E-Commerce & D2C Marketplaces

Chapter 10
E-Commerce Operations and Fulfilment

Post Graduate Program in Retail Management
E-Commerce & D2C Marketplaces   •   Post Graduate

E-Commerce Operations and Fulfilment

Introduction and Context

E-commerce fulfilment is the coordinated set of activities through which a customer order is converted into a delivered, usable and—when necessary—returned product. It includes demand planning, inventory positioning, warehousing, order capture, picking and packing, transport, last-mile delivery, customer communication, returns and after-sales support. In a D2C marketplace, fulfilment is not merely a logistics function. It is part of the value proposition and directly affects conversion, customer lifetime value, marketplace ranking, brand reputation and profitability.

The operational challenge is to provide high availability and rapid, reliable delivery without carrying excessive inventory or creating unsustainable transport and packaging costs. This challenge is intensified by demand volatility, geographically dispersed customers, multiple selling channels, promotions, product variety, reverse flows and expectations of convenient returns.

A useful managerial perspective is to treat fulfilment as a service system with four simultaneous objectives:

  1. Service: availability, delivery promise accuracy, speed and convenience.
  2. Cost: inventory, warehousing, labour, packaging, transport, technology and returns.
  3. Resilience: ability to absorb disruption and recover quickly.
  4. Sustainability: reduction of emissions, waste, energy use and avoidable product destruction.

These objectives conflict. Same-day delivery may require forward inventory and expensive local transport; centralised inventory may reduce cost but increase delivery time. Effective design therefore requires segmentation rather than a single universal policy.

Learning Objectives

After completing this chapter, the learner should be able to:

  • design inventory policies for uncertain e-commerce demand;
  • compare fulfilment-network and warehousing alternatives;
  • analyse order-management and warehouse processes;
  • calculate and interpret important service and cost measures;
  • design last-mile, reverse-logistics and returns processes;
  • evaluate resilience, sustainability, technology and governance choices; and
  • recommend an integrated fulfilment model for a D2C or marketplace business.

1. The Fulfilment System and Its Strategic Choices

An e-commerce fulfilment system links suppliers, fulfilment centres, stores, carriers, customers and return destinations. The principal design choices are as follows.

DecisionMain alternativesStrategic trade-off
Inventory ownershipBrand-owned, marketplace-owned, seller-owned, consignmentControl versus capital exposure
Network structureCentralised, regional, decentralised, store-basedScale efficiency versus delivery proximity
Fulfilment modeIn-house, third-party logistics, marketplace fulfilment, dropshipControl versus flexibility
Order allocationSingle node, split shipment, cost-based, promise-basedCost and speed versus complexity
Delivery propositionStandard, expedited, same-day, pickup/collectionCustomer convenience versus transport cost
Returns dispositionRestock, refurbish, resale, recycle, liquidationRecovery value versus processing cost

A product portfolio should be segmented by demand volume, variability, margin, size, perishability, return probability and service importance. High-volume, predictable products can justify regional positioning. Slow-moving or expensive products are often better held centrally. Bulky products may be shipped directly from suppliers, whereas small fast-moving products may be processed through automated fulfilment centres.

A customer promise must be operationally feasible. A delivery promise is not simply “two days”; it is a commitment based on inventory availability, order cut-off time, processing capacity, carrier performance, destination, holidays and exception risk. Promise accuracy is therefore a cross-functional measure shared by merchandising, technology, fulfilment and transport teams.

2. Demand, Inventory and Availability

2.1 Inventory objectives

Inventory performs several functions: it buffers demand and supply uncertainty, enables assortment breadth, supports service promises and decouples processes. However, it also creates holding cost, obsolescence, shrinkage, working-capital requirements and environmental impacts.

Important inventory categories include:

  • Cycle stock: inventory expected to meet normal demand between replenishments.
  • Safety stock: additional inventory held against uncertainty.
  • Pipeline inventory: goods in transit or otherwise committed but not yet available.
  • Anticipation inventory: stock built before predictable peaks or promotions.
  • Dead or obsolete stock: inventory with little realistic future demand.

2.2 Reorder point and safety stock

For a continuous-review system, a basic reorder point is:

ROP = μL + SS

where μL is expected demand during lead time and SS is safety stock. If average demand per period is d and lead time is L periods, then:

μL = dL

These expressions assume that demand and lead time are represented in compatible time units and that replenishment is triggered when inventory position reaches the reorder point. Inventory position normally includes on-hand inventory plus open orders minus backorders or committed demand.

When demand during lead time is approximately normally distributed and lead-time variability is ignored, safety stock may be estimated as:

SS = zσd√L

Here, σd is the standard deviation of demand per period, L is lead time in periods, and z is the standard-normal service factor. This formula assumes independent, identically distributed demand across periods, constant lead time and a service measure based on the probability of not stocking out during a replenishment cycle. It should not be used uncritically for intermittent demand, seasonal demand, highly promotional demand or strongly variable lead times.

If both demand and lead time vary and are treated as independent, a commonly used approximation is:

σDL = √(Lσd² + d²σL²)

and:

SS = zσDL

where σL is the standard deviation of lead time. The approximation omits the interaction term associated with simultaneous variability and is most defensible when demand and lead-time variation are reasonably stable and independent. Correlation, supplier minimums and non-normal distributions require more advanced simulation or empirical quantiles.

Worked example. A D2C retailer sells 100 units per day. Demand standard deviation is 20 units per day, lead time is 4 days, and the target cycle-service factor is z = 1.65. Expected lead-time demand is:

μL = 100 × 4 = 400 units.

With fixed lead time:

SS = 1.65 × 20 × √4 = 66 units.

Thus, the reorder point is ROP = 400 + 66 = 466 units. The result is an estimate, not a guarantee: a higher service target increases stock, and forecast bias can make the calculated policy inadequate.

2.3 Service measures

Inventory availability should be measured using more than one indicator.

  • Cycle service level: probability that no stockout occurs during a replenishment cycle.
  • Fill rate: proportion of demand supplied immediately from available stock.
  • Item availability: probability that a specified item is available when requested.
  • Perfect-order rate: proportion of orders delivered complete, on time, damage-free and with correct documentation.

These measures are not interchangeable. A business can achieve a high cycle service level while still having a poor fill rate if occasional stockouts are severe. Management should set differentiated targets by category and customer promise rather than maximising one aggregate percentage.

2.4 Forecasting and inventory segmentation

E-commerce forecasts should combine statistical history with causal information such as price, advertising, campaigns, holidays, weather, search trends and product lifecycle. Forecasts must be evaluated using measures appropriate to the decision. Mean absolute error is:

MAE = (1/n)∑|At − Ft|

where At is actual demand, Ft is forecast demand and n is the number of observations. MAE is expressed in units and is easy to interpret. Percentage errors become problematic when actual demand is zero or very small.

A practical segmentation may combine ABC analysis, based on annual consumption value, with variability or criticality. ABC alone can under-manage low-value but strategically important products, such as accessories required to complete a high-value purchase. Segmentation should therefore include margin, substitution, customer promise and supply risk.

3. Warehousing and Fulfilment-Centre Design

A fulfilment centre differs from a traditional wholesale warehouse. It processes many small orders, often containing few units, with high SKU variety and strong pressure for speed and accuracy. Core activities are receiving, put-away, storage, replenishment, picking, consolidation, packing, dispatch and inventory control.

3.1 Layout and process design

Fast-moving products should generally be positioned near efficient picking routes and packing stations, while hazardous, fragile, oversized or temperature-sensitive items need specialised zones. Slotting decisions should be reviewed after major assortment, demand or packaging changes. Poor slotting increases walking, congestion and error probability.

Common picking methods include:

  • Discrete picking: one picker completes one order; simple and accurate but labour-intensive.
  • Batch picking: similar orders are picked together; efficient for small items with common demand.
  • Zone picking: each worker handles a physical zone; useful for large assortments but requires consolidation.
  • Wave or waveless picking: work is released in planned groups or continuously according to capacity and promise time.
  • Goods-to-person automation: inventory is brought to the operator, reducing travel but requiring capital and reliable systems.

Automation should be assessed through total cost, throughput, flexibility, maintenance, integration, safety and failure recovery—not only labour savings. Highly automated systems can become bottlenecks if software, replenishment or exception handling is weak.

3.2 Inventory accuracy and control

Inventory records must distinguish physical stock, available stock, allocated stock, damaged stock, quarantined stock and stock in transit. A cycle-counting programme can focus frequent checks on high-value or high-risk SKUs. Root causes of discrepancy include receiving errors, mis-picks, unrecorded damage, theft, incorrect returns and system-integration failures.

A warehouse management system should maintain location control, task assignment, barcode or RFID identification, replenishment rules, status visibility and audit trails. The order-management system should determine what can be promised, while the warehouse system executes physical work.

4. Order Management and Omnichannel Orchestration

Order management begins when an order is captured and ends when it is delivered, cancelled, or closed after return resolution. A robust order-management process includes:

  1. order validation and payment authorisation;
  2. fraud, address and inventory checks;
  3. allocation to the best eligible fulfilment node;
  4. reservation and release of inventory;
  5. picking, packing and carrier manifesting;
  6. shipment tracking and customer communication;
  7. exception management; and
  8. settlement, feedback and after-sales support.

The available-to-promise quantity should not equal physical stock automatically. It must account for reservations, safety stock, open replenishment, processing capacity and channel commitments. In omnichannel retail, ship-from-store and click-and-collect can improve proximity but may disrupt store operations and create inaccurate inventory promises.

Order allocation can use a rules hierarchy: first meet the customer promise, then avoid split shipments, then minimise fulfilment and transport cost, while respecting inventory ownership, margin, capacity and regulatory restrictions. An optimisation model may minimise total cost:

Minimise C = ∑i∑j xij(pij + hij + sij) + ∑i ei yi

where xij is quantity shipped from node i to demand point j, pij is transport cost per unit, hij is handling cost, sij is split-shipment or service penalty, yi may represent activating node capacity, and ei is its fixed cost. Subject to inventory, capacity, demand, delivery-time and eligibility constraints, this is a planning model rather than a universal operational formula. The objective weights must reflect strategic priorities; a pure cost minimum may systematically violate customer promises.

5. Last-Mile Delivery

Last mile is often the most expensive and least predictable part of the physical journey. Cost drivers include delivery density, distance, failed attempts, traffic, address quality, parcel dimensions, service speed, wages, fuel and carrier pricing.

Delivery design choices include national parcel carriers, regional carriers, crowdsourced delivery, owned fleets, pickup points, lockers, store collection and scheduled delivery. The appropriate choice depends on geography, order density, product characteristics, service promise and regulatory environment.

Useful last-mile measures include:

  • on-time delivery rate;
  • first-attempt delivery success;
  • average cost per delivered parcel;
  • delivery promise accuracy;
  • damage and loss rate;
  • customer contact rate;
  • route productivity and stop density; and
  • emissions per parcel or per order.

A delivery failure is not simply a transport problem. Incorrect address capture, unclear customer communication, unsafe access, payment-on-delivery failure and unrealistic promise windows are common causes. Proactive tracking, delivery instructions, choice of time window and pickup alternatives can reduce failure and improve customer control.

A carrier scorecard should combine service, cost, claims, capacity, technology integration, labour standards and environmental performance. Lowest quoted price is rarely equivalent to lowest total cost.

6. Reverse Logistics and Returns

Reverse logistics manages the movement and disposition of products, packaging, information and financial value from the customer back through the network. Returns are structurally important in categories such as fashion, footwear, electronics and home goods. They may arise from fit uncertainty, damage, wrong item, late delivery, change of mind or misleading product information.

A returns process should provide:

  1. clear eligibility and time-window rules;
  2. simple authorisation and label or drop-off generation;
  3. item-level tracking;
  4. inspection and grading;
  5. customer refund or replacement decision;
  6. disposition based on recovery value and condition; and
  7. feedback to product, content, quality and fulfilment teams.

A useful disposition hierarchy is: resell as new, resell as open-box or refurbished, return to supplier, repair, harvest parts, recycle, donate where appropriate, and dispose only as a last resort. The hierarchy must comply with safety, consumer-protection and product-liability requirements.

The economic decision can compare recovery value with processing and onward costs. For a return option k, net recovery is:

NRk = Vk − (ctransport,k + cinspection,k + cprocessing,k + cholding,k)

where Vk is expected recoverable value and the c terms are relevant costs. The option with the highest feasible net recovery is not automatically best if it creates safety, reputational or environmental harm. Expected value should also account for probability of successful resale and time-related depreciation.

Return-rate analysis should be product- and customer-segment-specific. A high rate may indicate poor product information rather than customer opportunism. Reducing returns by making the process deliberately difficult can damage trust and increase complaints. Better interventions include accurate measurements, virtual fitting, improved images, quality control, packaging protection and informative product descriptions.

7. Customer Service and Exception Management

Customer service is an operational control point, not merely a communications function. Contacts often reveal failures in inventory accuracy, delivery promises, payments, product content or returns. Service processes should integrate order status, shipment events, customer history, policy rules and escalation authority.

Important measures include first-contact resolution, response time, resolution time, repeat-contact rate, complaint recurrence, customer effort and satisfaction. Average handling time should not be maximised in isolation: a short interaction that fails to resolve the issue creates repeat contacts and hidden cost.

Exception management should classify events by severity and controllability. Examples include payment rejection, stock discrepancy, carrier delay, lost parcel, damage, suspected fraud and safety-related recall. A clear ownership matrix should specify who can refund, replace, expedite, investigate or escalate. Machine-generated messages must be accurate, comprehensible and easy to transfer to a human agent.

8. Performance, Cost and Resilience

A fulfilment dashboard should connect customer outcomes to operational drivers. A compact scorecard may contain:

DimensionIllustrative measures
ServiceFill rate, perfect-order rate, promise accuracy
SpeedOrder cycle time, pick-to-ship time, delivery time
CostCost per order, fulfilment cost as percentage of sales, return cost
Asset useInventory turns, space utilisation, labour productivity
QualityPick accuracy, damage rate, complaint recurrence
ResilienceRecovery time, supplier concentration, backup capacity
SustainabilityEmissions per order, packaging intensity, waste recovery

Inventory turnover is commonly calculated as:

Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Average inventory at cost

The numerator and denominator must use consistent valuation and time periods. A high turnover may reflect efficiency, but it can also indicate understocking and lost sales. Likewise, warehouse utilisation should not be maximised if it creates congestion and delays.

Resilience involves redundancy, visibility, flexibility and collaboration. Measures include time to detect, time to recover, order backlog after disruption and proportion of critical SKUs with qualified alternatives. Strategies include multi-sourcing, regional inventory, postponement, alternative carriers, emergency capacity, scenario testing and clear crisis governance. Resilience is not identical to holding the maximum inventory; postponement and flexible capacity may provide protection at lower cost.

9. Sustainability, Ethics and Governance

Fulfilment sustainability includes transport emissions, packaging material, warehouse energy, product waste, labour conditions and reverse-logistics impacts. A credible assessment should use a defined boundary and avoid claiming that one local initiative makes the total operation sustainable. Consolidated delivery, pickup points, right-sized packaging, reusable packaging pilots, electric vehicles and renewable energy may reduce impact, but effects depend on utilisation and rebound behaviour.

Ethical issues include worker safety, algorithmic performance pressure, surveillance, fair pay, accessibility, customer privacy and equitable service availability. Gig-based delivery models require scrutiny of employment conditions, insurance and safety responsibilities. Returns policies must be transparent and must not unfairly disadvantage vulnerable consumers.

Data governance is essential. Fulfilment systems process addresses, payment information, behavioural data and delivery histories. Access should be role-based; retention should be limited; sensitive data should be protected; and customers should receive legally appropriate notices and choices. AI systems used for demand forecasting, fraud detection, routing or customer prioritisation should be monitored for bias, drift, explainability and harmful error. Human review is particularly important for adverse decisions such as account suspension or denial of a remedy.

10. Illustrative Case: NovaHome Direct

Background

NovaHome Direct is a fictional D2C retailer of small home appliances. It sells 1,200 SKUs through its website and two marketplaces. Its central fulfilment centre serves the country, while marketplace partners offer faster delivery in major cities.

Problem

Sales increased rapidly, but customer complaints rose. The business recorded frequent overselling during promotions, 12% split shipments, inconsistent delivery promises and a 19% return rate for selected products. Inventory was concentrated centrally, while same-day promises were being displayed in locations where carrier capacity was insufficient. Returns were placed in a general holding area and often lost resale value.

Analysis

An operational review found four linked causes. First, the website treated physical on-hand inventory as available-to-promise and ignored reservations. Second, promotional forecasts used ordinary weekly averages and therefore underestimated peaks. Third, order allocation prioritised proximity without checking pick capacity or carrier cut-off times. Fourth, returns lacked reason codes and rapid grading, preventing feedback to merchandising and quality teams.

The company also measured average delivery time but not promise accuracy, first-attempt success, split shipments or return recovery value. Consequently, managers could not distinguish a fast but unreliable service from a genuinely good service.

Approach and solution

NovaHome introduced SKU segmentation. High-volume, predictable items were positioned in two regional nodes through a fulfilment partner; long-tail products remained central. The order-management system began calculating available-to-promise after reservations, safety stock and capacity constraints. A promotion calendar was linked to forecast overrides and pre-build decisions.

Allocation rules first protected the stated customer promise, then avoided split shipments, then compared fulfilment and transport cost. Same-day service was restricted to postal areas meeting a tested cut-off and capacity threshold. Customers received pickup-point options where home delivery density was low.

In the warehouse, fast movers were re-slotted near packing stations, cycle counts targeted high-value SKUs, and returns received standardised reason codes. Returned appliances were inspected within 48 hours and graded for resale, refurbishment or supplier recovery. Product pages were improved using return data, especially for dimensions, compatibility and expected performance.

Outcome

After two quarters, the illustrative business reduced overselling and split shipments, improved promise accuracy and increased the proportion of returned products resold. The exact financial outcome would depend on implementation cost and demand conditions, but the main managerial improvement was integration: inventory, promise, warehouse capacity, transport and returns were managed as one system rather than separate departmental targets.

Learning points

The case demonstrates that fulfilment failures are usually systemic. More inventory alone would not have corrected inaccurate promises, poor allocation or slow returns processing. Operational metrics must be connected to customer outcomes, and service differentiation must be based on economically and physically feasible capabilities.

11. Implementation Road Map and Best Practices

A practical implementation sequence is:

  1. map the end-to-end order and return journey;
  2. establish a clean product, location, inventory and carrier-data foundation;
  3. segment products and customer promises;
  4. define service, cost, resilience and sustainability targets;
  5. improve available-to-promise and order orchestration;
  6. stabilise warehouse processes before automating them;
  7. pilot network, delivery or returns changes in a controlled geography;
  8. measure unintended effects, including split shipments and emissions;
  9. build exception ownership and escalation routines; and
  10. review policies through continuous improvement and scenario analysis.

Best practice is not a fixed technology package. It is alignment among proposition, inventory, processes, people, partners and information. Leaders should resist local optimisation—for example, maximising picking productivity while increasing packing errors, or reducing return approvals while increasing customer dissatisfaction. A balanced operating model makes trade-offs explicit.

Challenges and Limitations

Fulfilment models are affected by forecast error, structural breaks, data latency, carrier unreliability, labour shortages, regulatory variation and changing customer expectations. Quantitative models can create false precision when assumptions are hidden. Service-level calculations based on normal distributions may be unsuitable for intermittent or promotional demand. Pilot results may not generalise across regions or seasons. Sustainability estimates can be distorted by incomplete boundaries or inconsistent emission factors. Finally, technology cannot compensate for unclear ownership, poor master data or unrealistic commercial promises.

Managers should therefore combine analytical models with stress testing, empirical monitoring, frontline knowledge and customer evidence. The appropriate question is not whether a model is perfectly accurate, but whether it improves decisions, makes assumptions visible and supports timely correction.

Chapter Summary

E-commerce fulfilment is an integrated operating system linking inventory, warehousing, order management, delivery, returns and customer service. Effective design balances service, cost, resilience and sustainability. Inventory policies use demand and lead-time information, but formulas such as reorder point and safety stock depend on explicit assumptions. Warehousing requires appropriate slotting, picking, accuracy control and selective automation. Order management must calculate realistic available-to-promise quantities and allocate orders according to customer promise, capacity and total cost. Last-mile performance depends on density, carrier capability, address quality and delivery choice. Reverse logistics should recover value while protecting safety, trust and environmental goals. Dashboards must combine service, cost, quality, resilience and sustainability measures. Finally, governance, privacy, labour standards and responsible AI are operational requirements, not peripheral concerns.

Key Terms

Available-to-promise: Quantity that can reliably be committed to a customer after considering reservations, constraints and replenishment.

Cycle stock: Inventory used to satisfy expected demand between replenishments.

Safety stock: Additional inventory held against uncertainty.

Reorder point: Inventory position at which replenishment is triggered.

Fill rate: Proportion of demand supplied immediately from available stock.

Perfect-order rate: Share of orders that are complete, on time, accurate and undamaged.

Fulfilment centre: Facility designed to receive, store, process and dispatch customer orders.

Slotting: Assigning products to warehouse locations to support efficient operations.

Batch picking: Picking items for several orders in one activity.

Order orchestration: Coordinating order validation, allocation, fulfilment and exception handling.

Last mile: Final transport stage from a fulfilment node to the customer or pickup point.

Reverse logistics: Management of product and information flows from customer back through the network.

Return disposition: Decision about resale, repair, refurbishment, recycling or disposal of a returned item.

Promise accuracy: Degree to which the delivered outcome matches the promised service.

Inventory turnover: Cost of goods sold divided by average inventory at cost.

Resilience: Ability to absorb disruption, maintain service and recover.

Postponement: Delaying product finalisation or inventory positioning until demand is clearer.

Cycle counting: Ongoing counting of selected inventory rather than relying only on an annual count.

Delivery density: Number of deliveries achieved within a given route, area or distance.

Available capacity: Operational processing or transport capacity that can be committed without violating service requirements.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. Distinguish cycle stock from safety stock.
  2. Why is physical on-hand inventory not always equal to available-to-promise inventory?
  3. State two advantages and two limitations of batch picking.
  4. What is the purpose of return reason codes?
  5. Why should fulfilment performance be measured using both service and cost indicators?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain how a D2C retailer should segment inventory and service promises across a fulfilment network.
  2. Discuss the design of an integrated order-management process from checkout to post-delivery support.
  3. Evaluate alternative last-mile delivery models for a retailer serving both dense cities and rural areas.
  4. Explain how reverse logistics can improve both financial recovery and customer experience.
  5. Critically assess the role of automation and AI in e-commerce fulfilment, including governance risks.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A retailer has average demand of 150 units per day, demand standard deviation of 25 units per day, fixed lead time of 3 days and z = 1.28. Calculate expected lead-time demand, safety stock and reorder point. State the assumptions behind your calculation.
  2. A marketplace must choose between a central fulfilment centre and a regional node. Analyse the decision using delivery promise, inventory cost, split shipments, capacity, resilience and emissions rather than transport price alone.
  3. A fashion retailer has a high return rate concentrated in three product categories. Design an investigation and intervention plan that uses customer-service data, product content, fit information, inspection outcomes and resale economics.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which inventory component is primarily held to protect against uncertainty in demand or supply?

A. Cycle stock

B. Safety stock

C. Pipeline inventory

D. Dead stock

Correct Answer: B. Safety stock

Question 2

A retailer sells 80 units per day and has a fixed lead time of 5 days. Ignoring safety stock, what is the reorder point?

A. 16 units

B. 85 units

C. 400 units

D. 4,000 units

Correct Answer: C. 400 units

Question 3

Which measure records the proportion of demand supplied immediately from available inventory?

A. Fill rate

B. Inventory turnover

C. First-attempt delivery rate

D. Average handling time

Correct Answer: A. Fill rate

Question 4

What is the principal advantage of goods-to-person automation?

A. It eliminates the need for inventory records

B. It can reduce operator travel in the warehouse

C. It guarantees zero equipment failure

D. It removes the need for order orchestration

Correct Answer: B. It can reduce operator travel in the warehouse

Question 5

Which factor most directly affects last-mile delivery cost?

A. Delivery density

B. Product colour

C. Supplier brand name

D. Accounting depreciation method

Correct Answer: A. Delivery density

Question 6

Why should return items be inspected and graded quickly?

A. To increase the time products remain unavailable

B. To preserve recovery value and determine suitable disposition

C. To avoid recording return reasons

D. To ensure every item is discarded

Correct Answer: B. To preserve recovery value and determine suitable disposition

Question 7

If average daily demand is 100 units, demand standard deviation is 20 units, lead time is 4 days and z = 1.65, what is safety stock under the fixed-lead-time approximation?

A. 33 units

B. 66 units

C. 400 units

D. 466 units

Correct Answer: B. 66 units

Question 8

Which statement best describes promise accuracy?

A. The percentage of warehouse space occupied

B. The extent to which delivered service matches the customer promise

C. The number of products listed online

D. The ratio of returns to advertisements

Correct Answer: B. The extent to which delivered service matches the customer promise

Question 9

Which is an example of postponement?

A. Positioning every SKU in every region before demand occurs

B. Delaying final product configuration until demand information is available

C. Discarding all returned products

D. Removing safety stock from all categories

Correct Answer: B. Delaying final product configuration until demand information is available

Question 10

Why is a balanced fulfilment dashboard necessary?

A. Because maximising one local metric can damage total customer and financial performance

B. Because cost measures are never useful

C. Because service measures cannot be calculated

D. Because sustainability is unrelated to operations

Correct Answer: A. Because maximising one local metric can damage total customer and financial performance

E-Commerce & D2C Marketplaces
Chapter 10 of 15