Corporate Valuation

Chapter 1
Foundations of Corporate Valuation

Bachelors Program in Accounting and Finance
Corporate Valuation   •   Bachelor

Foundations of Corporate Valuation

Introduction

Corporate valuation is the disciplined process of estimating what a business, an ownership interest, or a financial claim is worth. It is central to investment analysis, mergers and acquisitions, financial reporting, taxation, restructuring, litigation, corporate finance and strategic decision-making. Although the word “value” is used frequently in business, it does not have one universal meaning. A company may have a market price that differs from its intrinsic value, an accounting book value that differs from both, and an enterprise value that differs from the value attributable solely to shareholders.

A sound valuation therefore begins with conceptual clarity. The analyst must identify what is being valued, for whom, as of what date, under which assumptions, and for what purpose. Valuation is not simply the application of a spreadsheet formula. It combines financial theory, accounting analysis, industry knowledge, forecasting, professional judgment and ethical discipline.

This chapter establishes the vocabulary and framework required for later study of discounted cash flow valuation, comparable-company analysis, precedent transactions and asset-based methods.

Learning objectives

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

  1. Distinguish value from price and explain why they may differ.
  2. Explain enterprise value, equity value, intrinsic value, market value and book value.
  3. Identify the purposes of valuation and the stakeholders who use valuation information.
  4. Describe major valuation standards, bases of value and professional responsibilities.
  5. Apply the basic relationship between enterprise value and equity value.
  6. Explain the principal stages, assumptions and limitations of a valuation process.
  7. Evaluate a valuation conclusion critically in a practical business setting.

1. Why valuation matters

A business is a collection of resources, contracts, capabilities and risks that generate, or are expected to generate, economic benefits. These benefits may take the form of cash distributions, reinvested growth, cost savings, control benefits or proceeds from a future sale. Valuation translates expectations about these benefits into an economic estimate.

Valuation is used when:

  • an investor decides whether to buy, hold or sell shares;
  • a company negotiates an acquisition or divestment;
  • management evaluates strategic alternatives;
  • a lender assesses security and repayment capacity;
  • an accountant tests assets for impairment or measures fair value;
  • tax authorities assess transfers or reorganizations;
  • courts determine damages, shareholder remedies or matrimonial assets; or
  • owners plan succession, an initial public offering or a recapitalization.

The same company can produce different valuation conclusions because the purpose, valuation date, ownership rights, information set and assumptions differ. A value for a controlling buyer may include expected synergies that are unavailable to a minority investor. A liquidation value may be substantially below a going-concern value. A fair value for financial reporting may not equal an investment value to a particular strategic acquirer.

2. The language of value

2.1 Value and price

Value is an economic estimate of the worth of an asset, business or interest based on specified assumptions and a defined basis of value. Price is the amount actually quoted, offered or paid in a transaction. Price is an observed negotiation outcome; value is an analytical conclusion or opinion.

In an efficient and well-informed market, price may provide useful evidence about value. However, the two can diverge because of bargaining power, liquidity constraints, taxes, transaction costs, incomplete information, differing expectations, forced sales or strategic synergies. A buyer may pay a price above standalone value because the target complements the buyer’s existing operations. Conversely, a distressed seller may accept a price below a reasonable going-concern value.

A useful investment comparison is:

  • if estimated intrinsic value exceeds the current price, the security may appear undervalued;
  • if estimated intrinsic value is below the current price, it may appear overvalued; and
  • if they are approximately equal, the security may appear fairly priced, subject to estimation error.

These conclusions are not automatic trading instructions. Valuation estimates contain uncertainty, and the market may incorporate information unavailable to the analyst.

2.2 Enterprise value

Enterprise value (EV) measures the value of the operating business available to all providers of operating capital, principally equity investors and interest-bearing debt providers. In simplified form:

EV = Equity Value + Debt + Preferred Equity + Non-controlling Interests − Non-operating Cash and Investments

Debt includes relevant interest-bearing borrowings, subject to the convention used. Preferred equity and non-controlling interests are included when the operating results being valued include those claims. Cash and non-operating investments are deducted because they are not required to support the operating enterprise and are available to capital providers, although classification requires judgment.

A commonly used special case is:

EV = Equity Value + Net Debt

where:

Net Debt = Interest-bearing Debt − Excess Cash

The formula is not a universal accounting identity. Analysts must investigate lease liabilities, pension deficits, restricted cash, investments, associates, provisions and other debt-like or non-operating items. The appropriate treatment depends on the valuation purpose and the definition used in the selected market multiple.

EV is often compared with operating measures such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), because EV represents claims before financing decisions while EBITDA is measured before interest. Such comparisons are meaningful only when numerator and denominator are conceptually consistent.

2.3 Equity value

Equity value is the value attributable to ordinary shareholders after considering claims senior to ordinary equity. For a listed company, the simplest market measure is:

Equity Value = Share Price × Number of Diluted Shares Outstanding

The number of diluted shares may include ordinary shares and the potential effect of options, restricted shares, convertible securities and other instruments, using an appropriate dilution method. Analysts must avoid double counting instruments that are already reflected in the share count.

From enterprise value, a simplified bridge to equity value is:

Equity Value = EV − Debt − Preferred Equity − Non-controlling Interests + Cash and Non-operating Investments

This bridge is appropriate only when the components are measured consistently and all material claims and non-operating assets have been considered.

2.4 Intrinsic value

Intrinsic value is an estimate of value based on the fundamental economic characteristics of an asset: expected cash flows, growth, risk, useful life and required return. It is normally associated with an investor-specific or fundamental analysis rather than with a directly observed transaction.

For a simple asset producing a single cash flow, present value can be expressed as:

PV = CFₜ ÷ (1 + r)ᵗ

where PV is present value, CFₜ is the cash flow expected at time t, r is the required rate of return per period, and t is the number of periods. The formula assumes a known or estimated cash flow, a constant discount rate over the relevant period and cash flows measured in the same currency and timing convention as the discount rate.

For multiple cash flows:

V₀ = ∑ₜ₌₁ⁿ CFₜ ÷ (1 + r)ᵗ

where V₀ is value at the valuation date, CFₜ is the cash flow in period t, r is the discount rate applicable to the risk of those cash flows, and n is the number of forecast periods. The equation is a general present-value relationship, not a guarantee that forecasts are accurate. It requires consistency: nominal cash flows should be discounted at a nominal rate, real cash flows at a real rate, and after-tax cash flows at an after-tax rate.

Intrinsic value is sensitive to assumptions. Small changes in long-term growth, margins, capital expenditure or discount rates can materially alter the result. A responsible analyst therefore reports key assumptions, sensitivity ranges and limitations rather than presenting a single figure as certain.

2.5 Market value

Market value is the value indicated by transactions or quoted prices in an active or sufficiently observable market. For a publicly traded ordinary share, the market value of the equity interest is commonly approximated by the current share price multiplied by the relevant number of shares.

Market value reflects the expectations and risk assessments of market participants. It may differ from an analyst’s intrinsic value because investors disagree, information is incomplete, markets are temporarily illiquid or the analyst’s assumptions differ from consensus expectations. Market value is not necessarily the same as fair value in every legal or accounting context; the applicable standard must be identified.

2.6 Book value

Book value is an accounting measure based on recognized assets, liabilities and equity under an applicable financial reporting framework. At the company level, book equity is generally the recognized assets less recognized liabilities attributable to the relevant owners. Book value is affected by historical cost, depreciation, amortization, impairment, provisions, accounting policies and recognition rules.

Book value is not a direct measure of economic value. Internally generated brands, employee capabilities, customer relationships and innovative know-how may be omitted or only partially recognized. Conversely, assets recorded on the balance sheet may be worth less than their carrying amounts. Book value can nevertheless be informative for asset-intensive businesses, financial institutions and analyses of capital adequacy, provided the accounting basis and limitations are understood.

The principal distinctions are summarized below.

ConceptCore meaningTypical evidenceMain caution
PriceAmount quoted, offered or paidMarket quote or transactionMay reflect negotiation or distress
Enterprise valueValue of operating assets to all major capital providersValuation bridge or transaction analysisTreatment of debt-like items must be consistent
Equity valueValue attributable to equity holdersShare price, DCF or transaction analysisSenior claims and dilution matter
Intrinsic valueFundamental estimate based on expected benefits and riskDCF, dividend or fundamental modelHighly assumption-sensitive
Market valueValue indicated by market participantsQuoted price or comparable transactionsMarket may be thin or temporarily inefficient
Book valueAccounting carrying amount of net assetsFinancial statementsMay differ materially from economic worth

3. Bases of value and standards

A basis of value states the fundamental premise under which the valuation is performed. Common bases include:

  • Market value: an estimate of the exchange price between willing, informed and properly motivated market participants under appropriate market conditions.
  • Fair value: a term whose precise meaning depends on the governing accounting, legal or regulatory framework. Under IFRS 13, fair value is an exit price in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
  • Investment value: value to a particular owner or prospective owner, reflecting that party’s objectives, synergies, financing and tax circumstances.
  • Liquidation value: value assuming assets are sold and liabilities settled, often distinguishing orderly liquidation from forced liquidation.
  • Going-concern value: value assuming the business continues operating rather than being dismantled.

These terms should not be used interchangeably. A valuation report should identify the basis, premise, valuation date, currency, ownership interest and level of control or marketability being considered.

International valuation practice is influenced by the International Valuation Standards (IVS), national professional standards and accounting requirements such as IFRS or US GAAP. Professional bodies may impose additional rules for members. Standards generally emphasize scope definition, competence, independence, appropriate methods, sufficient evidence, transparent assumptions and clear reporting. The exact legal requirement depends on jurisdiction and assignment.

Valuation is also shaped by the distinction between:

  • orderly transaction: adequate exposure to the market and no undue compulsion;
  • forced sale: unusual pressure or insufficient marketing time; and
  • control and minority interests: control may provide decision rights, while a minority interest may lack influence and may be less marketable.

Control premiums and minority discounts must not be applied mechanically. They depend on the underlying evidence, the valuation premise and whether the comparable prices already reflect control or minority characteristics.

4. Purposes and stakeholders

Different stakeholders ask different valuation questions.

Investors and analysts

Investors estimate expected returns, compare securities and evaluate whether a market price provides an adequate margin of safety. They focus on sustainable cash flows, risk, competitive advantage, capital allocation and scenario outcomes.

Managers and boards

Management uses valuation to assess acquisitions, divestments, capital investments, share repurchases, financing choices and strategic plans. Boards have governance responsibilities: they should challenge optimistic forecasts, examine conflicts of interest and ensure that decisions are supported by reliable analysis.

Buyers and sellers in transactions

A buyer may estimate standalone value, synergy value and a maximum price. A seller may assess a reservation price, alternative bidders and the value of retaining the business. Negotiated price is influenced by these values, but is not identical to either party’s analysis.

Lenders and creditors

Lenders examine enterprise value, asset coverage, cash-flow capacity, covenant headroom and downside or recovery value. They are particularly concerned with claims senior to equity and with the reliability of forecasts under stress.

Accountants, auditors and regulators

Financial reporting may require fair-value measurement, purchase-price allocation or impairment testing. Auditors evaluate whether the valuation methodology, inputs and disclosures comply with the applicable framework. Regulators may review market conduct, disclosure quality and tax consequences.

Courts, tax authorities and employees

Courts may require an independent valuation in disputes. Tax authorities may examine whether related-party transfers reflect an appropriate arm’s-length basis. Employees and pension trustees may be affected by acquisitions, restructurings and solvency assessments.

5. The valuation process

A professional valuation is an iterative process rather than a mechanical sequence.

Step 1: Define the assignment

Specify the subject company or asset, ownership interest, valuation date, purpose, basis of value, premise of value, currency, jurisdiction and intended users. Determine whether the assignment concerns the whole company, a division, a shareholding, a specific intangible asset or a liability.

Step 2: Gather and assess information

Collect financial statements, management accounts, budgets, forecasts, debt schedules, contracts, tax information, industry data, ownership documents and operational metrics. Test the reliability, completeness and consistency of information. Reconcile accounting data to operating reality and investigate unusual items.

Step 3: Understand the business and its environment

Analyze products, customers, suppliers, competitors, regulation, technology, lifecycle, geographic exposure, pricing power and competitive advantages. Identify value drivers such as volume growth, margins, working-capital intensity, reinvestment and cost of capital.

Step 4: Normalize historical performance

Historical results may contain non-recurring gains, owner-specific expenses, unusual litigation, restructuring charges or temporary price effects. Adjustments should be evidence-based, disclosed and treated consistently. “Adjusted EBITDA” is not automatically superior to reported EBITDA; aggressive adjustments can inflate apparent performance.

Step 5: Select appropriate methods

Common methods include:

  1. Income approach: values expected future economic benefits by converting them into present value. Discounted cash flow and capitalization of maintainable earnings are examples.
  2. Market approach: uses prices or valuation multiples from comparable public companies or precedent transactions.
  3. Asset approach: estimates the value of individual assets and liabilities, often useful for holding companies, asset-intensive businesses or liquidation analyses.

Method selection depends on the company’s characteristics and the availability and quality of evidence. Multiple methods can provide triangulation, but combining them without understanding their assumptions can create false precision.

Step 6: Forecast and model

Forecast operating performance, taxes, capital expenditure, working capital, financing effects and terminal or residual value where appropriate. Ensure that cash-flow definitions match discount rates and valuation levels. For example, free cash flow to the firm is generally discounted at a weighted average cost of capital, whereas free cash flow to equity is discounted at a cost of equity.

Step 7: Cross-check and perform sensitivity analysis

Compare implied multiples, margins, growth rates and returns on invested capital with historical and market evidence. Test alternative assumptions. A sensitivity table may show how value changes when the discount rate and terminal growth rate vary. Scenario analysis can distinguish a base case from downside and upside cases.

Step 8: Conclude and communicate

State a conclusion or range, explain the principal methods and assumptions, identify material uncertainties and disclose restrictions on use. A clear report enables a reader to understand not only the number but also how the number was produced.

6. Worked example: from enterprise value to equity value

Assume an analyst estimates the enterprise value of Orion Manufacturing at $120 million. The company has $35 million of interest-bearing debt, $4 million of preferred equity, $6 million of non-controlling interests and $18 million of cash and non-operating investments. The analyst must estimate the value attributable to ordinary shareholders.

Using the bridge:

Equity Value = EV − Debt − Preferred Equity − Non-controlling Interests + Cash

Substitution gives:

Equity Value = $120m − $35m − $4m − $6m + $18m = $93m

Thus, the estimated ordinary equity value is $93 million. If there are 10 million diluted ordinary shares, the implied value per share is:

Implied Value per Share = $93m ÷ 10m = $9.30

This example assumes that all amounts are measured at the same valuation date, that cash is available to equity holders, and that no material debt-like items or other claims have been omitted. If Orion also had a $7 million unfunded pension obligation treated as debt-like, equity value would fall to $86 million, or $8.60 per share. The adjustment illustrates why the bridge requires analysis rather than blind arithmetic.

7. Applied case: acquisition of Northstar Foods

Background

Northstar Foods is an illustrative privately owned company producing branded refrigerated meals. Its owners are considering a sale to either a financial investor or a large food group. Northstar has stable revenues, a strong regional brand and underutilized production capacity.

Problem

Management initially argues that the company is worth $80 million because its book equity is $78 million. A comparable-company analysis suggests an enterprise value of $105 million, while a preliminary discounted cash flow analysis produces an enterprise value of $96 million. The strategic food group offers $110 million, citing distribution synergies.

Analysis

The book figure is not automatically a market value. Northstar’s brand and customer relationships were internally developed and are only partly reflected in the accounts. Conversely, some equipment is carried above its recoverable amount. Book equity therefore provides context but not a complete valuation conclusion.

The comparable-company method uses enterprise-value-to-EBITDA multiples. Northstar’s normalized EBITDA is $12 million. An implied enterprise value of $105 million corresponds to:

EV ÷ EBITDA = $105m ÷ $12m = 8.75×

The analyst examines whether the selected companies have similar growth, margins, geography, accounting policies and leverage. A high multiple may be justified only if Northstar’s prospects support it.

The DCF analysis forecasts cash flows using expected volume growth, operating margins, taxes, working capital and capital expenditure. The analyst performs downside tests for lower growth and higher raw-material costs. The strategic buyer’s offer includes expected synergies, but those synergies are not necessarily part of Northstar’s standalone intrinsic value. The buyer may rationally pay more because the combined business is worth more to it than to a stand-alone owner.

Suppose Northstar has $22 million of debt and $7 million of cash. At an enterprise value of $105 million, the simplified equity value is:

Equity Value = $105m − $22m + $7m = $90m

The $110 million offer, if it is an enterprise-value offer, would imply equity proceeds of $95 million before transaction adjustments. If it is an equity-value offer, the interpretation is different. The transaction documents must therefore define the price precisely.

Approach and outcome

The board requests an independent valuation using the income and market approaches, reconciles normalized EBITDA, verifies debt-like items and separates standalone value from buyer-specific synergies. It concludes that Northstar’s standalone enterprise value is reasonably represented by a range of $96–105 million. The strategic offer is attractive because it shares some synergy value with the sellers.

Learning points

  1. Book value is not a substitute for economic valuation.
  2. Enterprise value and equity value must not be confused in negotiations.
  3. A strategic price can exceed standalone intrinsic value because of synergies.
  4. Valuation ranges and sensitivity analysis are more informative than unsupported precision.
  5. The definition of debt, cash and other adjustments can materially affect proceeds.

8. Limitations, ethics and governance

Valuation is subject to model risk, information risk and judgment risk. Forecasts may be biased, comparable companies may not be truly comparable, markets may be illiquid and terminal values may dominate a DCF result. Historical relationships can fail when technology, regulation or competition changes.

Ethical valuation requires competence, independence, objectivity, confidentiality and transparency. A valuer should not manipulate assumptions to achieve a desired price, hide adverse information, double count synergies or present a range as a fact. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed and, where necessary, managed through independent review.

Governance controls include documented assumptions, version control, review of management forecasts, sensitivity analysis, segregation of duties and approval by an appropriately informed board or committee. Auditors and valuation specialists should challenge unsupported adjustments and assess whether disclosures fairly communicate uncertainty.

Technology can improve data collection, scenario analysis and anomaly detection. Artificial intelligence may assist with document review and forecasting support, but it does not remove responsibility for source reliability, explainability, confidentiality, bias or professional judgment. An AI-generated estimate must be independently validated before being used in a material decision.

9. Best-practice checklist

Before accepting a valuation conclusion, ask:

  • What exactly is being valued?
  • What is the valuation date and purpose?
  • Which basis and premise of value apply?
  • Are the cash flows, discount rate and valuation multiple consistent?
  • Have debt, leases, pensions, minority interests and non-operating assets been assessed?
  • Are forecasts reconciled to historical performance and operational drivers?
  • Are adjustments supported by evidence?
  • Have downside scenarios and sensitivities been considered?
  • Is the conclusion independent, transparent and suitable for its intended users?

Chapter Summary

Corporate valuation estimates the economic worth of a business or financial interest for a defined purpose and date. Price is an observed amount, whereas value is an analytical estimate; they may diverge because of negotiation, information, liquidity and strategic considerations. Enterprise value represents the operating business available to major capital providers, while equity value is the residual attributable to ordinary shareholders after senior claims and relevant adjustments. Intrinsic value is based on expected benefits and risk, market value is indicated by market evidence, and book value is an accounting carrying amount.

A valuation must specify its basis of value, premise, ownership interest, assumptions and intended users. Common methods are the income, market and asset approaches. A professional process defines the assignment, gathers and tests information, understands the business, normalizes performance, selects methods, forecasts cash flows, performs cross-checks and communicates a reasoned conclusion. Ethical practice requires competence, independence, transparency and careful treatment of uncertainty. Valuation is therefore both quantitative and judgmental: formulas organize the analysis, but evidence and professional reasoning determine its credibility.

Key Terms

Value: An estimate of the economic worth of an asset, business or interest under specified assumptions.

Price: The amount quoted, offered or paid in a market or transaction.

Enterprise value: The value of an operating business available to equity and other major operating capital providers.

Equity value: The value attributable to equity holders after senior claims and relevant adjustments.

Intrinsic value: A fundamental estimate based on expected economic benefits, growth and risk.

Market value: Value indicated by market participant transactions or observable prices.

Book value: An accounting carrying amount based on recognized assets and liabilities.

Basis of value: The fundamental premise under which a valuation is performed.

Fair value: A defined measurement concept whose precise meaning depends on the governing accounting or legal framework.

Investment value: Value to a particular owner or prospective investor.

Going-concern value: Value assuming that the business continues operating.

Liquidation value: Value assuming assets are sold and liabilities are settled.

Discounted cash flow: An income-approach method that converts expected future cash flows into present value.

Comparable-company analysis: A market approach using valuation evidence from similar public companies.

Precedent transaction analysis: A market approach using prices or multiples from completed transactions.

Control premium: An increment associated with rights or benefits of controlling an enterprise.

Minority interest: An ownership interest that does not possess control.

Non-controlling interest: Equity in a subsidiary not attributable to the parent’s owners.

Normalization: Adjustment of historical or forecast results to represent sustainable operations.

Valuation date: The date as of which value is estimated.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. What is the principal difference between price and value?
  2. Define enterprise value and equity value.
  3. Why can book value differ from intrinsic value?
  4. What information should be specified when defining a valuation assignment?
  5. Name the three principal valuation approaches.

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain the differences among intrinsic value, market value and book value, using practical examples.
  2. Discuss why enterprise value is often used with operating performance measures such as EBITDA.
  3. Describe the complete professional valuation process from assignment definition to reporting.
  4. Explain how valuation purpose and stakeholder perspective can affect a valuation conclusion.
  5. Evaluate the ethical and governance responsibilities of a valuation professional.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A company has an enterprise value of $240 million, debt of $70 million, preferred equity of $8 million, non-controlling interests of $12 million and cash of $25 million. Calculate the simplified equity value and state two assumptions required for the calculation.
  2. A buyer offers a price above a target’s standalone intrinsic value because of expected distribution synergies. Explain why the offer may still be economically rational and identify how the synergy issue should be presented in a valuation report.
  3. A company’s book equity is increasing while its market value is falling. Analyze at least four possible explanations and identify additional evidence an analyst should investigate.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which statement best distinguishes price from value?

A. Price is always based on intrinsic value, whereas value is always historical cost.

B. Price is an observed or negotiated amount, whereas value is an estimate under defined assumptions.

C. Price applies only to private companies, whereas value applies only to public companies.

D. Price and value are identical whenever a transaction occurs.

Correct Answer: B. Price is an observed or negotiated amount, whereas value is an estimate under defined assumptions.

Question 2

Which item is normally deducted when moving from enterprise value to equity value?

A. Operating revenue

B. Cash and non-operating investments

C. Interest-bearing debt

D. Depreciation expense

Correct Answer: C. Interest-bearing debt

Question 3

A company has an enterprise value of $100 million, debt of $30 million and cash of $10 million, with no other adjustments. What is its simplified equity value?

A. $60 million

B. $70 million

C. $80 million

D. $140 million

Correct Answer: C. $80 million

Question 4

Which valuation concept is most directly based on expected future economic benefits and risk?

A. Book value

B. Intrinsic value

C. Historical cost

D. Invoice price

Correct Answer: B. Intrinsic value

Question 5

Under the simplified relationship, net debt equals:

A. Cash minus equity value

B. Debt minus excess cash

C. Debt plus revenue

D. Enterprise value minus EBITDA

Correct Answer: B. Debt minus excess cash

Question 6

Which approach primarily uses prices or multiples from similar public companies?

A. Market approach

B. Asset approach

C. Historical-cost approach

D. Replacement-budget approach

Correct Answer: A. Market approach

Question 7

Why might a strategic buyer pay more than a target’s standalone value?

A. The target’s book value automatically increases after an offer.

B. The buyer may obtain synergies unavailable to a standalone owner.

C. Enterprise value excludes all operating assets.

D. Market value is always lower than book value.

Correct Answer: B. The buyer may obtain synergies unavailable to a standalone owner.

Question 8

Which item should be specified at the beginning of a professional valuation?

A. The desired conclusion only

B. The valuation purpose, date, subject and basis of value

C. The final tax payment only

D. The buyer’s preferred price only

Correct Answer: B. The valuation purpose, date, subject and basis of value

Question 9

If equity value is $93 million and diluted shares equal 10 million, the implied value per share is:

A. $0.93

B. $9.30

C. $10.30

D. $93.00

Correct Answer: B. $9.30

Question 10

Which is an important ethical practice in valuation?

A. Selecting assumptions solely to reach management’s target price

B. Hiding uncertainty to make the report more persuasive

C. Disclosing material assumptions and conflicts of interest

D. Treating all debt-like items as irrelevant

Correct Answer: C. Disclosing material assumptions and conflicts of interest

Corporate Valuation
Chapter 1 of 15