Fundamentals of Marketing Management

Chapter 5
Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning

Bachelors Program in Brand Management
Fundamentals of Marketing Management   •   Bachelor

Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning

Introduction

Segmentation, targeting and positioning (STP) is the central process through which a firm converts a broad market into strategically manageable customer groups, chooses the groups it can serve most effectively, and establishes a distinctive meaning for its offering. STP links market analysis with marketing action. It influences product design, pricing, distribution, communication, customer experience and brand development.

A market is rarely homogeneous. Customers differ in their needs, purchasing power, usage situations, risk perceptions, cultural contexts and responses to marketing stimuli. Treating everyone as identical can produce weak value propositions and inefficient resource allocation. Conversely, dividing a market into excessively narrow groups may increase complexity and costs without creating sufficient value. Effective STP therefore requires both analytical discipline and managerial judgment.

The process is usually represented as:

Market segmentation → Target-market selection → Positioning and implementation

Segmentation identifies meaningful differences; targeting determines where the organization will compete; positioning defines how the chosen offer should be understood relative to alternatives. These activities are connected but not interchangeable. A segment is a group of customers. A target market is a segment or set of segments selected for attention. A position is the place an offering occupies in the minds of target customers.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:

  1. Explain the strategic role of segmentation, targeting and positioning.
  2. Segment consumer and business-to-business markets using appropriate variables.
  3. Assess segment attractiveness and organizational fit.
  4. Compare undifferentiated, differentiated, concentrated and micromarketing strategies.
  5. Develop a defensible positioning statement and value proposition.
  6. Construct and interpret a perceptual map.
  7. Translate positioning into personas, marketing actions and measurable outcomes.
  8. Identify ethical, technological and practical limitations in STP decisions.

1. The Logic of Market Heterogeneity

Marketing strategy begins with an exchange problem: customers seek value, while organizations seek sustainable returns. Value is not identical for all customers. For one consumer, convenience may dominate; for another, low price, prestige, durability or ethical sourcing may be more important.

A useful conceptual representation of customer value is:

Customer value = Perceived benefits − Perceived costs

Perceived benefits may include functional performance, emotional rewards, social status and convenience. Perceived costs include money, time, effort, risk and psychological discomfort. The expression is conceptual rather than an accounting identity: benefits and costs may not be measured in the same physical units, and customers evaluate them subjectively.

STP helps a firm identify groups for which its capabilities can create superior value. It also recognizes that a profitable customer is not necessarily the customer with the highest revenue. Profitability depends on revenue, service costs, acquisition costs, retention and expected future relationships.

2. Market Segmentation

2.1 Meaning and purpose

Market segmentation is the process of dividing a broader market into relatively similar groups whose members are expected to respond in comparable ways to a marketing program. Similarity is always relative and purpose-dependent. A group may be similar in need but diverse in age, or similar in purchasing behavior but diverse in motivation.

Segmentation supports four managerial tasks:

  • identifying unmet or poorly served needs;
  • estimating the size and potential of opportunities;
  • designing more relevant offers and communications;
  • allocating resources among competing opportunities.

Segmentation is not simply classification. A useful segment must have strategic meaning and support differentiated action.

2.2 Consumer-market segmentation variables

#### Geographic segmentation

Geographic segmentation divides markets by location, region, climate, population density or urban-rural status. It is useful when infrastructure, weather, culture, regulation or local purchasing patterns affect demand. A food retailer may adapt assortment to regional tastes; a clothing company may adjust products according to climate.

Geography should not be treated as a substitute for customer understanding. People in the same location can have very different needs, while digital commerce can reduce the importance of physical distance.

#### Demographic segmentation

Demographic variables include age, gender identity, household size, family life cycle, income, occupation, education and religion. They are widely used because they are comparatively easy to measure and often correlate with consumption patterns.

Demographics, however, are frequently proxy variables rather than explanations. Age may correlate with technology adoption, but motivation, confidence and access may explain adoption more directly. Managers should ask not only who customers are, but why they behave as they do.

#### Psychographic segmentation

Psychographics concerns lifestyles, values, personality, interests and attitudes. Two customers with similar incomes may respond differently because one values environmental responsibility and another prioritizes convenience. Psychographic research can produce richer positioning insights, although it may require carefully designed surveys, interviews or qualitative research.

#### Behavioral segmentation

Behavioral variables include purchase occasion, benefits sought, usage rate, loyalty, readiness to buy and response to promotions. Benefits-sought segmentation is especially valuable because it begins with the customer’s desired outcome rather than a descriptive characteristic.

For example, users of a streaming service may seek family entertainment, specialist knowledge, social conversation or background audio. These needs can guide content bundles and communication more effectively than age alone.

#### Needs-based and value-based segmentation

Needs-based segmentation groups customers according to the problem they are trying to solve. Value-based segmentation distinguishes customers by their economic contribution or expected lifetime value. Such approaches are strategically powerful but require reliable data and careful interpretation. A firm should avoid abandoning low-current-value customers when they may be future high-value customers or important influencers.

2.3 Business-market segmentation

Business markets require additional variables because buying decisions often involve organizations, procurement systems and multiple decision makers. Common variables include:

Segmentation basisExamplesStrategic question
FirmographicIndustry, size, location, revenueWhich organizations resemble our current successful customers?
Operating characteristicsTechnology, capacity, production processCan our solution integrate with their operations?
Purchasing approachCentralized buying, contract terms, vendor policyHow is the buying decision made?
Situational factorsUrgency, order size, applicationWhen does the need become active?
Buyer characteristicsRisk tolerance, expertise, authorityWho influences and approves the purchase?
Benefits soughtCost reduction, compliance, speed, reliabilityWhat business outcome is valued?

Business segmentation should distinguish the organization from the people within it. A chief financial officer, engineer, procurement officer and end user may have different criteria. The buying center concept describes these roles, which may include initiators, users, influencers, gatekeepers, buyers, deciders and approvers.

2.4 Requirements for effective segmentation

A segment should generally satisfy five criteria:

  1. Measurable: Its size, characteristics and purchasing behavior can be estimated.
  2. Substantial: It is sufficiently large or valuable to justify attention.
  3. Accessible: The firm can reach and serve it through distribution and communication.
  4. Differentiable: It responds differently from other segments to a marketing program.
  5. Actionable: The organization has resources and capabilities to design an effective offer.

These criteria are not absolute tests. A small niche may be substantial for a specialist firm, and a large segment may be unattractive if access costs are excessive. Digital channels also make some previously inaccessible niches reachable, although privacy and platform dependence create new risks.

3. Evaluating Segment Attractiveness

After identifying segments, managers evaluate both external attractiveness and internal fit. A segment may grow rapidly but attract powerful competitors, require expensive service or conflict with the organization’s brand.

A practical evaluation framework includes:

Market attractiveness

Relevant questions include:

  • How large is current demand?
  • Is the segment growing, stable or declining?
  • What margins and price levels are possible?
  • How intense is competition?
  • Are substitutes readily available?
  • How much bargaining power do buyers and suppliers possess?
  • Are legal, technological or cultural changes likely to affect the segment?

Company fit

Managers should assess:

  • brand credibility and reputation;
  • product and service capabilities;
  • financial resources;
  • data and technological capacity;
  • distribution access;
  • operational scalability;
  • ability to serve the segment better than competitors.

Strategic value

A segment may be valuable because it generates direct profit, provides a platform for growth, strengthens a brand’s legitimacy or creates learning that can be transferred elsewhere. Evaluation should therefore include both short-term economics and long-term strategic contribution.

A simple weighted scoring model can support discussion:

Sj = ∑(wi rij), i = 1 to n

Here, Sj is the total score for segment j, wi is the importance weight assigned to criterion i, and rij is the rating of segment j on that criterion. Usually, weights are non-negative and sum to 1, while ratings use a defined scale such as 1 to 5. The model assumes criteria are sufficiently distinct and that weighted addition is a reasonable approximation. It does not produce an objective truth; it makes assumptions visible and supports comparison.

Worked example. Suppose a firm evaluates two segments using market growth, profitability and strategic fit. The weights are 0.30, 0.40 and 0.30. Segment A receives ratings of 4, 3 and 5; Segment B receives 3, 5 and 3.

For Segment A:

SA = (0.30 × 4) + (0.40 × 3) + (0.30 × 5) = 1.20 + 1.20 + 1.50 = 3.90

For Segment B:

SB = (0.30 × 3) + (0.40 × 5) + (0.30 × 3) = 0.90 + 2.00 + 0.90 = 3.80

Segment A ranks slightly higher, but the difference is not large enough to eliminate managerial judgment. Sensitivity analysis should test whether a modest change in weights reverses the result.

4. Targeting Strategies

Targeting is the selection of one or more segments for concentrated marketing effort. Four broad approaches are commonly distinguished.

Undifferentiated marketing

The firm offers one broadly standardized program to the whole market. This can reduce production and communication costs, but it assumes that common needs are more important than differences. It is most plausible when customer needs are relatively homogeneous or when scale economies are exceptionally strong.

Differentiated marketing

The firm targets several segments with distinct offers or marketing programs. This can increase total coverage and relevance, but it also creates complexity, cannibalization risk and higher costs. Brand architecture becomes important when several offers operate under one corporate system.

Concentrated or niche marketing

The firm focuses on one segment or a small number of segments. This allows specialist expertise and a clear identity, but increases dependence on a limited market. Competitors, changing preferences or new technology may threaten the niche.

Micromarketing

Micromarketing adapts offers to local areas or individual customers. Local marketing customizes activity for communities or stores; individual marketing uses data and interaction to personalize offers. Personalization can increase relevance, but excessive customization may produce operational costs, inconsistent brand experiences or privacy concerns.

The choice of targeting strategy should reflect resources, product variability, market homogeneity, product life-cycle stage and competitor strategies. A small business often begins with a focused target, while a large firm may use differentiated targeting with clear portfolio boundaries.

5. Positioning and Differentiation

Positioning is the deliberate design of an offering and its meaning so that it occupies a distinct and valued place in the target customer’s mind relative to competing alternatives. Positioning is not merely a slogan. It must be supported by the total customer experience.

A position normally answers four questions:

  1. For whom is the offering intended?
  2. What category or frame of reference does it belong to?
  3. What important benefit or point of difference does it provide?
  4. Why should customers believe the claim?

A positioning statement can use the following structure:

For [target customer], [brand] is the [frame of reference] that [benefit or difference] because [reason to believe].

The statement is an internal strategic tool, not necessarily advertising copy. It should be specific enough to guide decisions and credible enough to survive customer scrutiny.

Points of parity and points of difference

Points of parity are associations necessary to be considered a legitimate choice in a category. For example, a payment application may need security and reliability as basic expectations. Points of difference are associations customers view as distinctive and favorable.

A successful position requires both. A brand that is different but fails on category essentials may be interesting but unusable. A brand that satisfies essentials but lacks meaningful distinction becomes interchangeable.

Sources of differentiation

Differentiation may be based on:

  • product performance, design or reliability;
  • service speed, support or customization;
  • distribution convenience;
  • employee expertise;
  • brand personality and symbolism;
  • technology and user experience;
  • social or environmental practices.

A differentiation claim is defensible when it is valuable, distinctive, communicable, difficult to copy and economically supportable. The claim must also remain relevant; a technically superior feature is weak positioning if customers do not value it.

6. Perceptual Mapping

A perceptual map represents how customers perceive competing brands or offerings on selected dimensions. It is not necessarily a map of objective product characteristics. A brand may perform objectively well on a feature but be perceived as weak because communication, experience or reputation has shaped another interpretation.

Illustrative perceptual map showing brands positioned by price and customization Lower price ← Price → Higher price Lower customization ← Customization → Higher Brand A Brand B Brand C Brand D Possible open space
Illustrative perceptual map showing brands positioned by price and customization
Figure: Illustrative perceptual map showing brands positioned by price and customization

Figure: An illustrative perceptual map using price and customization as customer-relevant dimensions.

To construct a map, researchers may ask respondents to rate brands on attributes, judge similarities, or indicate ideal points. Statistical methods such as factor analysis or multidimensional scaling can reduce many perceptions to two or more dimensions. At bachelor level, the important managerial principle is that dimensions should be meaningful to customers and supported by evidence.

An apparent empty space is not automatically an opportunity. It may indicate low demand, poor feasibility, an unmeasured dimension or an area competitors have avoided because it is unprofitable. Mapping should therefore be combined with segment attractiveness and capability analysis.

7. From Positioning to Personas and Value Propositions

Customer personas

A persona is a research-informed, representative profile of a target customer. It should synthesize behavior and motivation rather than rely on stereotypes. A useful persona may include:

  • identity and relevant context;
  • goals and desired outcomes;
  • barriers, anxieties and objections;
  • current alternatives;
  • information sources and decision triggers;
  • purchasing authority and constraints;
  • preferred service and communication expectations.

Personas should be based on interviews, behavioral data, customer-service records, surveys and market observation. They should be updated when evidence changes. A persona is a decision aid, not a claim that every customer is identical.

Value propositions

A value proposition states the value an organization promises to create for a particular customer and why that value is preferable to alternatives. It should connect customer problem, desired outcome, offering and proof.

For example: “For time-constrained independent retailers, our inventory platform provides dependable automatic replenishment and clear cash-flow visibility, supported by rapid onboarding and local advisory service.” This is stronger than “the best inventory software” because it identifies a user, problem, benefit and reason to believe.

The value proposition must be translated consistently across the marketing mix:

Marketing decisionPositioning translation
Product/serviceFeatures and experience that deliver the promised benefit
PriceA level and structure consistent with perceived value
PlaceChannels that provide expected access and convenience
PromotionEvidence and messages that make the position memorable
People/processService behaviors that confirm the promise
Physical evidenceTangible cues that reinforce credibility

Positioning fails when communication promises premium service but delivery is slow, or when a low-price position is undermined by complex fees.

8. Applied Case: GreenRoute Urban Mobility

This is an illustrative case.

Background

GreenRoute is a fictional urban mobility company offering bicycle and electric-scooter subscriptions. It operates in a large university city with students, office workers, tourists and delivery workers. Its initial approach used one message—“Affordable freedom for everyone”—and one monthly plan.

Problem

Growth in registrations was strong, but paid conversion and retention were weak. Research found that different users wanted different outcomes. Students valued low price and flexible cancellation. Office workers valued reliability and protection from weather. Delivery workers valued battery range and predictable availability. Tourists wanted short-term simplicity and local guidance.

Analysis

The company combined usage logs, interviews and a survey. It identified four potential segments:

SegmentMain benefitAttractivenessCapability fit
StudentsLow-cost flexible travelHighHigh
Office commutersReliable daily commutingHighHigh
Delivery workersAvailability and rangeMediumMedium
TouristsSimple short-term accessMediumHigh

The company selected students and office commuters as primary targets. Delivery workers required heavier fleet utilization and specialized support, while tourists were attractive seasonally but less aligned with the subscription model.

Approach and solution

GreenRoute developed two plans. The Flex plan offered lower monthly cost and easy pause options. The Commute plan offered reserved morning availability, maintenance priority and theft protection. Communication used separate creative executions, but both plans retained a common brand idea: dependable movement with lower urban impact.

The positioning statement for the Commute plan was: “For urban professionals who need dependable daily travel, GreenRoute is the flexible low-emission commuting service that reduces uncertainty in the journey because members receive priority maintenance, protected availability and transparent pricing.”

The company then redesigned onboarding, introduced commuter journey information and trained service staff to resolve maintenance issues quickly. It measured conversion by segment, monthly retention, service incidents, utilization and contribution margin rather than registrations alone.

Outcome

In the first six months, the Commute plan achieved higher retention than the original universal plan, while the Flex plan attracted students without requiring the same service guarantees. The company also discovered that reserved availability increased operational costs. It therefore limited reservations during peak demand and adjusted pricing after testing customer response.

Learning points

  1. Behavioral and needs-based distinctions revealed more than age or location alone.
  2. A target segment must fit both market opportunity and operational capability.
  3. Positioning must be translated into product rules and service processes.
  4. Segment-specific offers should still share a coherent brand meaning.
  5. Performance should be evaluated using retention and contribution, not registrations alone.

9. Measuring STP Effectiveness

STP decisions should be connected to measurable outcomes. Useful measures include:

  • segment reach and response rate;
  • acquisition cost by segment;
  • conversion rate;
  • average order value or account value;
  • retention and churn;
  • customer lifetime value;
  • share of target segment;
  • perceived differentiation;
  • willingness to recommend;
  • contribution margin.

A basic customer lifetime value estimate may be expressed as:

CLV ≈ (m × r) ÷ (1 + d − r) − CAC

Here, m is periodic contribution margin per customer, r is the probability of retention from one period to the next, d is the discount rate per period, and CAC is customer acquisition cost. This simplified formula assumes a constant margin, constant retention probability, constant discount rate and an indefinitely continuing relationship. It is not appropriate when margins, retention or acquisition costs vary substantially over time; a cohort-based discounted cash-flow model is then preferable.

STP measurement should also examine unintended effects. A campaign may improve conversion while attracting customers whose service costs make them unprofitable. A premium position may increase margin but reduce accessibility. Metrics must therefore be interpreted in relation to strategy and stakeholder responsibilities.

10. Ethical, Legal and Governance Issues

Segmentation uses information about people and organizations, so it raises ethical and regulatory concerns. Important issues include:

  • informed consent and lawful data use;
  • data minimization and security;
  • transparency about personalization;
  • discriminatory exclusion or differential treatment;
  • misleading claims about segment benefits;
  • manipulation of vulnerable customers;
  • use of sensitive attributes or inferred characteristics;
  • fairness in algorithmic targeting.

Personalization is not automatically ethical simply because it is technically possible. Firms should ask whether the data source is appropriate, whether customers would reasonably expect its use, and whether the resulting treatment creates unjustified disadvantage. Human review, documented governance, access controls, audit trails and fairness testing are useful safeguards.

Regulatory requirements vary by jurisdiction, but privacy law, consumer-protection law, advertising standards, competition law and sector-specific rules may all apply. Marketing managers should involve legal, compliance and data-governance specialists early rather than treating compliance as a final approval step.

11. Technology and Contemporary Developments

Digital platforms enable real-time segmentation based on browsing, purchase, location and engagement behavior. Artificial intelligence can support clustering, propensity modeling, sentiment analysis and content personalization. However, algorithmic outputs reflect the quality and bias of the data and should not be accepted without validation.

Several developments are reshaping STP:

  • privacy restrictions are reducing dependence on third-party identifiers;
  • first-party data and consent-based relationships are becoming more valuable;
  • customers expect seamless experiences across physical and digital channels;
  • communities and creators can influence segment identity;
  • sustainability and social values increasingly affect target-market choice;
  • dynamic pricing and personalization create fairness and transparency questions.

Technology should strengthen strategic understanding, not replace it. A cluster produced by an algorithm becomes meaningful only when managers can interpret its needs, reach it responsibly and serve it profitably.

12. Common Mistakes and Best Practices

Common mistakes include defining segments only by demographics, assuming a large segment is attractive, confusing a slogan with positioning, selecting an empty perceptual-map space without testing demand, creating too many personas, and promising benefits that operations cannot deliver.

Best practice involves:

  1. Begin with customer problems and desired outcomes.
  2. Combine quantitative evidence with qualitative understanding.
  3. Use multiple segmentation bases where they improve decision quality.
  4. Test whether segments are reachable and economically viable.
  5. Compare internal capabilities with competitor strengths.
  6. Keep the target choice focused enough to guide action.
  7. Make positioning distinctive, relevant and credible.
  8. Align every marketing-mix decision with the position.
  9. Monitor actual customer perceptions rather than relying only on intended messages.
  10. Review segments as markets, technologies and social expectations change.

Chapter Summary

Segmentation, targeting and positioning form an integrated process for creating customer relevance and strategic focus. Segmentation identifies relatively similar groups using geographic, demographic, psychographic, behavioral, needs-based, value-based and business-market variables. Effective segments are measurable, substantial, accessible, differentiable and actionable.

Targeting evaluates segment attractiveness, company fit and strategic value. Firms may use undifferentiated, differentiated, concentrated or micromarketing strategies. A weighted scoring model can clarify assumptions, but it should support rather than replace judgment.

Positioning defines the desired meaning of an offering relative to alternatives. Strong positioning combines category points of parity with valued and defensible points of difference. Perceptual maps help visualize customer perceptions, but an apparent market gap must be tested for demand and feasibility. Personas and value propositions translate positioning into usable customer insight and marketing action.

Finally, STP must be measured through outcomes such as conversion, retention, profitability and perceived differentiation. Ethical data use, privacy, fairness and operational credibility are essential. Effective STP is not a one-time exercise; it is an evidence-based cycle of analysis, choice, implementation and learning.

Key Terms

Market segmentation: Division of a broad market into relatively similar customer groups.

Target market: Segment or segments selected for marketing attention.

Positioning: Desired place and meaning of an offering in the target customer’s mind.

Geographic segmentation: Division by location or physical area.

Demographic segmentation: Division using characteristics such as age, income or household structure.

Psychographic segmentation: Division by lifestyles, values, interests or personality.

Behavioral segmentation: Division by actions, usage, loyalty or response.

Needs-based segmentation: Division according to customer problems or desired outcomes.

Firmographic segmentation: Business-market division by organizational characteristics.

Buying center: Individuals and roles involved in an organizational purchase.

Segment attractiveness: The potential value and viability of a market segment.

Undifferentiated marketing: One broad marketing program for the whole market.

Differentiated marketing: Distinct programs for multiple segments.

Concentrated marketing: Focus on one segment or a small number of niches.

Micromarketing: Local or individual adaptation of marketing activity.

Point of parity: Association needed to be considered a legitimate category choice.

Point of difference: Distinctive association valued by target customers.

Perceptual map: Visual representation of perceived relationships among offerings.

Persona: Research-informed profile representing a target customer type.

Value proposition: Statement of the value promised to a particular customer and why it is credible.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. What is the difference between a market segment, a target market and a position?
  2. Identify five criteria of effective market segmentation.
  3. Distinguish concentrated marketing from differentiated marketing.
  4. What are points of parity and points of difference?
  5. Why should an apparent gap on a perceptual map be tested before being pursued?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain how consumer-market segmentation variables can be combined to create a useful target market.
  2. Discuss the factors a firm should use when evaluating segment attractiveness and company fit.
  3. Compare the four major targeting strategies and identify circumstances in which each may be appropriate.
  4. Explain how a positioning statement should guide product, price, distribution and promotion decisions.
  5. Discuss the ethical and governance issues associated with data-driven personalization.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A new meal-delivery company has identified students, families with young children and older adults as possible segments. Develop a weighted evaluation framework, state suitable criteria and recommend a target strategy.
  2. Construct a positioning statement and three-part value proposition for a sustainable clothing brand aimed at price-conscious young professionals. Explain the evidence needed to support the claim.
  3. A perceptual map shows four competing smartphone brands clustered around moderate price and high functionality, with an apparently empty area at high price and high customization. Analyze whether this represents a genuine opportunity, identifying the additional research required.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which condition means that a market segment can be reached and served through appropriate distribution and communication channels?

A. Measurability

B. Accessibility

C. Differentiability

D. Substantiality

Correct Answer: B. Accessibility

Question 2

A firm creates separate offers for students, professionals and retirees. Which targeting strategy is this?

A. Undifferentiated marketing

B. Concentrated marketing

C. Differentiated marketing

D. Internal marketing

Correct Answer: C. Differentiated marketing

Question 3

Which statement best describes a point of difference?

A. A feature required for legal compliance

B. An association valued by customers and distinctive from competitors

C. A demographic description of the target market

D. A production cost shared by all brands

Correct Answer: B. An association valued by customers and distinctive from competitors

Question 4

What is the main purpose of a perceptual map?

A. To calculate exact market size

B. To show how customers perceive competing offerings on selected dimensions

C. To determine a product’s manufacturing cost

D. To replace all customer research

Correct Answer: B. To show how customers perceive competing offerings on selected dimensions

Question 5

Which variable is most directly associated with needs-based segmentation?

A. Customer’s desired outcome

B. Customer’s postal code

C. Customer’s company revenue

D. Customer’s household size

Correct Answer: A. Customer’s desired outcome

Question 6

Using the chapter’s weighted scoring example, what is Segment A’s score when the ratings are 4, 3 and 5 and the weights are 0.30, 0.40 and 0.30?

A. 3.20

B. 3.60

C. 3.90

D. 4.30

Correct Answer: C. 3.90

Question 7

Which item is most appropriate in a business-market segmentation analysis?

A. Buying-center roles

B. Favorite leisure activity of every consumer

C. Household life cycle only

D. Personal brand personality only

Correct Answer: A. Buying-center roles

Question 8

A positioning statement should primarily identify the target customer, frame of reference, distinctive benefit and:

A. Reason to believe

B. Competitor’s payroll

C. Firm’s tax rate

D. Retailer’s inventory turnover

Correct Answer: A. Reason to believe

Question 9

Why is a demographic variable sometimes insufficient as a segmentation basis?

A. Demographics can never be measured

B. Demographics describe customers but may not explain their motivations

C. Demographics are illegal in every market

D. Demographics always produce identical behavior

Correct Answer: B. Demographics describe customers but may not explain their motivations

Question 10

In the simplified CLV expression, what does CAC represent?

A. Customer acquisition cost

B. Customer attitude coefficient

C. Category awareness calculation

D. Competitive advantage contribution

Correct Answer: A. Customer acquisition cost

Fundamentals of Marketing Management
Chapter 5 of 15