Digital Transformation & Tech Strategy

Chapter 8
Emerging Technologies and Digital Innovation

Executive Post Graduate Program in Management (EPGPM)
Digital Transformation & Tech Strategy   •   Post Graduate

Emerging Technologies and Digital Innovation

Introduction

Emerging technologies are technologies whose performance, cost, institutional acceptance, or business applications are developing rapidly enough that their future impact remains uncertain. For managers, the central challenge is not to predict the future with precision. It is to identify strategically significant possibilities, test them economically, govern their risks, and build organizational capacity for adaptation.

This chapter examines the strategic evaluation of the Internet of Things (IoT), edge computing, blockchain, digital twins, immersive technologies, robotics, and quantum developments. These technologies should not be assessed as isolated products. Their value generally arises from combinations: IoT generates data; edge computing processes time-sensitive data; digital twins interpret operational states; artificial intelligence supports decisions; robotics performs physical work; and cloud platforms coordinate the enterprise. Blockchain may provide shared trust in selected multi-party settings, while immersive technologies reshape interaction, training, and design.

The chapter uses four complementary lenses:

  1. Technology scouting identifies relevant developments, actors, applications, and signals.
  2. Diffusion theory explains how innovations spread through organizations and markets.
  3. Scenario planning explores multiple plausible futures rather than relying on one forecast.
  4. Experimentation portfolios allocate resources across uncertain opportunities while limiting downside risk.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, learners should be able to:

  • distinguish major emerging technologies and explain their strategic logic;
  • assess technologies through feasibility, desirability, viability, and responsible-use criteria;
  • apply diffusion theory to adoption decisions;
  • construct scenarios under technological and environmental uncertainty;
  • design a staged experimentation portfolio;
  • evaluate cybersecurity, ethical, regulatory, and organizational implications; and
  • formulate an evidence-based technology strategy.

1. A Strategic View of Emerging Technology

A technology becomes strategically important when it changes one or more of the following:

  • the economics of production or service delivery;
  • the speed or quality of decisions;
  • the basis of customer value;
  • the structure of industry competition;
  • the distribution of power among firms, workers, platforms, and regulators; or
  • the organization’s exposure to risk.

A useful distinction is between invention, innovation, and digital transformation. Invention creates a new technical possibility. Innovation applies a new or improved idea to create recognized value. Digital transformation is a broader organizational process in which digital capabilities alter processes, business models, culture, and performance measurement.

Technology value is contingent. A technically superior system may fail because it lacks complementary assets such as data quality, skills, process redesign, standards, leadership sponsorship, or a viable revenue model. Conversely, a relatively mature technology can produce major value when integrated into a well-designed operating model.

Managers should therefore ask four questions:

  1. What problem is being solved?
  2. Which capability does the technology create or strengthen?
  3. What complements and organizational changes are required?
  4. What new dependencies, harms, and failure modes could result?

2. Technology Scouting and Evaluation

Technology scouting is the systematic search, interpretation, and prioritization of developments outside the organization. It differs from technology procurement: scouting explores possibilities before a purchase decision is justified.

2.1 The scouting cycle

A disciplined scouting cycle consists of:

  1. Strategic framing: define business questions, time horizons, and constraints.
  2. Signal collection: monitor research publications, patents, standards, start-ups, venture investment, customer behavior, regulation, supplier roadmaps, and competitor activity.
  3. Signal interpretation: distinguish durable trends from publicity, isolated demonstrations, and vendor claims.
  4. Opportunity mapping: connect technologies to customer jobs, operational bottlenecks, and strategic capabilities.
  5. Validation: conduct interviews, technical assessments, proofs of concept, and economic analysis.
  6. Portfolio decision: stop, monitor, experiment, scale, or partner.

The scouting process should use diverse sources. Academic research may reveal technical feasibility, while standards bodies reveal interoperability direction and regulators reveal future constraints. A single source creates confirmation bias.

2.2 Evaluation dimensions

A practical evaluation scorecard can assess each opportunity against the following dimensions:

DimensionCentral question
Strategic fitDoes it support a distinctive organizational priority?
Customer valueDoes it solve a meaningful customer problem?
Technical maturityCan it perform reliably in the intended environment?
Economic viabilityAre total benefits likely to exceed lifecycle costs?
Complementary assetsAre data, skills, processes, and partners available?
ScalabilityCan a successful pilot operate across sites and users?
InteroperabilityCan it connect to existing systems and standards?
Risk and responsibilityAre security, privacy, safety, and ethical risks manageable?
ReversibilityCan the organization exit without unacceptable losses?

A score is not a substitute for judgment. In particular, high technical maturity does not guarantee strategic value, and a low score may reflect missing complements that can be developed deliberately.

3. A Portfolio of Emerging Technologies

3.1 Internet of Things

The IoT is a network of physical objects equipped with sensing, identification, processing, communication, and sometimes actuation capabilities. Examples include industrial machines, vehicles, medical devices, energy meters, agricultural equipment, and consumer products.

An IoT system typically contains:

  • devices and sensors, which observe physical conditions;
  • connectivity, which transports data;
  • platform services, which store, normalize, and manage data;
  • analytics and applications, which generate insight or action; and
  • actuators and human interfaces, which influence the physical world.

IoT value depends on the decision loop, not merely on the number of connected devices. A sensor that produces data without a responsible decision process may create cost rather than value. Important design questions include sampling frequency, data ownership, device identity, battery life, calibration, firmware updates, and failure behavior.

In manufacturing, IoT can support predictive maintenance. Let T be the planning horizon, Cf the expected failure cost, Cm the planned-maintenance cost, and Cs the sensing and analytics cost. A simplified decision rule is to adopt monitoring when:

Expected avoided failure cost > Cm + Cs

This comparison is only a first approximation. It assumes that predictions lead to timely action and that failure probabilities are estimated credibly. It should include downtime, safety, quality, spare parts, labor, and false-alarm costs.

3.2 Edge computing

Edge computing places computation, storage, and control closer to data sources or users rather than sending all data to a centralized cloud. It is valuable when latency, bandwidth, resilience, privacy, or local autonomy matters.

Edge and cloud computing are complementary. Edge nodes can filter data, execute immediate controls, and continue operating during intermittent connectivity. Cloud platforms remain useful for large-scale model training, fleet-level analysis, archival storage, and coordination.

A total response time can be conceptualized as:

Ltotal = Lsensing + Lnetwork + Lprocessing + Lactuation

Here, each term is a latency component, measured in the same time unit. Edge computing mainly reduces the network and sometimes processing components. The expression is a model for diagnosis, not a universal performance guarantee. Wireless contention, queueing, encryption, and device limitations may add variability.

Edge systems increase architectural complexity. Managers must govern distributed software updates, physical security, identity, observability, data synchronization, and model drift. An edge deployment is justified when local responsiveness or autonomy creates value greater than the additional management burden.

3.3 Blockchain and distributed ledgers

Blockchain is a form of distributed ledger in which transactions are recorded using cryptographic techniques and a consensus mechanism. Its strategic proposition is not simply “decentralization”; it is the possibility of a shared, tamper-evident transaction history among parties that do not fully trust one another.

Potential applications include provenance, interorganizational reconciliation, tokenized assets, credentials, and automated contract execution. However, blockchain is often unnecessary when a trusted central administrator already exists and can operate a conventional database more efficiently.

Key evaluation questions are:

  • Who operates or validates the network?
  • What happens when data entered initially are false?
  • Can identities be linked to real actors?
  • What are throughput, latency, energy, and governance requirements?
  • How are privacy, correction, and legal enforceability handled?

The principle “garbage in, garbage out” remains decisive: immutability does not make an input truthful. Permissioned systems may improve governance and performance but can reduce the decentralization that motivates blockchain in the first place.

3.4 Digital twins

A digital twin is a digital representation of a physical or organizational object, process, or system that is connected to the represented entity through data and is used for monitoring, analysis, prediction, or control. A static computer-aided design file is not necessarily a digital twin.

Digital twins vary in fidelity and purpose. A product twin may support design and maintenance; a production-line twin may test scheduling alternatives; a city twin may model traffic or energy; an enterprise twin may represent processes and resource flows.

A twin requires:

  • a defined physical scope and purpose;
  • identity and data linkage between physical and digital entities;
  • models calibrated to observed behavior;
  • mechanisms for validation and uncertainty management; and
  • governance of access, updates, and decisions.

The danger is false precision. A visually impressive model may be strategically weak if its assumptions are opaque, its data delayed, or its predictions unvalidated. Twin investments should begin with a decision that matters, such as reducing unplanned downtime or testing an expensive process change.

3.5 Immersive technologies

Immersive technologies include virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), spatial computing, and related interfaces. VR replaces or largely isolates the user’s visual environment. AR overlays digital information on the physical environment. MR allows digital objects to interact more dynamically with physical surroundings.

Enterprise applications include worker training, remote assistance, engineering visualization, surgical education, retail experience, collaborative design, and workplace simulation. Benefits may include safe repetition, reduced travel, improved spatial understanding, and faster access to expert knowledge.

Limitations include motion sickness, accessibility barriers, hardware cost, content-production expense, social acceptance, workplace monitoring concerns, and uncertain productivity effects. Immersion should serve a task that genuinely benefits from spatial or embodied interaction; a conventional screen may be superior for many information tasks.

3.6 Robotics and autonomous systems

Robotics combines sensing, computation, actuation, and control to perform physical tasks. Industrial robots usually operate in structured environments, whereas service robots and autonomous mobile robots must cope with greater uncertainty.

Strategic applications include warehouse movement, inspection, agriculture, healthcare assistance, hazardous operations, and collaborative manufacturing. The business case depends not only on labor substitution but also on quality, safety, availability, flexibility, ergonomics, and the redesign of human work.

Robotic deployment requires hazard analysis, fail-safe behavior, maintenance capability, human–robot interaction design, and clear accountability. Automation can remove dangerous work, but poorly designed automation can create new hazards or deskill employees. Responsible implementation treats workers as participants in redesign rather than merely as costs to be removed.

3.7 Quantum developments

Quantum technologies exploit properties such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum measurement. Relevant domains include quantum computing, quantum sensing, and quantum communication. Quantum computing is not a universal replacement for classical computing; it is expected to provide advantages for particular problem classes and algorithms, subject to error, scale, and engineering constraints.

For most organizations, the immediate strategic issue is preparedness rather than large-scale deployment. Cryptographically relevant quantum computing could threaten some public-key cryptographic schemes, creating a need for cryptographic inventory, migration planning, and evaluation of post-quantum cryptography. Quantum sensing may have nearer-term value in specialized fields such as navigation, materials, and measurement.

Managers should distinguish laboratory demonstrations from commercially useful advantage. A credible quantum strategy may include horizon scanning, partnerships with research institutions, workforce development, and “harvest now, decrypt later” risk assessment for sensitive long-lived data.

4. Diffusion Theory and Adoption Decisions

Everett Rogers’ diffusion theory explains how an innovation spreads through a social system over time. Adoption is influenced by perceived relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. These attributes are perceptions, not purely technical properties.

Adopters are commonly described as innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. The categories are analytical rather than moral judgments. An organization may be an early adopter in one technology and conservative in another because its risks, capabilities, and institutional environment differ.

Diffusion is also shaped by networks, standards, regulation, switching costs, complementary infrastructure, and social legitimacy. A technology may diffuse rapidly among enthusiasts but stall at the organizational “chasm” between pilot users and mainstream operations. Scaling requires evidence, integration, support, procurement pathways, governance, and a credible economic model.

Managers can accelerate responsible diffusion by:

  • selecting visible but representative pilot sites;
  • involving users in design;
  • demonstrating measurable outcomes;
  • reducing perceived complexity through training and support;
  • publishing evidence, including failures; and
  • establishing standards and reusable implementation patterns.

5. Scenario Planning Under Uncertainty

Scenario planning is a disciplined method for constructing several plausible, internally consistent futures. It is not a forecast and should not be confused with a prediction of the most likely outcome.

A scenario process commonly involves:

  1. defining the focal strategic question;
  2. identifying driving forces and predetermined trends;
  3. assessing uncertainty and impact;
  4. selecting two high-impact, highly uncertain dimensions;
  5. constructing contrasting scenario logics;
  6. developing narratives, indicators, and implications; and
  7. testing strategic options across the scenarios.

For example, an industrial firm might use data governance maturity and availability of skilled labor as two critical uncertainties. The resulting scenarios could include highly automated trusted operations, constrained automation, fragmented data-driven growth, and labor-rich incremental improvement. The objective is not to name the future but to identify robust moves, early-warning indicators, and contingent actions.

Good strategies contain three types of action:

  • no-regret moves, valuable across most scenarios;
  • options, low-cost experiments that preserve future choice; and
  • bets, larger commitments made when evidence and conditions justify them.

6. Experimentation Portfolios

Emerging-technology decisions should be staged. A portfolio balances exploration of uncertain opportunities with exploitation of proven capabilities.

A useful portfolio contains:

Portfolio layerPurposeTypical evidence
Horizon scanningDetect signals and threatsResearch, standards, start-ups
DiscoveryUnderstand user and process problemsInterviews, observation, process mapping
Proof of conceptTest technical feasibilityPrototype performance and integration tests
PilotTest value in a controlled settingOperational, financial, and user outcomes
Scale preparationBuild repeatabilityArchitecture, training, governance, suppliers
Production scaleDeliver enterprise valueBenefits realization and continuous improvement

Each experiment should specify a hypothesis, target users, baseline, intervention, metrics, duration, owner, stopping rule, and ethical safeguards. A hypothesis might be: “Providing edge-based anomaly detection will reduce mean time to intervention without increasing unsafe false alarms.”

A simple benefit estimate is:

Net benefit = Benefits − (Capital cost + Operating cost + Risk-adjusted cost)

Risk-adjusted cost may include expected loss. If pi is the probability of adverse event i and Li is its loss, then, under a simplifying expected-value assumption:

Expected loss = ∑ pi × Li

The probabilities and losses must be decision-relevant, expressed in consistent monetary or utility units, and treated as uncertain estimates rather than facts. Non-financial harms, such as loss of dignity or safety, should not be reduced mechanically to money; they may require exclusion thresholds or rights-based controls.

A portfolio should also use stage gates. Possible gates are: technical feasibility, user acceptance, security approval, regulatory acceptability, economic viability, and scalability. Stopping an experiment is a valid outcome when evidence does not support continuation.

7. Illustrative Case: Port Meridian’s Intelligent Cold Chain

Background

Port Meridian, a fictional regional food distributor, operates refrigerated warehouses and a vehicle fleet. Product spoilage, energy costs, and delivery delays are increasing. Management proposes sensors, edge analytics, digital twins, robotics, and blockchain-based provenance.

Problem

The proposal is technologically broad but strategically unfocused. The organization lacks a clear priority, has inconsistent sensor data, and assumes that a blockchain ledger will solve supplier-trust problems.

Analysis

Technology scouting identifies that low-cost temperature sensors and edge gateways are mature, while full warehouse autonomy remains less mature. Interviews show that spoilage claims arise mainly from gaps in handoffs and delayed alerts. A process analysis finds that managers need rapid intervention, not merely historical dashboards.

The firm therefore prioritizes three hypotheses:

  1. edge alerts can reduce the duration of temperature excursions;
  2. a digital twin of one warehouse can improve energy and maintenance decisions; and
  3. standardized digital event records can reduce reconciliation time.

Blockchain is not selected initially because the principal problem is process discipline and data capture, not the absence of a shared ledger.

Approach

The firm establishes a 12-week pilot in one warehouse. Sensors are calibrated against reference instruments. Edge gateways continue alerting during internet outages. A baseline period is compared with the intervention period. Measures include excursion duration, spoilage rate, energy consumption, false-alert rate, response time, worker acceptance, and cybersecurity incidents.

The digital twin begins with refrigeration assets and temperature zones rather than the entire enterprise. Employees participate in alert-rule design. Access is role-based, and data retention is limited to operational need. A later supplier trial uses signed event records; a permissioned ledger remains an option only if multiple parties require a common history that existing systems cannot provide.

Outcome

In this illustrative case, the pilot produces a credible reduction in response time but reveals that sensor calibration and ownership of alerts are more important than advanced algorithms. Energy savings are promising but require process changes. Workers accept the system when alerts are prioritized and do not become a surveillance mechanism. The organization scales the edge and twin architecture gradually, postponing blockchain investment.

Learning points

  • Start with a costly decision or failure mode, not a fashionable technology.
  • Test data quality and operating processes before optimizing models.
  • Use architecture that permits future options without committing prematurely.
  • Treat adoption, skills, and governance as part of the technology system.
  • A negative or partial pilot result can prevent a much larger waste of capital.

8. Governance, Ethics, and Regulation

Emerging technologies alter who can observe, decide, act, and be held accountable. Governance must therefore be designed from the beginning.

Privacy and surveillance: IoT devices, immersive systems, and robotics may collect location, biometric, behavioral, or workplace data. Collection should be necessary, proportionate, transparent, secure, and subject to appropriate consent or lawful basis.

Safety: Autonomous machines and cyber-physical systems require hazard identification, testing under abnormal conditions, emergency controls, maintenance procedures, and incident reporting.

Security: Connected devices expand attack surfaces. Controls should include asset inventory, strong identity, least privilege, encryption where appropriate, secure updates, network segmentation, logging, vulnerability management, and tested recovery.

Fairness and labor: Automation and algorithmic decisions can distribute opportunity and burden unevenly. Organizations should assess effects on workers, provide reskilling where feasible, and maintain meaningful human review for consequential decisions.

Data governance: Data provenance, retention, quality, access, lineage, and correction mechanisms are essential. Immutability can conflict with legal or operational requirements to correct or delete information.

Accountability: Contracts and operating procedures should identify responsibility for model failure, unsafe action, defective data, outages, and third-party dependency. “The algorithm decided” is not an adequate accountability structure.

Regulatory requirements vary by jurisdiction and sector. Managers should involve legal, compliance, security, safety, procurement, and affected users early rather than treating governance as a final approval step.

9. Best Practices for Executive Decision-Makers

  1. Link every technology initiative to a measurable strategic or operational problem.
  2. Separate technical possibility from organizational readiness.
  3. Use independent evidence in addition to vendor material.
  4. Prefer interoperable, modular architectures and explicit exit strategies.
  5. Pilot in realistic environments, including failure and edge cases.
  6. Measure user adoption and process change, not only system performance.
  7. Include security, privacy, safety, and inclusion in the business case.
  8. Create stage gates with authority to stop or redirect initiatives.
  9. Maintain a technology radar with owners, signals, and review dates.
  10. Build capabilities in data governance, systems integration, experimentation, and change leadership.

Contemporary Direction

Several developments are converging. AI is making IoT and digital twins more useful by extracting patterns from streams of operational data, but it also increases the need for explainability, model monitoring, and quality controls. Edge AI is moving inference closer to devices, creating opportunities for low-latency and privacy-sensitive applications. Spatial computing is becoming more integrated with industrial design and training. Robotics is advancing through better perception, simulation, and human–robot collaboration. Post-quantum preparedness is becoming a strategic cybersecurity issue even before fault-tolerant quantum computers are available.

The strategic implication is convergence rather than isolated adoption. Organizations should build an adaptable digital foundation: trusted data, secure connectivity, modular platforms, skilled people, and governance capable of handling uncertainty.

Chapter Summary

Emerging technologies should be evaluated as components of sociotechnical systems rather than as standalone gadgets. IoT connects physical assets and generates data; edge computing supports local, resilient, low-latency processing; blockchain can coordinate shared records where trust and governance justify its overhead; digital twins connect models to physical or organizational systems; immersive technologies support spatial and embodied interaction; robotics performs or augments physical work; and quantum developments create specialized opportunities and future cryptographic risks.

Technology scouting identifies relevant signals and connects them to strategic problems. Diffusion theory explains adoption through relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, observability, networks, and complementary assets. Scenario planning prepares organizations for multiple plausible futures, while experimentation portfolios manage uncertainty through staged learning, explicit hypotheses, metrics, and stopping rules. Responsible strategy integrates cybersecurity, privacy, safety, fairness, accountability, regulation, and workforce implications from the beginning.

Key Terms

Artificial intelligence: Computational methods that perform tasks associated with human cognitive capabilities.

Blockchain: A distributed ledger using cryptographic techniques and a consensus mechanism to record transactions.

Digital twin: A connected digital representation of a physical, organizational, or process entity.

Diffusion of innovation: The process through which an innovation spreads through a social system over time.

Edge computing: Processing and storage located near data sources or users.

Experimentation portfolio: A set of staged initiatives designed to learn while balancing risk and opportunity.

Immersive technology: Technology that creates or overlays digitally mediated environments and interactions.

Internet of Things: Networked physical objects capable of sensing, communicating, processing, or acting.

IoT gateway: A device that connects local sensors or devices to other networks and services.

Model drift: Deterioration in model performance as data or operating conditions change.

Quantum computing: Computing based on quantum-mechanical principles for selected problem classes.

Quantum sensing: Measurement using quantum effects to achieve specialized sensitivity or precision.

Scenario planning: Exploration of multiple plausible, internally consistent future environments.

Technology scouting: Systematic search and interpretation of external technological developments.

Technology readiness: The maturity and demonstrated reliability of a technology for a defined use.

Total cost of ownership: The full lifecycle cost of acquiring, operating, maintaining, securing, and retiring a system.

Trialability: The extent to which an innovation can be experimented with before full adoption.

Robotics: The design and use of machines that sense, compute, and act in physical environments.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. What distinguishes an invention from an innovation and digital transformation?
  2. Why is edge computing complementary to, rather than a replacement for, cloud computing?
  3. State two situations in which blockchain may be unnecessary.
  4. What are the five perceived attributes influencing diffusion in Rogers’ model?
  5. Why should a digital twin be linked to a specific decision or operational purpose?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain how a manager could use technology scouting to evaluate robotics for a distribution center.
  2. Compare IoT, edge computing, and digital twins as components of an industrial operating model.
  3. Discuss the benefits and limitations of blockchain for interorganizational provenance.
  4. Explain how scenario planning and experimentation portfolios complement one another.
  5. Evaluate the ethical and governance requirements for immersive technologies in the workplace.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. Design a 12-week experiment to test edge-based predictive maintenance in a manufacturing plant. Specify the hypothesis, baseline, metrics, risks, and stopping rules.
  2. Construct two critical uncertainties for a company considering autonomous mobile robots, develop four scenario combinations, and identify one no-regret move and one contingent bet.
  3. A firm proposes blockchain because suppliers disagree about shipment records. Analyze whether blockchain is justified, identify alternative solutions, and specify evidence required before investment.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which condition most strongly justifies edge computing?

A. The organization wants to eliminate all cloud services

B. The application requires low latency and continued local operation during connectivity loss

C. The organization has no physical devices

D. The application only needs annual reporting

Correct Answer: B. The application requires low latency and continued local operation during connectivity loss

Question 2

What is a defining feature of a digital twin?

A. It is always a three-dimensional visualization

B. It must use blockchain

C. It is connected through data to the physical or organizational entity it represents

D. It can only represent manufacturing equipment

Correct Answer: C. It is connected through data to the physical or organizational entity it represents

Question 3

Which situation is least likely to justify blockchain?

A. Several parties need a shared transaction history and do not fully trust one another

B. A trusted central administrator can operate a conventional database efficiently

C. Multiple organizations need coordinated provenance records

D. Participants require cryptographically verifiable transaction history

Correct Answer: B. A trusted central administrator can operate a conventional database efficiently

Question 4

In diffusion theory, trialability refers to:

A. The extent to which an innovation can be tested before full adoption

B. The number of suppliers offering an innovation

C. The speed at which a technology processes data

D. The legal enforceability of a contract

Correct Answer: A. The extent to which an innovation can be tested before full adoption

Question 5

Which is a no-regret move in scenario planning?

A. A commitment valuable only in one highly specific future

B. An action that creates value across several plausible futures

C. A decision made without identifying uncertainties

D. A forecast treated as certain

Correct Answer: B. An action that creates value across several plausible futures

Question 6

If an adverse event has probability 0.10 and loss of $50,000, its expected loss under a simple expected-value assumption is:

A. $500

B. $5,000

C. $50,000

D. $500,000

Correct Answer: B. $5,000

Question 7

Which statement about quantum computing is most accurate?

A. It is expected to replace all classical computing immediately

B. It provides equal advantage for every computational problem

C. It may provide advantages for selected problem classes and creates potential cryptographic implications

D. It is unrelated to cybersecurity planning

Correct Answer: C. It may provide advantages for selected problem classes and creates potential cryptographic implications

Question 8

What is the main limitation of an immutable ledger?

A. It guarantees that all entered data are truthful

B. It cannot record any transaction

C. It does not correct false information entered at the source

D. It always requires a public, permissionless network

Correct Answer: C. It does not correct false information entered at the source

Question 9

Which item should be specified in a responsible technology experiment?

A. Only the vendor’s projected benefits

B. A hypothesis, baseline, metrics, owner, and stopping rule

C. A commitment to scale regardless of results

D. A decision to exclude end users

Correct Answer: B. A hypothesis, baseline, metrics, owner, and stopping rule

Question 10

Which governance issue is especially relevant to connected workplace devices?

A. Whether physical data should be collected and used proportionately and transparently

B. Whether all devices should be permanently offline

C. Whether experimentation should be prohibited

D. Whether models should never be monitored after deployment

Correct Answer: A. Whether physical data should be collected and used proportionately and transparently

Digital Transformation & Tech Strategy
Chapter 8 of 15