5. Environmental Pollution, Waste and RemediationIntroduction and ContextEnvironmental pollution is the undesirable alteration of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of air, water, and land. It occurs when substances, energy, or organisms enter the environment at rates that exceed its capacity to absorb, transform, or recover from them. Pollution is therefore not determined only by the presence of a contaminant; concentration, exposure pathway, duration, toxicity, ecological sensitivity, and the resilience of the receiving environment are equally important. Industrialisation, urbanisation, intensive agriculture, transport, energy production, mining, and digital consumption have greatly increased the movement of materials through the technosphere. The environmental consequences are often interconnected. Air emissions may deposit on soil and water; contaminated soil may pollute groundwater; poorly managed waste may generate methane, leachate, toxic smoke, and disease vectors; and thermal discharges may alter aquatic ecosystems. Effective environmental management consequently requires systems thinking rather than isolated treatment of individual pollutants. For environmental professionals and engineers, pollution control involves four linked tasks: identifying sources, understanding transport and fate, assessing risks, and selecting technically feasible, economically reasonable, and socially acceptable controls. Remediation extends this responsibility to already contaminated sites, where the objective is to reduce risks and restore useful environmental functions. Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter, students should be able to: 1. Explain the sources, transport mechanisms, effects, and indicators of major forms of pollution. 2. Distinguish between primary and secondary pollutants and between point and non-point sources. 3. Apply pollution-prevention principles, waste hierarchies, and life-cycle thinking. 4. Describe monitoring methods for air, water, soil, noise, thermal, and radioactive pollution. 5. Compare engineering and biological methods for pollution control and site remediation. 6. Evaluate hazardous-waste and e-waste management decisions using risk, regulatory, and ethical criteria. 7. Analyse an integrated pollution-management problem and justify an appropriate intervention strategy. Pollution as a Source–Pathway–Receptor ProblemA useful risk framework represents pollution through three elements: source, pathway, and receptor. The source is the activity or location releasing a contaminant, such as a smokestack, wastewater outlet, landfill, leaking storage tank, or abandoned mine. The pathway is the route by which the contaminant moves, including air dispersion, surface runoff, groundwater flow, food-chain transfer, or direct contact. The receptor is a person, ecological community, building, water supply, or other entity exposed to the contaminant. Risk is commonly conceptualised as a function of hazard and exposure. Hazard refers to the intrinsic potential of a substance or energy form to cause harm. Exposure depends on concentration, frequency, duration, route of entry, and receptor vulnerability. This distinction is important: a highly toxic chemical contained in a secure system may pose less immediate risk than a moderately toxic chemical released continuously into a drinking-water source. Pollution sources may be classified as point sources, which originate from identifiable locations, or non-point sources, which are diffuse. A wastewater pipe is a point source, whereas nutrient runoff from many agricultural fields is non-point pollution. Pollutants may be primary, emitted directly from a source, or secondary, formed through atmospheric or environmental reactions. Sulfur dioxide emitted from combustion is primary; ground-level ozone formed through photochemical reactions involving nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds is secondary. The environmental behaviour of a contaminant depends on properties such as solubility, volatility, persistence, adsorption, biodegradability, and chemical reactivity. Transport models may use mass balances, dispersion equations, hydrological models, and geospatial analysis. A basic steady-state mass balance is: Accumulation = Inputs − Outputs + Generation − Consumption This relationship supports the analysis of tanks, rivers, treatment systems, landfills, and atmospheric compartments. It also illustrates why pollution control should address both the quantity released and the conditions that determine its transformation and movement. Air Pollution: From Emission to ExposureAir pollution includes gases, vapours, aerosols, particulate matter, biological materials, and energy-related contaminants present at concentrations capable of harming health, ecosystems, materials, or climate. Important pollutants include particulate matter, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, ammonia, ozone, toxic metals, and persistent organic pollutants. Major sources include fossil-fuel combustion, industries, transport, construction, mining, domestic solid-fuel use, agriculture, waste burning, and natural events such as dust storms and wildfires. Particulate matter is especially significant because fine particles can penetrate deeply into the respiratory system. Their effects depend on size, composition, surface chemistry, and exposure duration. Atmospheric transport is influenced by wind speed, atmospheric stability, temperature inversions, terrain, stack height, and rainfall. Under stable conditions, vertical mixing is weak and pollutants may accumulate near the ground. Dispersion models estimate downwind concentrations from emission rates and meteorological parameters. However, models require reliable inventories and validation through monitoring. Air-pollution effects include respiratory and cardiovascular disease, reduced visibility, crop injury, acid deposition, corrosion, and climate forcing. Nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds can react in sunlight to form photochemical smog. Sulfur and nitrogen compounds may acidify soils and surface waters. Certain pollutants also contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion or global warming, although local air-quality management and climate policy are not identical objectives. Monitoring combines fixed stations, mobile laboratories, passive samplers, satellite observations, source testing, and low-cost sensor networks. Measurements should be interpreted with attention to calibration, detection limits, representativeness, quality assurance, and time averaging. Control strategies follow the hierarchy of intervention: eliminate or substitute the polluting process, improve combustion and process efficiency, capture emissions, treat exhaust gases, and manage residuals safely. Common technologies include cyclones, fabric filters, electrostatic precipitators, wet scrubbers, catalytic converters, adsorption beds, thermal oxidisers, and selective catalytic or non-catalytic reduction systems. No device is universally superior. Selection depends on pollutant properties, gas temperature, flow rate, moisture, required removal efficiency, energy demand, maintenance, and the fate of captured material. Water Pollution and Aquatic RiskWater pollution occurs when physical, chemical, biological, or radiological changes impair the use or ecological function of surface water, groundwater, estuaries, or marine systems. Domestic sewage, industrial effluent, agricultural runoff, mining drainage, landfill leachate, oil releases, plastics, pharmaceuticals, pathogens, nutrients, salts, metals, and heat are important sources. Organic pollution is often assessed through biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). BOD estimates the oxygen consumed by microorganisms while degrading biodegradable organic matter under specified conditions. COD measures the oxygen equivalent required for chemical oxidation and is generally higher than BOD. Excessive organic loading can deplete dissolved oxygen, producing hypoxic or anoxic conditions harmful to fish and benthic organisms. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can cause eutrophication. The sequence may involve nutrient enrichment, excessive algal growth, decomposition of biomass, oxygen depletion, and loss of aquatic biodiversity. Toxic substances may cause acute mortality, chronic physiological effects, endocrine disruption, or bioaccumulation. Biomagnification is the increase in contaminant concentration at successive trophic levels, particularly for persistent and lipid-soluble chemicals. Water quality monitoring may include temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, BOD, COD, nutrients, metals, pathogens, organic micropollutants, and biological indicators. Sampling design must account for flow variation, seasonal changes, stratification, mixing zones, and quality-control blanks. Biological monitoring can reveal ecological effects that a single chemical measurement may miss. Wastewater treatment is commonly organised into stages. Preliminary treatment removes coarse solids and grit. Primary treatment uses screening, sedimentation, and flotation to remove settleable and floating matter. Secondary treatment uses microorganisms to degrade dissolved and colloidal organic matter, as in activated-sludge, trickling-filter, moving-bed, or anaerobic systems. Tertiary or advanced treatment targets nutrients, pathogens, dissolved salts, metals, and trace contaminants through filtration, membranes, adsorption, advanced oxidation, or disinfection. Treatment plants generate sludge, which may contain nutrients, pathogens, metals, and persistent chemicals. Sludge management must therefore be integrated with wastewater treatment. Options include stabilisation, dewatering, digestion, composting, thermal treatment, beneficial use, and secure disposal, subject to contaminant quality and regulatory requirements. Soil and Groundwater ContaminationSoil is both a living ecosystem and a medium for food production, construction, water storage, and biogeochemical cycling. Contamination may arise from pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons, mining wastes, industrial chemicals, sewage sludge, atmospheric deposition, salts, and illegal dumping. Unlike many air pollutants, soil contaminants can remain in place for decades and may be redistributed by erosion, dust, plant uptake, or groundwater movement. The behaviour of a contaminant depends on soil texture, organic matter, pH, redox conditions, moisture, mineralogy, and microbial activity. Adsorption can reduce mobility but may not eliminate risk; changes in pH or redox potential can remobilise contaminants. Groundwater contamination is particularly difficult because pollutants may move through heterogeneous aquifers, form dissolved plumes, or remain as non-aqueous phase liquids. Site investigation generally proceeds from a preliminary historical review to a conceptual site model, field screening, systematic sampling, laboratory analysis, risk assessment, and remedial design. A conceptual site model identifies sources, contaminant distributions, migration pathways, receptors, and uncertainties. Sampling should be guided by hypotheses rather than by random collection alone. Remediation may be in situ, treating contamination without excavation, or ex situ, removing material for treatment elsewhere. Methods include excavation and secure disposal, soil washing, solidification and stabilisation, bioremediation, phytoremediation, thermal desorption, chemical oxidation, permeable reactive barriers, pump-and-treat, monitored natural attenuation, and institutional controls. Selection involves contaminant properties, geology, land use, treatment duration, secondary impacts, cost, and the required end use of the site. Noise, Thermal, and Radioactive PollutionNoise pollution is unwanted sound that interferes with communication, sleep, learning, work, or ecological behaviour. It is measured using sound-pressure levels, commonly expressed in decibels, with frequency weighting used to approximate human hearing. Noise exposure is influenced by level, duration, frequency, intermittency, and individual sensitivity. Control follows the source–path–receptor sequence: quieter equipment and maintenance at the source, barriers and acoustic enclosures along the path, and building design or hearing protection at the receptor. Environmental noise assessment requires representative measurements, appropriate time periods, meteorological information, and consideration of background noise. Excessive reliance on personal protective equipment is a common management error when engineering or planning controls are feasible. Noise mapping and geographic information systems can identify population exposure and support zoning and transport planning. Thermal pollution is the undesirable change in water or air temperature caused by industrial cooling systems, power stations, urban surfaces, deforestation, or altered flow regimes. Warm-water discharge reduces dissolved-oxygen solubility, changes metabolic rates, affects reproductive cycles, and may favour invasive species. Cooling towers, recirculating systems, heat recovery, cooling ponds, and controlled discharge are possible measures. The preferred strategy is often energy recovery and reduced heat rejection rather than simple transfer of heat from one medium to another. Radioactive pollution involves unwanted radioactive materials or ionising radiation. Sources include nuclear facilities, medical and research activities, mining and processing of radioactive ores, industrial gauges, and naturally occurring radionuclides. Risk depends on activity, radiation type, exposure route, shielding, time, and distance. Management follows containment, controlled handling, monitoring, dose limitation, secure storage, and eventual disposal. Radioactive waste must be segregated by activity and half-life, shielded where necessary, tracked through its life cycle, and managed by authorised institutions. Public communication and independent oversight are essential because perceived risk and technical risk may differ substantially. Waste Hierarchy and Circular Resource ManagementWaste is not merely a disposal problem; it is an indicator of material inefficiency. The preferred hierarchy is prevention, reduction, reuse, repair, refurbishment, remanufacturing, recycling, recovery of materials or energy, treatment, and final disposal. The hierarchy is not mechanically absolute: life-cycle assessment may show that a particular recycling route consumes excessive energy or causes toxic exposure. Nevertheless, disposal should generally be the last option. Source segregation is fundamental. Mixing organic, recyclable, hazardous, biomedical, electronic, and residual wastes contaminates material streams and increases treatment costs. Collection systems should therefore be designed around clear categories, safe storage, reliable transport, worker protection, and traceability. Organic waste can be treated by composting or anaerobic digestion, while residual waste may require engineered landfilling or controlled thermal treatment with air-pollution controls. A sanitary landfill is an engineered containment system, not an open dump. It requires suitable siting, liners, leachate collection, gas management, daily or periodic cover, storm-water control, environmental monitoring, closure, and post-closure care. Methane recovery may reduce climate impacts and produce energy, but it does not remove all risks associated with leachate or long-term settlement. Hazardous waste is characterised by properties such as ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, toxicity, infectiousness, or persistence. Management requires identification, compatible storage, labelling, manifests, emergency planning, trained personnel, and treatment or disposal at authorised facilities. Illegal mixing, informal burning, untracked transport, and dilution as a substitute for treatment are serious professional failures. E-waste contains recoverable metals and polymers as well as hazardous constituents. Computers, communication equipment, batteries, displays, and circuit boards require secure collection, data destruction where relevant, environmentally sound dismantling, and recovery by trained workers. Informal recycling may expose workers and communities to lead, mercury, brominated flame retardants, acids, and contaminated dust. Design for repair, modularity, durability, material transparency, and producer responsibility supports a more circular electronics system. Pollution Prevention, Monitoring, and Digital Decision SupportPollution prevention acts before waste is generated. Process redesign, substitution of less hazardous materials, closed-loop water systems, energy efficiency, inventory control, leak prevention, and good housekeeping often outperform end-of-pipe treatment in both environmental and economic terms. Cleaner production audits identify material inputs, losses, emission points, and opportunities for reduction. Environmental monitoring should be designed to answer a decision question. A compliance programme may verify whether an emission limit is met; a research programme may identify transport mechanisms; a remediation programme may determine whether exposure is declining. Quality assurance includes documented procedures, calibrated instruments, chain of custody, laboratory controls, detection-limit evaluation, validation, and transparent reporting of uncertainty. Digital technologies increasingly support environmental management. Geographic information systems integrate sources, land use, receptors, and monitoring results. Remote sensing can identify land-cover change, dust plumes, algal blooms, thermal anomalies, and illegal dumping. Internet-of-Things sensors enable high-frequency monitoring of air quality, water parameters, noise, and waste containers. Machine-learning models can detect anomalies and forecast pollution episodes, but they require representative data, calibration, explainability, cybersecurity, and human oversight. A prediction is not a measurement, and automated alerts should not replace regulatory sampling or professional judgement. Illustrative Case Study: Remediation of an Industrial River CorridorBackgroundA fictional medium-sized city developed around a metal-finishing and engineering cluster located beside a river. For several decades, untreated or partially treated wastewater, storm-water runoff, and waste storage practices affected the river corridor. Residents reported discoloured sediment, declining fish populations, and concerns about groundwater used for irrigation. Situation and ProblemPreliminary investigation found elevated concentrations of metals in selected sediments and shallow groundwater, but contamination was spatially irregular. The city initially proposed dredging the entire riverbank. Stakeholders disagreed: dredging could remove contaminated sediment quickly, but it could also resuspend pollutants, damage habitat, and transfer large quantities of hazardous material to a landfill. AnalysisThe project team developed a conceptual site model. Sources included historical waste piles, leaking drains, and current storm-water transport. Pathways included sediment movement, groundwater migration, dust, and uptake by aquatic organisms. Receptors included residents, fishers, irrigation users, workers, and river biodiversity. Additional sampling distinguished background concentrations from industrial contributions and identified areas where exposure was plausible. Risk assessment showed that risks were highest at two accessible riverbank locations and in a groundwater plume near a former storage area. Some sediment contamination was stable and buried beneath clean material, while other deposits were mobile during floods. This distinction made a uniform remedy inappropriate. Strategy and SolutionThe city adopted a risk-based, staged approach. Current industrial discharges were first reduced through process changes, closed-loop rinsing, improved storage, and a monitored pretreatment system. Contaminated soil at the former storage area was excavated and treated or securely disposed of. A permeable reactive barrier was installed to intercept part of the groundwater plume, while pumping was reserved for locations where hydraulic control was necessary. Highly contaminated, accessible sediment was removed under controlled conditions; stable areas were capped and monitored. Riparian vegetation was restored to reduce erosion and improve habitat. Community members participated in sampling-location selection and received plain-language results. Independent laboratories and regulatory inspections were used to verify performance. Digital mapping linked monitoring wells, sediment results, land use, and flood pathways. OutcomeAfter several monitoring cycles, concentrations in the groundwater plume declined and visible sediment transport was reduced. The river corridor was reopened for limited public use after exposure pathways were reassessed. The project did not eliminate every contaminant, but it reduced unacceptable risks while avoiding unnecessary disturbance of stable sediment. Long-term institutional controls and monitoring remained necessary. Learning PointsThe case demonstrates that remediation should begin with source control, not only treatment of contaminated media. A conceptual site model prevents poorly targeted excavation. Different parts of a site may require different remedies, and technical success must be judged against risk reduction, ecological recovery, cost, community confidence, and long-term reliability. Challenges, Governance, and Professional ResponsibilityPollution management faces uncertainty in emission inventories, incomplete monitoring, changing land use, cumulative exposures, climate-related hazards, and limited institutional capacity. Treatment may also transfer pollution between media: scrubber sludge, activated carbon, sewage sludge, and contaminated ash require further management. Remediation can create secondary emissions, occupational hazards, traffic, noise, and community disruption. Regulation typically establishes ambient standards, emission limits, discharge permits, waste classifications, environmental-impact assessment procedures, worker-protection requirements, and liability rules. Effective governance requires inspection, enforcement, transparent data, emergency preparedness, polluter-pays mechanisms, and meaningful public participation. Standards should be interpreted as minimum legal requirements, not as proof that all ecological or health risks are absent. Environmental professionals have duties of competence, honesty, precaution, and protection of public welfare. They should disclose uncertainty, avoid manipulating monitoring boundaries or sampling periods, preserve data integrity, and consider environmental justice. Communities near industrial facilities, informal recycling sites, landfills, and transport corridors may bear disproportionate risks while receiving limited economic benefits. Fair decision-making therefore requires attention to distributional effects, procedural inclusion, and the rights of future generations. Current Directions and Best PracticesImportant developments include circular-economy policy, extended producer responsibility, industrial symbiosis, low-cost sensor networks, advanced oxidation and membrane treatment, nature-based solutions, digital waste tracking, and life-cycle assessment. Emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, antimicrobial-resistance genes, and microplastics challenge conventional monitoring and treatment systems. Sound practice can be summarised as follows: - Prevent pollution at source before investing in treatment capacity.
- Build a defensible source–pathway–receptor model.
- Use monitoring designs linked to decisions, not merely data accumulation.
- Combine engineering controls with operational, regulatory, and behavioural measures.
- Manage treatment residuals as potential wastes rather than assuming they are harmless.
- Prefer adaptive remediation that can respond to new evidence.
- Apply life-cycle and life-cycle-cost perspectives to technology selection.
- Protect workers and affected communities through participation and transparent communication.
- Use digital tools with validation, cybersecurity, and professional oversight.
- Verify outcomes through independent monitoring and long-term stewardship.
Chapter SummaryPollution is best understood as an interaction among a source, a transport pathway, and an exposed receptor. Air, water, soil, noise, thermal, and radioactive pollution differ in behaviour and measurement, but all require attention to sources, exposure, effects, control, and residual risks. Monitoring must be scientifically designed and supported by quality assurance. Pollution prevention and the waste hierarchy favour elimination, reduction, reuse, and recovery before treatment and disposal. Hazardous waste and e-waste demand segregation, traceability, worker protection, authorised treatment, and producer responsibility. Remediation is a risk-based process involving site characterisation, conceptual modelling, remedy selection, implementation, verification, and long-term management. Effective practice integrates engineering, digital tools, regulation, ethics, environmental justice, and community participation. Key TermsAmbient air quality: The condition of outdoor air in relation to specified pollutant concentrations and exposure standards. Bioaccumulation: The gradual accumulation of a substance in an organism when uptake exceeds elimination. Biomagnification: Increase in contaminant concentration at successively higher trophic levels. BOD: Oxygen consumed by microorganisms while biologically degrading organic matter under defined conditions. COD: Oxygen equivalent required for chemical oxidation of substances in a water sample. Conceptual site model: A representation of contaminant sources, pathways, receptors, and uncertainties at a site. Eutrophication: Nutrient enrichment of water that can produce excessive plant or algal growth and oxygen depletion. Hazardous waste: Waste possessing properties that can cause significant harm to health or the environment. Leachate: Contaminated liquid generated when water percolates through waste. Non-point source: A diffuse pollution source without one readily identifiable discharge point. Persistent pollutant: A substance that resists environmental degradation and remains for long periods. Phytoremediation: Use of plants to remove, immobilise, transform, or contain contaminants. Point source: An identifiable location from which pollutants are discharged. Pollution prevention: Reduction or elimination of pollution before it is generated. Remediation: Actions taken to control, remove, degrade, or contain contamination and reduce risk. Source–pathway–receptor model: A framework linking a contaminant source to its movement route and exposed entity. Thermal pollution: Harmful alteration of environmental temperature caused by human activities. Waste hierarchy: A preference order from prevention and reuse through recovery, treatment, and disposal. Review QuestionsShort Answer Questions1. Distinguish between primary and secondary air pollutants with one example of each. 2. Why are BOD and COD useful in assessing wastewater pollution? 3. Explain the source–pathway–receptor concept. 4. What is the purpose of a landfill leachate collection system? 5. State two reasons why e-waste requires specialised management. Long Answer Questions1. Explain the sources, transport processes, effects, monitoring methods, and control technologies associated with air pollution. 2. Describe the stages of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment and discuss the management of treatment residuals. 3. Discuss the waste hierarchy and its application to hazardous waste and e-waste. 4. Compare in-situ and ex-situ remediation methods for contaminated soil and groundwater. 5. Explain how environmental monitoring, regulation, professional ethics, and community participation contribute to effective pollution governance. Analytical / Application Questions1. A river receives nutrient-rich agricultural runoff and organic wastewater from a settlement. Develop a source–pathway–receptor analysis and propose a monitoring and control programme. 2. A contaminated industrial site is proposed for residential redevelopment. Identify the investigations, risk considerations, remediation alternatives, and verification steps required before redevelopment. 3. A factory meets its legal discharge limit but nearby residents continue to report odour and health concerns. Analyse possible reasons and recommend a technically and ethically defensible response. 22. Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which situation best represents a secondary air pollutant? A. Sulfur dioxide released directly from a smokestack B. Carbon monoxide emitted by incomplete combustion C. Ozone formed by reactions involving nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds D. Dust released during construction Correct Answer: C. Ozone formed by reactions involving nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds Question 2In a source–pathway–receptor analysis, groundwater flow from a leaking storage tank to a drinking-water well is the: A. Source B. Pathway C. Receptor D. Hazard classification Correct Answer: B. Pathway Question 3A sudden decline in dissolved oxygen downstream of a wastewater outlet is most directly associated with high: A. Biochemical oxygen demand B. Sound-pressure level C. Radioactive half-life D. Particulate settling velocity Correct Answer: A. Biochemical oxygen demand Question 4Which intervention is highest in the waste hierarchy? A. Landfilling residual waste B. Recovering energy from mixed waste C. Recycling contaminated material D. Preventing waste generation through process redesign Correct Answer: D. Preventing waste generation through process redesign Question 5Why might a uniform dredging remedy be inappropriate for a contaminated river corridor? A. Dredging never removes contaminants B. Contamination and exposure pathways may vary spatially C. Sediment cannot transport pollutants D. Groundwater is unaffected by river contamination Correct Answer: B. Contamination and exposure pathways may vary spatially Question 6Which technology is primarily designed to remove particulate matter from industrial exhaust? A. Fabric filter B. Anaerobic digester C. Permeable reactive barrier D. Activated-sludge reactor Correct Answer: A. Fabric filter Question 7A major environmental concern associated with poorly controlled informal e-waste recycling is: A. Reduced atmospheric humidity B. Exposure to metals and hazardous combustion products C. Increased dissolved oxygen in rivers D. Elimination of persistent chemicals Correct Answer: B. Exposure to metals and hazardous combustion products Question 8Which statement best describes monitored natural attenuation? A. Immediate excavation and off-site disposal of all soil B. Allowing contamination to spread without observation C. Using verified natural processes while monitoring risk reduction D. Diluting hazardous waste before discharge Correct Answer: C. Using verified natural processes while monitoring risk reduction Question 9A machine-learning system predicts an air-pollution episode. What is the most appropriate professional response? A. Treat the prediction as a substitute for all measurements B. Ignore calibration because the model is automated C. Validate the prediction and use it with monitoring and expert judgement D. Publish the result without reporting uncertainty Correct Answer: C. Validate the prediction and use it with monitoring and expert judgement Question 10Which measure most directly addresses pollution prevention rather than end-of-pipe control? A. Installing a scrubber on an existing exhaust B. Sending treatment sludge to a landfill C. Substituting a less hazardous raw material in the production process D. Increasing the height of a discharge stack Correct Answer: C. Substituting a less hazardous raw material in the production process
|