Advance Computer Applications

Chapter 12
Business Analytics and Decision-Support Applications

Master of Business Administration
Advance Computer Applications   •   Maters

Business Analytics and Decision-Support Applications

Introduction

Business organizations generate data through transactions, customer interactions, supply chains, websites, sensors, financial systems, and social platforms. Data, however, does not automatically create value. Managerial value emerges when data is transformed into reliable information, interpreted through appropriate analytical methods, and connected to decisions and action.

Business analytics is the systematic use of data, statistical and computational methods, models, and managerial judgment to understand business performance and improve decisions. Decision-support applications are the technological and organizational arrangements that help managers investigate problems, evaluate alternatives, anticipate outcomes, and select actions. They include spreadsheets, dashboards, visualization platforms, forecasting systems, optimization tools, and integrated decision-support systems.

For MBA managers, analytics is not merely a technical function. It is a capability involving problem definition, data governance, measurement design, interpretation, communication, implementation, and accountability. A sophisticated model can produce poor decisions if the underlying data is biased, the business question is vague, or managers confuse statistical association with causation.

Learning Objectives

After studying this chapter, students should be able to:

  1. Distinguish descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analytics.
  2. Develop a data-driven decision process from business question to managerial action.
  3. Select appropriate metrics, visualizations, dashboards, and spreadsheet models.
  4. Explain the structure and organizational role of decision-support systems.
  5. Apply basic forecasting, scenario, sensitivity, and optimization techniques.
  6. Evaluate analytical models according to validity, uncertainty, ethics, governance, and business usefulness.

1. From Data to Decisions

A data-driven decision process normally follows a sequence:

  1. Define the decision. Specify what must be decided, by whom, when, and according to which objectives.
  2. Identify relevant measures. Translate the decision into indicators such as revenue, contribution margin, service level, retention, risk, or customer satisfaction.
  3. Acquire and prepare data. Locate sources, check definitions, remove or investigate errors, and document transformations.
  4. Analyze and model. Use appropriate analytical methods to describe conditions, explain drivers, predict outcomes, or recommend actions.
  5. Communicate evidence. Present findings using dashboards, visualizations, narrative, and explicit assumptions.
  6. Decide and implement. Assign responsibility, resources, timing, and controls.
  7. Monitor and learn. Compare outcomes with expectations and update the model or decision process.

This process is iterative rather than strictly linear. A diagnostic investigation may reveal that a metric was poorly defined; implementation may generate new data; and monitoring may reveal that a model performs differently across customer groups.

A useful distinction is between an indicator, a metric, and a key performance indicator (KPI). An indicator is an observable signal. A metric is a quantified measure defined by a formula and measurement rules. A KPI is a metric explicitly linked to a strategic objective and managerial accountability. For example, “website activity” is vague; “conversion rate,” defined as completed purchases divided by eligible sessions, is a metric; and “conversion rate for the strategic digital channel” may be a KPI.

A metric must have a clear numerator, denominator where relevant, time period, population, data source, and owner. Without these specifications, two departments may report apparently conflicting values while using different definitions.

2. The Four Forms of Business Analytics

The four forms of analytics represent different questions. They are complementary, not mutually exclusive.

TypeCentral questionTypical outputsManagerial use
DescriptiveWhat happened or is happening?Reports, summaries, dashboardsMonitor performance
DiagnosticWhy did it happen?Drill-downs, comparisons, root-cause analysisIdentify drivers
PredictiveWhat is likely to happen?Forecasts, probabilities, risk scoresPrepare and allocate resources
PrescriptiveWhat should be done?Recommended actions, optimization, scenariosChoose among alternatives

2.1 Descriptive Analytics

Descriptive analytics summarizes historical or current data. It includes totals, averages, medians, rates, distributions, trends, rankings, and variance from targets. A sales dashboard showing monthly revenue by region is descriptive. It does not, by itself, establish why revenue changed or what action should be taken.

Important descriptive measures include:

  • Mean: the arithmetic average, appropriate when extreme values do not distort interpretation.
  • Median: the middle observation after sorting, often more representative for skewed income, transaction-value, or delivery-time data.
  • Rate or ratio: a numerator divided by a relevant denominator, such as defects per 1,000 units.
  • Growth rate: change relative to a prior period.

For a measure with current value xt and prior value xt-1, the percentage growth rate is:

Growth rate = ((xt − xt−1) ÷ xt−1) × 100%

This formula assumes xt−1 ≠ 0 and that the two values use consistent definitions and units. If the prior value is negative or close to zero, percentage growth can be misleading; an absolute change or an indexed series may be preferable.

Descriptive analysis should also expose distribution. Two products may have the same average delivery time but very different variability. A manager therefore needs measures such as range, percentiles, or standard deviation, not only an average.

2.2 Diagnostic Analytics

Diagnostic analytics investigates causes, contributors, and relationships. It asks why a result occurred. Techniques include drill-down from enterprise to region to store, cohort comparison, variance analysis, correlation analysis, segmentation, process mapping, and root-cause analysis.

Correlation measures the direction and strength of linear association between two variables. The sample Pearson correlation is:

r = Σ[(xi − x̄)(yi − ȳ)] ÷ √{Σ(xi − x̄)² × Σ(yi − ȳ)²}

Here, xi and yi are paired observations, x̄ and ȳ are sample means, and r lies between −1 and +1. The measure is unit-free and describes linear association, not causation. It can be distorted by outliers, nonlinear patterns, restricted ranges, or confounding variables.

A useful managerial diagnostic is variance decomposition. If actual profit differs from budgeted profit, managers can examine price, volume, product mix, labor cost, material cost, and overhead effects. The objective is not to assign blame automatically but to identify controllable and uncontrollable drivers.

Diagnostic analysis should distinguish four possibilities: a genuine causal driver, a consequence of the outcome, a common cause affecting both variables, and a coincidental association. Controlled experiments, natural experiments, longitudinal data, and carefully designed quasi-experimental methods provide stronger evidence of causality than simple correlation.

2.3 Predictive Analytics

Predictive analytics estimates future or unobserved outcomes using historical patterns and explanatory variables. Applications include demand forecasting, credit-risk scoring, churn prediction, fraud detection, equipment-failure prediction, and workforce planning.

A simple linear regression model can be written as:

yi = β0 + β1xi + εi

where yi is the outcome for observation i, xi is a predictor, β0 is the intercept, β1 is the expected change in y for a one-unit change in x under the model, and εi is the unexplained error. The model assumes, for standard inference, an appropriate linear specification, independent errors, constant error variance, and—when confidence intervals or significance tests are used—usually approximately normally distributed errors. Prediction may remain useful even when some inference assumptions are imperfect, but validation is essential.

For multiple predictors:

yi = β0 + β1x1i + β2x2i + … + βkxki + εi

The coefficient βj represents the modeled association with predictor xj while holding the other included predictors constant. This phrase does not guarantee causal interpretation.

Forecast accuracy should be assessed on data not used to fit the model. Common measures include mean absolute error (MAE):

MAE = (1 ÷ n) × Σ|yi − ŷi|

where yi is the actual value, ŷi is the predicted value, and n is the number of test observations. MAE has the same units as the outcome and is readily interpretable. Mean squared error gives greater weight to large errors, while percentage measures can be unstable when actual values are zero or close to zero.

Predictive accuracy is not the only criterion. A model may be accurate on average but systematically less accurate for rural customers, new products, or small business accounts. Managers should examine calibration, subgroup performance, stability over time, interpretability, and the cost of false positives and false negatives.

2.4 Prescriptive Analytics

Prescriptive analytics evaluates possible actions and recommends one or more choices under objectives, constraints, and uncertainty. It combines predictions with decision rules. For example, a demand forecast may be converted into an inventory order recommendation after considering holding cost, stockout cost, supplier capacity, and service-level targets.

A basic linear programming model has the form:

Maximize Z = c₁x₁ + c₂x₂ + … + cnxn

subject to:

aj1x₁ + aj2x₂ + … + ajnxn ≤ bj, for j = 1, 2, …, m
xi ≥ 0, for i = 1, 2, …, n

Here, xi are decision variables, ci are objective contributions, aji are resource coefficients, and bj are available resource limits. The model applies when relationships are sufficiently represented as linear, coefficients are meaningful, and constraints accurately describe the decision environment. Integer or nonlinear methods are required when quantities must be whole numbers or relationships are nonlinear.

Prescriptive analysis should expose trade-offs. An “optimal” solution is optimal only relative to its objective function, constraints, data, and assumptions. A recommendation that maximizes short-term margin may reduce customer lifetime value or increase regulatory risk. Therefore, optimization must be interpreted within strategy and governance, not treated as an unquestionable answer.

3. Dashboards and Visualization

A dashboard is a purposeful visual interface that presents selected information for monitoring, analysis, and action. It is not simply a collection of charts. A well-designed dashboard answers a defined managerial question, identifies deviations, supports appropriate drill-down, and makes action ownership visible.

Dashboards may be classified as:

  • Strategic dashboards, which track long-term objectives and enterprise-level KPIs.
  • Tactical dashboards, which support departmental planning and resource allocation.
  • Operational dashboards, which monitor frequent transactions and immediate exceptions.
  • Analytical dashboards, which allow exploration, filtering, segmentation, and comparison.

A dashboard design process begins with users and decisions, not available graphics. The designer should identify the audience, decision frequency, thresholds, data latency, required level of detail, and acceptable response time. A chief executive may need trend, target, and strategic context; a distribution manager may need location-level exceptions updated hourly.

Principles of Effective Visualization

  1. Match the chart to the analytical task. Use lines for time trends, bars for category comparisons, scatter plots for relationships, maps for genuinely geographic patterns, and tables when exact values matter.
  2. Make comparisons easy. Use consistent scales, meaningful baselines, and direct labels.
  3. Reduce visual noise. Avoid unnecessary three-dimensional effects, excessive colors, decorative icons, and dense labels.
  4. Show uncertainty and context. Include targets, confidence intervals, sample sizes, data dates, and definitions where relevant.
  5. Design for accessibility. Do not rely on color alone; provide labels, adequate contrast, and readable text.
  6. Support action. Highlight exceptions and connect them to drill-down, explanation, or responsibility.

A common error is displaying a KPI without its denominator. “Five hundred complaints” may indicate deterioration or improvement depending on customer volume. Rates should be accompanied by counts when interpretation could be distorted by small samples. Another error is using a truncated axis to exaggerate small differences. Visual integrity requires that scale choices reflect the magnitude and purpose of comparison.

4. Spreadsheet Analytics

Spreadsheets remain important because they are accessible, flexible, and familiar. They are useful for exploratory analysis, budgets, scenario models, sensitivity analysis, and communication. Their flexibility also creates risks: undocumented formulas, inconsistent versions, accidental overwriting, hidden rows, hard-coded assumptions, and weak access controls.

A disciplined spreadsheet model separates:

  • Inputs: assumptions and source data.
  • Calculations: formulas and transformations.
  • Outputs: summaries, charts, decisions, and warnings.
  • Documentation: definitions, sources, dates, owners, and version history.

Good practice includes using named ranges or clear cell references, keeping units visible, avoiding hard-coded constants inside formulas, validating input ranges, protecting formula cells, reconciling totals to source systems, and testing extreme cases. A model should include checks such as “balance equals zero,” “percentages sum to 100%,” or “inventory cannot be negative.”

Worked Spreadsheet Example: Contribution and Break-Even

Suppose a product sells for $80 per unit, has a variable cost of $50 per unit, and incurs monthly fixed costs of $90,000. Contribution per unit is:

Contribution per unit = Selling price − Variable cost = $80 − $50 = $30

The contribution margin ratio is:

Contribution margin ratio = Contribution per unit ÷ Selling price = $30 ÷ $80 = 0.375 = 37.5%

The break-even volume, assuming constant price and cost within the relevant range, is:

Break-even units = Fixed costs ÷ Contribution per unit = $90,000 ÷ $30 = 3,000 units

At 4,000 units, operating profit is:

Operating profit = (Selling price − Variable cost) × Units − Fixed costs
= ($80 − $50) × 4,000 − $90,000
= $30,000

The assumptions are important: fixed costs do not change within the activity range, variable cost per unit and selling price remain constant, all units produced are sold, and the product mix is stable. If multiple products are sold, a weighted-average contribution margin is required and the break-even result depends on the assumed sales mix. Managers should therefore use data tables or scenario analysis rather than treating one calculated point as a forecast.

5. Decision-Support Systems

A decision-support system (DSS) is an interactive information system that combines data, analytical models, and user interfaces to support semi-structured or unstructured managerial decisions. A DSS does not necessarily automate the decision. It helps decision-makers examine evidence, compare alternatives, conduct what-if analysis, and understand consequences.

A typical DSS contains:

  1. Data layer: internal transactions, operational databases, data warehouses, external datasets, and metadata.
  2. Model layer: forecasting, statistical, simulation, optimization, financial, or rule-based models.
  3. Knowledge and governance layer: definitions, business rules, permissions, quality controls, and model documentation.
  4. User interface: reports, dashboards, query tools, scenario controls, alerts, and recommendations.
  5. Feedback layer: outcomes and user decisions returned for monitoring and improvement.

Business intelligence platforms commonly emphasize reporting, dashboards, and self-service analysis. Enterprise planning systems integrate budgets, forecasts, and resource plans. Executive information systems present highly summarized strategic information. Modern systems increasingly combine these capabilities with machine-learning services and natural-language interfaces, but conversational access does not remove the need for data definitions, validation, and authorization.

DSS effectiveness depends on fit with the decision context. A highly automated system may be suitable for repetitive, high-volume decisions with clear rules. Human review is essential when decisions involve novel conditions, moral judgments, legal rights, significant customer consequences, or ambiguous objectives. The appropriate design is often human-in-the-loop: the system provides evidence and recommendations, while an accountable manager reviews exceptions and records the basis for action.

6. Decision Models Under Uncertainty

Managers rarely know future demand, costs, competitor responses, or regulatory outcomes with certainty. Three related tools are particularly useful.

Scenario analysis examines coherent alternative futures, such as base, optimistic, and adverse conditions. Scenarios should vary meaningful drivers rather than merely applying arbitrary percentage changes.

Sensitivity analysis changes one or more assumptions to examine their effect on an output. If profit is highly sensitive to price but relatively insensitive to packaging cost, management attention should reflect that asymmetry.

Simulation repeatedly samples uncertain inputs from specified probability distributions and calculates resulting outcomes. It can estimate a distribution of possible profits or service levels rather than one point estimate. Simulation results are only as credible as the distributions, dependencies, and model structure used.

Expected monetary value can support decisions when probabilities and payoffs are sufficiently credible:

EMV(action) = Σ ps × payoff(action, s)

where ps is the probability of state s, and the probabilities sum to 1. EMV is a decision criterion under risk, not a prediction of the outcome that will certainly occur. It may be inappropriate when probabilities are highly subjective, outcomes are irreversible, or nonfinancial values dominate.

7. Applied Case: Regional Retail Inventory Decision

The following is an illustrative case based on a fictional retail organization.

Background

Northstar Retail operates 60 stores and an online channel. The company has experienced both stockouts of fast-moving products and excess inventory of slow-moving products. Senior management wants to improve availability without materially increasing working capital.

Problem

The existing process uses a monthly spreadsheet in which store managers manually adjust orders. The spreadsheet reports prior sales but does not distinguish seasonal demand, promotions, regional differences, or supplier lead time. Management needs a more disciplined decision-support process.

Analysis

The analytics team first defines two objectives: improve the proportion of customer demand fulfilled immediately and reduce average inventory investment. It establishes common definitions for demand, stockout, inventory value, and service level. Historical data is checked for discontinued products, missing sales during stockouts, and promotional periods.

Descriptive dashboards show that stockouts are concentrated in a small group of products and occur disproportionately in three regions. Diagnostic analysis indicates that some apparent low-demand products were actually underreported because inventory was unavailable. This finding prevents the organization from treating observed sales as complete demand.

A predictive model forecasts weekly demand using product history, seasonality, promotion indicators, and region. The model is evaluated on a holdout period using MAE and subgroup checks. Forecasts are then passed into a prescriptive replenishment model that considers forecast demand, supplier lead time, minimum order quantities, available warehouse stock, and a target service level.

The spreadsheet remains useful as a controlled scenario interface. Managers can change a promotion assumption or supplier lead time and observe the effect, but the approved baseline data and formulas are protected. A dashboard displays forecast demand, recommended order, projected stockout risk, inventory value, and exceptions requiring review.

Approach and Solution

The organization pilots the system in 10 stores. Recommendations are not automatically executed; store and category managers review unusual cases. Every override requires a reason code, allowing the team to evaluate whether the model or the operating process needs improvement.

The governance design includes role-based access, documented metric definitions, a model owner, monthly performance review, and an escalation rule for data-quality failures. The pilot compares results with a similar group of stores operating under the previous process.

Outcome

After the pilot, immediate fulfillment improves and excess inventory declines, but results vary by product category. The model performs poorly for newly launched products because historical data is unavailable. Management therefore introduces a separate judgmental launch process and gradually incorporates new-product information. The outcome demonstrates that analytics should augment, not eliminate, managerial knowledge.

Learning Points

  1. Better decisions began with precise definitions, not a sophisticated algorithm.
  2. Diagnostic analysis revealed that stockout periods concealed true demand.
  3. Predictive forecasts became useful only when connected to constraints and actions.
  4. Dashboard design required clear ownership and exception rules.
  5. Pilot evaluation and subgroup monitoring were essential for responsible adoption.

8. Governance, Ethics, and Limitations

Analytics creates risks as well as benefits. Data may be collected without meaningful consent, reused beyond its original purpose, or combined in ways that expose sensitive attributes. Access should follow least privilege, retention should be justified, and personally identifiable information should be protected through appropriate controls such as minimization, pseudonymization, encryption, and audit logging.

Fairness requires more than removing protected attributes. Other variables may act as proxies, historical decisions may encode discrimination, and unequal error rates may create unequal harm. Organizations should test performance across relevant groups, document trade-offs, provide human review where appropriate, and establish appeal or correction mechanisms.

Model risk arises from poor data quality, leakage of future information into training data, changing customer behavior, unstable relationships, inappropriate extrapolation, and overfitting. A model that performs well in historical data may fail after a policy change or market shock. Monitoring should therefore include input drift, prediction performance, calibration, outcome quality, and decision impact.

Managers should distinguish accuracy from usefulness. A model may have excellent statistical accuracy but support a decision that is too slow, too costly, legally impermissible, or inconsistent with strategy. Conversely, a simple transparent model may be preferable when its performance is adequate and its reasoning can be explained.

Contemporary analytics increasingly uses cloud data platforms, real-time streams, machine learning, automated feature generation, and generative AI interfaces. These technologies can reduce the time required to query data and produce narratives, but generated explanations may be incomplete or incorrect. AI-enabled analytics requires human validation, provenance, access controls, prompt and output monitoring, and clear accountability for decisions.

Best-Practice Checklist

  • Begin with a decision and a measurable objective.
  • Establish shared definitions, owners, and data lineage.
  • Separate descriptive facts from causal claims and recommendations.
  • Validate models on out-of-sample data and examine subgroup performance.
  • Present uncertainty, assumptions, denominators, and data dates.
  • Use dashboards to support action rather than maximize visual content.
  • Build spreadsheet controls, documentation, versioning, and independent checks.
  • Combine predictions with constraints, costs, risks, and strategic priorities.
  • Keep humans accountable for consequential decisions.
  • Monitor outcomes and revise models as conditions change.

Chapter Summary

Business analytics converts data into evidence for managerial action through four complementary forms. Descriptive analytics summarizes what happened; diagnostic analytics investigates why; predictive analytics estimates what may happen; and prescriptive analytics evaluates what should be done under objectives and constraints. Effective decisions require a disciplined process linking business questions, data quality, models, communication, implementation, and feedback.

Dashboards and visualizations make performance and exceptions visible when they use appropriate metrics, honest scales, relevant context, and clear ownership. Spreadsheets remain valuable for transparent modeling and scenarios but require controls against formula, version, and data errors. Decision-support systems integrate data, models, governance, interfaces, and feedback to assist semi-structured managerial decisions.

Analytics must be evaluated not only by accuracy but also by validity, interpretability, fairness, security, cost, strategic fit, and practical impact. Scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, simulation, and optimization help managers reason under uncertainty. Ultimately, responsible analytics combines technological capability with managerial judgment, ethical governance, and continuous learning.

Key Terms

Business analytics: Systematic use of data, methods, and models to improve business understanding and decisions.

Descriptive analytics: Analysis that summarizes historical or current performance.

Diagnostic analytics: Analysis that investigates reasons, drivers, or contributors to an observed result.

Predictive analytics: Analysis that estimates future or unobserved outcomes.

Prescriptive analytics: Analysis that recommends actions under objectives, constraints, and uncertainty.

Metric: A defined quantitative measure with specified data, formula, scope, and period.

Key performance indicator: A strategically relevant metric linked to an objective and accountable owner.

Dashboard: A visual interface designed to monitor, explore, and act on selected information.

Data lineage: A record of data origins, transformations, movement, and use.

Correlation: A unit-free measure of linear association between two variables.

Regression: A model relating an outcome to one or more explanatory variables.

Forecast: An estimate of a future value or event.

Mean absolute error: Average absolute difference between actual and predicted values.

Optimization: Systematic selection of the best feasible action according to a defined objective.

Decision-support system: An interactive system combining data, models, and interfaces to support managerial decisions.

Scenario analysis: Examination of outcomes under coherent alternative assumptions about the future.

Sensitivity analysis: Assessment of how changes in assumptions affect an output.

Model risk: Risk that a model is unsuitable, misused, poorly implemented, or inaccurate under changed conditions.

Human-in-the-loop: A design in which people review, interpret, or authorize system outputs.

Data governance: Policies, roles, standards, and controls that ensure responsible data management.

Review Questions

Short Answer Questions

  1. Distinguish descriptive analytics from diagnostic analytics.
  2. Why should a KPI include a clearly defined denominator where applicable?
  3. State two principles of effective dashboard design.
  4. What are the main layers of a decision-support system?
  5. Why should predictive models be evaluated on data not used for fitting?

Long Answer Questions

  1. Explain the four forms of business analytics and show how they can be integrated into one managerial decision process.
  2. Discuss the benefits and risks of spreadsheet-based analytics in organizations.
  3. Explain how dashboards can support strategic, tactical, and operational management.
  4. Describe the assumptions and managerial limitations of a linear regression model.
  5. Discuss ethical, governance, and accountability requirements for AI-enabled decision-support systems.

Analytical / Application Questions

  1. A company reports rising revenue but falling profit. Design a diagnostic analytics process that identifies possible causes, specifies required data, and distinguishes correlation from causation.
  2. Using the contribution and break-even example in this chapter, evaluate how a 10% increase in variable cost would affect break-even units. Explain the managerial implications and assumptions.
  3. Design a decision-support application for allocating a limited advertising budget across three customer segments. Identify the objective, decision variables, constraints, data, model, dashboard outputs, and governance controls.

Multiple Choice Questions with Answers

Question 1

Which question is primarily addressed by diagnostic analytics?

A. What happened to sales last quarter?

B. Why did sales decline in one region?

C. What will sales be next quarter?

D. Which pricing action maximizes profit?

Correct Answer: B. Why did sales decline in one region?

Question 2

A product sells for $80, has a variable cost of $50, and fixed costs are $90,000. What is the break-even volume?

A. 1,125 units

B. 2,250 units

C. 3,000 units

D. 4,500 units

Correct Answer: C. 3,000 units

Question 3

Which measure has the same units as the predicted outcome?

A. Correlation coefficient

B. Mean absolute error

C. Percentage growth rate

D. Contribution margin ratio

Correct Answer: B. Mean absolute error

Question 4

What is the main purpose of a prescriptive analytics model?

A. To summarize historical data

B. To identify the data owner

C. To recommend actions under objectives and constraints

D. To display unprocessed transactions

Correct Answer: C. To recommend actions under objectives and constraints

Question 5

Which dashboard design practice most directly improves comparison across categories?

A. Using three-dimensional effects

B. Using consistent scales and meaningful baselines

C. Removing all numerical labels

D. Using a different color for every data point

Correct Answer: B. Using consistent scales and meaningful baselines

Question 6

In a controlled spreadsheet model, assumptions should primarily be separated from:

A. Input data

B. Calculations and outputs

C. Documentation

D. Source citations

Correct Answer: B. Calculations and outputs

Question 7

What does a correlation coefficient of zero generally indicate?

A. A perfect causal relationship

B. No linear association detected

C. Identical values for both variables

D. That one variable causes the other

Correct Answer: B. No linear association detected

Question 8

Which component of a decision-support system contains forecasting and optimization models?

A. Data layer

B. Model layer

C. User-interface layer

D. Feedback layer

Correct Answer: B. Model layer

Question 9

Why is human review especially important for high-consequence automated decisions?

A. Models never use data

B. Human review eliminates all uncertainty

C. Such decisions may involve context, rights, ethics, and accountability

D. Dashboards cannot display numbers

Correct Answer: C. Such decisions may involve context, rights, ethics, and accountability

Question 10

A forecast has actual values 100 and 120, and predicted values 90 and 130. What is the MAE?

A. 5

B. 10

C. 15

D. 20

Correct Answer: B. 10

Advance Computer Applications
Chapter 12 of 15