Planning, Scheduling and Resource ManagementIntroductionConstruction and interior fit-out projects are temporary production systems. They transform design information, materials, labour, plant and financial resources into a completed facility within defined requirements of time, cost, quality, safety and performance. Planning determines what must be done and how the work will be organised; scheduling determines when activities will occur; resource management ensures that the required people, materials, equipment and subcontractors are available at the right time and in the right quantity. In interior construction, planning is especially important because work is often undertaken inside an existing building with restricted access, occupied neighbouring spaces, limited storage, complex services and strict handover dates. A delay in one trade may prevent several others from working. For example, incomplete mechanical services can prevent ceiling closure, which can delay painting, lighting installation, testing and final cleaning. A professional site manager therefore treats the programme as a control system rather than merely a graphical timetable. The programme communicates the intended sequence, identifies dependencies, supports procurement and provides a baseline against which actual progress can be measured. Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this chapter, the learner should be able to: - Develop a work breakdown structure (WBS) for an interior construction project.
- Explain logical construction sequences and activity dependencies.
- Prepare and interpret bar charts and network diagrams.
- Calculate early dates, late dates, float and the critical path.
- Develop practical resource plans for labour, materials, plant and subcontractors.
- Establish milestones and suitable progress-monitoring methods.
- Analyse delays, productivity and resource constraints.
- Apply planning principles to a realistic interior fit-out case.
1. The Planning FrameworkConstruction planning operates at several levels: | Level | Typical time horizon | Main purpose | Typical output |
|---|
| Strategic | Project duration | Define delivery strategy and major constraints | Procurement and execution strategy | | Master programme | Months or project duration | Coordinate major packages and milestones | Baseline programme | | Short-term or look-ahead | 2–6 weeks | Make work ready and remove constraints | Look-ahead plan | | Weekly/daily control | Days to one week | Coordinate crews and immediate tasks | Daily allocation and progress record |
A sound planning process normally includes the following sequence: - Clarify the scope, contract requirements and constraints.
- Divide the project into manageable work packages.
- Define activities and their required outputs.
- Establish logical relationships and construction sequence.
- Estimate durations and resource requirements.
- Develop the schedule and identify milestones.
- Check resource feasibility and procurement lead times.
- Approve a baseline programme.
- Monitor actual progress and update forecasts.
- Analyse variance and take corrective action.
Planning is not completed when the initial programme is issued. It continues throughout construction because design information, site conditions, productivity, availability and client decisions may change. 2. Work Breakdown StructuresA work breakdown structure is a hierarchical decomposition of the total project scope into deliverable-oriented elements. It answers the question: “What must be delivered?” It does not, by itself, specify the exact order in which work will occur. A WBS should be: - comprehensive, covering the entire agreed scope;
- mutually exclusive, avoiding double counting;
- sufficiently detailed for estimating, assigning responsibility and measuring progress;
- aligned with the contract, cost plan and procurement packages; and
- structured around verifiable deliverables or work packages.
A typical interior fit-out WBS may contain the following levels: | Level | Example |
|---|
| 1 | Office fit-out project | | 2 | Preliminaries, demolition, partitions, finishes, services, furniture, testing and handover | | 3 | Under partitions: setting out, tracks, studs, insulation, boards, joint treatment | | 4 | Under joint treatment: material approval, delivery, installation and inspection |
The lowest practical level is a work package. A work package should have a defined scope, responsible person, measurable completion condition, estimated duration, resources and cost or budget reference. Excessive detail creates administrative burden; insufficient detail prevents effective control. The correct level is the one at which responsibility and progress can be managed reliably. A useful distinction is between a product breakdown structure and an activity list. “Suspended ceiling” is a deliverable; “install hangers,” “install grid,” “place tiles” and “inspect ceiling” are activities required to produce it. The WBS establishes the scope hierarchy, while the activity list supports scheduling. WBS coding and responsibilityCoding enables information to be connected across drawings, schedules, cost reports and digital management systems. For example, code 04.03.02 might represent “Level 3—Partitions—Joint treatment.” A responsibility assignment matrix can then identify the person or organisation accountable for each package. The WBS should be reviewed against drawings, specifications, schedules of finishes, bills of quantities, client requirements and statutory obligations. Omissions at this stage often become expensive variations or delays later. 3. Construction Sequence and LogicConstruction sequence is governed by physical, technical, contractual and operational logic. Typical interior fit-out logic includes: - access and protection before demolition or delivery;
- surveys and setting out before permanent installation;
- concealed services before closing walls or ceilings;
- wet trades and dusty work before delicate finishes;
- testing and inspection before concealment;
- commissioning before handover; and
- cleaning and defects correction before occupation.
Activities are linked by relationships. The most common relationship is finish-to-start (FS): Activity B cannot start until Activity A finishes. Other relationships are: - Start-to-start (SS): Activity B may start after Activity A starts, possibly with a lag.
- Finish-to-finish (FF): Activity B cannot finish until Activity A finishes.
- Start-to-finish (SF): Activity B cannot finish until Activity A starts; this is uncommon in ordinary fit-out work.
A lag is a deliberate waiting or offset period. For example, painting may start two days after plastering starts in different zones, or adhesive may require a curing period before floor use. Lags should be justified because excessive use can conceal the true logic of the programme. Example of sequence logicConsider a small meeting-room fit-out: | Activity | Description | Duration | Predecessor |
|---|
| A | Site protection and setting out | 2 days | — | | B | First-fix electrical and data | 4 days | A | | C | Metal stud partitions | 3 days | A | | D | Close partitions | 2 days | B and C | | E | Ceiling installation | 3 days | B | | F | Floor finishes | 2 days | D | | G | Second-fix services | 2 days | D and E | | H | Decoration and final clean | 3 days | F and G |
The table shows that B and C can proceed in parallel after A. D requires both services and partitions. H cannot begin until both floor finishes and second-fix services are complete. 4. Estimating Activity Durations and ProductivityDuration estimates should be based on quantities, production rates, crew composition, working hours, access conditions and reasonable allowances for non-productive time. For a task with quantity Q, effective production rate r and crew or resource capacity already represented in that rate, the basic duration estimate is: D = Q ÷ r where D is duration, normally in hours or working days; Q is the quantity of work; and r is the production rate in quantity per unit time. Units must be consistent. If Q is 240 m² and r is 60 m²/day, then D = 4 days. If a standard rate is given per worker-day, an alternative form is: D = Q ÷ (n × p) where n is the number of workers and p is the production per worker per day. This assumes that workers can work productively together and that additional workers do not create congestion or interference. Worked example: estimating durationA partition crew must install 180 m² of plasterboard. The planned crew consists of three installers. Each installer is expected to complete 18 m² per day under the actual site conditions. Daily output = 3 × 18 = 54 m²/day. Duration = 180 ÷ 54 = 3.33 working days. The planner should not automatically schedule 3.33 days. If work is continuous and measurable, the programme may use four working days. The estimate should also be checked for delivery, inspection, access, cutting, waste, interruptions and interface work. Productivity is affected by skill, supervision, congestion, rework, material availability, design changes, weather, access, safety controls and working-hour restrictions. Published productivity data are starting points, not guarantees. Site records should be used to establish project-specific performance. 5. Bar Charts and MilestonesA bar chart, or Gantt chart, represents activities as horizontal bars against a time scale. It is simple to read and effective for communicating planned start and finish dates, overlapping activities, milestones and current status. A milestone is a significant event with zero or negligible duration, such as: - possession of the site;
- approval of shop drawings;
- completion of demolition;
- delivery of long-lead equipment;
- completion of first fix;
- practical completion; or
- client handover.
Milestones should be objectively verifiable. “Project progressing well” is not a useful milestone; “all life-safety system tests passed” is measurable. Bar charts are useful for site communication but have limitations. They may not clearly show complex dependencies, available float or the effect of a delay on the completion date. A schedule should therefore be supported by a logic network or equivalent digital model. Baseline and update barsA professional bar chart may display: - baseline dates;
- actual start and finish dates;
- forecast dates;
- percentage or quantity complete; and
- identified constraints.
The baseline must be preserved. If the original programme is overwritten during every update, it becomes difficult to demonstrate what was planned and to analyse delay fairly. 6. Network Scheduling and the Critical Path MethodA network diagram represents activities and logical relationships. The critical path method (CPM) calculates the earliest and latest permissible dates of activities and identifies the sequence controlling project completion. For clarity, this section uses an activity-on-node convention in which each activity is represented by a node and arrows show logical relationships. Assume a conventional finish-to-start network, no negative durations and a project start time of zero. Forward passFor an activity with duration di, early start ESi and early finish EFi: EFi = ESi + di For an activity with predecessors, its early start is the largest early finish among its immediate predecessors: ESi = max(EFj) where j represents each immediate predecessor. For an activity with no predecessor, ESi is normally zero. Backward passLet LFi be late finish and LSi be late start. The late start is: LSi = LFi − di For an activity with successors, its late finish is the smallest late start among its immediate successors: LFi = min(LSk) where k represents each immediate successor. For final activities, late finish is set to the planned project duration unless a different contractual constraint applies. Total float is: TFi = LSi − ESi = LFi − EFi An activity with zero total float lies on a critical path under the stated network assumptions. In practice, more than one critical path may exist, and the critical path can change as progress and logic change. Worked CPM exampleUse the eight activities listed earlier. The forward-pass results are: | Activity | Duration | Predecessor(s) | ES | EF |
|---|
| A | 2 | — | 0 | 2 | | B | 4 | A | 2 | 6 | | C | 3 | A | 2 | 5 | | D | 2 | B, C | 6 | 8 | | E | 3 | B | 6 | 9 | | F | 2 | D | 8 | 10 | | G | 2 | D, E | 9 | 11 | | H | 3 | F, G | 11 | 14 |
The planned duration is 14 working days. Working backwards from day 14 gives: | Activity | LS | LF | Total float |
|---|
| A | 0 | 2 | 0 | | B | 2 | 6 | 0 | | C | 3 | 6 | 1 | | D | 6 | 8 | 0 | | E | 6 | 9 | 0 | | F | 9 | 11 | 1 | | G | 9 | 11 | 0 | | H | 11 | 14 | 0 |
The critical path is A–B–D–G–H, with duration 14 working days. Activities C and F each have one day of total float. This does not mean that their delay is harmless: using their float may reduce flexibility and may affect resources or other work. Limitations of CPMCPM often assumes that durations are sufficiently predictable, relationships are correctly modelled and resources are available when required. These assumptions may not hold. A logically non-critical activity can become critical when its assigned crew is unavailable. Resource constraints can therefore produce a resource-critical path different from the purely logical critical path. 7. Resource ManagementResource management coordinates four major resource categories: - Labour: direct workers, supervisors, specialists and support staff.
- Materials: permanent materials, consumables, samples and temporary protection.
- Plant and equipment: tools, access equipment, lifting equipment and temporary services.
- Subcontractors and suppliers: specialist organisations responsible for defined packages.
The resource plan should connect each resource to a scheduled activity, quantity, required date, responsible party and control method. Labour planningLabour planning considers crew size, competence, working hours, supervision, welfare, access and safe systems of work. Increasing crew size does not always reduce duration proportionally. Crowding, limited work fronts and trade interference may reduce productivity. A site manager should plan work fronts rather than simply maximise headcount. A labour histogram displays the number of workers or labour-hours required over time. Peaks may indicate congestion, welfare pressure, access problems or excessive cost. Valleys may indicate under-utilisation or a procurement delay. Smoothing labour demand can improve productivity, but it must not compromise contractual milestones. Materials planningMaterials should be planned using a procurement schedule linked to the programme. Important fields include specification, approved source, submittal date, approval date, order date, fabrication period, delivery date, inspection status, storage requirement and installation date. For a simple stock-control situation, reorder point can be expressed as: ROP = d × L + SS where ROP is reorder point in units, d is average demand per time unit, L is supplier lead time in the same time unit, and SS is safety stock. This formula assumes demand and lead time are reasonably represented by the selected averages. Where demand is highly variable, a more formal probabilistic inventory model is required. In construction, material planning must also account for minimum order quantities, colour batches, wastage, damage, storage conditions and inspection. Long-lead items such as specialist lighting, stone, ironmongery, acoustic products and custom furniture should be identified during pre-construction. Plant and equipmentPlant selection should consider capacity, access, power, operating space, maintenance, operator competence, inspection and removal. Examples in interior work include mobile towers, scissor lifts, material hoists, vacuum lifters, cutting equipment and temporary extraction. Equipment schedules should identify booking periods and prevent double allocation. The cheapest equipment is not necessarily the most economical if it causes slow production, unsafe handling or frequent breakdowns. Subcontractor coordinationSubcontractors should be selected and coordinated according to competence, capacity, technical scope, programme commitment, safety performance and quality systems. Their programmes should be integrated into the master schedule rather than treated as separate documents. Interfaces require particular attention. For example, an electrical subcontractor may depend on partition layouts, ceiling coordination and approved fixture schedules. A subcontractor’s completion should be defined by an inspectable condition, including records, test certificates and removal of temporary works where applicable. 8. Resource Levelling and Work ReadinessResource levelling adjusts activity dates to avoid exceeding available resources. It may extend the project duration if no additional resources are available. Resource smoothing adjusts non-critical activities within their available float while attempting to preserve the completion date. These approaches should not be confused with simply delaying work. A controlled adjustment requires an updated logic network, revised resource profile and assessment of milestone effects. The look-ahead plan is a practical bridge between the master programme and site execution. Each activity should be checked for constraints such as: - approved drawings and specifications;
- access and work-front availability;
- preceding work complete;
- materials delivered and inspected;
- labour and plant available;
- permits and risk controls in place; and
- required inspections arranged.
An activity that is shown on the programme but is not ready to proceed is not a reliable promise. Constraint removal is therefore a central responsibility of the site management team. 9. Progress Measurement and ControlProgress should be measured using objective evidence. Suitable methods include installed quantities, completed areas, approved deliverables, inspection records, tested systems and milestone achievement. Percentage estimates based only on visual impressions are unreliable. A simple schedule variance can be expressed as: SV = EV − PV where EV is earned value, representing the budgeted value of work actually completed, and PV is planned value, representing the budgeted value of work scheduled by the status date. Both values must use the same approved budget basis. A positive SV indicates more budgeted work has been completed than planned; a negative value indicates less. The schedule performance index is: SPI = EV ÷ PV When PV is greater than zero, SPI above 1 indicates progress ahead of the planned value and below 1 indicates progress behind it. Earned-value indicators should not replace critical-path analysis because they may conceal delay to a key milestone when substantial non-critical work has been completed. Daily records should include labour numbers, weather where relevant, deliveries, plant, work completed, instructions, inspections, disruptions, safety events and photographs. Good records support management decisions and provide evidence for delay and variation assessment. 10. Delay AnalysisDelay is a failure to complete an activity or milestone by the planned or contractually required time. Delay analysis should distinguish cause, effect, responsibility, entitlement and mitigation. Common causes include: - late or incomplete design information;
- client variations;
- late approvals;
- unavailable work fronts;
- material or manufacturing delays;
- poor productivity;
- subcontractor failure;
- unforeseen site conditions;
- access restrictions; and
- exceptional external events.
A basic investigation should establish the planned logic, actual event, affected activities, critical-path status, available float, mitigation attempted and resulting completion effect. A delay to a non-critical activity may have no immediate completion impact if float remains. Conversely, a short delay to a critical activity may delay handover. Delay categories used in contract administration vary by jurisdiction and contract form. They may include excusable or non-excusable delay, compensable or non-compensable delay, and concurrent delay. The precise legal meaning depends on the contract and governing law; site managers should preserve records and refer contractual interpretation to the authorised commercial or legal team. 11. Safety, Ethics and GovernanceTime pressure must never justify unsafe work, inadequate inspection or concealment of defective work. Planning should include safe access, sequencing of hazardous operations, emergency routes, permits, lifting plans, temporary works and coordination of simultaneous activities. Ethical planning requires honest reporting. A programme should not be manipulated to create a misleading appearance of progress, hide a missed milestone or shift responsibility without evidence. Forecast dates should be distinguished from contractual dates and from optimistic targets. Governance also includes approval controls, document revision management, procurement transparency, segregation of duties and protection of commercially sensitive information. Digital systems should maintain an audit trail of changes to dates, logic, quantities and responsibility. 12. Digital Tools and Artificial IntelligenceScheduling software can calculate network dates, display resource histograms, link documents and compare baseline with actual progress. Building information modelling (BIM) can connect three-dimensional elements with time and cost information, creating 4D and 5D management capabilities. These tools improve coordination only when the underlying scope, logic and data are reliable. Artificial intelligence may assist with progress recognition from photographs, forecasting likely delay, identifying unusual productivity patterns, searching project records and suggesting resource allocations. However, AI outputs require human verification. Risks include inaccurate data, biased historical assumptions, unclear accountability, confidentiality breaches and false confidence in automated forecasts. The project team remains responsible for safety, contractual decisions and the accuracy of issued information. 13. Illustrative Case: Retail Interior Fit-OutBackgroundA contractor is appointed to fit out a 1,200 m² retail unit in an operating shopping centre. The contract requires handover in 12 weeks. Work includes demolition, partitions, mechanical and electrical services, ceilings, floor and wall finishes, display fixtures, testing and cleaning. Access is restricted to night deliveries, and the centre requires noisy work to stop during trading hours. ProblemThe initial programme shows all trades proceeding continuously, but it does not include approval periods for shopfront details, long-lead lighting and specialist display units. The labour histogram also shows a large peak during the final two weeks. The site manager anticipates congestion and a possible handover delay. AnalysisThe team develops a WBS and identifies three controlling interfaces: approval of the lighting package, completion of concealed services before ceiling closure, and delivery of display fixtures before final floor protection is removed. A network review shows that display fixtures lie on the critical path. The procurement review reveals a six-week manufacturing lead time, while approval is expected to take two weeks. The team also calculates that the planned final-week workforce would exceed the available work space. Simply adding workers would create interference and reduce productivity. Approach and solutionThe contractor takes the following actions: - Submits coordinated lighting and display drawings at the start of the project.
- Creates a procurement milestone for client approval and a separate milestone for factory release.
- Divides the retail unit into three zones so that services, ceilings and finishes can proceed sequentially rather than compete for one work front.
- Uses a look-ahead plan with constraint reviews twice each week.
- Re-sequences decoration and floor protection so that completed zones can receive display fixtures earlier.
- Books lifting equipment for night deliveries and assigns a logistics supervisor.
- Retains the original baseline and records approved changes separately.
OutcomeThe revised programme preserves the contractual handover date without increasing total labour substantially. The peak workforce is reduced by moving display installation into completed zones. Progress is measured by completed zones, tested services and approved inspection records rather than by estimated percentages. Learning pointsThe case demonstrates that a useful programme must integrate scope, sequence, procurement, access, resources and evidence of completion. Critical-path analysis alone would not have solved the problem; the project also required resource planning, zone-based production, early approvals and disciplined information management. 14. Best-Practice ChecklistBefore issuing a programme, confirm that: - the WBS covers the full scope;
- every major activity has a clear output and responsible party;
- logic reflects actual construction methods;
- durations are based on quantities and realistic productivity;
- procurement and approval activities are included;
- milestones are measurable;
- calendars reflect site working restrictions;
- labour, materials, plant and subcontractors are available;
- safety and inspection activities are planned;
- the critical path has been reviewed;
- assumptions and exclusions are recorded; and
- the baseline is approved and protected from uncontrolled editing.
During construction, update actual starts, finishes, quantities, constraints, forecasts and decisions. Investigate variance early. A programme is valuable when it enables action, not merely when it presents attractive graphics. Chapter SummaryPlanning converts project scope into an organised delivery strategy. The work breakdown structure decomposes the project into manageable deliverables and work packages. Activity lists and logical relationships then translate those deliverables into a construction sequence. Bar charts communicate timing clearly, while network schedules reveal dependencies, float and the critical path. The critical path is calculated through forward and backward passes, but it should be interpreted with awareness of resource constraints and changing site conditions. Duration estimates depend on quantities, production rates, crew capacity and actual working conditions. Resource management coordinates labour, materials, plant and subcontractors. Procurement schedules, labour histograms, look-ahead plans and constraint registers make the programme executable. Progress must be measured using objective evidence, and delays should be analysed according to cause, effect, responsibility, float and critical-path impact. Effective site management combines technical scheduling with communication, ethical reporting, safety governance, procurement control and informed use of digital tools. The programme is a living management instrument: it must be updated, tested against reality and used to remove constraints before they become delays. Key TermsWork breakdown structure: Hierarchical decomposition of total project scope into manageable deliverables and work packages. Work package: A controllable portion of work with defined scope, responsibility, resources and completion criteria. Activity: A scheduled operation that consumes time and resources. Milestone: A significant, objectively verifiable event with little or no duration. Dependency: A logical relationship between activities. Finish-to-start: Relationship in which a successor starts after its predecessor finishes. Lag: Deliberate time offset between linked activities. Bar chart: Time-scaled chart showing activities as horizontal bars. Network diagram: Graphical representation of activities and their logical relationships. Critical path: Longest controlling sequence of activities determining calculated project duration. Early start: Earliest time an activity can begin based on predecessor logic. Late finish: Latest time an activity can finish without extending the planned completion date. Total float: Permissible delay before an activity affects the planned completion date. Resource levelling: Adjusting activity timing to remain within resource availability. Resource smoothing: Adjusting activities within float to reduce resource fluctuations while preserving completion. Productivity: Output achieved per unit of resource and time. Look-ahead plan: Short-term programme used to make upcoming work ready. Baseline programme: Approved reference schedule used for comparison with actual performance. Earned value: Budgeted value of work actually completed. Concurrent delay: Overlapping delays arising from different causes during the same period. Review Questions5 Short Answer Questions- What is the purpose of a work breakdown structure?
- Distinguish between a milestone and an activity.
- What does total float represent?
- Identify four resources that must be coordinated on a construction project.
- Why should a baseline programme be preserved during updates?
5 Long Answer Questions- Explain how a WBS, activity list and network schedule are related.
- Describe the forward-pass and backward-pass procedures used in CPM.
- Discuss the principal factors affecting productivity in interior fit-out work.
- Explain how procurement planning can prevent delay to long-lead materials.
- Evaluate the strengths and limitations of bar charts and network schedules.
3 Analytical / Application Questions- A ceiling package requires 360 m² of installation. A four-person crew produces 20 m² per worker per day. Calculate the basic duration and explain why the scheduled duration may differ from the result.
- Using the meeting-room activities in this chapter, explain the likely effect of a two-day delay to Activity C and a two-day delay to Activity B.
- Prepare a short resource-management strategy for a fit-out project with restricted delivery hours, three specialist subcontractors and a fixed handover date. Identify at least five constraints and explain how they would be controlled.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which statement best describes a work breakdown structure? A. A hierarchy that decomposes the total project scope into manageable deliverables B. A list of only the project’s labour requirements C. A chart showing actual daily productivity D. A legal agreement with subcontractors Correct Answer: A. A hierarchy that decomposes the total project scope into manageable deliverables Question 2In a finish-to-start relationship, when can the successor normally begin? A. When the predecessor begins B. When the predecessor finishes C. When the project reaches practical completion D. Only after all project activities finish Correct Answer: B. When the predecessor finishes Question 3A task has a quantity of 240 m² and a production rate of 60 m² per day. What is its basic duration? A. 2 days B. 3 days C. 4 days D. 6 days Correct Answer: C. 4 days Question 4Which formula represents total float? A. TF = ES + EF B. TF = LS − ES C. TF = LF + EF D. TF = d ÷ Q Correct Answer: B. TF = LS − ES Question 5In the worked CPM example, which sequence is the critical path? A. A–C–D–F–H B. A–B–D–G–H C. A–B–E–G–H D. A–C–E–F–H Correct Answer: B. A–B–D–G–H Question 6What is the main purpose of a look-ahead plan? A. To replace the contract documents B. To make upcoming work ready by removing constraints C. To calculate annual company profit D. To record only completed defects Correct Answer: B. To make upcoming work ready by removing constraints Question 7Which item is most appropriately treated as a measurable milestone? A. Project progressing well B. Workers are satisfied C. All life-safety system tests passed D. The site looks busy Correct Answer: C. All life-safety system tests passed Question 8If earned value is 80 and planned value is 100, what is the schedule performance index? A. 0.80 B. 1.25 C. 20 D. 180 Correct Answer: A. 0.80 Question 9What is resource levelling intended to address? A. Exceeding available resource capacity B. Changing the project brief without approval C. Removing all project milestones D. Increasing every activity duration equally Correct Answer: A. Exceeding available resource capacity Question 10Why should AI-generated schedule forecasts be reviewed by competent project personnel? A. AI cannot display dates B. Automated outputs may reflect inaccurate data or assumptions C. AI is legally responsible for construction safety D. AI always produces longer programmes Correct Answer: B. Automated outputs may reflect inaccurate data or assumptions
|