CNC Technology & Additive Manufacturing

Chapter 9
Additive Manufacturing Principles and Process Classification

Bachelors Program in Mechnical Engineering
CNC Technology & Additive Manufacturing   •   Bachelor

Additive Manufacturing Principles and Process Classification

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) is the production of physical parts by joining material layer by layer from a digital model. Unlike subtractive manufacturing, which removes material from a billet, or forming, which plastically deforms material, AM creates geometry selectively and progressively. This principle enables complex internal channels, lattice structures, customized products, rapid design iteration, and part consolidation.

AM is not simply “three-dimensional printing.” It is a manufacturing system involving product design, digital model preparation, process planning, material deposition or consolidation, post-processing, inspection, and qualification. The final part is influenced by the digital model, machine parameters, material condition, thermal history, environmental control, and post-processing route.

The ISO/ASTM 52900 family classifies AM processes according to the physical mechanism by which material is joined or formed. The seven principal categories are material extrusion, vat photopolymerization, powder bed fusion, binder jetting, directed energy deposition, material jetting, and sheet lamination.

Learning Objectives

After studying this chapter, the student should be able to:

  1. Explain the layer-based manufacturing principle and distinguish AM from conventional processes.
  2. Describe the preparation of a digital model for AM production.
  3. Classify AM processes using the ISO/ASTM categories.
  4. Explain the operating principles, materials, advantages, and limitations of the seven categories.
  5. Relate process selection to geometry, material, accuracy, productivity, cost, and application requirements.
  6. Identify important sources of defects, anisotropy, environmental impact, and safety risk.

1. The Layer-Based Manufacturing Principle

A typical AM workflow begins with a three-dimensional computer-aided design (CAD) model. The model is converted into a representation suitable for manufacturing, commonly a triangulated mesh such as an STL file or a more modern format such as 3MF. Software then divides the model into two-dimensional cross-sections. Each cross-section defines the material that must be deposited, cured, bonded, or consolidated at a particular height.

The machine builds one layer, changes the build position by a prescribed layer thickness, and builds the next layer. Repetition produces the complete part. The layer thickness is usually represented by t, where t has units of millimetres or micrometres. If a vertical feature has height H and all layers have equal thickness, the nominal number of layers is:

N = ⌈H/t⌉

Here, N is the number of layers, H is the build height, and t is the layer thickness. The ceiling symbol means that a partial final layer is counted as a complete layer. This relation is an ideal geometric estimate; actual build time also includes recoating, platform movement, heating, cooling, scanning, cleaning, and post-processing.

The layer concept introduces a characteristic direction called the build direction, usually designated z. Properties in the x–y plane may differ from properties in the z direction because each layer must bond to the preceding layer. This directional dependence is called anisotropy. It can arise from incomplete fusion, insufficient polymer interdiffusion, thermal gradients, porosity, or differences in cooling history.

Layer-based additive manufacturing workflow CAD model3D geometry Slicing2D sections Layer buildingdeposit / cure / fuse Finished partpost-process and inspect Digital thread from design to physical component
Layer-based additive manufacturing workflow
Figure: Layer-based additive manufacturing workflow

Figure: The principal stages of a layer-based additive manufacturing workflow.

1.1 Geometric consequences of layering

Layering can produce stair-step surfaces on inclined or curved faces. The effect becomes more pronounced as layer thickness increases or as the surface angle becomes shallow relative to the build plane. Orientation therefore affects surface finish, dimensional accuracy, support requirements, mechanical properties, and build time.

A successful design must also account for minimum wall thickness, unsupported overhangs, trapped powder or resin, drainage openings, thermal distortion, and removal of support structures. Design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) is consequently more than transferring a conventional CAD model to a printer; it is the redesign of a product around the capabilities and constraints of the selected process.

2. Digital Model Preparation

2.1 Geometry and file representation

The CAD model should be watertight, meaning that surfaces form a closed solid with consistent normals and no gaps, self-intersections, or duplicate faces. A defective mesh can cause missing regions, inverted volumes, or unexpected tool paths. Tessellation converts curved surfaces into triangular facets. Excessively coarse tessellation causes visible geometric error, whereas excessively fine tessellation increases file size without necessarily improving machine accuracy.

The 3MF format can store geometry, units, multiple materials, colors, and manufacturing information more reliably than the older STL format. Regardless of format, the designer should verify scale, units, orientation, tolerances, and the relationship between separate bodies.

2.2 Slicing and process planning

Slicing software intersects the model with parallel planes and generates layer contours. It may also create infill, support structures, scan paths, exposure patterns, build orientation, and process parameters. Important parameters include layer thickness, hatch spacing, extrusion width, laser or electron-beam power, scan speed, nozzle temperature, chamber temperature, binder saturation, exposure time, and cooling conditions. These parameters are not interchangeable between process categories.

The volume of a simple prismatic region can be estimated as:

V ≈ A × H

where V is volume, A is the constant cross-sectional area, and H is height. For a sliced model, a more general estimate is:

V ≈ ∑ᵢ Aᵢ tᵢ

where Aᵢ is the cross-sectional area of layer i and tᵢ is its thickness. The approximation assumes that the layer areas adequately represent the geometry and that overlaps or gaps between layers are negligible.

2.3 Supports and orientation

Supports may carry overhangs, anchor a part to a build plate, conduct heat, or prevent movement. Their disadvantages include material consumption, removal time, surface damage, and restricted access. Orientation is therefore a multi-objective decision. A practical orientation may minimize support volume while keeping critical surfaces accurate and placing major loads in favorable directions.

2.4 Digital traceability

A professional workflow records the CAD revision, machine identification, material batch, parameter set, operator, environmental conditions, build orientation, and inspection results. This digital thread is important for aerospace, medical, automotive, and safety-critical products. It also supports root-cause analysis when a build fails.

3. ISO/ASTM Additive Manufacturing Process Categories

The categories describe the dominant method of material joining. A machine may use several physical mechanisms in one production sequence, but classification is based on the principal process.

CategoryBasic mechanismCommon materialsTypical strengthsImportant limitations
Material extrusionMaterial is forced through a nozzle or orificeThermoplastics, composites, some pastes and metalsLow cost, accessible, broad prototyping useLayer bonding, resolution, support removal
Vat photopolymerizationLiquid photopolymer is selectively cured by lightPhotopolymer resins, ceramics in suspensionsFine detail, smooth surfacesLimited material durability, resin handling, post-curing
Powder bed fusionThermal energy selectively fuses powderPolymer, metal, ceramic powdersComplex parts, no conventional support for many geometriesPowder handling, residual stress, roughness, energy use
Binder jettingBinder selectively joins particlesMetals, sand, ceramics, polymersHigh throughput, large parts, no thermal distortion during printingShrinkage, debinding, lower green strength
Directed energy depositionFeedstock and energy are delivered to a melt poolMetal wire or powderRepair, large parts, composition changesLower resolution, surface finish, heat management
Material jettingDroplets are selectively deposited and solidifiedPhotopolymers, waxes, some biological materialsFine detail, multiple materialsLimited material range, support and durability issues
Sheet laminationSheets are bonded and cut into layersPaper, polymer, metal foilRapid layered construction, low thermal input in some variantsBond quality, waste, internal access and anisotropy

4. Material Extrusion

In material extrusion, a filament, pellet, paste, or similar feedstock is conveyed through a heated or otherwise controlled nozzle. The material is deposited along programmed paths and solidifies by cooling, drying, chemical reaction, or another mechanism. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) and fused deposition modeling (FDM) are common thermoplastic examples.

Thermoplastic extrusion requires the deposited material to remain sufficiently mobile for bonding and then cool to retain shape. Interlayer strength depends on contact area, temperature, time above the bonding temperature, polymer diffusion, cooling rate, and contamination. Fibres such as glass or carbon may increase stiffness and strength, but can reduce ductility and complicate flow.

Advantages include low equipment cost, easy material switching, and suitability for fixtures, prototypes, educational models, and some end-use parts. Limitations include visible layers, nozzle-related resolution limits, warpage, voids, and anisotropic strength. Large-format extrusion can manufacture tooling and architectural components, while paste extrusion can process ceramics, concrete, food materials, or biological gels.

5. Vat Photopolymerization

Vat photopolymerization selectively cures liquid resin in a vat using ultraviolet or visible light. In stereolithography (SLA), a laser or focused optical system traces the layer. In digital light processing (DLP) and related projection systems, an image may cure an entire layer or a large region simultaneously.

The liquid resin contains reactive monomers or oligomers and photoinitiators. Light initiates polymerization, converting selected liquid regions into a solid. The part is usually washed and post-cured to reach the required conversion and mechanical properties. Supports are commonly needed because the part is formed in a liquid and may be attached to a build platform.

Vat photopolymerization offers excellent detail and surface quality, making it useful for dental models, investment-casting patterns, visual prototypes, and microfeatures. However, resins may be brittle, sensitive to ultraviolet exposure, or unsuitable for elevated temperatures. Uncured resin requires controlled handling, and post-cure conditions influence dimensional change and final properties.

6. Powder Bed Fusion

Powder bed fusion (PBF) spreads a layer of powder and selectively fuses regions using thermal energy. Selective laser melting or laser powder bed fusion is widely used for metals. Polymer powder processes commonly use laser energy or thermal control to fuse selected regions. Electron-beam powder bed fusion uses an electron beam in a vacuum or controlled environment.

The energy must produce adequate bonding without excessive evaporation, balling, lack of fusion, or distortion. A simplified energy-density indicator sometimes used for process comparison is:

Eᵥ = P/(v h t)

where Eᵥ is a volumetric energy-density indicator in J/mm³, P is power in watts, v is scan speed in mm/s, h is hatch spacing in mm, and t is layer thickness in mm. This expression is only an approximate comparative metric. It does not fully describe absorptivity, beam diameter, thermal conduction, scan strategy, powder packing, preheating, or material properties; equal Eᵥ values do not guarantee equal part quality.

PBF can manufacture internal channels and intricate lattice structures with little conventional support because surrounding powder supports many features. Nevertheless, heat input creates residual stresses and distortion, particularly in metal parts. Parts may require stress relief, removal from the build plate, machining, hot isostatic pressing, heat treatment, or surface finishing. Powder recovery, explosion risks, contamination control, and operator exposure must be managed.

7. Binder Jetting

Binder jetting deposits a liquid binder selectively onto a powder bed. The binder joins particles into a fragile “green” part. Subsequent curing, depowdering, debinding, and sintering produce the final component. Since the printing stage does not melt the principal material, thermal distortion during layer formation can be lower than in fusion processes.

Binder jetting can process metals, ceramics, sand, and other particulate materials. It is attractive for batch production and large components because the printhead can cover broad areas rapidly. The central technical challenge is dimensional change during drying and sintering. Shrinkage may be approximately isotropic or direction-dependent depending on packing, geometry, binder distribution, and furnace conditions. Dimensional compensation must therefore be established experimentally for the material and process.

Green strength, powder spreading, binder saturation, trapped powder, sintering atmosphere, and furnace uniformity are important quality factors. The process is particularly useful for sand moulds and cores, metal components with suitable sintering routes, and ceramic shapes.

8. Directed Energy Deposition

Directed energy deposition (DED) feeds metal wire or powder into a localized energy source, often a laser, electron beam, or electric arc. Material melts and solidifies in a melt pool that moves relative to the workpiece. Deposition may occur on a substrate, on an existing component, or on a previously deposited region.

DED is well suited to repair, feature addition, large metal structures, and graded or multi-material deposition. Wire-fed systems generally offer high deposition efficiency and clean handling, while powder-fed systems can provide more flexible material delivery and finer deposition control. Arc-based systems can deposit large volumes economically but typically have lower accuracy and greater heat input than laser-based systems.

DED parts commonly require machining because the as-deposited surface is relatively rough and dimensional accuracy is limited by bead geometry. Thermal gradients can cause residual stress, distortion, porosity, dilution with the substrate, and changes in microstructure. Real-time sensing of melt-pool temperature, geometry, and acoustic or optical signals is increasingly used for process monitoring.

9. Material Jetting

Material jetting deposits small droplets of build material through printheads. Droplets are placed selectively and solidified, commonly by ultraviolet curing in photopolymer systems. Multiple printheads may deposit different materials, colors, or support materials in one build.

The process provides fine resolution and smooth surfaces and is useful for visual prototypes, anatomical models, product design, and investment-casting patterns. Its disadvantages include a relatively restricted material portfolio, possible brittleness or aging of photopolymers, nozzle reliability issues, and the need to remove support material. Droplet placement, viscosity, surface tension, wetting, and curing must be controlled to maintain accuracy.

10. Sheet Lamination

Sheet lamination builds parts from layers of sheet material. Sheets may be bonded with adhesive, heat, pressure, or ultrasonic energy and then cut to the required contour. Laminated object manufacturing uses adhesive-bonded sheets and cutting operations. Ultrasonic additive manufacturing uses ultrasonic welding to join metal foils, often followed by machining.

The category can be relatively fast and may impose limited bulk thermal exposure. It can also support embedded components in selected processes. Limitations include interlayer bond quality, anisotropic properties, sheet handling, edge waste, and difficulty producing enclosed internal regions that cannot be accessed during lamination. Metal foil processes may permit dissimilar-material joining but require careful control of surface preparation and ultrasonic energy.

11. Selecting an AM Process

Process selection should begin with functional requirements rather than machine availability. Key questions include:

  • What material family and mechanical properties are required?
  • Is the part a prototype, tooling component, repair, or certified end-use product?
  • What accuracy, surface finish, and dimensional stability are needed?
  • Does the geometry contain overhangs, enclosed voids, channels, or lattices?
  • What build volume, production rate, and cost are acceptable?
  • Can the required post-processing and inspection be performed?
  • What safety, environmental, and regulatory controls apply?

A polymer prototype requiring high visual quality may favor material jetting or vat photopolymerization. A complex metal aerospace bracket may favor metal PBF, followed by heat treatment and machining. A damaged high-value turbine feature may favor DED because material is added only where repair is needed. A large sand mould may favor binder jetting.

No category is universally superior. A process with excellent accuracy may have expensive materials or limited durability; a high-throughput process may require substantial sintering control; a low-cost process may produce anisotropic parts requiring careful orientation and testing.

12. Defects, Quality, and Inspection

Common AM defects include porosity, lack of fusion, incomplete curing, delamination, warpage, cracking, dimensional error, surface roughness, contamination, and support-removal damage. Their causes may be geometric, material-related, thermal, optical, mechanical, or software-related.

Quality assurance commonly combines:

  1. Input control: verify powder size distribution, moisture, resin condition, filament diameter, and material certification.
  2. Process monitoring: record temperature, chamber conditions, power, speed, layer images, melt-pool signals, or extrusion behavior.
  3. In-process control: detect deviations and, where possible, correct them during the build.
  4. Post-process inspection: use dimensional measurement, visual inspection, microscopy, density measurement, coordinate measurement, computed tomography, or mechanical testing.
  5. Documentation: preserve build files, parameter sets, material batches, and inspection records.

Qualification is application-specific. A prototype may require dimensional and visual inspection, while a flight-critical component may require validated procedures, traceable materials, nondestructive testing, statistical process control, and formal regulatory approval.

13. Applied Case: Illustrative Lightweight Cooling Bracket

Background

A manufacturer needs a small aluminium bracket supporting a cooling line inside an industrial machine. The conventional machined bracket requires several operations and contains excess material. The design team proposes a topology-optimized form with an internal cable passage.

Problem

The bracket must carry a static load of 1.5 kN, fit within a 120 mm × 80 mm × 60 mm envelope, and provide a machined mounting face. The internal passage cannot be produced easily by conventional milling.

Analysis

A metal PBF process is considered because it can produce the internal passage and complex external form. The design team orients the mounting face upward and tilts the part to reduce unsupported regions. Critical holes are undersized in the printed model so that they can be finish-machined. Support structures are placed on nonfunctional surfaces and connected to the build plate.

Approach and solution

The CAD model is checked for watertightness, exported in a suitable format, sliced, and assigned a qualified aluminium parameter set. The build is performed under controlled atmosphere. After printing, the bracket is stress-relieved, removed from the plate, depowdered, and machined at the mounting interfaces. Computed tomography checks the internal passage, while coordinate measurement verifies external dimensions.

Outcome

The redesigned bracket uses less material and consolidates several conventional features into one component. However, the AM route is justified only because the internal passage and reduced assembly effort provide value greater than the costs of powder handling, support removal, post-processing, and qualification.

Learning points

The case illustrates that AM benefits arise from design freedom and functional integration, not merely from replacing a machining operation. It also shows why process selection, orientation, inspection, and post-processing must be considered during design.

14. Safety, Sustainability, and Emerging Developments

AM safety risks include hot surfaces, moving mechanisms, ultraviolet radiation, lasers or electron beams, combustible powders, respirable particles, solvents, uncured resins, fumes, and compressed gases. Risk assessments, guarding, ventilation, personal protective equipment, grounding, powder housekeeping, and documented operating procedures are essential.

Environmental performance depends on material efficiency, electricity source, machine utilization, powder or resin waste, support structures, post-processing, transport, and product lifetime. AM can reduce waste and enable lightweight products, but a low buy-to-fly ratio alone does not guarantee lower environmental impact.

Contemporary developments include automated build monitoring, hybrid additive-subtractive machines, metal- and polymer-based multi-material deposition, recycled feedstocks, large-scale construction printing, biofabrication, and AI-assisted parameter optimization. AI can identify patterns in process-monitoring data or propose process parameters, but its recommendations require physical validation, traceability, and awareness of data bias. It should support—not replace—engineering judgment and qualified procedures.

Best-Practice Design and Process Checklist

  • Define functional, material, dimensional, and inspection requirements before selecting the process.
  • Use a validated material and parameter set whenever performance matters.
  • Check CAD geometry, units, scale, mesh closure, and tolerances.
  • Evaluate orientation, supports, thermal distortion, and post-processing access.
  • Distinguish nominal machine resolution from achieved part accuracy.
  • Design critical surfaces and holes for appropriate finishing operations.
  • Record the complete digital and physical process history.
  • Validate parts under the loads, temperatures, environments, and failure modes expected in service.
  • Treat powder, resin, radiation, heat, and emissions as industrial safety hazards.

Chapter Summary

Additive manufacturing creates parts by selectively joining material in successive layers from a digital model. The process chain includes CAD preparation, mesh verification, slicing, orientation, support generation, layer building, post-processing, and inspection. Layering enables complex geometry but can produce stair-stepping, residual stress, and anisotropic properties.

The ISO/ASTM framework identifies seven major categories: material extrusion, vat photopolymerization, powder bed fusion, binder jetting, directed energy deposition, material jetting, and sheet lamination. Each category differs in feedstock, joining mechanism, accuracy, material range, productivity, defects, and post-processing requirements. Process selection must consider geometry, materials, performance, cost, safety, qualification, and sustainability.

AM is most powerful when products are redesigned for the process. Successful engineering practice combines DfAM, validated parameters, digital traceability, inspection, and responsible management of safety and environmental risks.

Key Terms

Additive manufacturing: Manufacturing by joining material layer by layer from digital data.

Build direction: The direction in which layers are accumulated.

CAD model: A computer-based geometric representation of a product.

DfAM: Design for additive manufacturing; design methods that exploit AM capabilities and address its constraints.

Layer thickness: Vertical height assigned to one manufactured layer.

Slicing: Converting a three-dimensional model into two-dimensional layer data.

Support structure: Temporary material used to support, anchor, or thermally manage a part.

Anisotropy: Direction-dependent variation in material or mechanical properties.

Material extrusion: AM in which material is forced through an orifice and deposited.

Vat photopolymerization: Selective curing of liquid photopolymer in a vat.

Powder bed fusion: Selective thermal fusion of regions in a powder bed.

Binder jetting: Selective deposition of binder into a powder bed.

Directed energy deposition: Feeding material into a localized energy source to form a deposit.

Material jetting: Selective deposition of droplets of build material.

Sheet lamination: Joining and shaping sheets to form a three-dimensional object.

Green part: A fragile, incompletely densified part before final sintering or curing.

Residual stress: Locked-in stress produced by nonuniform thermal or mechanical history.

Post-processing: Operations performed after building, such as curing, sintering, machining, or heat treatment.

Digital thread: Traceable connection among design, process, material, machine, and inspection data.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. What is the fundamental difference between additive and subtractive manufacturing?
  2. Why is a watertight CAD model important for slicing?
  3. Define anisotropy in an AM part.
  4. Name the seven ISO/ASTM AM process categories.
  5. Why are support structures used?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain the complete digital-to-physical AM workflow and identify major sources of error.
  2. Compare material extrusion, vat photopolymerization, and material jetting in terms of feedstock, strengths, and limitations.
  3. Explain the operating principle of powder bed fusion and discuss residual stress and post-processing.
  4. Compare binder jetting with directed energy deposition for metal component production.
  5. Discuss how build orientation affects accuracy, surface finish, support requirement, and mechanical performance.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A designer must manufacture a complex metal repair onto an existing shaft. Which AM category would you recommend, and what post-processing and inspection issues must be addressed?
  2. A polymer part has excellent in-plane strength but repeatedly fails between layers. Analyze possible causes and propose changes to material, temperature, orientation, and process parameters.
  3. A topology-optimized bracket can be produced either by machining from a solid block or by metal powder bed fusion. Develop a decision framework that considers material waste, machine time, support removal, qualification, surface finish, and total cost.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which feature most directly distinguishes additive manufacturing from subtractive manufacturing?

A. It always uses polymer materials

B. It creates geometry by selectively adding and joining material in layers

C. It requires no digital model

D. It eliminates all post-processing

Correct Answer: B. It creates geometry by selectively adding and joining material in layers

Question 2

What is the primary purpose of slicing software?

A. To heat the build chamber

B. To convert a 3D model into layer-wise manufacturing data

C. To inspect internal porosity after production

D. To determine the chemical composition of powder

Correct Answer: B. To convert a 3D model into layer-wise manufacturing data

Question 3

Which ISO/ASTM category selectively cures liquid photopolymer in a vat?

A. Material extrusion

B. Binder jetting

C. Vat photopolymerization

D. Sheet lamination

Correct Answer: C. Vat photopolymerization

Question 4

In material extrusion, interlayer strength is strongly influenced by:

A. Polymer bonding and thermal history at the interface

B. The colour of the build platform

C. The number of CAD bodies only

D. The density of the surrounding air only

Correct Answer: A. Polymer bonding and thermal history at the interface

Question 5

Which process uses a liquid binder to join particles in a powder bed?

A. Binder jetting

B. Directed energy deposition

C. Material jetting

D. Vat photopolymerization

Correct Answer: A. Binder jetting

Question 6

Which process is particularly suitable for adding material to repair an existing metal component?

A. Directed energy deposition

B. Sheet lamination using paper

C. Vat photopolymerization

D. Material jetting

Correct Answer: A. Directed energy deposition

Question 7

A part has build height H = 40 mm and uniform layer thickness t = 0.20 mm. Ignoring machine setup layers, what is the nominal layer count?

A. 8 layers

B. 80 layers

C. 200 layers

D. 400 layers

Correct Answer: C. 200 layers

Question 8

Why can powder bed fusion manufacture many overhangs without conventional support structures?

A. The surrounding powder can provide physical support

B. The laser removes gravity

C. The part is always flexible

D. The powder chemically dissolves the overhang

Correct Answer: A. The surrounding powder can provide physical support

Question 9

Which statement about the volumetric energy-density indicator Eᵥ = P/(v h t) is correct?

A. It completely predicts part quality for every PBF machine

B. It is a comparative indicator that does not capture all thermal and material effects

C. It has units of newtons

D. It applies only to sheet lamination

Correct Answer: B. It is a comparative indicator that does not capture all thermal and material effects

Question 10

Why is build orientation an important DfAM decision?

A. It affects only the colour of the part

B. It can affect supports, surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and anisotropic strength

C. It changes a metal process into a polymer process

D. It removes the need for inspection

Correct Answer: B. It can affect supports, surface finish, dimensional accuracy, and anisotropic strength

CNC Technology & Additive Manufacturing
Chapter 9 of 15