Media Strategy and Traditional Media PlanningIntroductionMedia strategy is the managerial process of deciding where, when, how often and at what cost an advertising message should be delivered to a defined audience. Traditional media—television, radio, print, outdoor, cinema, sponsorship and place-based media—remain important because they provide scale, local presence, sensory impact, credibility and opportunities for repeated exposure. Their role has changed, however. They now operate within integrated campaigns in which traditional channels interact with digital, social, mobile and retail communication. A media plan translates marketing objectives into an efficient pattern of audience exposure. It must balance four questions: - Audience: Who must be reached?
- Communication: What level and quality of exposure is required?
- Timing: When should exposure occur?
- Economics: What investment is justified by expected outcomes?
Media planning is not simply the purchase of inexpensive audience. A low cost may be unattractive if the audience is poorly matched, exposure is accidental, or the medium cannot communicate the message effectively. Professional planning therefore combines quantitative measures such as reach, frequency, impressions and cost per thousand with qualitative judgements concerning attention, credibility, context and brand safety. Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this chapter, the learner should be able to: - evaluate the strategic strengths and limitations of major traditional media;
- distinguish reach, frequency, impressions, rating points, effective exposure and cost metrics;
- calculate reach, frequency, gross rating points and CPM under stated assumptions;
- design continuity, flighting and pulsing schedules;
- assess media choices using both audience quality and cost efficiency;
- integrate sponsorship and place-based media into a broader communication plan; and
- identify ethical, regulatory and measurement challenges in traditional media planning.
1. Media Strategy: From Marketing Objective to Media ScheduleA media strategy should follow, rather than replace, market and communication strategy. The usual sequence is: Business objective → marketing objective → communication objective → target audience → media role → media mix → schedule → budget → measurement. For example, a new beverage may have the business objective of achieving profitable trial. Its communication objective may be to create awareness and demonstrate a consumption occasion among urban adults aged 18–34. Television may provide rapid reach and demonstration; outdoor may reinforce availability near stores; radio may provide frequency during commuting; and cinema may deliver an attentive, entertainment-compatible environment. 1.1 Audience definition and qualityThe target audience should be described using demographic, geographic, behavioural and psychographic variables. A media audience is not automatically equivalent to a target audience. Three distinctions are useful: - Audience size: the number of people exposed or potentially exposed.
- Audience composition: the proportion of the audience belonging to the target market.
- Audience quality: the strategic value of the exposure, including attention, relevance, credibility, context and likelihood of response.
A medium with a smaller but highly concentrated target audience may be more valuable than a mass medium with substantial wastage. Media planners therefore consider duplication, geographic availability, purchasing power, consumption habits and the role of the medium in the customer journey. 1.2 Communication tasks and media rolesDifferent communication tasks require different media characteristics. Demonstration and emotional storytelling often benefit from television or cinema. Immediate local reminders may be appropriate for radio and outdoor. Detailed comparison and information seeking may favour print. Sponsorship can transfer associations from an event or institution to a brand, while place-based media can influence consumers close to a purchase or usage occasion. 2. Traditional Media Platforms2.1 TelevisionTelevision combines sight, sound, movement and narrative. It is effective for rapid mass reach, brand-building, demonstrations and emotional appeals. It can also provide strong social visibility when brands associate with major programmes or events. Its limitations include high production and placement costs, clutter, fragmented viewing, avoidance behaviour and difficulty proving individual exposure. Television audiences may also be spread across numerous channels and platforms. Television is strongest when the campaign requires scale and audio-visual storytelling, but it should be evaluated for target-audience composition rather than total audience alone. Important planning considerations include programme environment, daypart, audience profile, market coverage, commercial length, frequency of insertion and expected duplication across programmes. 2.2 RadioRadio is relatively flexible, local and cost-efficient. It supports high frequency, short lead times, traffic and weather updates, promotional announcements and local-language communication. It is particularly useful for commuters, retail activation and reminder advertising. Because radio is primarily an audio medium, creative execution must be distinctive, simple and repeated sufficiently. Listeners may be multitasking, and visual demonstration is impossible. Station selection should consider audience composition, listening occasion, geographic coverage, credibility and clutter—not merely average listenership. 2.3 PrintNewspapers, magazines, trade publications and specialist journals offer varying combinations of reach, authority, permanence and targeting. Print permits detailed information, comparison, coupons, technical explanation and selective audience targeting. Magazines may provide strong editorial context and visual quality, while newspapers may offer local immediacy and broad coverage. Limitations include declining or fragmented readership in some markets, delayed feedback, variable reproduction quality and uncertain attention. Print planning should distinguish circulation from readership: one copy may be read by several people, while some distributed copies may not be read at all. The planner should examine audited data where available. 2.4 Outdoor mediaOutdoor, or out-of-home media, includes billboards, transit advertising, street furniture, digital screens, airport displays and roadside formats. It is effective for geographic dominance, repeated reminders, directional communication and reinforcing campaigns encountered elsewhere. Outdoor creative must be understood quickly. Legibility, contrast, viewing distance, traffic speed, dwell time, lighting, obstruction and environmental context matter. A visually elaborate advertisement may fail if it cannot be processed within a few seconds. Measurement is often based on opportunity-to-see estimates rather than confirmed attention, so exposure should not be treated as guaranteed recall. 2.5 CinemaCinema offers a large screen, high-quality sound, a captive environment and strong emotional immersion. It can be valuable for launches, entertainment brands, premium products and campaigns aimed at young urban audiences. The environment may support attention better than many cluttered media settings. Its limitations are relatively low frequency, restricted geographic coverage, high concentration in particular audience segments and possible mismatch between cinema attendance and the target market. Cinema is often most effective as a high-impact supplement rather than a sole reach medium. 2.6 SponsorshipSponsorship is a negotiated association between a brand and a property such as sport, music, culture, education or a social cause. The property may provide naming rights, signage, broadcast visibility, hospitality, content access and activation opportunities. The value of sponsorship does not arise from logo exposure alone. It depends on: - fit between the brand and the property;
- the distinctiveness and credibility of the association;
- audience relevance and scale;
- exclusivity within the category;
- activation investment; and
- the ability to measure awareness, engagement, trial or sales.
A common planning error is to count media-equivalent visibility while ignoring rights fees, activation costs, congestion, controversy and the possibility that audiences remember the event but not the sponsor. Sponsorship should therefore be evaluated as a platform requiring communication support, not as a free media substitute. 2.7 Place-based mediaPlace-based media reaches people in a specific location or consumption environment: retail stores, malls, elevators, gyms, universities, offices, airports, petrol stations, restaurants and healthcare facilities. Its principal advantage is contextual proximity. A message can be delivered near purchase, usage or decision moments. Place-based media can be highly targeted but may have limited scale and variable measurement standards. Permission, privacy, environmental suitability, sound levels, dwell time and audience circulation require careful assessment. Retail media, for example, may connect exposure with product availability and transaction data, but planners must distinguish paid placement from independently verified audience delivery. 3. Quantitative Foundations of Media PlanningMedia metrics describe delivery, not automatically persuasion or sales. They should be interpreted as indicators within a measurement system. 3.1 Impressions, reach and frequencyAn impression is one exposure opportunity delivered to one person or household. If the same person sees an advertisement three times, this contributes three impressions but only one reached person. Reach is the number or percentage of distinct people exposed at least once during a specified period. Frequency is the average number of exposures among those reached. Average frequency = Total impressions ÷ Number reached If reach is expressed as a percentage of the target population, the denominator must be the target population, and the units must be consistent. The relationship is: Impressions = Reach count × Average frequency This simple relationship assumes that reach count and frequency refer to the same target, period and exposure definition. It does not reveal how exposures are distributed: one person may receive many exposures while another receives only one. 3.2 Rating and rating pointsA rating is the percentage of a defined population exposed to a programme or insertion at a particular time. A one-point rating equals 1% of the relevant population. The relevant population must be specified; a rating among all adults is not interchangeable with a rating among adults aged 18–34. Gross rating points (GRPs) measure the total weight of a schedule: GRP = ∑ rating points for all insertions For a schedule expressed in percentage reach and average frequency: GRP = Reach (%) × Average frequency GRPs are gross because exposures to the same people are counted repeatedly. They do not indicate unique reach or target-audience quality. A schedule delivering 300 GRPs could have broad reach at moderate frequency or narrow reach at very high frequency. Target rating points (TRPs) use ratings for the specific target audience. In practice, planners should state whether “rating points” means a general population measure or target-specific measure. 3.3 Worked example: reach, frequency and GRPsAn advertiser buys five television spots with ratings of 8, 6, 10, 5 and 7 among the target audience. GRP = 8 + 6 + 10 + 5 + 7 = 36 The schedule therefore delivers 36 GRPs. Suppose the estimated unduplicated reach is 24% of the target audience. Then: Average frequency = 36 ÷ 24 = 1.5 The answer means that the average reached target member receives 1.5 exposure opportunities. It does not mean every person sees exactly 1.5 spots; actual frequency distribution may be highly uneven. 3.4 CPM and cost efficiencyCost per thousand impressions (CPM) standardises the cost of delivered impressions: CPM = (Media cost ÷ Impressions) × 1,000 Here media cost and impressions must cover the same delivery period, audience and unit. CPM is not a measure of effectiveness by itself. Suppose a newspaper insertion costs ₹180,000 and is expected to deliver 600,000 target-audience impressions: CPM = (₹180,000 ÷ 600,000) × 1,000 = ₹300 The result is ₹300 per thousand target-audience impressions. If the denominator were total circulation rather than target-audience impressions, it would be a different and potentially less useful CPM. 3.5 Effective exposure and effective frequencyNot every exposure has equal communication value. An exposure may be ineffective because the audience is outside the target, the message is not noticed, the context is unsuitable, or the person has not yet processed the brand. Planners therefore distinguish opportunity-to-see from effective exposure. A simple planning model may estimate effective impressions as: Effective impressions = Gross impressions × p where p is the estimated proportion of gross exposure opportunities that meet a defined effectiveness criterion. This is a planning assumption, not a universal law. The value of p must be supported by research or an explicit judgement, and it may vary by medium, creative, placement and audience. Effective frequency is the number of exposures judged necessary for a communication task within a specified period. There is no universally correct number. The requirement depends on brand familiarity, message complexity, purchase cycle, competitive clutter, involvement and campaign objective. A launch may require rapid repeated exposure; a mature brand reminder may require less. 3.6 Reach curves and duplicationWhen insertions are added, reach usually increases but at a declining rate because new insertions increasingly reach people already exposed. This is the phenomenon of duplication. Exact reach estimation requires audience data, overlap information or a validated reach model. It cannot be calculated accurately by simply adding individual ratings. A schedule with 40% reach and 4 average frequency may be preferable to one with 70% reach and 2 frequency when the message is complex and repetition is necessary. Conversely, a new mass product may prioritise broad reach. Media decisions must therefore reflect the communication task rather than maximise one metric. 4. Scheduling Strategies4.1 ContinuityContinuity maintains advertising activity throughout the planning period, usually at a relatively steady level. It is suitable for frequently purchased products, ongoing availability, stable demand and brands that need constant reminder presence. Advantages include reduced periods of complete absence, regular memory reinforcement and support for habitual purchase. Disadvantages include possible underweighting during peak demand, budget dilution and inefficient exposure during low-opportunity periods. 4.2 FlightingFlighting alternates periods of advertising with periods of no advertising. It concentrates budget into selected weeks or events and may be appropriate for seasonal products, limited budgets or campaigns designed around launches and promotions. Flighting can generate strong short-term weight but risks loss of memory and competitive vulnerability during off periods. The planner should assess whether the brand can tolerate silence and whether the purchase cycle permits concentrated communication. 4.3 PulsingPulsing combines a continuing base level with periodic increases. It is often useful for brands requiring year-round presence but facing seasonal demand peaks, competitive events or promotional windows. The base protects continuity while pulses create additional weight. 4.4 Schedule design exampleAn ice-cream brand has a modest year-round demand but expects high sales during April–June. A continuity schedule may provide low weekly radio and outdoor activity throughout the year. Pulses in April and May can add television and cinema, while retail place-based media intensifies near stores. A flighting schedule restricted to April–June may reduce cost but could sacrifice pre-season awareness and post-purchase reinforcement. The appropriate choice depends on budget, category purchase cycle, competitive activity and sales response. | Scheduling pattern | Typical use | Main strength | Main risk |
|---|
| Continuity | Frequent purchases and stable demand | Persistent presence | Budget dilution | | Flighting | Seasonal or event-led campaigns | Concentrated weight | Periods of silence | | Pulsing | Ongoing brands with peaks | Balance of continuity and intensity | More complex management |
5. Evaluating a Media MixA media mix should be assessed across five dimensions: - Quantitative delivery: reach, frequency, impressions, GRPs and CPM.
- Audience fit: proportion and value of the target audience reached.
- Communication quality: attention, involvement, credibility, mood and message richness.
- Context and proximity: relevance of the environment and distance from purchase or usage.
- Operational and governance factors: availability, flexibility, brand safety, regulation and measurability.
A useful professional practice is to compare alternatives using a media brief and a weighted decision matrix. For instance, a planner may assign weights to target fit, reach, attention, cost efficiency and geographic coverage. The weights are managerial assumptions and should be made explicit; a numerical score does not eliminate judgement. 5.1 Reach versus frequency trade-offWith a fixed budget, increasing reach may reduce average frequency, while increasing frequency may reduce the number of unique people reached. The correct balance depends on the campaign objective. Awareness campaigns for low-involvement products may prioritise reach. Demonstration, repositioning or complex service communication may require greater frequency and attention. 5.2 Audience quality versus priceA low CPM can be misleading when many impressions are outside the target or occur in low-attention contexts. Target-audience CPM, effective CPM and cost per qualified reach may provide more useful comparisons, provided their definitions are consistent. The planner should also account for production, sponsorship rights, activation, traffic, research and measurement costs rather than comparing media rates alone. 6. Integrated Planning and Contemporary DevelopmentsTraditional media increasingly operate as connected systems. A television commercial may prompt online search; outdoor may direct consumers to a nearby retailer; radio may support a mobile promotion; cinema may launch content later shared on social platforms. The planner should define the role of each medium and avoid counting the same audience or response multiple times. Addressable and connected television, digital out-of-home screens, audio streaming, retail media networks and location-informed planning have blurred the boundary between traditional and digital media. These developments offer better targeting and faster optimisation, but they also introduce identity resolution problems, inconsistent definitions and privacy concerns. Technology should improve planning quality, not encourage false precision. Artificial intelligence can assist with schedule optimisation, audience modelling, copy variation and anomaly detection. Human oversight remains necessary because models may inherit biased data, optimise cheap delivery rather than meaningful outcomes, or obscure assumptions. Planners should document data provenance, model objectives, constraints and validation procedures. 7. Ethical, Legal and Governance IssuesMedia planning has responsibilities beyond efficiency. Key concerns include: - Truthfulness: claims must be substantiated and not materially misleading.
- Protection of vulnerable audiences: special care is required for children and audiences with limited decision-making capacity.
- Stereotyping and representation: creative and placement decisions should avoid discriminatory portrayals.
- Privacy: location, viewing and purchasing data must be collected and used lawfully and transparently.
- Brand safety: advertisements should not appear beside harmful, extremist or deceptive content.
- Sponsorship disclosure: commercial relationships should be clear, especially in editorial or influencer-like environments.
- Environmental impact: production, printing, outdoor materials and event operations should be assessed for avoidable waste.
- Measurement integrity: agencies and media owners should disclose definitions, estimates, make-goods and conflicts of interest.
Regulatory requirements differ by jurisdiction. Professional practice requires consultation of current advertising codes, broadcasting rules, consumer-protection law, privacy law and outdoor-signage requirements rather than reliance on outdated generalisations. 8. Applied Case: Illustrative Media Plan for a Regional Ready-to-Drink BeverageBackgroundThe fictional brand “Nexa Lime” is a new ready-to-drink beverage launching in three metropolitan regions. Its target is adults aged 18–34 who purchase refreshments during commuting, study and social occasions. The budget is limited, and the brand must build awareness while creating proximity to retail outlets. ProblemA television-only plan could create rapid awareness but would be expensive and may provide insufficient local purchase reinforcement. A radio-only plan could deliver frequency but might lack visual distinctiveness. The challenge is to create a coherent mix and schedule without assuming that every exposure produces equal effect. AnalysisThe campaign has three communication tasks: - establish recognition of the name and pack;
- associate the beverage with refreshment and social occasions; and
- remind consumers near stores during the launch period.
Television and cinema can provide sensory demonstration. Radio can build frequency during commuting. Outdoor and place-based media can reinforce availability. Sponsorship of selected youth music events may create cultural relevance, but only if the rights package includes meaningful activation rather than passive logo display. Approach and solutionThe planner selects a pulsing schedule over twelve weeks: - Weeks 1–2: television launch burst and cinema trailers to establish recognition;
- Weeks 1–12: radio continuity in selected commuting dayparts;
- Weeks 3–12: outdoor near retail clusters and transit routes;
- Weeks 4–8: place-based screens in gyms, colleges and food-service locations;
- Weeks 5–7: sponsorship activation at two relevant music events;
- Weeks 9–10: second television pulse linked to a trial promotion.
The plan is evaluated using target reach, average frequency, target-audience CPM, store-lift measures and brand tracking. Sponsorship is judged by aided awareness, association with the event, sampling, redemption and incremental sales—not merely estimated logo impressions. Outcome and interpretationIn an illustrative evaluation, the campaign reaches 62% of the target audience at an average frequency of 3.2, producing: GRP = 62 × 3.2 = 198.4 If total measured impressions are 9.6 million and media expenditure is ₹2.4 million: CPM = (₹2,400,000 ÷ 9,600,000) × 1,000 = ₹250 These figures describe delivery and cost, not causal sales impact. A stronger evaluation would compare exposed and matched unexposed markets, control for distribution and promotions, and examine changes in awareness, consideration, trial and repeat purchase. The illustrative outcome suggests efficient delivery, but managerial conclusions require evidence of quality and response. Learning pointsThe case demonstrates that a media plan should assign distinct roles to media, use scheduling to reflect the purchase cycle, and evaluate sponsorship and place-based activity through outcomes rather than visibility alone. It also shows why reach, frequency and CPM must be interpreted alongside target fit, attention, context and incremental business results. Challenges and Limitations of Traditional Media PlanningTraditional planning faces fragmented audiences, changing consumption patterns, incomplete measurement, non-comparable currencies and uncertain attention. Estimated impressions may include opportunity-to-see rather than verified exposure. Reach calculations can be sensitive to duplication assumptions, panel design and data quality. Media owners may report different definitions of audience, circulation or viewability. Managers should therefore triangulate evidence using independent audits, audience studies, brand tracking, sales data, experiments and marketing-mix analysis where appropriate. No single metric captures communication effectiveness. A sophisticated plan states assumptions, separates observed results from estimates, and includes a process for revising the schedule when evidence changes. Best-Practice ChecklistBefore approving a traditional media plan, ask: - Is the target audience precisely defined?
- Does each medium have a clear communication role?
- Are reach, frequency, impressions and GRPs based on consistent definitions?
- Are target-audience composition and duplication considered?
- Is the schedule aligned with demand, purchase cycle and competitive activity?
- Are production, rights, activation and measurement costs included?
- Are effective-exposure assumptions explicit and evidence-based?
- Are legal, privacy, accessibility, safety and environmental issues addressed?
- Does the evaluation measure both delivery and business or communication outcomes?
Chapter SummaryMedia strategy converts marketing and communication objectives into decisions about audience, media role, investment and timing. Television offers scale and audio-visual storytelling; radio provides flexible local frequency; print supports information and selective targeting; outdoor delivers repeated geographic reminders; cinema offers immersive attention; sponsorship transfers associations through properties; and place-based media reaches consumers near relevant contexts. The principal quantitative measures are impressions, reach, average frequency, rating points, GRPs, CPM and effective exposure. GRPs summarise schedule weight but do not reveal unique reach or audience quality. CPM compares the cost of impressions but is meaningful only when cost and impression definitions are consistent. Effective exposure requires explicit assumptions and should not be confused with mere opportunity-to-see. Continuity provides persistent presence, flighting concentrates activity into selected periods, and pulsing combines a base level with strategic bursts. Effective planning balances reach and frequency, quantitative efficiency and qualitative value, and media delivery with measurable communication or business outcomes. Ethical governance, transparent measurement, privacy protection and human judgement remain essential as traditional media become increasingly data-enabled and integrated with digital channels. Key TermsMedia strategy: A plan for using communication channels to achieve defined marketing and communication objectives. Media mix: The combination of media channels used in a campaign. Impression: One exposure opportunity delivered to one person or household. Reach: The number or percentage of distinct members of a target audience exposed at least once. Frequency: The average number of exposure opportunities received by those reached. Rating point: One percentage point of a specified population exposed to a media vehicle or insertion. Gross rating points (GRPs): The sum of rating points across a schedule. Target rating points (TRPs): Rating points calculated for a specified target audience. CPM: Cost per thousand impressions. Effective exposure: An exposure opportunity judged likely to meet a defined communication criterion. Audience composition: The proportion of a medium’s audience belonging to a specified target group. Duplication: Overlap between audiences exposed to different insertions or media vehicles. Continuity: A schedule maintaining advertising activity throughout a period. Flighting: A schedule alternating active advertising periods with inactive periods. Pulsing: A schedule combining continuous base activity with periodic increases. Sponsorship: A paid or negotiated association between a brand and a property or event. Place-based media: Media delivered in a specific location or consumption environment. Opportunity-to-see: The possibility that an audience member could be exposed to a message. Audience quality: The strategic value of an audience based on fit, attention, context and response potential. Media wastage: Exposure delivered outside the intended target or without useful communication value. Review QuestionsShort Answer Questions- Distinguish reach from frequency and explain why the distinction matters.
- What are the principal strengths and limitations of radio as an advertising medium?
- Define GRPs and explain why they do not measure unique reach.
- Explain the difference between continuity, flighting and pulsing.
- Why should sponsorship be evaluated as more than logo visibility?
Long Answer Questions- Critically evaluate television, print and outdoor media for a national brand-building campaign.
- Explain how a planner can balance target-audience quality against CPM and total reach.
- Discuss the role of cinema, sponsorship and place-based media in an integrated traditional media plan.
- Describe the assumptions and limitations involved in estimating effective exposure.
- Explain the ethical, legal and governance responsibilities involved in contemporary media planning.
Analytical / Application Questions- A schedule delivers 45% reach and 3.5 average frequency. Calculate its GRPs and explain what the result does and does not reveal.
- Compare a ₹900,000 media package delivering 3 million target impressions with a ₹1,200,000 package delivering 5 million target impressions. Calculate CPM for each and recommend one, stating what additional qualitative evidence you would require.
- Design a twelve-week continuity, flighting or pulsing schedule for a seasonal product. Justify the choice using purchase cycle, reach, frequency, competitive activity and budget considerations.
Multiple Choice Questions with AnswersQuestion 1Which measure represents the average number of exposure opportunities among people reached? A. Reach B. Frequency C. CPM D. Circulation Correct Answer: B. Frequency Question 2A schedule has ratings of 6, 8 and 11. What are its gross rating points? A. 19 B. 24 C. 25 D. 66 Correct Answer: C. 25 Question 3A campaign delivers 2,000,000 impressions at a media cost of ₹500,000. What is its CPM? A. ₹25 B. ₹250 C. ₹400 D. ₹2,500 Correct Answer: B. ₹250 Question 4Which scheduling pattern combines a continuous base level with periodic increases? A. Flighting B. Pulsing C. Sponsorship D. Duplication Correct Answer: B. Pulsing Question 5Which medium is generally strongest for detailed information and comparison? A. Print B. Cinema trailers only C. Roadside billboard only D. Ambient audio only Correct Answer: A. Print Question 6Why can GRPs not be interpreted as unique audience reach? A. They exclude all repeated exposures B. They count rating points across insertions, including duplicated exposures C. They measure only production cost D. They apply only to print media Correct Answer: B. They count rating points across insertions, including duplicated exposures Question 7Which is a principal strategic advantage of place-based media? A. It always provides national mass reach B. It eliminates the need for creative adaptation C. It can reach consumers near a purchase or usage context D. It guarantees message attention Correct Answer: C. It can reach consumers near a purchase or usage context Question 8A newspaper insertion costs ₹180,000 and delivers 600,000 target impressions. What is the target-audience CPM? A. ₹30 B. ₹180 C. ₹300 D. ₹1,080 Correct Answer: C. ₹300 Question 9Which statement best describes flighting? A. Advertising is maintained at a constant level throughout the year B. Advertising alternates between active and inactive periods C. Advertising is limited to sponsorship properties D. Advertising is measured only through reach Correct Answer: B. Advertising alternates between active and inactive periods Question 10What is the most appropriate interpretation of effective exposure? A. Every purchased impression automatically produces persuasion B. It is an exposure opportunity judged against a defined effectiveness criterion C. It is identical to total circulation D. It is always equal to GRPs Correct Answer: B. It is an exposure opportunity judged against a defined effectiveness criterion
|