Financial and Risk Analytics

Chapter 5
Financial Performance Analytics and Dashboards

Diploma in Business Analytics
Financial and Risk Analytics   •   Diploma

Financial Performance Analytics and Dashboards

Introduction

Financial performance analytics converts accounting and operational data into evidence for managerial decisions. Financial statements describe what has happened; analytics investigates why it happened, whether it is sustainable, and what action should follow. A useful performance system therefore combines profitability, growth, liquidity, efficiency, cash generation, risk and strategic progress.

A dashboard is not merely a collection of charts. It is a controlled management-reporting system that selects relevant measures, presents them at the correct level of aggregation, highlights exceptions and supports accountable decisions. Poor dashboards create noise, encourage short-term manipulation and may conceal deteriorating cash flow behind attractive profit figures. Effective dashboards connect strategic objectives to operational drivers and show the relationship between targets, actual results, forecasts and corrective actions.

This chapter develops a practical framework for designing key performance indicators (KPIs), performing variance analysis, measuring profitability and working capital, identifying anomalies and root causes, and communicating findings through dashboards.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:

  1. Distinguish financial outcomes from operational and leading indicators.
  2. Design KPIs with clear definitions, owners, targets and data sources.
  3. Calculate and interpret common profitability, efficiency, liquidity and working-capital measures.
  4. Perform price, volume, mix and budget variances while avoiding misleading interpretations.
  5. Use driver trees, segmentation and root-cause analysis to explain performance.
  6. Design management dashboards that are concise, trustworthy and action-oriented.
  7. Recognise limitations, ethical risks and governance requirements in financial analytics.

1. From Financial Reporting to Performance Analytics

Financial reporting is primarily concerned with faithful representation, comparability and compliance. Performance analytics has a different but complementary purpose: it supports decisions. It may combine the income statement, balance sheet and cash-flow statement with sales, customer, product, staffing, inventory and service data.

A useful distinction is between four types of measures:

Measure typeMain questionExamples
Outcome or lagging indicatorWhat result was achieved?Operating profit, ROCE, cash flow
Driver indicatorWhat explains the result?Price, volume, conversion rate, utilisation
Leading indicatorWhat may predict future performance?Pipeline quality, renewal intention, defects
Risk or control indicatorWhat threatens reliability or compliance?Overdue receivables, limit breaches, unusual journals

A KPI is a measure regarded as sufficiently important to receive regular attention and assigned accountability. Not every metric is a KPI. A metric becomes a KPI only when its purpose, calculation, target, reporting frequency and responsible owner are defined.

The performance chain can be expressed as:

Strategic objective → critical success factor → KPI → target → analysis → action → review.

For example, the objective “improve profitable growth” may lead to the success factors “retain valuable customers” and “increase contribution per order.” KPIs could include customer retention, contribution margin and average order value. The dashboard should then connect these measures to actions such as pricing review, service improvement or product rationalisation.

2. Designing High-Quality KPIs

2.1 KPI specification

A robust KPI specification should include:

  • Name and purpose: what decision does it support?
  • Formula: how is it calculated?
  • Numerator and denominator: especially for ratios and percentages.
  • Scope: entities, products, customers and time period included.
  • Data source: ledger, transaction system, CRM, inventory system or survey.
  • Frequency and timing: daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly.
  • Target and tolerance: desired value and acceptable variance.
  • Owner: person or function accountable for action.
  • Direction of desirability: whether higher or lower is better.
  • Known limitations: accounting estimates, timing effects or missing data.

A KPI should be specific enough to reproduce independently. “Improve customer profitability” is an objective, not a complete KPI. “Contribution margin per active customer, reported monthly using invoiced revenue less traceable variable fulfilment and service cost” is more operationally useful.

2.2 SMART and balanced measures

Targets should be specific, measurable, achievable but challenging, relevant and time-bounded. However, a purely SMART target can still be harmful if it rewards one dimension at the expense of another. For example, a sales target may encourage excessive discounting, while a collection target may encourage inappropriate pressure on customers.

A balanced KPI set normally includes:

  1. Financial: revenue growth, margin, operating cash flow and return on capital.
  2. Customer: retention, complaints, satisfaction or service-level performance.
  3. Process: cycle time, first-pass yield, forecast accuracy or on-time delivery.
  4. People and capability: staff turnover, training completion and safety.
  5. Risk and control: overdue balances, exceptions and compliance breaches.

The objective is not to maximise the number of dimensions. It is to reduce the risk that an apparently successful result is achieved by damaging another important outcome.

2.3 KPI hierarchy and aggregation

A board dashboard may show total revenue and ROCE; a commercial dashboard may show pipeline conversion, average discount and customer contribution; an operations dashboard may show utilisation, defects and inventory days. The measures should be consistent across levels, but the level of detail should match the decision-maker’s authority.

Aggregation requires care. Revenue can generally be summed across products and periods. Percentages and ratios usually cannot be averaged without weighting. For example, an overall gross margin should be calculated from total gross profit divided by total revenue, not from the simple average of product margins.

3. Core Financial Performance Measures

3.1 Revenue and growth

Revenue analysis should separate changes caused by price, volume, product or customer mix, foreign exchange and acquisitions or disposals. Nominal growth may be misleading when inflation or currency movements are significant.

The growth rate from a prior period is:

Growth rate = (Current revenue − Prior revenue) ÷ Prior revenue × 100%

Revenue is measured in currency and the growth rate is dimensionless. The formula assumes that the periods are comparable and that the prior revenue is non-zero. If the prior value is negative or close to zero, percentage growth may be unstable and an absolute change should also be reported.

3.2 Profitability

Gross profit is revenue less cost of goods sold. Operating profit normally deducts operating expenses, while net profit is affected by financing costs and taxation. Analysts must identify the accounting basis and avoid comparing measures prepared under inconsistent classifications.

Gross margin = Gross profit ÷ Revenue × 100%
Operating margin = Operating profit ÷ Revenue × 100%
Net margin = Profit after tax ÷ Revenue × 100%

Margins are percentages, so currency units cancel. They are meaningful only when revenue and profit relate to the same period and accounting scope.

Return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) assess returns relative to invested resources. Return on capital employed (ROCE) is commonly used to compare operating profit with long-term capital employed:

ROCE = Operating profit ÷ Average capital employed × 100%

Capital employed may be defined as total assets less current liabilities or as equity plus interest-bearing debt, depending on the organisation’s policy. The definition must be stated and applied consistently. Average capital employed is preferable where the balance changes materially during the period.

A useful decomposition of ROCE is:

ROCE = Operating margin × Capital turnover

where:

Capital turnover = Revenue ÷ Average capital employed

The identity follows because operating profit divided by capital employed equals operating profit divided by revenue multiplied by revenue divided by capital employed. It helps managers see whether return is being driven by margin, asset utilisation or both.

Worked example: profitability and capital utilisation

An organisation reports revenue of $2,400,000, cost of sales of $1,440,000, operating expenses of $720,000 and average capital employed of $1,600,000.

Gross profit = $2,400,000 − $1,440,000 = $960,000.

Operating profit = $960,000 − $720,000 = $240,000.

Gross margin = $960,000 ÷ $2,400,000 × 100% = 40%.

Operating margin = $240,000 ÷ $2,400,000 × 100% = 10%.

Capital turnover = $2,400,000 ÷ $1,600,000 = 1.5 times.

ROCE = $240,000 ÷ $1,600,000 × 100% = 15%.

The decomposition confirms that 10% × 1.5 = 15%. Management could improve ROCE by increasing operating margin, using capital more efficiently, or both. Increasing sales without adequate margin or tying additional capital in inventory may not improve ROCE.

3.3 Contribution and break-even analysis

Contribution is revenue less variable cost. It indicates how much remains to cover fixed costs and profit. Contribution margin is:

Contribution margin = (Revenue − Variable cost) ÷ Revenue × 100%

For a single product with constant selling price and variable cost per unit, break-even volume is:

Break-even units = Fixed costs ÷ Contribution per unit

The formula assumes fixed costs remain fixed over the relevant activity range, variable cost per unit and selling price are constant, and all units produced are sold. In a multi-product business, a stable sales mix must be assumed or a weighted-average contribution margin used.

Contribution analysis is useful for pricing and product decisions, but it should not replace full-cost analysis where capacity, shared resources, long-term investment or strategic effects matter.

4. Working-Capital and Cash-Flow Analytics

Profit is not the same as cash. A business can report profit while experiencing cash stress because customers have not paid, inventory has increased or suppliers are being paid sooner. Working capital analytics examines the operating investment required to support sales.

4.1 Receivables, inventory and payables days

Receivables days estimate the time taken to collect credit sales:

Receivables days = Average trade receivables ÷ Credit sales × Number of days

Inventory days estimate the time inventory is held:

Inventory days = Average inventory ÷ Cost of sales × Number of days

Payables days estimate the time taken to pay suppliers:

Payables days = Average trade payables ÷ Credit purchases × Number of days

The number of days may be 365 or 360 according to organisational convention. Credit sales, cost of sales and credit purchases should be used where possible. Using revenue for receivables and cost of sales for inventory maintains conceptual consistency, but definitions should be disclosed.

The cash conversion cycle is:

Cash conversion cycle = Receivables days + Inventory days − Payables days

It estimates the period between paying for operating inputs and collecting cash from customers. It is not a complete cash-flow forecast because it excludes items such as tax, payroll, capital expenditure, financing and seasonality.

Worked example: cash conversion cycle

Average receivables are $300,000, credit sales are $2,190,000, average inventory is $240,000, annual cost of sales is $1,752,000, average payables are $180,000 and credit purchases are $1,460,000. Using 365 days:

Receivables days = $300,000 ÷ $2,190,000 × 365 = 50.0 days.

Inventory days = $240,000 ÷ $1,752,000 × 365 = 50.0 days.

Payables days = $180,000 ÷ $1,460,000 × 365 = 45.0 days.

Cash conversion cycle = 50 + 50 − 45 = 55 days.

A reduction could result from faster collection, lower inventory or longer negotiated supplier terms. Each option has consequences: aggressive collection may damage customer relationships, excessive inventory reduction may cause stock-outs, and delayed supplier payment may damage credit standing.

4.2 Liquidity measures

The current ratio is:

Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities

The quick ratio excludes less-liquid inventory, although the precise definition varies:

Quick ratio = (Cash + Short-term investments + Trade receivables) ÷ Current liabilities

Ratios should be interpreted against business model, seasonality, covenant requirements and historical trends. A high current ratio is not automatically good if it reflects obsolete inventory or uncollectible receivables.

5. Variance Analysis

Variance analysis compares actual performance with a reference point, such as budget, forecast, prior period or benchmark. The reference must be stated because a result may be favourable against budget but unfavourable against the latest forecast.

For a financial measure where a higher value is normally favourable, a simple variance is:

Variance = Actual − Budget

For costs, a lower actual cost is usually favourable, so organisations often report cost variance as Budget − Actual. The sign convention must be visible in the report.

Percentage variance is:

Percentage variance = (Actual − Budget) ÷ |Budget| × 100%

The absolute value in the denominator avoids a confusing sign when the budget is negative, but managers should also see the currency amount. Percentage variance is inappropriate or unstable when the budget is zero or very small.

5.1 Flexible budgets

A static budget may be unfair when actual activity differs from planned activity. A flexible budget adjusts variable costs to actual activity while retaining relevant fixed-cost assumptions. This separates the effect of activity volume from efficiency or spending.

For a cost with fixed component F and variable rate v per unit at actual activity Q:

Flexible budget cost = F + v × Q

This applies only when the cost behaviour is reasonably linear within the relevant range. Step-fixed costs, capacity constraints and nonlinear relationships require more careful modelling.

5.2 Sales variances

For a single product:

Sales price variance = (Actual price − Budget price) × Actual quantity
Sales volume variance = (Actual quantity − Budget quantity) × Budget price

The two variances sum to the total sales revenue variance. For multiple products, mix and volume effects should be separated where product prices or margins differ. A revenue increase caused by selling more low-margin products may be less valuable than a smaller increase in high-margin products.

Worked example: price and volume variance

Budget sales are 10,000 units at $50 each. Actual sales are 11,000 units at $48 each.

Budget revenue = 10,000 × $50 = $500,000.

Actual revenue = 11,000 × $48 = $528,000.

Total revenue variance = $528,000 − $500,000 = $28,000 favourable.

Sales price variance = ($48 − $50) × 11,000 = −$22,000, unfavourable.

Sales volume variance = (11,000 − 10,000) × $50 = $50,000, favourable.

Net variance = −$22,000 + $50,000 = $28,000 favourable. The apparent revenue success combines strong volume with a price reduction. Profit impact cannot be inferred without analysing variable cost and product mix.

6. Drivers, Anomalies and Root Causes

A dashboard should answer not only “what changed?” but also “why?” A driver tree decomposes a top-level outcome into controllable contributors. For example:

ROCE → operating margin and capital turnover → price, volume, mix, variable cost, fixed cost, receivables, inventory and assets.

A root-cause investigation commonly follows these steps:

  1. Define the signal precisely: metric, period, baseline and materiality.
  2. Validate data completeness, timing, classification and units.
  3. Segment by product, customer, region, channel, branch or process.
  4. Compare with relevant benchmarks and historical patterns.
  5. Form hypotheses about causal drivers.
  6. Test hypotheses using reconciliations, drill-downs and operational evidence.
  7. Assign corrective action and monitor whether the signal improves.

Segmentation can reveal Simpson’s paradox: an aggregate trend may differ from trends within important groups because the composition of groups has changed. Analysts should therefore avoid concluding that a KPI caused another KPI merely because they moved together.

Anomaly detection

An anomaly is an observation that differs materially from expected behaviour. Basic methods include threshold rules, year-on-year comparisons, control charts and rolling averages. A z-score can standardise an observation when the distribution is approximately stable:

z = (x − μ) ÷ σ

where x is the observation, μ is the reference mean and σ is the reference standard deviation. A large absolute z-score may indicate an unusual value, but it is not proof of error or fraud. Seasonality, promotions, one-off contracts and structural changes must be considered. Robust methods such as the median and interquartile range may be preferable when outliers distort the mean and standard deviation.

7. Designing Effective Management Dashboards

A management dashboard should be designed around decisions rather than available data. Begin by asking:

  • Who will use it?
  • Which decisions are made at that level?
  • What time horizon matters?
  • Which exceptions require intervention?
  • What drill-down is needed to identify ownership and cause?

A practical dashboard structure is:

  1. Executive scorecard: a small number of strategic KPIs, target status and major risks.
  2. Financial performance: revenue, margin, costs, cash and return measures.
  3. Drivers: volume, price, mix, productivity, service and working-capital measures.
  4. Exceptions: significant variances, anomalies, overdue actions and control breaches.
  5. Action register: issue, owner, action, due date, expected impact and status.

Visualisation principles

  • Use line charts for trends and column charts for comparable categories.
  • Use waterfall charts for bridge analysis, such as budget profit to actual profit.
  • Use bullet charts or compact variance bars for target comparison.
  • Use scatter plots to examine relationships such as margin and growth.
  • Use tables when exact values, rankings or accountability are central.
  • Label units, period, currency, source and refresh date.
  • Use colour sparingly and do not rely on colour alone; use labels or symbols for accessibility.
  • Avoid three-dimensional effects, unnecessary decoration and overloaded gauges.
  • Preserve consistent definitions and scales across reporting periods.

A traffic-light status should be tied to explicit thresholds. For example, green may mean within 2% of target, amber between 2% and 5%, and red beyond 5%; the thresholds must reflect materiality and business context rather than arbitrary decoration.

Dashboard quality has three dimensions: accuracy, relevance and usability. A visually attractive dashboard with unreliable data is dangerous. A technically accurate dashboard containing 60 measures may be unusable. A concise dashboard that omits emerging risk is also inadequate.

8. Illustrative Case: Northstar Office Supplies

Background

Northstar Office Supplies is an illustrative regional distributor. Monthly revenue increased by 8% compared with the prior year, and the sales team reported strong performance. However, the finance manager observed declining cash balances and increasing short-term borrowing.

Problem

Management initially focused on revenue growth and did not know whether the cash pressure arose from profitability, collection, inventory or supplier terms.

Analysis

The analytics team reconciled the monthly dashboard with the general ledger and operating systems. It found:

  • Revenue growth of 8%, but average selling price down 3% because of discounting.
  • Gross margin falling from 31% to 27%.
  • Receivables days increasing from 42 to 58 days.
  • Inventory days increasing from 48 to 63 days.
  • Payables days falling from fifty to forty-five days after a supplier policy change.
  • Growth concentrated in low-margin institutional contracts.

The revenue variance was therefore favourable, but the margin and cash consequences were adverse. Customer segmentation showed that two large accounts represented much of the receivables increase. Inventory analysis identified slow-moving products purchased for a promotional campaign that had not generated the expected demand.

Approach and solution

The team created a driver-based dashboard with:

  • revenue, gross margin and contribution by customer segment;
  • price, volume and mix variances;
  • receivables ageing and collection promise dates;
  • inventory days, ageing and sell-through rate;
  • supplier-payment terms and cash forecast;
  • red-amber-green thresholds with named owners.

Management approved a pricing floor for low-margin contracts, a collection plan for the two large accounts, a controlled clearance programme for obsolete inventory and renewed supplier negotiations. The sales incentive was revised to include contribution margin and collection quality rather than revenue alone.

Outcome

After three reporting cycles, management observed improved visibility of margin leakage and assigned actions earlier. The case does not claim a guaranteed financial result; its central lesson is that dashboard design changed the conversation from “sales are growing” to “which growth creates cash and return?”

Learning points

  1. Revenue growth is not equivalent to profitable growth.
  2. Working-capital metrics explain why profit may not convert into cash.
  3. Mix and customer concentration can conceal risk in aggregate figures.
  4. KPIs influence behaviour, so incentives must reflect the complete objective.
  5. A dashboard is effective only when linked to owners and decisions.

9. Governance, Ethics and Technology

Financial analytics depends on controlled definitions and reliable lineage. Organisations should maintain a KPI dictionary, version-controlled formulas, reconciliations to source systems, access controls and an audit trail of changes. Data should be refreshed according to a documented schedule, and late or incomplete data should be visible to users.

Ethical risks include selective reporting, target manipulation, inappropriate employee surveillance, privacy breaches and pressure to classify costs or transactions in ways that improve reported performance. Analysts should distinguish fact from interpretation, disclose assumptions and avoid presenting uncertain estimates as precise conclusions.

Business intelligence platforms can automate data extraction, semantic models, drill-through and alerts. Machine-learning methods may support anomaly detection or cash forecasting, but they do not remove the need for accounting judgement. AI-generated explanations can reproduce data errors, infer causation without evidence or expose confidential information. Human review, model monitoring, access control and explainability are therefore essential.

Contemporary performance systems increasingly combine financial and non-financial data, near-real-time operational signals and scenario analysis. The resulting speed is valuable only if definitions remain stable and users understand that preliminary data may be revised. Forecasts should present assumptions, uncertainty and alternative scenarios rather than a single apparently certain number.

10. Best-Practice Checklist

Before publishing a dashboard, confirm that:

  • each KPI has a clear decision purpose and accountable owner;
  • formulas, units, scope and sign conventions are documented;
  • actuals reconcile to authoritative financial records;
  • targets and thresholds are approved and time-specific;
  • variances are shown in both absolute and percentage terms where meaningful;
  • flexible-budget logic is used when activity differs materially from plan;
  • profitability measures are connected to price, volume, mix and cost drivers;
  • working-capital measures use appropriate denominators and consistent days;
  • anomalies have been validated before escalation;
  • visual design supports comparison and accessibility;
  • confidential information is protected;
  • every significant exception has a next action, owner and due date.

Chapter Summary

Financial performance analytics links accounting outcomes to operational drivers and managerial action. Effective KPI design requires a precise definition, reliable data, a meaningful target, an owner and an understanding of limitations. Profitability measures such as margin, contribution and ROCE should be interpreted alongside growth, capital utilisation and risk. Working-capital measures—receivables days, inventory days, payables days and the cash conversion cycle—explain how operating performance affects liquidity.

Variance analysis separates actual results from budget, forecast or prior-period expectations. Price, volume and mix analysis prevents misleading conclusions from aggregate revenue movements. Driver trees, segmentation and anomaly investigation help identify root causes, while governance prevents data and interpretation errors. A management dashboard should present a limited set of strategically relevant measures, highlight exceptions and connect every important issue to an accountable action. Technology can improve speed and detection, but professional judgement, transparency and ethical control remain essential.

Key Terms

KPI: A critical performance measure linked to an objective, target and accountable owner.

Lagging indicator: A measure of an outcome that has already occurred.

Leading indicator: A measure that may provide information about future performance.

Driver: A factor that contributes to a financial or operational result.

Gross margin: Gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenue.

Operating margin: Operating profit expressed as a percentage of revenue.

Contribution: Revenue less variable cost.

ROCE: Operating profit divided by average capital employed.

Capital turnover: Revenue divided by average capital employed.

Working capital: Operating current assets and liabilities, commonly including receivables, inventory and payables.

Receivables days: An estimate of the average time taken to collect credit sales.

Inventory days: An estimate of the average time inventory is held.

Cash conversion cycle: Receivables days plus inventory days minus payables days.

Variance: The difference between an actual result and a reference amount.

Flexible budget: A budget adjusted for actual activity levels.

Mix variance: The effect of changing the relative composition of products, services or customers.

Anomaly: An observation that differs materially from expected behaviour.

Root cause: An underlying condition that explains a problem or performance outcome.

Data lineage: The documented path of data from source through transformation to report.

Dashboard: A visual management-reporting interface that presents selected measures and exceptions.

Review Questions

5 Short Answer Questions

  1. What distinguishes a KPI from an ordinary operational metric?
  2. Why should financial dashboards include both lagging and leading indicators?
  3. State the formula for the cash conversion cycle and explain each component.
  4. What is the purpose of a flexible budget?
  5. Why can a high current ratio fail to indicate strong liquidity?

5 Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain how an organisation can develop a KPI hierarchy from strategic objectives to operational actions.
  2. Discuss the uses and limitations of ROCE and its decomposition into operating margin and capital turnover.
  3. Explain how price, volume and mix analysis can improve interpretation of sales performance.
  4. Describe the design principles of an effective management dashboard, including visualisation and governance.
  5. Discuss the ethical and control risks associated with automated financial analytics and AI-supported dashboards.

3 Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A company’s revenue rises by 10%, but its operating margin falls from 12% to 8%, receivables days increase from 35 to 52, and inventory days increase from 40 to 58. Analyse at least three possible performance drivers and propose a dashboard response.
  2. Budget sales are 20,000 units at $30. Actual sales are 22,000 units at $28. Calculate the total revenue variance, sales price variance and sales volume variance, and interpret the result.
  3. Design a one-page dashboard for a distributor experiencing cash pressure despite revenue growth. Specify at least eight KPIs, their owners, suitable visualisations and two warning thresholds.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which measure is generally classified as a lagging indicator?

A. Sales pipeline quality

B. Operating profit

C. Customer renewal intention

D. Forecast order volume

Correct Answer: B. Operating profit

Question 2

An organisation has revenue of $800,000 and operating profit of $96,000. What is its operating margin?

A. 8%

B. 10%

C. 12%

D. 14%

Correct Answer: C. 12%

Question 3

Average receivables are $100,000, credit sales are $730,000 and a 365-day year is used. What are receivables days?

A. 30 days

B. 40 days

C. 50 days

D. 60 days

Correct Answer: A. 30 days

Question 4

If receivables days are 45, inventory days are 60 and payables days are 35, what is the cash conversion cycle?

A. 50 days

B. 60 days

C. 70 days

D. 140 days

Correct Answer: C. 70 days

Question 5

Which formula represents a single-product sales price variance?

A. (Actual quantity − Budget quantity) × Actual price

B. (Actual price − Budget price) × Actual quantity

C. (Actual price − Budget price) × Budget quantity

D. Actual revenue − Budget cost

Correct Answer: B. (Actual price − Budget price) × Actual quantity

Question 6

Why may a flexible budget be preferable to a static budget?

A. It removes all fixed costs

B. It adjusts relevant variable costs for actual activity

C. It guarantees favourable variances

D. It replaces the financial statements

Correct Answer: B. It adjusts relevant variable costs for actual activity

Question 7

Which visualisation is most suitable for explaining how budget profit reconciles to actual profit through several changes?

A. Waterfall chart

B. Pie chart

C. Scatter plot

D. Radar chart

Correct Answer: A. Waterfall chart

Question 8

What is the main purpose of a driver tree?

A. To decorate a dashboard

B. To replace source-system controls

C. To decompose an outcome into contributing factors

D. To calculate tax automatically

Correct Answer: C. To decompose an outcome into contributing factors

Question 9

In the ROCE identity, capital turnover is calculated as:

A. Operating profit ÷ revenue

B. Revenue ÷ average capital employed

C. Average capital employed ÷ revenue

D. Revenue ÷ operating profit

Correct Answer: B. Revenue ÷ average capital employed

Question 10

What is an important governance practice for KPI reporting?

A. Changing definitions whenever results are disappointing

B. Using undocumented formulas for flexibility

C. Maintaining a KPI dictionary and data lineage

D. Reporting only favourable indicators

Correct Answer: C. Maintaining a KPI dictionary and data lineage

Financial and Risk Analytics
Chapter 5 of 15