Chapter 14
Digital Facilities, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence
Graduate Program in Operation Management (GPOM)
Facility Layout & Location Planning
•
Graduate
Digital Facilities, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence
Introduction
Facility location and layout planning have traditionally relied on maps, engineering drawings, historical demand data, expert judgment, and discrete-event analysis. Contemporary facilities, however, are increasingly represented and operated through interconnected digital systems. Building information modelling (BIM), geographic information systems (GIS), Internet of Things (IoT) devices, radio-frequency identification (RFID), warehouse-management systems (WMS), manufacturing-execution systems (MES), digital twins, simulation, virtual reality (VR), optimization platforms, and artificial intelligence (AI) now influence decisions from initial site screening to real-time operational control.
The central managerial issue is not whether an organization should acquire a particular technology. It is how digital technologies can improve the quality, speed, transparency, and adaptability of facility decisions without creating excessive cost, cyber risk, bias, or dependence on unreliable data. A sophisticated visualization cannot compensate for poor demand assumptions; an AI model cannot correct an incorrectly defined objective; and a digital twin is not useful unless it is connected to valid operational data and used in a decision process.
Digital facility planning therefore requires an integrated view of physical infrastructure, data architecture, analytical models, human expertise, and governance. This chapter develops that view and evaluates how digital tools support location screening, layout generation, predictive analysis, and real-time improvement.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this chapter, students should be able to:
Explain the roles and relationships of BIM, GIS, IoT, RFID, WMS, MES, digital twins, simulation, VR, optimization, and AI.
Design a digital workflow for facility location and layout planning.
Formulate basic location, layout, capacity, and performance measures with appropriate assumptions.
Evaluate the validity, limitations, and governance requirements of digital models.
Recommend an integrated technology architecture for a contemporary facility.
Critically assess the managerial, ethical, cybersecurity, and workforce implications of AI-enabled facilities.
1. From Digital Representation to Digital Decision-Making
A digital facility system can be understood as five connected layers:
Layer
Main purpose
Typical technologies
Physical layer
Machines, buildings, people, materials, and infrastructure
Conveyors, robots, sensors, vehicles
Identification and data layer
Capture the identity, location, condition, and movement of assets
RFID, barcodes, IoT sensors, cameras
System-of-record layer
Store transactions and coordinate work
ERP, WMS, MES, maintenance systems
Model and analytics layer
Explain, predict, simulate, and optimize performance
BIM, GIS, simulation, optimization, AI
Decision and visualization layer
Support human action and operational control
Dashboards, VR, control rooms, mobile applications
The layers should not be treated as independent software purchases. Their value depends on interoperability, data quality, process ownership, and decision rights. For example, a warehouse dashboard showing travel time is useful only if item identities, locations, task timestamps, and route definitions are consistently recorded.
A useful distinction is between a digital model, a digital shadow, and a digital twin. A digital model is a static or manually updated representation. A digital shadow receives data from the physical system, usually in one direction. A digital twin maintains a continuing data relationship between physical and digital systems and may support prediction, experimentation, and feedback control. Many commercial systems described as twins are more accurately digital shadows or integrated simulation models. Precise terminology matters because it prevents exaggerated expectations.
Layered digital facility architecture
Figure: Layered digital facility architecture
Figure: A layered architecture for digital facility planning and operation.
2. Digital Technologies Across the Facility Life Cycle
2.1 GIS for location screening
GIS combines spatial data, analytical functions, and maps. It supports location screening by integrating customer demand, suppliers, transport networks, labour availability, land cost, utilities, flood exposure, zoning, emissions constraints, and competitor locations. GIS is especially valuable when the decision has a strong geographic component.
A common screening process is:
Define mandatory constraints, such as zoning, minimum site area, access, and environmental restrictions.
Assemble spatial layers in a common coordinate system.
Standardize or normalize comparable criteria.
Apply weights reflecting strategic priorities.
Conduct sensitivity analysis on weights and uncertain data.
Inspect high-ranking sites using engineering, legal, financial, and community review.
A simple weighted score is:
Sj = ∑i=1n wi rij
Here, Sj is the score for site j, wi is the weight of criterion i, and rij is the standardized rating of site j on criterion i. Usually wi ≥ 0 and ∑wi = 1. The method assumes that criteria can reasonably be represented on a common scale and that additive trade-offs are acceptable. It is a screening device, not proof that the highest-scoring site is optimal.
For transport-oriented decisions, a more explicit model may minimize weighted distance:
Minimize Z = ∑k=1m dk qk ck
where dk is distance for flow or customer group k (km), qk is quantity transported (units or tonnes), and ck is cost per unit-distance. This formulation is valid when distance, volume, and unit-distance cost are sufficiently meaningful and other constraints are separately represented.
GIS limitations include outdated land records, inconsistent spatial resolution, omitted informal constraints, false precision in scores, and difficulty representing social acceptance or future regulation. A map should initiate investigation, not replace it.
2.2 BIM for facility configuration
BIM is a structured, object-oriented representation of a built asset. Unlike a conventional drawing, a BIM object may contain geometry, material, cost, maintenance, fire rating, installation sequence, and spatial relationships. In layout planning, BIM can coordinate architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, and process requirements.
BIM supports:
clash detection between equipment, structure, utilities, and access paths;
quantity and cost estimation;
constructability and installation sequencing;
space validation and clearance checking;
energy and environmental analysis;
maintenance planning and asset handover.
BIM is most effective when naming conventions, object attributes, model ownership, revision control, and information-exchange requirements are defined at the beginning of a project. A visually impressive model with missing attributes is not an analytically useful model.
2.3 IoT, RFID, WMS, and MES
IoT connects sensors, machines, vehicles, meters, and environmental devices to communication and data systems. Typical measurements include temperature, vibration, energy consumption, occupancy, queue length, speed, and equipment state. RFID identifies tagged objects through radio communication and is particularly useful for receiving, inventory accuracy, work-in-process tracking, and automated gate or conveyor events. RFID does not automatically provide perfect location; accuracy depends on reader placement, tag orientation, interference, and event interpretation.
A WMS coordinates warehouse receiving, put-away, storage, replenishment, picking, packing, shipping, and inventory records. An MES coordinates production execution, dispatching, quality records, labour and machine status, and traceability. The ERP generally provides enterprise-level orders, purchasing, finance, and master data. Integration is necessary because facility decisions depend on the relationship between planned demand, released work, physical movements, and actual completion.
Important data-quality dimensions include accuracy, completeness, timeliness, consistency, uniqueness, and lineage. A timestamp should have a defined event meaning, time zone, clock source, and unit. Otherwise, apparently precise process-time calculations can be misleading.
3. Analytics for Location, Layout, and Capacity
3.1 Descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analytics
Descriptive analytics reports what happened: throughput, utilization, inventory, travel distance, service level, and downtime. Diagnostic analytics asks why it happened, often using process mining, bottleneck analysis, and root-cause investigation. Predictive analytics estimates what may happen, such as demand, failures, congestion, or order completion time. Prescriptive analytics recommends actions, such as site selection, slotting, staffing, routing, or equipment allocation.
These categories overlap in practice. A predictive model may be embedded in an optimization model; a simulation may be used to compare prescriptive policies; and a descriptive dashboard may reveal data problems before advanced analysis begins.
3.2 Layout generation and flow analysis
A layout should reflect material flow, process relationships, safety, supervision, flexibility, maintainability, and future expansion. Digital layout generation can use constraint-based design, heuristic search, mixed-integer programming, or simulation-based evaluation.
A basic load–distance measure is:
LD = ∑i=1n∑j=1n fij dij
Here, fij is the number of movements from department or area i to j during a defined period, and dij is the distance per movement. The result has movement-distance units, such as pallet-kilometres per day. If movements have different costs, use cost-weighted distance instead. The measure assumes that distance is a meaningful proxy for handling burden; it does not by itself capture congestion, risk, equipment type, or uneven travel time.
For a candidate layout, the objective may combine flow cost with penalties:
Minimize F = αLD + βC + γR + δE
where C represents congestion or capacity penalties, R safety or risk penalties, E expansion or flexibility penalties, and α, β, γ, δ are decision weights or monetary conversion factors. Because the terms may have different units, they must be normalized or converted to a defensible common value before aggregation.
3.3 Simulation
Discrete-event simulation represents events such as arrival, processing, movement, inspection, failure, and departure. It is appropriate when queues, variability, resource contention, routing logic, and time-dependent behaviour are important. A simulation model should specify entities, resources, events, states, routing rules, input distributions, warm-up treatment, replication strategy, and performance outputs.
For a stable single-server queue under restrictive assumptions—Poisson arrivals, exponential service times, one server, unlimited waiting space, first-come-first-served discipline, and arrival rate λ less than service rate μ—utilization is:
ρ = λ ÷ μ
The condition ρ < 1 is necessary for a stable long-run queue. Real facilities often violate these assumptions, so simulation is generally preferable when arrival patterns, processing times, or routing are complex. Simulation outputs are estimates and require adequate replications and confidence analysis; one run is not evidence of a reliable conclusion.
3.4 Optimization platforms
Optimization platforms can link decision variables, objectives, constraints, data, and solvers. Examples include site allocation, facility-to-market assignment, dock scheduling, storage-slot assignment, vehicle routing, workforce planning, and equipment placement.
A generic binary location model may use xj = 1 if site j is selected and zero otherwise, and yjk = 1 if demand point k is assigned to site j. A simplified objective is:
Minimize Z = ∑j Fj xj + ∑j∑k cjk yjk
subject to:
∑j xj = p
∑j yjk = 1 for every k
yjk ≤ xj
Here, Fj is fixed cost for site j, cjk is the assignment cost from site j to demand point k, and p is the number of sites to open. The model assumes costs and demand are adequately estimated and that assignment is feasible. Capacity, service, labour, emissions, and resilience constraints must be added when relevant.
Optimization does not eliminate managerial judgment. It formalizes selected assumptions and can produce an optimal answer to an unrealistic model. Scenario analysis, infeasibility diagnosis, and sensitivity testing are therefore essential.
4. Digital Twins and Real-Time Improvement
A digital twin connects a physical facility with a computational representation through a continuing data flow. Its functions may include state estimation, anomaly detection, prediction, scenario testing, and closed-loop or human-approved control.
A mature twin requires:
a clearly defined operational purpose;
reliable asset and process identity;
synchronized time and event definitions;
validated geometry and process logic;
interfaces among operational and information technology;
model-update procedures;
cybersecurity and access controls;
performance measures linked to decisions.
Real-time improvement commonly follows a sense–interpret–decide–act cycle. Sensors detect a deviation, analytics interpret its likely cause, a rule or optimization model proposes an action, and an operator or control system implements it. Examples include rerouting autonomous vehicles around congestion, changing pick waves, adjusting replenishment priorities, or scheduling maintenance before failure.
The cycle must include safeguards. Automated action should be limited when consequences are safety-critical, data confidence is low, or the model is outside its validated operating range. A human-in-the-loop design assigns explicit authority, escalation thresholds, and override procedures.
5. Artificial Intelligence in Facility Planning
AI includes machine-learning methods that infer patterns from data, as well as knowledge-based systems, computer vision, natural-language interfaces, and generative methods. Relevant applications include:
demand forecasting and order-profile prediction;
predictive maintenance from vibration, temperature, or current signals;
computer vision for safety, quality, occupancy, and counting;
automated slotting and batching;
route and schedule recommendations;
anomaly and cyber-threat detection;
natural-language querying of operational data;
generative layout alternatives subject to engineering constraints.
AI should be evaluated against a baseline. A forecasting model, for example, should be compared with a transparent benchmark such as seasonal naïve forecasting. A maintenance model should be evaluated not only by accuracy but also by false alarms, missed failures, intervention cost, and safety consequences.
For a regression model, mean absolute error is:
MAE = (1 ÷ n) ∑t=1n |yt − ŷt|
where yt is the observed value, ŷt is the prediction, and n is the number of observations. MAE has the same units as the predicted variable and treats errors linearly. It is not sufficient when large errors have disproportionate operational consequences.
AI deployment should address data leakage, concept drift, explainability, fairness, robustness, and monitoring. A model trained during normal demand may fail during promotions, disruptions, or new product introductions. A computer-vision model may perform differently under altered lighting or with different worker clothing. A model that recommends faster work without considering fatigue or safety may optimize the wrong objective.
6. Virtual Reality and Human-Centred Design
VR enables planners, operators, engineers, and safety specialists to inspect proposed environments before construction or rearrangement. It can reveal blocked sight lines, awkward reaches, insufficient clearance, poor signage, excessive walking, and unsafe interaction between people and vehicles. It also supports training and emergency rehearsal.
VR is not a substitute for ergonomic measurement, accessibility review, physical prototyping, or regulatory inspection. Users can become immersed in a visually convincing but physically inaccurate environment. The model must therefore include correct scale, representative equipment, realistic task sequences, and participation by actual users.
Augmented reality can provide location-specific instructions, maintenance guidance, or picking information in the physical environment. Its effectiveness depends on interface design, worker acceptance, information accuracy, and avoidance of visual or cognitive overload.
7. Integrated Implementation Framework
A practical implementation can proceed through the following stages:
Stage 1: Define the decision
Specify whether the need is site screening, layout redesign, capacity expansion, congestion reduction, traceability, maintenance, or another measurable problem. Define decision horizon, stakeholders, constraints, and success criteria.
Stage 2: Establish the data foundation
Create asset registers, master-data ownership, event dictionaries, coordinate conventions, data-quality rules, and interfaces. Identify missing, biased, or inaccessible data before selecting advanced software.
Stage 3: Build a minimum viable model
Start with the smallest BIM, GIS, simulation, or analytical model that can answer the decision question. Validate structure and behaviour with subject-matter experts.
Stage 4: Compare alternatives
Use optimization to generate candidates, simulation to test variability, VR to inspect human interaction, and financial analysis to assess investment. Do not rely on a single analytical lens.
Stage 5: Pilot and validate
Test on a bounded process or zone. Compare model outputs with observed performance. Record assumptions, error ranges, exceptions, and user feedback.
Stage 6: Govern and scale
Define cybersecurity controls, model ownership, audit trails, change management, training, access rights, and retirement criteria. Scale only when benefits and risks are demonstrated.
Useful key performance indicators include throughput, cycle time, order-fill rate, inventory accuracy, travel distance, space utilization, energy per unit, unplanned downtime, near misses, prediction error, schedule adherence, and resilience under disruption. Indicators should be balanced: maximizing utilization alone may increase queues and reduce responsiveness.
8. Illustrative Case: NorthRiver Distribution Centre
Background
NorthRiver, a fictional regional distributor of packaged food, operates a 28,000-square-metre centre serving 420 retail outlets. Growth in e-commerce orders has increased picking congestion, dock waiting, and inventory discrepancies. Management is considering a layout redesign and selective automation.
Problem
The facility has a conventional WMS, barcode scanning, limited RFID at receiving, and no integrated model of pedestrian and material flow. Managers disagree about whether the principal problem is insufficient space, poor slotting, inadequate dock capacity, or unbalanced labour.
Analysis
The project team first established a common product and location master. GIS was used to examine delivery territories and identify future demand concentration. BIM represented the building, racks, docks, fire separations, utilities, and proposed equipment. WMS data supplied order lines, pick sequences, replenishment events, and timestamps. RFID receiving events were reconciled with barcode transactions.
A descriptive analysis found that 18% of stock-keeping units generated 71% of order lines. A load–distance analysis showed that fast-moving items were dispersed across three zones. A discrete-event simulation represented order arrivals, batching, picking, replenishment, packing, dock assignment, and equipment failures. Alternative layouts were tested under average and peak demand rather than average demand alone.
Approach and solution
The team compared three alternatives: a low-cost slotting change, a moderate redesign with a forward-pick area and additional packing stations, and a high-automation design using goods-to-person equipment. The simulation showed that the high-automation alternative had the greatest peak capacity but was vulnerable to single-system downtime and required substantial capital. The moderate alternative reduced travel and congestion while preserving manual flexibility.
VR walkthroughs revealed that the preliminary moderate design created a blind intersection between pedestrians and pallet vehicles. The design was revised with a separated crossing, visual controls, and a relocated replenishment aisle. An AI model was then used to recommend weekly slotting changes, subject to weight, cube, compatibility, replenishment, and safety constraints. Supervisors retained approval authority.
Outcome
In the illustrative case, a pilot zone produced a 24% reduction in picker travel, a 13% reduction in order cycle time, and improved inventory accuracy. These figures are project results rather than universal benchmarks. The pilot also revealed that RFID read failures near metal structures required antenna adjustment and exception handling. The project therefore included data-quality monitoring and a staged rollout rather than immediate full automation.
Learning points
The best result came from integrating several technologies rather than selecting one “smart” technology.
Simulation exposed peak-period weaknesses that average utilization concealed.
VR identified a human-safety issue not visible in a two-dimensional layout.
AI was constrained by operational rules and supervised by managers.
Data governance and pilot testing were as important as software capability.
9. Challenges, Ethics, and Governance
Digital facilities create significant risks. Cybersecurity threats include ransomware, unauthorized control of equipment, credential theft, sensor spoofing, and lateral movement from office systems into operational technology. Controls should include network segmentation, least-privilege access, multifactor authentication, patch governance, secure backups, incident response, vendor review, and recovery testing.
Privacy is relevant when cameras, wearables, location tags, or productivity systems monitor workers. Organizations should define legitimate purposes, minimize collection, restrict access, communicate clearly, establish retention limits, and comply with applicable privacy and labour laws. Continuous surveillance can damage trust and encourage unsafe behaviour if workers feel compelled to optimize measured activity at the expense of judgment or wellbeing.
AI governance should address accountability, transparency, discrimination, human oversight, model documentation, validation, and appeal. Automated decisions affecting work allocation, performance evaluation, or employment require particular caution. Safety-critical systems should meet applicable machinery, occupational safety, electrical, building, accessibility, and data-protection requirements. Standards and regulations differ by jurisdiction; professional teams must verify current requirements rather than assume that a software supplier provides compliance.
Digital inequity also matters. Small suppliers, contractors, and workers may lack the technology or skills required by a digitally integrated facility. A responsible implementation includes training, accessible interfaces, transition support, and consultation with affected groups.
10. Contemporary Developments and Best Practices
Important developments include edge computing for low-latency control, private wireless networks, autonomous mobile robots, computer vision, energy-aware optimization, interoperable open data standards, and generative design constrained by engineering rules. Generative AI can accelerate exploration and natural-language interaction, but outputs require verification because fluent text or attractive geometry does not guarantee feasibility.
Best practices include:
begin with a decision and measurable value proposition;
maintain a single source of truth for critical master data;
use open interfaces and documented data ownership;
validate models against observed events;
test alternatives under variability and disruption;
combine quantitative analysis with operator knowledge;
separate experimentation from live control;
monitor model drift and system health;
design for cybersecurity and privacy from the outset;
retain human authority for ambiguous or high-consequence decisions;
measure total lifecycle cost, not only acquisition price;
review whether the digital system still serves the original operational purpose.
Chapter Summary
Digital facility planning links physical assets, data capture, enterprise systems, analytical models, and human decisions. GIS supports geographic screening; BIM supports coordinated spatial and asset representation; IoT and RFID provide operational visibility; WMS and MES coordinate warehouse and production execution; simulation evaluates variability and congestion; optimization formalizes trade-offs; VR supports human-centred review; and digital twins connect models to continuing operational data. AI can improve forecasting, maintenance, vision, slotting, routing, and anomaly detection, but only when data quality, validation, governance, and human accountability are present.
The most important managerial lesson is that digital sophistication does not guarantee decision quality. Sound objectives, defensible assumptions, integrated data, sensitivity analysis, pilot testing, cybersecurity, privacy protection, and workforce participation remain essential. A facility becomes genuinely digital when technology improves reliable decisions and adaptive performance—not merely when more sensors or software are installed.
Key Terms
BIM: A structured digital representation of built assets and their information.
Digital shadow: A digital representation that receives data from a physical system, generally in one direction.
Digital twin: A connected computational representation that supports monitoring, prediction, experimentation, or control of a physical system.
GIS: A system for storing, analyzing, and visualizing geographically referenced data.
IoT: A network of connected physical devices that sense, communicate, or act.
RFID: Radio-frequency identification of tagged objects through radio communication.
WMS: Warehouse-management system coordinating warehouse transactions and work.
MES: Manufacturing-execution system coordinating production execution and traceability.
Digital model: A representation that may be static or manually updated.
Simulation: Computational experimentation with a representation of system behaviour.
Optimization: Systematic selection of decisions that best satisfy an objective and constraints.
Load–distance analysis: Evaluation of material movement using flow multiplied by travel distance.
Predictive analytics: Analysis estimating future or unknown outcomes.
Prescriptive analytics: Analysis recommending actions among alternatives.
Concept drift: Change in the relationship between input data and outcomes over time.
Edge computing: Processing data near the physical source rather than exclusively in a remote cloud.
Human-in-the-loop: A design in which people retain review, approval, intervention, or override authority.
Process mining: Analysis of event logs to discover and evaluate operational processes.
Model validation: Evidence that a model adequately represents the real system for its intended use.
Data governance: Policies and responsibilities controlling data quality, access, security, and use.
Review Questions
Short Answer Questions
Distinguish a digital model, digital shadow, and digital twin.
What are two important uses of GIS in facility location planning?
Why must RFID data be interpreted rather than assumed to provide perfect location information?
State two assumptions of the simple utilization relationship ρ = λ ÷ μ.
Identify three governance issues associated with AI-enabled facilities.
Long Answer Questions
Explain how BIM, GIS, WMS, MES, IoT, and simulation can be integrated across a facility life cycle.
Critically evaluate the use of weighted scoring for location screening.
Discuss how digital twins can support real-time facility improvement and explain their limitations.
Compare simulation and optimization as tools for layout planning.
Develop a governance framework for a facility using worker-location data and AI-based task recommendations.
Analytical / Application Questions
A company is choosing among sites using land cost, transport access, labour availability, and flood exposure. Design a GIS-based screening process, including how you would treat mandatory constraints, weights, uncertainty, and final managerial review.
A warehouse has high average utilization but severe peak-period congestion. Explain why average utilization may be misleading and propose a simulation study, including inputs, scenarios, outputs, and validation steps.
Design an integrated digital solution for a manufacturing facility experiencing unplanned downtime, material shortages, and unsafe pedestrian–vehicle interactions. Specify the technologies, data flows, decision rules, human controls, and performance measures.
Multiple Choice Questions with Answers
Question 1
Which technology is primarily designed to integrate geographically referenced data for location screening?
A. GIS
B. MES
C. RFID
D. VR
Correct Answer: A. GIS
Question 2
In the load–distance measure LD = ∑ fijdij, what does fij represent?
A. Fixed cost of department i
B. Number or volume of movements from i to j
C. Failure rate of equipment i
D. Floor area between i and j
Correct Answer: B. Number or volume of movements from i to j
Question 3
Which statement best describes a digital twin?
A. A static architectural drawing
B. A manually prepared project budget
C. A connected computational representation linked to a physical system
D. A barcode printed on an asset
Correct Answer: C. A connected computational representation linked to a physical system
Question 4
If arrival rate is λ = 8 jobs per hour and service rate is μ = 10 jobs per hour, utilization under the simple single-server model is:
A. 0.20
B. 0.80
C. 1.25
D. 18 jobs per hour
Correct Answer: B. 0.80
Question 5
Which system most directly coordinates receiving, put-away, picking, and shipping in a warehouse?
A. WMS
B. BIM
C. GIS
D. CAD-only software
Correct Answer: A. WMS
Question 6
Why is simulation particularly useful in facility layout analysis?
A. It guarantees the globally optimal layout
B. It eliminates the need for operational data
C. It can represent variability, queues, and resource contention
D. It converts all qualitative judgments into prices
Correct Answer: C. It can represent variability, queues, and resource contention
Question 7
What is a key risk when an AI model trained under normal demand is used during an unusual disruption?
A. Concept drift or operation outside the validated range
B. Automatic improvement in accuracy
C. Removal of all data requirements
D. Guaranteed unbiased recommendations
Correct Answer: A. Concept drift or operation outside the validated range
Question 8
Which practice best supports responsible real-time automation?
A. Allow every model output to control equipment immediately
B. Use human oversight and escalation for high-consequence decisions
C. Delete exception records to simplify dashboards
D. Avoid monitoring after deployment
Correct Answer: B. Use human oversight and escalation for high-consequence decisions
Question 9
What is a principal purpose of VR in facility planning?
A. To replace all safety regulations
B. To inspect proposed spaces and work interactions before construction
C. To calculate accounting depreciation automatically
D. To guarantee worker acceptance
Correct Answer: B. To inspect proposed spaces and work interactions before construction
Question 10
In a binary facility-location model, what does xj = 1 commonly indicate?
A. Demand point j is closed
B. Site j is selected or opened
C. Site j has zero capacity
D. Shipment j is delayed
Correct Answer: B. Site j is selected or opened
Facility Layout & Location Planning
Chapter 14
of 15