with improved counterparty diversification, and introduces quarterly reserve and liquidity stress tests. The combined ratio initially worsens because pricing and reserve assumptions are corrected, but the insurer’s risk profile becomes more credible and resilient.

Learning points. Reported profitability is not equivalent to economic profitability. Underwriting leverage magnifies both returns and losses. Reinsurance reduces net exposure but introduces dependencies. Capital, liquidity, data quality and governance must be evaluated together.

10. Technology, data and contemporary developments

Insurance finance increasingly relies on automated underwriting, telematics, remote sensing, electronic health records, claims analytics and machine-learning models. These tools can improve pricing, fraud detection and reserving, but they also create model risk, cyber risk, privacy concerns and potential discrimination.

AI systems should be governed through documented purpose, data lineage, validation, performance monitoring, explainability appropriate to the decision, human oversight and controls against drift. An apparently accurate model may still be unacceptable if it uses prohibited variables, embeds historical bias or produces decisions that cannot be challenged.

Climate change is altering catastrophe frequency, severity, correlation and insurability. Cyber risks can accumulate across apparently unrelated policies. Pandemic experience has highlighted the difficulty of defining exclusions and aggregation. Low interest rates, inflation volatility and changing regulation have reinforced the importance of duration management, scenario analysis and transparent assumptions.

Challenges and limitations

Insurance financial analysis is constrained by uncertainty in data, changing legal environments, long settlement periods and model dependence. Historical claims may not represent future conditions. Accounting profit may differ from economic value because of discounting, market movements, contract boundaries and recognition rules. Ratios can be distorted by portfolio mix, reserve releases, reinsurance structure or unusual catastrophe years.

Risk pooling also has limits. Correlation can rise precisely when protection is most needed. Some risks are difficult to price, monitor or diversify. Affordability constraints may prevent technically adequate premiums. Regulatory capital models simplify reality and may create incentives to optimise reported capital rather than reduce underlying risk.

Best practice is therefore not to rely on a single ratio or model. Management should triangulate accounting results, cash flows, economic valuations, stress tests, exposure data, expert judgement and independent challenge.

Chapter Summary

Insurance finance combines risk pooling, contractual protection, investment management and capital allocation. Premiums generally precede claims, creating an insurance cash-flow cycle and an investment-float opportunity, but also liquidity and asset-liability risks. Pooling reduces relative uncertainty when losses are sufficiently independent; correlation, catastrophe and systemic events limit diversification.

Underwriting leverage links premium and reserve obligations to available capital. Loss ratios, expense ratios and combined ratios help assess general insurance performance, but they must be interpreted alongside reserve development, reinsurance and investment results. Profitability is driven by pricing, selection, claims frequency and severity, expenses, investment returns, growth, reserve adequacy and capital costs.

Life insurance is dominated by long-duration liabilities and biometric, lapse and guarantee risks. Health insurance is shaped by morbidity, utilisation, medical inflation and affordability. General insurance focuses on frequency, severity, catastrophe and claims development. Reinsurance provides capacity and volatility protection while introducing counterparty, accumulation and information risks.

Stakeholder interests may conflict, making governance, fair conduct, capital adequacy, liquidity management and transparent modelling essential. Contemporary challenges include climate change, cyber accumulation, inflation, model risk and the responsible use of AI.

Key Terms

Risk pooling: Combining many exposures so that individual uncertainty may become more predictable in aggregate.

Underwriting: The process of selecting, pricing and accepting insurance risks.

Premium: Consideration paid by a policyholder for insurance protection.

Earned premium: Premium allocated to the period in which insurance coverage is provided.

Incurred claims: Claims costs relating to the coverage period, including relevant changes in claim liabilities.

Insurance float: Funds held between premium receipt and payment of claims and expenses.

Underwriting result: Earned premium less claims and underwriting expenses.

Loss ratio: Incurred claims divided by earned premium.

Expense ratio: Underwriting expenses divided by earned premium.

Combined ratio: Loss ratio plus expense ratio.

Underwriting leverage: The scale of premium or liabilities relative to available capital.

Adverse selection: Risk imbalance caused by higher-risk individuals being more likely to seek insurance.

Moral hazard: Behavioural change after insurance is obtained that increases expected loss or claim cost.

Claims reserve: Liability established for claims already incurred but not fully paid or settled.

Asset-liability management: Coordinating assets and liabilities to manage timing, interest-rate, liquidity and other risks.

Reinsurance: Insurance purchased by an insurer from another insurer.

Available capital: Capital recognised as available to absorb losses under a specified framework.

Required capital: Capital considered necessary for a specified risk level under a regulatory or internal model.

Solvency: The capacity to meet obligations and remain financially viable under adverse conditions.

Accumulation risk: The risk that one event affects many policies, portfolios or counterparties.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. Why can an insurer report profit but still experience liquidity stress?
  2. Define adverse selection and moral hazard.
  3. What does a combined ratio below 100% generally indicate?
  4. Identify two major financial risks faced by life insurers.
  5. Why does reinsurance not eliminate all risk for a primary insurer?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain the insurer cash-flow cycle and discuss the relationship between underwriting and investment income.
  2. Derive the economic intuition behind risk pooling and explain why correlation limits diversification.
  3. Compare the financial characteristics of life, health, general and reinsurance businesses.
  4. Discuss the objectives of major insurance stakeholders and the governance conflicts that may arise.
  5. Explain how underwriting leverage can improve returns while simultaneously increasing solvency risk.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. An insurer has earned premium of CU 250 million, incurred claims of CU 162.5 million and underwriting expenses of CU 75 million. Calculate the loss ratio, expense ratio, combined ratio and underwriting result. Interpret the results.
  2. A portfolio contains highly correlated property risks concentrated in one flood region. Explain why increasing the number of policies may not reduce capital needs proportionately, and recommend two risk-management responses.
  3. A life insurer experiences falling interest rates, rising longevity and increased policy lapses. Analyse the likely effects on its liabilities, assets, liquidity and solvency, and propose an appropriate management response.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which statement best describes the insurer’s basic financial model?

A. It collects premiums after all claims have been paid.

B. It collects premiums, invests available funds, and pays uncertain future claims.

C. It avoids all investment and underwriting risk.

D. It finances claims exclusively through shareholder dividends.

Correct Answer: B. It collects premiums, invests available funds, and pays uncertain future claims.

Question 2

If individual losses are independent, what happens to the coefficient of variation of aggregate loss as the number of risks increases?

A. It increases in direct proportion to the number of risks.

B. It remains constant.

C. It decreases approximately in proportion to the inverse square root of the number of risks.

D. It becomes exactly zero after sufficient pooling.

Correct Answer: C. It decreases approximately in proportion to the inverse square root of the number of risks.

Question 3

An insurer has earned premium of CU 100 million and incurred claims of CU 60 million. What is its loss ratio?

A. 40%

B. 60%

C. 100%

D. 160%

Correct Answer: B. 60%

Question 4

A loss ratio is 70% and an expense ratio is 25%. What is the combined ratio?

A. 45%

B. 70%

C. 95%

D. 105%

Correct Answer: C. 95%

Question 5

Which risk is particularly associated with long-duration life insurance liabilities?

A. Only daily cash-register errors

B. Longevity and interest-rate risk

C. No asset-liability mismatch

D. Only short-tail property damage

Correct Answer: B. Longevity and interest-rate risk

Question 6

What is adverse selection?

A. A post-claim investment loss caused by inflation

B. The tendency for higher-risk individuals to seek or retain more insurance protection

C. A regulator’s decision to increase capital requirements

D. The payment of claims earlier than expected

Correct Answer: B. The tendency for higher-risk individuals to seek or retain more insurance protection

Question 7

An insurer has CU 150 million of available capital and CU 300 million of net written premium. Its premium leverage is:

A. 0.5 times

B. 1.0 times

C. 2.0 times

D. 4.5 times

Correct Answer: C. 2.0 times

Question 8

Which statement about reinsurance is most accurate?

A. It eliminates the cedant’s counterparty risk.

B. It can reduce volatility but creates recoverable and counterparty exposures.

C. It guarantees that catastrophe losses cannot occur.

D. It removes the need for underwriting controls.

Correct Answer: B. It can reduce volatility but creates recoverable and counterparty exposures.

Question 9

Why can a high correlation between insured risks reduce the benefits of pooling?

A. It causes aggregate losses to become less variable in every circumstance.

B. It makes losses move together, increasing aggregate loss volatility.

C. It eliminates the need for capital.

D. It guarantees lower premiums.

Correct Answer: B. It makes losses move together, increasing aggregate loss volatility.

Question 10

Which action is most consistent with sound insurer governance?

A. Relying on one favourable financial ratio

B. Ignoring liquidity because accounting profit is positive

C. Combining stress tests, independent challenge, exposure analysis and capital assessment

D. Maximising growth without considering underwriting capacity

Correct Answer: C. Combining stress tests, independent challenge, exposure analysis and capital assessment

Insurance Finance & Solvency Models
Chapter 1 of 14